Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Norbert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 08:00 |
Yes for me.
Both are brilliant.
|
 |
bjl 2003
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 33
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 09:26 |
These are my two favourite bands of all time, both of whom have
produced brilliant pieces of music at various stages in their careers,
and both of whose albums will always remain firmly at the centre of my
album collection. If I had to choose between them, though, I wouldn't
have to think too long about it : YES, without question, for
their musicianship, for Anderson's amazing voice, and above all
for their ability to express emotion in its purest form that surpasses
even (and this is really saying something !) even what Genesis were
able to produce. Close to the Edge remains, for me, the whole
progressive movement's ultimate achievement. Mind you, my number 2
album of all time would be Selling England ... Whichever one you
choose, though (and each of us will have his/her own individual
preference), I think most of us would agree that these are probably the two best exponents of progressive music in general.
|
 |
Tyrant
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 19 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 66
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 09:58 |
bjl 2003 wrote:
Whichever one you choose, though (and each of us will have his/her own individual preference), I think most of us would agree that these are probably the two best exponents of progressive music in general. |
Well put, although I must say that if one were to choose only two exponents of progressive music, the competition is so hard that it is not given that it would be these two who would win.
Personally I prefer Genesis to Yes, at least if we're talking about Genesis in the Peter Gabriel-era. Even though Yes has produced some of prog rock's most memorable moments, especcially on Close To The Edge and Relayer, Genesis represents something more unique and profound in my opinion. Peter Gabriel's theatrical approach really sets Genesis apart from anything else in music (even though they weren't the only theatrical rock band).
If I was to pick an exponent number two, after Genesis, it would either be King Crimson (for starting the whole progressive movement and being able to keep a high quality standard for 5 decades) or Van Der Graaf Generator (for matching Gabriel's theatricality, although in a much darker fashion).
|
 |
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1330
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 14:37 |
|
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight
|
 |
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 47188
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 17:25 |
Genesis these days
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30711
|
Posted: November 03 2006 at 17:33 |
...which makes The Mars Volta 'heirs apparent' 
|
 |
stewe
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Czechoslovakia
Status: Offline
Points: 596
|
Posted: November 04 2006 at 14:34 |
Of course Yes for me, they bring me more emotions, experiences, colours and they have written more brilliant stuff through the years. Genesis, though I like them lot, will always look from below.
|
 |
prog4evr
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 22 2005
Location: Wuhan, China
Status: Offline
Points: 1455
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 03:56 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
I like Genesis more, but Yes is not a joke in comparison with anybody.
This is more a matter of taste than a matter of musical quality
and denying the qualifications of Yes is denying Progressive Rock....
|
Indeed, the thread originator's comment is a bit harsh. I also
like Genesis more for the respective time-period (1971-1976), but you
are right in saying to deny Yes' contribution and qualifications is to
deny the essence of (early 1970s) prog.
|
 |
progrocklover
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 12 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 11
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 07:51 |
|
 |
jalas
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 07 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 283
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 11:46 |
Yes will always win in this debate, not because they're better, but because they had roundabout. It was a radio hit and they became more popular and their music began to represent the childhood of many people.
|
JOIN THE COMMUNIST PARTY!
|
 |
Dr. Occulator
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 04 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 649
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 12:20 |
Will this nonsence ever end?
|
My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head.
|
 |
Freak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 304
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 16:37 |
Genesis, because they simply make more beautiful music!
|
|
 |
Chus
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
|
Posted: November 21 2006 at 17:13 |
Tommy wrote:
Yes for me. I remember circa 76/77 when Genesis were said to be Yes wannabes. Besides, although I like some of Genesis they were too much of a keyboard driven band, whereas Yes had 5 musical maestros. |
I beg to differ.... compare "Nursery Cryme" with "The YES Album" of the same year... Yes was still a more melodic rock act with progressive tendencies... but Genesis, from 1970, were already an established symphonic prog act, whereas Yes became a fully blown symphonic progressive band around Close To The Edge, while in Fragile they were close. So I even dare to say that Yes were ripping off Genesis... well rip-off is kind of a harsh term... but they surely learned a lot from Genesis and KC.
|
Jesus Gabriel
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.