Print Page | Close Window

Prog albums you think are a little overrated

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=133243
Printed Date: April 27 2025 at 21:12
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Prog albums you think are a little overrated
Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Subject: Prog albums you think are a little overrated
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 12:08
What prog albums do think are at least a little bit overrated. I mean you possibly still like them and they are still great (or at least good) but you think they are at least a tad overrated or maybe you just don't like them at all despite their reputation. Here's a few for me. I still like these though.


VDGG - Pawn Hearts (maybe I need to listen more but I probably prefer Godbluff)
King Crimson - Red (the title track is really repetitioius and the improv piece is well an improv piece. Anyway, I much prefer LTIA)
Porcupine Tree - In Absentia (not many "wow" moments imo)
Camel - Moonmadness (a solid album for sure but I still much prefer Mirage and The Snow Goose)
Rush - 2112 (I love side one but side 2 is probably their weakest side from the 70s although still good)
Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
ELP - Brain Salad Surgery (some great stuff on here for sure but the karn evil 9 epic is too repetitious to be thoroughly enjoyable. I prefer the debut.)
Genesis - Foxtrot (supper's ready is the best thing they ever did but side one is a little spotty imo especially get em out by Friday which took me a long time to warm up to).




Replies:
Posted By: Steve Wyzard
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:21
Yes - Tales from Topographic Oceans
Genesis - Trespass & Nursery Cryme
Rush - Moving Pictures & 2112
Pink Floyd - Animals & The Wall
ELP - Tarkus
Alan Parsons Project - Tales of Mystery and Imagination
Moody Blues - In Search of the Lost Chord
Steve Hackett - Voyage of the Acolyte
Mike Oldfield - Tubular Bells
Supertramp - the first two albums
Marillion - everything with Fish


Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:21
I used to agree with you about 2112, Red and In Absentia but they really grew on me as entire albums. The first side of 2112 is better but the second side finally clicked.
 
Brain Salad Surgery is also a grower. Not perfect but has also improved over the years as i've listened to it.

Totally agree with Foxtrot. Same goes for Nursery Crime. Really don't get what everyone sees in these albums as classics although i find Trespass and SEBTP to be masterpieces.

Personally tastes, go figure!



(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8a4c932119602716',t:'MTcyMTI0Mzg3My4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">


-------------

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy


Posted By: verslibre
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:28
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

What prog albums do think are at least a little bit overrated. I mean you possibly still like them and they are still great (or at least good) but you think they are at least a tad overrated or maybe you just don't like them at all despite their reputation. Here's a few for me. I still like these though.


VDGG - Pawn Hearts (maybe I need to listen more but I probably prefer Godbluff)
King Crimson - Red (the title track is really repetitioius and the improv piece is well an improv piece. Anyway, I much prefer LTIA)
Porcupine Tree - In Absentia (not many "wow" moments imo)
Camel - Moonmadness (a solid album for sure but I still much prefer Mirage and The Snow Goose)
Rush - 2112 (I love side one but side 2 is probably their weakest side from the 70s although still good)
Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
ELP - Brain Salad Surgery (some great stuff on here for sure but the karn evil 9 epic is too repetitious to be thoroughly enjoyable. I prefer the debut.)
Genesis - Foxtrot (supper's ready is the best thing they ever did but side one is a little spotty imo especially get em out by Friday which took me a long time to warm up to).




Red and Brain Salad Surgery overrated? Nope. Nah. Nein!

I do agree about Camel. I think everything they released between Camel and the (underrated) Rain Dances is overrated.

-------------
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_ipg=50&_sop=1&_rdc=1&_ssn=musicosm" rel="nofollow - eBay


Posted By: verslibre
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:32
Originally posted by Steve Wyzard Steve Wyzard wrote:

Yes - Tales from Topographic Oceans
Genesis - Trespass & Nursery Cryme
Rush - Moving Pictures & 2112
Pink Floyd - Animals & The Wall
ELP - Tarkus
Alan Parsons Project - Tales of Mystery and Imagination
Moody Blues - In Search of the Lost Chord
Steve Hackett - Voyage of the Acolyte
Mike Oldfield - Tubular Bells
Supertramp - the first two albums
Marillion - everything with Fish


Also disagree about Moving Pictures, Tarkus and Voyage of the Acolyte.

I think all of APP's are overrated, but Tales of Mystery and Imagination is far and away the best thing they ever did. The first side is stellar. After that, it's all downhill.

The Wall is the very definition of overrated, I concur.

-------------
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_ipg=50&_sop=1&_rdc=1&_ssn=musicosm" rel="nofollow - eBay


Posted By: Antoni
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:48
Zopp's "Dominion" comes to mind. In my opinion, that's a significantly weaker album than the debut. To these ears, "Dominion" features weaker compositions, melodies, and production compared to the debut album, and, finally, those changes in musical direction weren't successful. Hence, I really don't understand why people are championing "Dominion" so much!


Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 14:57
In the Court of the Crimson King.

The opening tune is a masterpiece. The closing track is really good. The remainder is nothing special.


Posted By: presdoug
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 15:01
ELP-Brain Salad Surgery-I much prefer what came before it
Genesis-Nursery Crime-I much prefer the previous "Trespass"
Eloy-Floating-it does nothing for me, I really dig the debut and especially "Inside" much more
The Soft Machine-debut and Volume Two-these first two albums are nonsense to me; their later albums like "Fourth" and "Seven" are much more focused and together recordings.



Posted By: ThyroidGlands
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 15:32
Yes - The Yes Album, Fragile, CTTE, Tales, Relayer
ELP - s/t, Trilogy
PFM - Storia di un Minuto
Pink Floyd - Animals
Maxophone - s/t
Collegium Musicum - Konvergenzie
Camel - the entire discography (sorry it's very boring for me)


-------------
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' about
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' at all


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 15:51
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

I used to agree with you about 2112, Red and In Absentia but they really grew on me as entire albums. The first side of 2112 is better but the second side finally clicked.
 
Brain Salad Surgery is also a grower. Not perfect but has also improved over the years as i've listened to it.

Totally agree with Foxtrot. Same goes for Nursery Crime. Really don't get what everyone sees in these albums as classics although i find Trespass and SEBTP to be masterpieces.

Personally tastes, go figure!



(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8a4c932119602716',t:'MTcyMTI0Mzg3My4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">

I just listened to Nursery Cryme the other night and I think it might be a contender for best Genesis album. I think next to A Trick of the Tail it's probably their most consistent. SEBTP and Foxtrot both have a bit of low points (or as some people might say "filler") and the same goes for Lamb.

The only Yes album that might be a little overrated (these days anyway) is Close to the Edge. These days that's to prog what Dark Side of the Moon or Led Zepp 4 is to classic rock. Too bad the classic rock crowd never really caught on but in prog circles at least it's often seen as the GOAT.


Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 16:10
I counted 35 titles in PA's top prog albums, that according to my tastes are overrated, but I'm not going to name them. 
I can say which ones I disagree about that's been mentioned here instead: VDGG - Pawn Hearts, King Crimson - Red, Camel - Moonmadness, The Soft Machine - Volume Two, Genesis - Trespass & Nursery Cryme (my two favorite Genesis albums), PFM - Storia di un Minuto and finally:
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

In the Court of the Crimson King.
The opening tune is a masterpiece. The closing track is really good. The remainder is nothing special.

I know not everyone loves the whole album like I do, but thinking of Epitaph as nothing special, is just weird to me.


Posted By: Lewian
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 16:53
Not sure whether it's "overrated" but VDGG's Godbluff does nothing for me, which is very surprising as it's their highest rated and I love all their albums around it (except World Record) to pieces.
I also think Wish You Were Here firmly belongs in the lower half of Pink Floyd's albums.
Another one from the category "highly rated albums from an artist I love that I don't think are that good" is Oldfield's Amarok, which is quite messy in my view, and it doesn't help that he intentionally damaged the flow of it just to annoy Richard Branson apparently.


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 17:32
^Aside from DSOTM (and mainly because it's just been so overplayed on the radio) the only one by them I think is kind of overrated is Animals. "Dogs" is great but the other two main tracks ("sheep" and "pigs (three different ones") don't really do a whole lot for me. I think maybe part of this is because of the reduced role of Rick Wright. He's all over Wish You Were Here but other than the middle part of Dogs his synth seems to be mostly in the background which is a shame imo.


Posted By: Boojieboy
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 19:57
Mostly DSofM and Misplaced Childhood. To a lesser degree Fragile. 


Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 20:30
Quite subjective topic, since it's based on personal taste, not on musical quality, knowledge, etc. I personally don't like the term "overrated," since it would mean I want to impose my views/taste over somebody's else.


Posted By: Mystique
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 20:39
Änglagård Hybris
Tool Lateralus
The Mars Volta De-Loused in the Comatorium
Wobbler From Silence to Somewhere
Seven Impale Summit


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 17 2024 at 22:33
Originally posted by Mystique Mystique wrote:

Änglagård Hybris
Tool Lateralus
The Mars Volta De-Loused in the Comatorium
Wobbler From Silence to Somewhere
Seven Impale Summit

I admittedly was a little underwhelmed when I first heard Seven Impale's Summit but I only listened to it once so far. Not bad but maybe just not the style I typically like and listen to. TMV I have to listen to again. They seem a bit wild. Hybris is a stone cold classic though and the Wobbler is very good too but need to listen to more.


Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 03:06

Certainly not a new subject, maybe except from the "little" Big smile
but okay, some of them are and maybe not just little:

King Crimson - Discipline
Rush - Moving Pictures
Yes - Fragile
Tull - TaaB
VdGG - Pawn Hearts


-------------
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 03:41
Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 06:34
Everything from Genesis (sorry but I've never been able to survive an entire album in one shot)

But The Lamb is a great exception to what I have written above. 


-------------
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 06:46
Originally posted by Manuel Manuel wrote:

Quite subjective topic, since it's based on personal taste, not on musical quality, knowledge, etc. I personally don't like the term "overrated," since it would mean I want to impose my views/taste over somebody's else.

Hi,

Agreed. I do think as well that saying that something as this, is rather weird .... I was about to state that the "influence" of others is a serious issue, otherwise you or I would never think of anything as such.

As an artist, stuff like this is a bummer. It takes away a lot of the beauty and effort that so many people have put together for an album. I guess it's different today since you can "compose" in your bed, or shower, and that "qualifies one to say something else is "overrated"? Blame Byron, who used to write some of his poetry in the bath!

Definitely weird!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 07:06
King Crimson- Red
I was disappointed in the album in 1974. In the 90s it grew to be this iconic masterpiece in Prog.

To me...that is overrated. That is such an exaggeration. It wasn't groundbreaking to every Prog musician on the planet.

An abundance of population like the album. Does that make it great to everyone? No it doesn't. It's ignorant to assume that it does. That is why it is overrated!!

If you like the album ...fine! ..but placing it above and beyond Univers Zero and loads of other bands is ridiculous. That's an opinion not a fact. Music is subjective so in that case it may be iconic to anyone as a personal preference but it is not a fact that it is greater or better than anything else in Progressive Rock..


Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 07:39
2112's flipside has 2.5 pearls IMHO
Bangkok and Something For Nothing are downright excellent , and ditto to a lesser extent Twilight.
The other two tracks are really nowhere (barely worthy of CoS caliber).

Originally posted by Steve Wyzard Steve Wyzard wrote:

Supertramp - the first two albums

I don't see how over-rated these albums can be.Confused

The debut is one of the most under-rated, while the second is universally considered a turd.Stern Smile


-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: Jared
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 08:30
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:


VDGG - Pawn Hearts (maybe I need to listen more but I probably prefer Godbluff)
King Crimson - Red (the title track is really repetitioius and the improv piece is well an improv piece. Anyway, I much prefer LTIA)
Porcupine Tree - In Absentia (not many "wow" moments imo)
Camel - Moonmadness (a solid album for sure but I still much prefer Mirage and The Snow Goose)
Rush - 2112 (I love side one but side 2 is probably their weakest side from the 70s although still good)
Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
ELP - Brain Salad Surgery (some great stuff on here for sure but the karn evil 9 epic is too repetitious to be thoroughly enjoyable. I prefer the debut.)
Genesis - Foxtrot (supper's ready is the best thing they ever did but side one is a little spotty imo especially get em out by Friday which took me a long time to warm up to).


Maybe I'm easily pleased, but I think they are all 5 Star albums, except the Rush (Side A 5/5 B 3.5/5)


-------------
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson


Posted By: Prog-jester
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 09:30
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

VDGG - Pawn Hearts
Porcupine Tree - In Absentia
Rush-2112
agree
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:


King Crimson - Red
Camel - Moonmadness
Genesis - Foxtrot

gotta disagree with these, my picks for "overrated" from these bands would've been ITCOTCK, The Snow Goose and SEBTP

And some examples of the little overrated albums, immediately followed by the slightly underrated ones from the same artists:

Opeth - Blackwater Park (Ghost Reveries is the GOAT in my book)
Marillion (h era) - both Brave and Marbles (Seasons End all the way for me)
Marillion (Fish era) - Clutching At Straws (it still sounds like a Misplaced Childhood clone for me, can't understand all the praise)
Steven Wilson - The Raven That Refused to Sing (I'm sad To The Bone is so ignored)
Fates Warning - the whole Arch era (yet 2000-2010s, their best period, gets little love for some reason)

And some albums that I just consider a bit overrated:
Änglagård - Hybris (it's a classic but I'd rather listen to Sinkadus)
All Traps On Earth - s/t
Phideaux - Doomsday Afternoon
Bacamarte - Depois do Fim
Bubu - Anabelas
Khan - Space Shanty
Museo Rosenbach - Zarathustra...honestly, most one-album-wonders from the 70s were not that great

Also Yes, everything from Devin Townsend, Wobbler - they're ok but why you guys love them SO much?


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 09:38
Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

...
In the 90s it grew to be this iconic masterpiece in Prog.

To me...that is overrated. That is such an exaggeration. It wasn't groundbreaking to every Prog musician on the planet.
...

Hi,

Weird that in the 90's it was thought as "overrated" by some. When it came out, there was no "Prog", or even "Progressive" as a known term, and everyone just thought, like I did ... nice! Really nice! And very enjoyable.

This is the tough part of how some folks rank/rate so many of these things according to TODAY's standards, instead of what I think was the time and place WHEN it came out, when the album was special and far out, and so different from the previous stuff that KC had done. One could say that they were "progressing" really nicely as opposed to many other bands that repeated themselves.

For me, it's like saying that Beethoven's 3rd and 4th are overrated when compared to the 5th and the 9th ... and in the end, I think this is not respectful to the artist and his/her ability to give us so much music that we enjoy over and over again, and to think that we are almost to the 50th year after its release, makes me appreciate it even more, and the fact that KC still performs these in concert is special to me ... that was a magic time, 1972/1973, 1974 and 1975 ... when so much music made our heart go wow.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: TerLJack
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 09:54
Reading this topic's headline at first, I was expecting this to be ultra negative.  Not so much.  You set it up nicely with your post.

My picks?

The Wall for certain.  It's good, but no WYWH or DSotM.

Fragile? The epics are great.  The solos for the most part? meh.

In the Court of the Crimson King.  Yes, I know it's groundbreaking, and prog would not exist without it, and blah blah blah.  Half of it is just Fripp and the gang just noodling all about the place.  IMHO.

and.. oh this is not good.. I have never gotten into VDGG.  It's not Peter Hammill's voice, as you might expect.  I have some solo stuff by Peter I quite enjoy.  Their music is a bit to "abrasive" for me?  I'm really not sure what it is.

I guess in this poll, at the end of the day, it's all about personal taste and opinions.
(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8a53aa636c625367',t:'MTcyMTMxODIyNi4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< height="1" width="1" style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: none; visibility: ;">


Posted By: TerLJack
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 09:56
What's with all the computer jargon in my post?(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8a53a6412d372b91',t:'MTcyMTMxODA1Ny4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< height="1" width="1" style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: none; visibility: ;">


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 10:05
Selling England By The Pound. Cinema Show, Dancing With The Moonlit Knight and Firth Of Fifth are masterpieces in their own right but the rest sounds 'thrown together' and it would have benefited from being 40 minutes rather than 55 minutes (lose Battle Of Epping Forest please!)
Dark Side Of The Moon. Actually a fantastic rock album but slightly overrated as a prog album. Also never understood the big deal about AP's production. Nearly everything else recorded in 1973 sounds better to me!
Script For A Jesters Tear. Never been the biggest Marillion fan but I much prefer Fugazi which has better playing and seemed a bit more original to these ears.
Hybris. Actually I love this album but it seems to overshadow a lot of equally good albums that were released in the 90's. Maybe like Marillion it was that 'first in gets the bacon' thing.
Scenes From A Memory Pt2. Never could connect with this and there are other DT albums I like a lot more. However this one gets the masterpiece status while Octavarium, A Change Of Seasons and Six Degrees Of Inner Turbulence skulk in it's shadow for reasons I never understand.
and finally of course In The Court Of The Crimson King. Yep first in gets the bacon!



Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 10:19
Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!


If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Posted By: omphaloskepsis
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 10:29
Genesis- "The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway ...my seventh favorite Genesis album

Miles Davis- "Kind of Blue"  ...not in my top ten Davis albums

Harmonium- "Si On Avait Besoin D'une Cinquieme Saison"...I like this album, but not a top 200 prog album for me...Hard for me to understand why it's a top-thirty all-time album 

Supertramp- "Crime of the Century"..Not a top 100 album in my book



Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 10:35
Sometimes I do think that the perspective from which albums are judged makes a big difference. Crime Of The Century is a perfect example. Great ''prog album'? Nope. Great ''arty pop album''?. Sure thing!


Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: July 18 2024 at 10:37
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Manuel Manuel wrote:

Quite subjective topic, since it's based on personal taste, not on musical quality, knowledge, etc. I personally don't like the term "overrated," since it would mean I want to impose my views/taste over somebody's else.

Hi,

Agreed. I do think as well that saying that something as this, is rather weird .... I was about to state that the "influence" of others is a serious issue, otherwise you or I would never think of anything as such.

As an artist, stuff like this is a bummer. It takes away a lot of the beauty and effort that so many people have put together for an album. I guess it's different today since you can "compose" in your bed, or shower, and that "qualifies one to say something else is "overrated"? Blame Byron, who used to write some of his poetry in the bath!

Definitely weird!
Absolutely. Many artist put a lot of effort in the writing, instrumenting, orchestrating, recording, etc. of an album, just to be labeled "overrated" by somebody who doesn't have a clue how to do this, sometimes they don't even know how to play an musical instrument, let alone know how to write a song, only because it doesn't appeal to their taste. It seems quite unfair to me, honestly, and I don't agree with it at all. Of course it's only my opinion, but I'm glad there're at least a few people who agree with me.


Posted By: Mystique
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 01:02
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Mystique Mystique wrote:

Änglagård Hybris
Tool Lateralus
The Mars Volta De-Loused in the Comatorium
Wobbler From Silence to Somewhere
Seven Impale Summit
Hybris is a stone cold classic though 
Hybris is a classic example of an overrated album.


Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 03:55
According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:

1) JT: Thick as a Brick
2) Genesis: Nursery Crime
3) Gentle Giant: In A Glass House
4) Rush: all the albums
5) Pink Floyd: Meddle
6) Yes album
7) Camel: The Snow Goose 
8) Al di Meola: all the albums
9) Mahavishnu Orchestra: All the albums
10) Opeth: all the albums
11) Anglagard all the albums
12) Death: all the albums
13) Riverside: all the albums
14) Return to forever: all the albums

overrated/little overrated:

1) Yes: Fragile and little overrated Close to the edge
2) Genesis: Selling England and little overrated Foxtrot
3) Vdgg: Still Life and little overrated Godbluff
4) Pink Floyd: Animals and little overrated Dark Side
5) Camel: Moonmadness and Mirage
6) PFM: Per un amico and Isola di niente
7) Banco: Io sono nato libero
8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums
9) Porcupine Tree /Steve Wilson: little overrated all the albums
10)  All Traps on Earth: lttle overrated all the albums
11) M. Oldfield: all the albums
12) Supertramp: little overrated Crime
13) King Crimson: litlle overrated Larks
14) Wobbler: litlle overrated all the albums
15) Gentle Giant: The Power and Free Hand
The, Little overrated Harmonium, Metropolis part 2, In The Land,  Obscura, De Pois do film etc.



-------------
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.


Posted By: Deadwing
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 04:31
From my favourite band/artist:

Porcupine Tree - Fear of a Blank Planet
Steven Wilson - The Raven that refused to sing
Pink Floyd - The Wall
Genesis - Nursey Crime



Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 06:30
Robert Wyatt - Rock Bottom is overrated a lot.


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 06:41
IQ - Resistance

-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 06:42
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 06:42
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Robert Wyatt - Rock Bottom is overrated a lot.

I've noticed that too, although I would never say that. Tongue

By the same token, I could say my favourite band Mostly Autumn are overrated too, but only because I've given all of their albums the full five stars. Smile

In the end, it all comes down to subjective opinion, where a 1-star turkey for me could be a 5-star masterpiece (and vice versa) from someone else's perspective. Geek


Posted By: Prog-jester
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 11:19
Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

IQ - Resistance
hard agree, their weakest so far, very bland, very IQ-by-the-numbers. I don't get why people seem to love it so much


Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 11:58
Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

IQ - Resistance
hard agree, their weakest so far, very bland, very IQ-by-the-numbers. I don't get why people seem to love it so much

Strongly disagree. That's the album that finally broke down my Resistance to the sound of poor man's Gabriel imitator Peter Nicholls and Resistance still remains my favourite IQ album to this day.  

Horses for courses, the silence and sold sources. Smile


Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 12:58
I generally am not keen on the overrated and underrated terms unless one can refer to specific claims that are true or false, demonstrable, verifiable or unverifiable, and arguments that are valid or invalid / faulty.  There is little point in arguing tastes and saying that my opinion of art is better than other people's -- which is pretty arrogant and can lead to or be a sign of very insular thinking.  Like what music you like, dislike what you will, to each his or her own tastes.   We all experience music differently to some extent.  We have physical differences, mental differences... different psyches... experiences, associations, dispositions.

That said, a little less valued by me or a lot less than the majority opinion that I have observed would be Yes' Close to the Edge.  Well, I'd give it three stars.  With Magma, MDK (the studio album) is often said to be THE Zeuhl classic, and I understand and won't disagree, but while I used to love it, it has gone down in esteem for me (live versions are great).  I Like Magma's debut the most. Thinking Plague's In Extremis would be another (much prefer earlier Thinking Plague). I understand the love for Captain Beefheart's Troutmask Replica, and I have loved the album before, but unadventurous me would rather the comfort of Safe As Milk.  I would have said Tangerine Dream's Phaedra at one time, but now I love it.


-------------
"Questions are a burden to others; answers a prison for oneself" (The Prisoner, 1967).


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 13:20
Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

IQ - Resistance
hard agree, their weakest so far, very bland, very IQ-by-the-numbers. I don't get why people seem to love it so much

Weaker than Nomzamo? I'll say it probably shouldn't have been a double but I don't think it's that bad. Maybe on par with  Frequency (imo).


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 13:22
Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.

Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 13:31
I remember in the 70s when Mahavishnu Orchestra released Apocalypse and Visions Of Emerald Beyond. A very large dosage of opinions from fans of the McLaughlin, Cobham,Laird, Hammer and Goodman line up were super negative and based on personal disappointment over the original band going their separate ways.

I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.

Maybe fans saw the first line up to be iconic in the sense that it changed Fusion. It was innovative. The 5 of them on stage in 1972 was a unique experience. Pieces like "Dance Of Maya" and "Birds Of Fire" filled the air with strato bombers and goblin fires and mystery. People desired for that to continue. John McLaughlin obviously was taking a different direction musically. Apocalypse and Emerald Beyond creating a different vibe . They featured singers and were spiritually different from Birds Of Fire and Inner Mounting Flame. I enjoy both periods. A lot of hard-core supporters don't.


Posted By: verslibre
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 14:32
Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

I remember in the 70s when Mahavishnu Orchestra released Apocalypse and Visions Of Emerald Beyond. A very large dosage of opinions from fans of the McLaughlin, Cobham,Laird, Hammer and Goodman line up were super negative and based on personal disappointment over the original band going their separate ways.

I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.

Maybe fans saw the first line up to be iconic in the sense that it changed Fusion. It was innovative. The 5 of them on stage in 1972 was a unique experience. Pieces like "Dance Of Maya" and "Birds Of Fire" filled the air with strato bombers and goblin fires and mystery. People desired for that to continue. John McLaughlin obviously was taking a different direction musically. Apocalypse and Emerald Beyond creating a different vibe . They featured singers and were spiritually different from Birds Of Fire and Inner Mounting Flame. I enjoy both periods. A lot of hard-core supporters don't.


When the line-up thoroughly consists of powerhouses, it's virtually guaranteed to be a temporary one (there are a few exceptions). Hammer and Cobham immediately jumped off to lasting solo careers, the former hitting the proverbial commercial jackpot a decade later. Goodman made some solo albums and eventually ended up in the Dregs when they needed a violinist. Laird found plenty to do and also made a solo album.

Hammer was the first to decide he was done when he learned McLaughlin was getting all the writing credit, even for a pure improvisation like "Sapphire Bullets of Pure Love."

I sure am glad Jan bailed, because right off the bat we got Like Children by Hammer & Goodman (which I prefer to anything M.O. did), the exceptional solo recording The First Seven Days, followed by his participation in Elvin Jones' On the Mountain and John Abercrombie's masterwork Timeless. Then: Jan Hammer Group! One win after another!

-------------
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_ipg=50&_sop=1&_rdc=1&_ssn=musicosm" rel="nofollow - eBay


Posted By: Prog-jester
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 14:33
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Maybe on par with  Frequency (imo)
well it's the same level of comfort zone IQ by the numbers, but at least from Frequency I could still remember coupla tunes. Trying to remember anything from Resistance on the other hand makes my brain, well, resist


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 15:09
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


I’ve tried twice but I don’t think the gremlins want to let me explain….

-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 15:10
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

IQ - Resistance
hard agree, their weakest so far, very bland, very IQ-by-the-numbers. I don't get why people seem to love it so much


Weaker than Nomzamo? I'll say it probably shouldn't have been a double but I don't think it's that bad. Maybe on par with  Frequency (imo).


Yes, weaker than Nomzamo and all other IQ albums! Frequency is waaaaaay better….

-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 15:45
Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Maybe on par with  Frequency (imo)
well it's the same level of comfort zone IQ by the numbers, but at least from Frequency I could still remember coupla tunes. Trying to remember anything from Resistance on the other hand makes my brain, well, resist
Funnily enough, I can't remember any songs from Resistance either, but it's still my favourite IQ album. Smile


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 16:26
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:


4) Rush: all the albums


overrated/little overrated:


8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums



I would have to take issue with the idea that everything is overrated.

Although I wouldn't go as far as crediting Rush with creating Prog metal they were as important as anyone and massively influential. I would say their seventies albums are fair game but Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures are no way overrated. 

I am a fully paid up member of the ELP fan club so I'm passionate that they are regarded about right on PA. Emerson, Lake and Palmer's debut was a massive statement of intent in 1970 and rightly occupies a place in the Top 100 (lower reaches). After that Brain Salad Surgery tends to be more polarising but has a rating quite a bit lower than many prog albums of 1973 that are far less interesting. This is subjective of course. If you check the ratings of all their albums they seem about right. ELP were a better live band than album band but they have to be given due credit for their part in raising the benchmark with not just their debut but also Tarkus and Pictures At An Exhibition. This is me trying to be objective. Prog was a real movement that happened and not just an idea that was dreamt up by a bunch of college grads. It needed some rocket fuel and ELP were that.




Posted By: cstack3
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 17:14
All of them.  

That is why they are "progressive."  Pompous, over-the-top, overly serious about themselves.  

Spinal Tap with Mellotrons.  

Ask Rick, he'll tell you. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1045969/Yes-original-Spinal-Tap-says-Rick-Wakeman-Seventies-prog-rock-supergroup.html#ixzz1Ss5rspNu" rel="nofollow - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1045969/Yes-original-Spinal-Tap-says-Rick-Wakeman-Seventies-prog-rock-supergroup.html#ixzz1Ss5rspNu




-------------
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!


Posted By: ThyroidGlands
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 17:40
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

With Magma, MDK (the studio album) is often said to be THE Zeuhl classic, and I understand and won't disagree, but while I used to love it, it has gone down in esteem for me (live versions are great).  I Like Magma's debut the most.

My favorite studio album by Magma is either Emehntehtt-Re or Felicite-Thosz. MDK is superb, but its full splendor isn't quite captured in the studio. I believe the best version is the one from Trianon. Without a doubt, it's the greatest zeuhl recording of all time.


-------------
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' about
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' at all


Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 18:22
Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


I’ve tried twice but I don’t think the gremlins want to let me explain….

Confused


Posted By: ThyroidGlands
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 18:29
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


I’ve tried twice but I don’t think the gremlins want to let me explain….

Confused

😁


-------------
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' about
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' at all


Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 18:32
Originally posted by verslibre verslibre wrote:

[QUOTE=Jacob Schoolcraft] I remember in the 70s when Mahavishnu Orchestra released Apocalypse and Visions Of Emerald Beyond. A very large dosage of opinions from fans of the McLaughlin, Cobham,Laird, Hammer and Goodman line up were super negative and based on personal disappointment over the original band going their separate ways.

I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.

Maybe fans saw the first line up to be iconic in the sense that it changed Fusion. It was innovative. The 5 of them on stage in 1972 was a unique experience. Pieces like "Dance Of Maya" and "Birds Of Fire" filled the air with strato bombers and goblin fires and mystery. People desired for that to continue. John McLaughlin obviously was taking a different direction musically. Apocalypse and Emerald Beyond creating a different vibe . They featured singers and were spiritually different from Birds Of Fire and Inner Mounting Flame. I enjoy both periods. A lot of hard-core supporters don't.


When the line-up thoroughly consists of powerhouses, it's virtually guaranteed to be a temporary one (there are a few exceptions). Hammer and Cobham immediately jumped off to lasting solo careers, the former hitting the proverbial commercial jackpot a decade later. Goodman made some solo albums and eventually ended up in the Dregs when they needed a violinist. Laird found plenty to do and also made a solo album.

Hammer was the first to decide he was done when he learned McLaughlin was getting all the writing credit, even for a pure improvisation like "Sapphire Bullets of Pure Love."

I sure am glad Jan bailed, because right off the bat we got Like Children by Hammer & Goodman (which I prefer to anything M.O. did), the exceptional solo recording The First Seven Days, followed by his participation in Elvin Jones' On the Mountain and John Abercrombie's masterwork Timeless. Then: Jan Hammer Group! One win after another! [/QUOTE

I like it all...and the early Jan Hammer solo albums were really special. Like Children,The First Seven Days and Oh Yeah are outstanding. They really hold my interest. The first 5 Billy Cobham albums are creative and unique. A very interesting collection to have.


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 19:09
Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

...
I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.
...
 

Hi,

In my book, McLaughlin is way better at improvisation because he works on it time and again, specially with many foreign players alongside, and his excursions into other musics are neat, different, and sometimes not to everyone's taste, I don't think.

Jean Luc Ponty is very good, but in a classical way ... he is not, in my book a good improvisational player, and I think he is more in sync with the chords and notes and then joins in ... unlike someone like Shankar ... on a Bruce Springsteen rehearsal and shows ... when Bruce asked him ... what chord you in, man? ... and Shankar replies ... Bruce, my friend, yo just play and I join in!

That's not to say that JLP is not good, but I do not see in him as much freedom as we could probably see ... and this reminds me of a show at the Hollywood Bowl one time, when the great flute buffoon, was paired up with a jazz flute/woodwinds master ... and that night the buffon showed that he could not improvise, and was lost half the time. The bootleg (recording was never released to my knowledge!). showed it to be more of a comedy than anything else ... and a serious statement about how much a lot of well known classical music folks didn't really know crap about music!

JLP, for me, even in his solo albums, is REALLY WELL THOUGHT OUT and defined ... and that makes it look like the solos are better and that he is improvising ... he didn't have to ... he had the studio to be able to change/add/subtract some things.

When I saw him with RTF a few years back in Eugene, I did not feel like he was improvising, or had the spotlight that Corea and Clark showed, or the guitarist (Gamboli? sp) ... and it felt like he was merely making sure his parts were clean ... and well done, but he never smiled or played "hot" like his other friends. But I'm not sure that RTF had worked solos for him, since he did not tour with them all the time, due to his many commitments. Corea and Clarke didn't need a violin that night, or any other night! But their "improvisational abilities" were small and amounted to a few seconds on a transition or the like.

Another great example of improvisation with someone that is note/composition inclined, is Chick Corea's thing with Hiromi ... she was free flowing, and you can easily see his mind going ... start on this chord ... or equivalent ... he never really had the smile and free flow that Hiromi showed. She went by "colors" ... he went by notes and chords ... and the difference, was massive. It's hard to not appreciate Chick Corea, but on that night Hiromi, stole the show and then some.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: presdoug
Date Posted: July 19 2024 at 19:29
Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

I remember in the 70s when Mahavishnu Orchestra released Apocalypse and Visions Of Emerald Beyond. A very large dosage of opinions from fans of the McLaughlin, Cobham,Laird, Hammer and Goodman line up were super negative and based on personal disappointment over the original band going their separate ways.

I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.

Maybe fans saw the first line up to be iconic in the sense that it changed Fusion. It was innovative. The 5 of them on stage in 1972 was a unique experience. Pieces like "Dance Of Maya" and "Birds Of Fire" filled the air with strato bombers and goblin fires and mystery. People desired for that to continue. John McLaughlin obviously was taking a different direction musically. Apocalypse and Emerald Beyond creating a different vibe . They featured singers and were spiritually different from Birds Of Fire and Inner Mounting Flame. I enjoy both periods. A lot of hard-core supporters don't.
I find the Mahavishnu Orchestra albums inconsistent, even in one existing lineup; The Inner Mounting Flame is genius, while Birds of Fire does pretty well nothing for me; Apocalypse is for me incredibly boring, while Visions Of The Emerald Beyond works wonders for me. Go figure. I feel some of the McLaughlin pre MO albums are pretty amazing, like Devotion and Extrapolation, and to a bit of a lesser extent, My Goals Beyond. After VOTEB, I am less enthusiastic about his music.....


Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: July 20 2024 at 06:05
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:


4) Rush: all the albums


overrated/little overrated:


8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums



I would have to take issue with the idea that everything is overrated.

Although I wouldn't go as far as crediting Rush with creating Prog metal they were as important as anyone and massively influential. I would say their seventies albums are fair game but Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures are no way overrated. 

I am a fully paid up member of the ELP fan club so I'm passionate that they are regarded about right on PA. Emerson, Lake and Palmer's debut was a massive statement of intent in 1970 and rightly occupies a place in the Top 100 (lower reaches). After that Brain Salad Surgery tends to be more polarising but has a rating quite a bit lower than many prog albums of 1973 that are far less interesting. This is subjective of course. If you check the ratings of all their albums they seem about right. ELP were a better live band than album band but they have to be given due credit for their part in raising the benchmark with not just their debut but also Tarkus and Pictures At An Exhibition. This is me trying to be objective. Prog was a real movement that happened and not just an idea that was dreamt up by a bunch of college grads. It needed some rocket fuel and ELP were that.



I don't think anyone denies the importance of Rush for the development of heavy prog and their competence as musicians.
But otherwise, judgement on their records, from 2112 to Moving Pictures, is very divisive.
In Europe I don't think prog fans love them as much as in America (Canada and the US). I knew them little, before coming to this forum, and I was amazed that no less than four of their records hovered in the top 20-40 positions, close to the greatest prog masterpieces. So I tried to listen to them carefully, but I was quite disappointed, I didn't hear any masterpieces. All pleasant, all very well played, their records, but I don't see much other than hard rock played with virtuosity, and combining different pieces into one song to make it resemble a suite. Their most emblazoned record, Moving Pictures, is also the most commercial and the least prog, the most easy listening, with only one long composition - and I admit that is their best opera. This is obviously my opinion. I probably would have liked them better in my twenties.


The issue with EL&P is very different. They are British and are among the founders of prog. Their historical importance is immense. Enrico Merlin puts two of their albums in his book 1000 Records for a Century, where the criterion is musical innovation. EL&P were thus innovators in mixing cultured music with prog music, they influenced many prog artists who came after them, including the most famous Italian ones (Pfm, Banco, Orme). Having said that, if I evaluate the beauty of their albums, I think that they didnot churn out any masterpieces, that Tarkus suite, although innovative, is much less beautiful than the suites of Yes, Genesis, VdGG, King Crimson, that their records are full of low quality songs. I therefore put them in the little overrated ones, since they are not in the top positions of the Top 100. 

I can say this, though: I would understand not just one record, but two EL&P records in the Top 100 or even Top 50 (the debut and Tarkus, or the debut and Brain Salad) more than four Rush records.

Which EL&P album do you like most?
Which is your ranking?


-------------
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.


Posted By: Floydoid
Date Posted: July 20 2024 at 10:59
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

^Aside from DSOTM (and mainly because it's just been so overplayed on the radio) the only one by them I think is kind of overrated is Animals. "Dogs" is great but the other two main tracks ("sheep" and "pigs (three different ones") don't really do a whole lot for me. I think maybe part of this is because of the reduced role of Rick Wright. He's all over Wish You Were Here but other than the middle part of Dogs his synth seems to be mostly in the background which is a shame imo.


I tend to agree about Animals - I'm a Floyd fanatic and I always thought it was a tad disappointing (with an overall coldness to it) after DSOTM and WYWH, and with Rick, whose keyboards were always an essential ingredient to Floyd's great works, being practically reduced to the role of hired hand.

Tho for me Sheep is the best track, magnificently held together by Roger's bass.

-------------
"Christ, where would rock & roll be without feedback?" - D. Gimour


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: July 20 2024 at 16:08
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:


4) Rush: all the albums


overrated/little overrated:


8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums



I would have to take issue with the idea that everything is overrated.

Although I wouldn't go as far as crediting Rush with creating Prog metal they were as important as anyone and massively influential. I would say their seventies albums are fair game but Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures are no way overrated. 

I am a fully paid up member of the ELP fan club so I'm passionate that they are regarded about right on PA. Emerson, Lake and Palmer's debut was a massive statement of intent in 1970 and rightly occupies a place in the Top 100 (lower reaches). After that Brain Salad Surgery tends to be more polarising but has a rating quite a bit lower than many prog albums of 1973 that are far less interesting. This is subjective of course. If you check the ratings of all their albums they seem about right. ELP were a better live band than album band but they have to be given due credit for their part in raising the benchmark with not just their debut but also Tarkus and Pictures At An Exhibition. This is me trying to be objective. Prog was a real movement that happened and not just an idea that was dreamt up by a bunch of college grads. It needed some rocket fuel and ELP were that.



I don't think anyone denies the importance of Rush for the development of heavy prog and their competence as musicians.
But otherwise, judgement on their records, from 2112 to Moving Pictures, is very divisive.
In Europe I don't think prog fans love them as much as in America (Canada and the US). I knew them little, before coming to this forum, and I was amazed that no less than four of their records hovered in the top 20-40 positions, close to the greatest prog masterpieces. So I tried to listen to them carefully, but I was quite disappointed, I didn't hear any masterpieces. All pleasant, all very well played, their records, but I don't see much other than hard rock played with virtuosity, and combining different pieces into one song to make it resemble a suite. Their most emblazoned record, Moving Pictures, is also the most commercial and the least prog, the most easy listening, with only one long composition - and I admit that is their best opera. This is obviously my opinion. I probably would have liked them better in my twenties.


The issue with EL&P is very different. They are British and are among the founders of prog. Their historical importance is immense. Enrico Merlin puts two of their albums in his book 1000 Records for a Century, where the criterion is musical innovation. EL&P were thus innovators in mixing cultured music with prog music, they influenced many prog artists who came after them, including the most famous Italian ones (Pfm, Banco, Orme). Having said that, if I evaluate the beauty of their albums, I think that they didnot churn out any masterpieces, that Tarkus suite, although innovative, is much less beautiful than the suites of Yes, Genesis, VdGG, King Crimson, that their records are full of low quality songs. I therefore put them in the little overrated ones, since they are not in the top positions of the Top 100. 

I can say this, though: I would understand not just one record, but two EL&P records in the Top 100 or even Top 50 (the debut and Tarkus, or the debut and Brain Salad) more than four Rush records.

Which EL&P album do you like most?
Which is your ranking?

Moving Pictures is very highly rated by many musicians and almost as important as Red in some respects. Rolling Stone magazine put it at No3 in their list of the greatest prog albums behind DSOTM and SEBTP. I was very impressed by their list but I get that you are going on personal taste. We can all be a bit objective though if we try. I've always thought Hemispheres was overrated but so many put it on a pedestial I've had to rethink a bit. Nevertheless I think it is overpraised. Early 80's Rush though is important because they were able to change with the times but still put out music that had artistic integrity. I think they also learnt the art of consistency with those albums.

ELP wise it's always Brain Salad Surgery. I actually played the debut on Friday and fell asleep during Take A Pebble and had to take it off the CD player during Tank. I was bored which a horrible admission to make as a fan! The albums I rate the highest after BSS are all live albums - Pictures At Exhibition, Mar Y Sol (1972) and the triple. Those are the ones I listen to the most aside from BSS. If ELP hadn't included the drum solo on the triple album in the middle of Karn Evil 9 then I would probbaly not even bother with the studio album. I also believe that Works Volume One deserves a bit more praise although the rating of it is about right on PA. It has some bold ideas and I think that Pirates is the very zenith of their music as a band. Fanfare in it's album form is also great and was superbly produced. After that album and the Works tour it was steeply down hill all the way unfortunately.




Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: July 20 2024 at 17:57
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:


4) Rush: all the albums


overrated/little overrated:


8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums



I would have to take issue with the idea that everything is overrated.

Although I wouldn't go as far as crediting Rush with creating Prog metal they were as important as anyone and massively influential. I would say their seventies albums are fair game but Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures are no way overrated. 

I am a fully paid up member of the ELP fan club so I'm passionate that they are regarded about right on PA. Emerson, Lake and Palmer's debut was a massive statement of intent in 1970 and rightly occupies a place in the Top 100 (lower reaches). After that Brain Salad Surgery tends to be more polarising but has a rating quite a bit lower than many prog albums of 1973 that are far less interesting. This is subjective of course. If you check the ratings of all their albums they seem about right. ELP were a better live band than album band but they have to be given due credit for their part in raising the benchmark with not just their debut but also Tarkus and Pictures At An Exhibition. This is me trying to be objective. Prog was a real movement that happened and not just an idea that was dreamt up by a bunch of college grads. It needed some rocket fuel and ELP were that.



I don't think anyone denies the importance of Rush for the development of heavy prog and their competence as musicians.
But otherwise, judgement on their records, from 2112 to Moving Pictures, is very divisive.
In Europe I don't think prog fans love them as much as in America (Canada and the US). I knew them little, before coming to this forum, and I was amazed that no less than four of their records hovered in the top 20-40 positions, close to the greatest prog masterpieces. So I tried to listen to them carefully, but I was quite disappointed, I didn't hear any masterpieces. All pleasant, all very well played, their records, but I don't see much other than hard rock played with virtuosity, and combining different pieces into one song to make it resemble a suite. Their most emblazoned record, Moving Pictures, is also the most commercial and the least prog, the most easy listening, with only one long composition - and I admit that is their best opera. This is obviously my opinion. I probably would have liked them better in my twenties.


The issue with EL&P is very different. They are British and are among the founders of prog. Their historical importance is immense. Enrico Merlin puts two of their albums in his book 1000 Records for a Century, where the criterion is musical innovation. EL&P were thus innovators in mixing cultured music with prog music, they influenced many prog artists who came after them, including the most famous Italian ones (Pfm, Banco, Orme). Having said that, if I evaluate the beauty of their albums, I think that they didnot churn out any masterpieces, that Tarkus suite, although innovative, is much less beautiful than the suites of Yes, Genesis, VdGG, King Crimson, that their records are full of low quality songs. I therefore put them in the little overrated ones, since they are not in the top positions of the Top 100. 

I can say this, though: I would understand not just one record, but two EL&P records in the Top 100 or even Top 50 (the debut and Tarkus, or the debut and Brain Salad) more than four Rush records.

Which EL&P album do you like most?
Which is your ranking?

Moving Pictures is very highly rated by many musicians and almost as important as Red in some respects. Rolling Stone magazine put it at No3 in their list of the greatest prog albums behind DSOTM and SEBTP. I was very impressed by their list but I get that you are going on personal taste. We can all be a bit objective though if we try. I've always thought Hemispheres was overrated but so many put it on a pedestial I've had to rethink a bit. Nevertheless I think it is overpraised. Early 80's Rush though is important because they were able to change with the times but still put out music that had artistic integrity. I think they also learnt the art of consistency with those albums.

ELP wise it's always Brain Salad Surgery. I actually played the debut on Friday and fell asleep during Take A Pebble and had to take it off the CD player during Tank. I was bored which a horrible admission to make as a fan! The albums I rate the highest after BSS are all live albums - Pictures At Exhibition, Mar Y Sol (1972) and the triple. Those are the ones I listen to the most aside from BSS. If ELP hadn't included the drum solo on the triple album in the middle of Karn Evil 9 then I would probbaly not even bother with the studio album. I also believe that Works Volume One deserves a bit more praise although the rating of it is about right on PA. It has some bold ideas and I think that Pirates is the very zenith of their music as a band. Fanfare in it's album form is also great and was superbly produced. After that album and the Works tour it was steeply down hill all the way unfortunately.



I have discussed many times on this forum the dichotomy between what is my favorite and what is the best, that is, between subjectivity and objectivity. Just as I have discussed so much about the criteria to be used in making a ranking, I have also made rankings of my own to show the difference between evaluating quality and evaluating e.g. historical importance etc. But evidently we haven't crossed paths, otherwise you would know that my considerations are always made under the banner not of my tastes, but of what I consider the beauty of a work (objectively, although each of us tries to be objective subjectively). So everything I have written has nothing to do with following my tastes.

For me no Rush album should be in a Top 10 prog ranking, but I know that Rolling Stone, an American rock and roll magazine, likes Rush and other commercial rock works. (For me Rush never wrote anything comparable to Red). These are my evaluations, as subjective as yours and Rolling Stone's, no more and no less.

Rolling Stone's ranking however is not so different from PA's, all things considered, and even features a Can record in the top 10. And Emisphere is 12th and Brain Salad 13th.... I strongly disagree even with TDSOTM at the top. Dark Side ad Movin' Picture at first and third place are very excessive for me: they are two fine commercial album not properly prog. (Dark Side is better than Moving Picture).

I will try to listen to Works 1 by EL&P carefully. 


Atually, My rankings are

Rush
1) Moving (4 stars)
2) Emisphere (between 3 and 4)
---
3) 2112 - 3 stars
4) Farewell
---
5) Permanent - 2 stars
6) Caress

EL&P
1) EL&P (3 stars)
2) Tarkus
3) Brain Salad
---
4) Trilogy (2 stars)
5) Pictures




-------------
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.


Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: July 20 2024 at 18:20
Keith Emerson was such a huge influence on most keyboard players beginning with The Nice. Tony Banks has mentioned the importance of Keith Emerson and The Nice several times in different interviews and he mentions it from a creative standpoint that influenced bands around him.

Beggar's Opera, Rare Bird, Greenslade, and evidently a long list of people Emerson had an impact on....and it was ridiculous in a way as if to think one particular keyboardist had all the answers..and as a result of the reality a lot of outstanding keyboardists copied his style and sometimes even dressed like him or getting their hair styled like his...the image of Keith Emerson on the front cover of Trilogy.

Rick Wakeman started getting recognition when he joined Yes and he was thought to be great...and he was...however Emerson had already laid a foundation for many keyboardist to follow years before Wakeman joined Strawbs. Emerson seemed to be followed by keyboardists and he was taken very seriously.

On "Piano Improvisations" from Welcome Back his skill on piano is revealed ...in such a way that he grabs the perfect amount of essence of a style of music...and not unlike any virtuoso on piano would do...but he was in a Rock Band and it influenced a vast quanity of American keyboardists to imitate him . Imitating his presence..for example...because in many ways he was challenging and learning his pieces involved a lot of hard work...practice.

But just Keith Emerson alone was a huge influence on Progressive Rock and he was determined to break boundaries and try new creative ways for music. In a way you have to think of him as a great pioneer of Prog and electronics not unlike Paul Beaver , Wendy Carlos, Mort Garson , Ruth White, Bernard Krause who also consulted with Bob Moog. Paul Beaver had collaborated with someone to help design a Moog Synthesizer to Emerson's specifications. This has been mentioned in Moog history a few times...and Emerson was living the dream. He was interested in using the Moog Synthesizer in a Progressive Rock style of his own..which had been mimicked several times.

Several European Prog bands auditioning drummers that could play a fast and clean style ...as what is heard on The Barbarian or several underground European Progressive Rock bands of the 70s needing a bass player that could sing with the power of Greg Lake ...in his early days of King Crimson and ELP. Not many bands could reach these levels...but they took the fringe aspect of it and somehow pulled off the style...while other bands with skilled keyboardists were impressive...Trace...The Enid...and others


Posted By: essexboyinwales
Date Posted: July 21 2024 at 14:41
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


I’ve tried twice but I don’t think the gremlins want to let me explain….


Confused


OK, let’s try this again….

I’ve tried many times with CTTE but it (the title track) just sounds horrible to my ears. And I don’t really like Steve Howe’s playing in general….

-------------
Heaven is waiting but waiting is Hell


Posted By: cstack3
Date Posted: July 21 2024 at 20:31
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

...
I would hear John McLaughlin and Jean Luc Ponty producing these timeless solos on Apocalypse and I was floored. Both of them were universally expressive during improvisation. I had difficulties in understanding how fans of the early Mahavishnu could not like this.
...
 

Hi,

In my book, McLaughlin is way better at improvisation because he works on it time and again, specially with many foreign players alongside, and his excursions into other musics are neat, different, and sometimes not to everyone's taste, I don't think.


I agree!  I love to watch this clip over and over!!  



-------------
I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: July 22 2024 at 01:27
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

According to my tastes/evaluations, I see many albums very (and little) overrated in PA Top 200.

For example, very overrated:


4) Rush: all the albums


overrated/little overrated:


8) Emerson Lake and Palmer: all the albums



I would have to take issue with the idea that everything is overrated.

Although I wouldn't go as far as crediting Rush with creating Prog metal they were as important as anyone and massively influential. I would say their seventies albums are fair game but Permanent Waves and Moving Pictures are no way overrated. 

I am a fully paid up member of the ELP fan club so I'm passionate that they are regarded about right on PA. Emerson, Lake and Palmer's debut was a massive statement of intent in 1970 and rightly occupies a place in the Top 100 (lower reaches). After that Brain Salad Surgery tends to be more polarising but has a rating quite a bit lower than many prog albums of 1973 that are far less interesting. This is subjective of course. If you check the ratings of all their albums they seem about right. ELP were a better live band than album band but they have to be given due credit for their part in raising the benchmark with not just their debut but also Tarkus and Pictures At An Exhibition. This is me trying to be objective. Prog was a real movement that happened and not just an idea that was dreamt up by a bunch of college grads. It needed some rocket fuel and ELP were that.



I don't think anyone denies the importance of Rush for the development of heavy prog and their competence as musicians.
But otherwise, judgement on their records, from 2112 to Moving Pictures, is very divisive.
In Europe I don't think prog fans love them as much as in America (Canada and the US). I knew them little, before coming to this forum, and I was amazed that no less than four of their records hovered in the top 20-40 positions, close to the greatest prog masterpieces. So I tried to listen to them carefully, but I was quite disappointed, I didn't hear any masterpieces. All pleasant, all very well played, their records, but I don't see much other than hard rock played with virtuosity, and combining different pieces into one song to make it resemble a suite. Their most emblazoned record, Moving Pictures, is also the most commercial and the least prog, the most easy listening, with only one long composition - and I admit that is their best opera. This is obviously my opinion. I probably would have liked them better in my twenties.


The issue with EL&P is very different. They are British and are among the founders of prog. Their historical importance is immense. Enrico Merlin puts two of their albums in his book 1000 Records for a Century, where the criterion is musical innovation. EL&P were thus innovators in mixing cultured music with prog music, they influenced many prog artists who came after them, including the most famous Italian ones (Pfm, Banco, Orme). Having said that, if I evaluate the beauty of their albums, I think that they didnot churn out any masterpieces, that Tarkus suite, although innovative, is much less beautiful than the suites of Yes, Genesis, VdGG, King Crimson, that their records are full of low quality songs. I therefore put them in the little overrated ones, since they are not in the top positions of the Top 100. 

I can say this, though: I would understand not just one record, but two EL&P records in the Top 100 or even Top 50 (the debut and Tarkus, or the debut and Brain Salad) more than four Rush records.

Which EL&P album do you like most?
Which is your ranking?

Moving Pictures is very highly rated by many musicians and almost as important as Red in some respects. Rolling Stone magazine put it at No3 in their list of the greatest prog albums behind DSOTM and SEBTP. I was very impressed by their list but I get that you are going on personal taste. We can all be a bit objective though if we try. I've always thought Hemispheres was overrated but so many put it on a pedestial I've had to rethink a bit. Nevertheless I think it is overpraised. Early 80's Rush though is important because they were able to change with the times but still put out music that had artistic integrity. I think they also learnt the art of consistency with those albums.

ELP wise it's always Brain Salad Surgery. I actually played the debut on Friday and fell asleep during Take A Pebble and had to take it off the CD player during Tank. I was bored which a horrible admission to make as a fan! The albums I rate the highest after BSS are all live albums - Pictures At Exhibition, Mar Y Sol (1972) and the triple. Those are the ones I listen to the most aside from BSS. If ELP hadn't included the drum solo on the triple album in the middle of Karn Evil 9 then I would probbaly not even bother with the studio album. I also believe that Works Volume One deserves a bit more praise although the rating of it is about right on PA. It has some bold ideas and I think that Pirates is the very zenith of their music as a band. Fanfare in it's album form is also great and was superbly produced. After that album and the Works tour it was steeply down hill all the way unfortunately.



I have discussed many times on this forum the dichotomy between what is my favorite and what is the best, that is, between subjectivity and objectivity. Just as I have discussed so much about the criteria to be used in making a ranking, I have also made rankings of my own to show the difference between evaluating quality and evaluating e.g. historical importance etc. But evidently we haven't crossed paths, otherwise you would know that my considerations are always made under the banner not of my tastes, but of what I consider the beauty of a work (objectively, although each of us tries to be objective subjectively). So everything I have written has nothing to do with following my tastes.

For me no Rush album should be in a Top 10 prog ranking, but I know that Rolling Stone, an American rock and roll magazine, likes Rush and other commercial rock works. (For me Rush never wrote anything comparable to Red). These are my evaluations, as subjective as yours and Rolling Stone's, no more and no less.

Rolling Stone's ranking however is not so different from PA's, all things considered, and even features a Can record in the top 10. And Emisphere is 12th and Brain Salad 13th.... I strongly disagree even with TDSOTM at the top. Dark Side ad Movin' Picture at first and third place are very excessive for me: they are two fine commercial album not properly prog. (Dark Side is better than Moving Picture).

I will try to listen to Works 1 by EL&P carefully. 


Atually, My rankings are

Rush
1) Moving (4 stars)
2) Emisphere (between 3 and 4)
---
3) 2112 - 3 stars
4) Farewell
---
5) Permanent - 2 stars
6) Caress

EL&P
1) EL&P (3 stars)
2) Tarkus
3) Brain Salad
---
4) Trilogy (2 stars)
5) Pictures



Beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder as someone once said. I think the only way to be objective is to take account of other opinions which is why I like a rating site. We also value different things and this the prism through which we judge.

I think for ELP studio albums
1. BSS 4.4 (PA 4.17)
2. Trilogy 4.3 (PA 4.14)
3. E,L and P 4.1 (4.24)
4. Tarkus 3.8 (PA 4.07)
5. Works Volume One 3.3 (PA 2.96)
Some are overrated and some underrated imo, overall if you add up total ratings they are not that far off

For Rush (top 5)
1. Moving Pictures 4.6 (PA 4.38)
2. Permanent Waves 4.4 (PA 4.27)
3. 2112 4.2 (PA 4.11)
4. AFTK 4.1 (PA 4.34)
5. Hemispheres 3.9 (PA 4.38)

I think that AFTK and Hemispheres didn't really improve that much on 2112 which was also more historically important. PA is about right with MP and PW but I would still elevate them a bit higher personally.




Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: July 26 2024 at 12:00
Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by essexboyinwales essexboyinwales wrote:

Close To The Edge - although, TBH, I don’t really like it very much at all, so maybe I’m wrong to include it here!

Marbles - it IS a good album, but it’s not great. Too much filler!



If you dislike CTTE more than just a little that's ok too but I'm wondering what it is about the album that puts you off so much.


Why are you posting my quote if you aren't going to answer the question. 


I’ve tried twice but I don’t think the gremlins want to let me explain….


Confused


OK, let’s try this again….

I’ve tried many times with CTTE but it (the title track) just sounds horrible to my ears. And I don’t really like Steve Howe’s playing in general….


You mean his crazy sounding improvisation at the intro of CTTE? He uses a bit too much treble on his guitar. Is that what you mean?...or is it his phrasing?

Some of the most lousy sounding guitar soloing is on an album called The Song Remains The Same. It is sloppy and it is to my understanding that thousands of people made adjustments and acceptance for it. That seems rather backwards for people that are snobby about music. I don't get it? You're either snobby or not? Why do people accept that ? Why because it's Jimmy Page? In other words...its accepted that he is pitifully sloppy, but no one else can be right? 😆 It's a back in the woods way of thinking. If a guitarist is asked to cover "Heartbreaker" and he doesn't play sloppy like Page then he's disliked? Yeah that's it. That position is moronic


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: July 26 2024 at 18:48
Originally posted by Jacob Schoolcraft Jacob Schoolcraft wrote:

 
...
 It is sloppy and it is to my understanding that thousands of people made adjustments and acceptance for it. That seems rather backwards for people that are snobby about music. I don't get it? You're either snobby or not? Why do people accept that ? Why because it's Jimmy Page? In other words...its accepted that he is pitifully sloppy, but no one else can be right? 😆 It's a back in the woods way of thinking. If a guitarist is asked to cover "Heartbreaker" and he doesn't play sloppy like Page then he's disliked? Yeah that's it. That position is moronic

Hi,

I wonder how many musicians find "sloppy" a good way to find new things to do and learn.

It's kinda weird when you hear RF say "bollocks" when he misses one of his exercises, however, if his history is any example, in 50 years, he has had more chances than anyone to be "sloppy" and eventually come up with something else for another day.

As for like or dislike? ... I don't exactly think in terms of the subjective ways of looking at many of these folks ... I never think that they are not exactly looking to find new ways and things to do in a future setting. Sloppy might just as well be another word for "new" ... until we get used to it.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Frets N Worries
Date Posted: August 10 2024 at 00:18
Easy, The Yes Album, I've heard it several times, it's not good. Perhaps I would've though differently If I had been there upon it's release, but it doesn't hold up. Time and a Word and their debut are better.

-------------
The Wheel of Time Turns, and Ages come and pass. What was, what will be, and what is, may yet fall under the shadow.

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time...



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk