ELP missing from PA Top 100 Choices
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57579
Printed Date: May 20 2025 at 14:54 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: ELP missing from PA Top 100 Choices
Posted By: ARISCOTLE
Subject: ELP missing from PA Top 100 Choices
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 19:42
I was looking through the PA top 100 and found it shamefully lacking ANYTHING by Emerson, Lake & Palmer - who IMO are just prog rock at its pinnacle. They had some of the best talent, arrangement, breakthrough style and 2 of the best albums ever recorded (IMO) in any genre "Tarkus" - 1971 & "Brain Salad Surgery" - 1973
I won't argue and bitch with people on here like so many do about who is and isn't prog, but I don't care who you are ELP belongs in the top 5 and when bands like Dream Theater, Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Dun, Ayreon, Phideaux, The Mars Volta, Psychotic Waltz, Arena, Sieges Even, Bubu, Atlas, Los Jaivas, Atheist, Unexpect, Edge of Sanity, Riverside, Hoyry-Kone, Disillusion, and Death all make the list and ELP doesn't, it makes me question the validity of a community that calls itself a "PROG" community and has no reference to hands down one of the great inventors of the genre to begin with.
Sad - Sad - Sad - Sad - Sad - Shameful PEOPLE PLEASE GET A GRIP AND PAY RESPECT WHERE IT IS DUE
longliverealprog :)
------------- august 1, 1981 - the day the music died
never forget black saturday
|
Replies:
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 20:48
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
-------------
 
|
Posted By: MovingPictures07
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 20:52
Once you stop caring about what other people's opinions, the better. The top 100 will never satisfy everyone.
-------------
|
Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 21:04
All a matter of opinion i suppose,but i think ELP's debut should definitely be in the top 100. ELP are one of the few bands who non-prog fans know are prog along with YES and maybe GENESIS.
I shake my head at some of the bands in the top 100 as well,but if i made my own top 100 list there would be tons of people shaking their heads too.
------------- "The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 21:34
Join the club man!!!!!!!!
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 21:48
So do something about it and write some good reviews for them. I do believe we've had this complaint before. ;-)
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: ARISCOTLE
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 22:15
@Henry
You make a good point, can't really complain too much from the sidelines. Maybe I will start writing some reviews. Though if this was a "progressive rock" forum, as the name indicates ELP would not have to compete with so much other drivel. I'm way too opinionated though in my view of what is prog and what is not. Just because some band uses an instrument other than guitar/bass/drums, or has technical savvy surely does not make it "progressive" -
Shame on all you proggers who show no love for ELP keep listening to whatever...its all subjective enjoy music
and, btw, I actually don't care what other people think, I was just noting that it was surprising to see the contents of the top 100.
peace & music
------------- august 1, 1981 - the day the music died
never forget black saturday
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 22:40
ARISCOTLE wrote:
Though if this was a "progressive rock" forum, as the name indicates ELP would not have to compete with so much other drivel. |
Oh, this again. :/ While I sometimes take issue with inclusion, particularly in prog-related, there is a good reason every band is included, and maybe you should try to find out why that is. Anyway, I was being sarcastic because we've had a lot of these threads before, but I can't seem to find any of them with the search function, so I'll let you off the hook this time. ;-)
Shame on all you proggers who show no love for ELP |
I used to like ELP, does that count?
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 22:43
I like ELP these days. I used to love them. I guess in time what they've done seems dated and not as interesting or compelling as compared to others bands. Peoples taste change as well. Part of the problem is that they seemed not to work as a unit. You have Emerson's input and ego then Lake's input and ego and it seems Palmer is just along for the ride. IMHO.
|
Posted By: Wanorak
Date Posted: April 30 2009 at 23:25
I totally agree:) Brain Salad Surgery was way ahead of it's time and deserves to be in the top 10; nevermind Tarkus, ELP and Trilogy. Enough of the prog-metal already and give ELP their due!!!
------------- A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
|
Posted By: russellk
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 02:29
Not a fan of ELP myself; one of the very few prog acts that bores me to tears. But given the central role they played in prog rock in the 70s, it's a surprise that their better albums don't feature.
Having said that, this probably reflects the way this band divides the prog community.
|
Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 02:33
I think a lot of proggers are embarrased of the way that they helped put the nails into the coffin of the mid 70s progressive scene
*douses self in gasloline*
I love BSS, but there's 100 prog albums better than it. And what? What's that? There's no 101 spot on the top 100? Shame, that.
|
Posted By: Mr ProgFreak
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 02:37
My suggestion:
Split the top prog albums list on the start page. Instead of showing one list of the top 100 albums, make it two lists with 50 albums:
1. Top classic prog albums (1968-1975) 2. Top prog albums (1976-*)
How about that?
------------- https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike" rel="nofollow - https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike
|
Posted By: Pekka
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 02:42
Nah, they just should've left the Bennys and Jeremys in the studio.
I love parts of their work, more and more all the time, but their music is so provocative in its flashiness that it's no wonder to me that their albums are not rated that highly. For one lover theres always one hater.
------------- http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42652" rel="nofollow - It's on PA!
|
Posted By: Jake Kobrin
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 02:48
ARISCOTLE wrote:
I was looking through the PA top 100 and found it shamefully lacking ANYTHING by Emerson, Lake & Palmer - who IMO are just prog rock at its pinnacle. They had some of the best talent, arrangement, breakthrough style and 2 of the best albums ever recorded (IMO) in any genre "Tarkus" - 1971 & "Brain Salad Surgery" - 1973
I won't argue and bitch with people on here like so many do about who is and isn't prog, but I don't care who you are ELP belongs in the top 5 and when bands like Dream Theater, Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Dun, Ayreon, Phideaux, The Mars Volta, Psychotic Waltz, Arena, Sieges Even, Bubu, Atlas, Los Jaivas, Atheist, Unexpect, Edge of Sanity, Riverside, Hoyry-Kone, Disillusion, and Death all make the list and ELP doesn't, it makes me question the validity of a community that calls itself a "PROG" community and has no reference to hands down one of the great inventors of the genre to begin with.
Sad - Sad - Sad - Sad - Sad - Shameful PEOPLE PLEASE GET A GRIP AND PAY RESPECT WHERE IT IS DUE
longliverealprog :)
|
Opeth deserves the spot much, much, much more...
------------- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Neil-Kobrin/244687105562746" rel="nofollow - SUPPORT MY FATHER AND BECOME A FAN
Jacob Kobrin Illustration
|
Posted By: Mr ProgFreak
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 03:02
^ Ayreon too!
------------- https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike" rel="nofollow - https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 03:54
I suggest we end the thread right here, with ELP at the beginning and Ayreon at the end. A perfect illustration of going from bad to worse.
Though Jake Kobrin would need to edit the Opeth mention out of his post.
|
Posted By: Mr ProgFreak
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 05:06
^ why always tell people which of their favorite bands are actually crap? I mean, you don't have to like Ayreon, but rather than telling me that it sucks I'd prefer people to tell me what they like instead. Recommendations are always better than negative rants IMO.
------------- https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike" rel="nofollow - https://tagyourmusic.org/users/Mike
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 05:18
I'm not going to recommend any prog metal to a prog metal expert, so:
http://www.amazon.com/Age-Everything-Joe-Morris/dp/B000068Q32/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1241172982&sr=1-2 - http://www.amazon.com/Age-Everything-Joe-Morris/dp/B000068Q32/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1241172982&sr=1-2
|
Posted By: Mr ProgFreak
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 05:49
^ I added the album to the PF database. Unfortunately I can't find any samples ... which of his albums that are available on eMusic.com would you recommend?
http://www.emusic.com/artist/Joe-Morris-MP3-Download/11563777.html - http://www.emusic.com/artist/Joe-Morris-MP3-Download/11563777.html
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 06:14
There used to be some samples on Amazon.com or uk...
I don't think you can really go wrong with any of his work. Of those I've heard - Rebus, Thesis, High Definition, Age of Everything - it is the last one that I've found the most interesting. Damn, I see only Rebus is available on eMusic.
BTW, he's not prog, not by a longshot.
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:05
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Once you stop caring about what other people's opinions, the better. The top 100 will never satisfy everyone. |
^Maybe not, but it should at least accurately represent prog music. Which it doesn't with the lack of ELP. Basically this website dedicated to prog music has watered itself down so much, that it no longer caters to true prog, but some hybrid that borders on mediocrity.
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: SgtPepper67
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:07
I completely agree but I think this have been discussed many times. At least 4 of ELP albums definitely deserve to be in the top 100, it's a shame they're not appreciated while there's a lot of bands that I think are overrated here.
-------------
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:44
Now that you've mentioned no ELP being in the 100, I do find that a bit odd. Here I am a fan from way back and a collaborator and I just noticed I've only reviewed the box set. To be honest, I don't listen to many of the classic '70's prog that much anymore primarily do to wearing them out already. I'm more interested in what's new going on out there and ELP ain't it. Still I do have to go back and review a classic every now and then. 
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:47
SgtPepper67 wrote:
I completely agree but I think this have been discussed many times. At least 4 of ELP albums definitely deserve to be in the top 10, it's a shame they're not appreciated while there's a lot of bands that I think are overrated here.
|
I really, really hope you meant top 100.
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:49
I think it comes down to the fact that they are a very divisive band that many people dont like, I myself consider them the most overhyped classic prog band as they have zero ability to write cohesive songs and let their egos run away with them, but then I've heard others say the same about Dream Theater, who I think are fantastic, so it all comes down to opinion.
Your right about the top 100 being not particularly representative. Even though I'm on the Prog Metal Team I think there's too much Tech/Extreme in that list but thats because those albums only seem to be reviewed by fans of that style, with the exception of Opeth. At least you know those albums are conisderd the best of the bunch from people that like that style and so they do make a good place to start.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:51
CCVP wrote:
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
|
As much as I hate to say it, this shows a flaw in the system. ELP and Classic Prog are synonomous. Oh well, what can you do?
-------------
|
Posted By: Pekka
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:52
threefates wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Once you stop caring about what other people's opinions, the better. The top 100 will never satisfy everyone. |
^Maybe not, but it should at least accurately represent prog music. Which it doesn't with the lack of ELP. Basically this website dedicated to prog music has watered itself down so much, that it no longer caters to true prog, but some hybrid that borders on mediocrity. |
Prog progresses. Crimso, ELP and that bunch started it, why do you think it ends with them too?
------------- http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42652" rel="nofollow - It's on PA!
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:53
StyLaZyn wrote:
CCVP wrote:
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
|
As much as I hate to say it, this shows a flaw in the system. ELP and Classic Prog are synonomous. Oh well, what can you do? |
No, it just shows the thoughts of people that have reviewed it here. A band shouldnt have albums automatically placed highly just because several people call it sacralige otherwise, the rest of us dont agree.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:57
I think sleeper is right - the problem is, based on the ratings, that you can't get a consensus of a "masterpiece" status for any the ELP albums. Look at the usual suspects at the top - Close to the Edge, Selling England, Thick as a Brick, etc. - and you'll see that despite an incredible number of ratings, the average is above 4.5 - so think of those as can be "rounded" to masterpiece status. ELP just doesn't seem to garner that sort of consensus - their albums "round" to excellent. To be honest I think ELP were certainly important enough to the prog scene that their complete omission from the top 100 albums is glaring and seems odd - but this is certainly not by an arbitrary decision by progarchives.com; rather, just seems to be the opinion of all who have rendered a verdict on their work. Had the debut or BSS or whatever received a lot more 5 stars than 4, you bet they would be right up at the top.
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 09:59
sleeper wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
CCVP wrote:
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
|
As much as I hate to say it, this shows a flaw in the system. ELP and Classic Prog are synonomous. Oh well, what can you do? |
No, it just shows the thoughts of people that have reviewed it here. A band shouldnt have albums automatically placed highly just because several people call it sacralige otherwise, the rest of us dont agree.
|
It's all about favorites. Just like The Grammy's and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Brain Salad Surgery is a must have but since a majority don't like it it fails? The idea that Santana, which is a great band, is referred to more importantly than ELP in the realm of Prog is mind boggling.
-------------
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 10:09
StyLaZyn wrote:
sleeper wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
CCVP wrote:
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
|
As much as I hate to say it, this shows a flaw in the system. ELP and Classic Prog are synonomous. Oh well, what can you do? |
No, it just shows the thoughts of people that have reviewed it here. A band shouldnt have albums automatically placed highly just because several people call it sacralige otherwise, the rest of us dont agree.
|
It's all about favorites. Just like The Grammy's and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Brain Salad Surgery is a must have but since a majority don't like it it fails? The idea that Santana, which is a great band, is referred to more importantly than ELP in the realm of Prog is mind boggling. |
Of course its all about favourites since the ratings are determined by people that have come here to rate/review whatever they want.
I strongly disagree with BSS being a must have manly because I had it, listened to it about a dozen times over several months and got rid of it because I really dont like it, and if the majority dont like it then it really cant be a must have, cant it? (I dont think thats true, its probably more like half and half.)
I agree with you on the Santana bit, ELP do deserve at least one album in the top 100, but those that are saying "shame on you" for not rating their albums highly enough to get into the top 10 need to grow up.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: Pekka
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 10:16
StyLaZyn wrote:
sleeper wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
CCVP wrote:
yeah, ELP is incredibly underrated here in ProgArchives. Just a shame, they are one of my favorite bands ever.
|
As much as I hate to say it, this shows a flaw in the system. ELP and Classic Prog are synonomous. Oh well, what can you do? |
No, it just shows the thoughts of people that have reviewed it here. A band shouldnt have albums automatically placed highly just because several people call it sacralige otherwise, the rest of us dont agree.
|
It's all about favorites. Just like The Grammy's and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Brain Salad Surgery is a must have but since a majority don't like it it fails? The idea that Santana, which is a great band, is referred to more importantly than ELP in the realm of Prog is mind boggling. |
Let's take a look at the ratings:
53% of reviewers consider it a masterpiece worth five stars, and further 27% gave it four stars. That's 80% of reviewers, four in every bunch of five, thinking that BSS is a brilliant album. And still the majority doesn't like it? 4.15 is a failure?
------------- http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=42652" rel="nofollow - It's on PA!
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 10:44
SgtPepper67 wrote:
I completely agree but I think this have been discussed many times. At least 4 of ELP albums definitely deserve to be in the top 10, it's a shame they're not appreciated while there's a lot of bands that I think are overrated here. |
We need more prog reviewers like SgtPepper67!!!
Honestly , while I agree that Brain Salad surgery is a top 1 album I think that the top 10 should be diverse enough and including 4 ELP albums would be quite the opposite.
But then some people may find weird having 4 ELP albums in the top , but what about Genesis and Pink Floyd??? Those bands put together had 6 of the top 10 albums some months ago.
To the one that created this thread , I suggest sending your ELP reviews to the site as I did.
Anyway , don't feel bad if your 5 stars rating gets crushed by a 1 star review from a Collabaorator/ ProgReviewer saying: " Oh , this band is so bombastic and over the top , synths are so cheesy , loads of filler... Id rather put Moonmadness blah blah blah." 
|
Posted By: TGM: Orb
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 11:08
Yes, we've been round the block on this a few times.
I think, basically
1) While there is broad consensus on Genesis', Yes', Pink Floyd's etc. crowning achievement, there isn't on ELP. I'd say the debut, some'd say Tarkus, Pictures, Trilogy and BSS. 2) A lot of people don't consider ELP very consistent because of less serious songs. Yeah, it happens, think people should maybe try to appreciate them based on content rather than style. 3) More avant-folk don't seem to be crazy about Lake's voice. Their loss.
So, yeah, I think there are some ELP albums which obviously deserve to be in the top 100, even top 20, but I'm not crazy-mad about a 'most popular' list missing them out.
|
Posted By: Progfan1958
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 11:36
ELP do belong to be there. Debut, Trilogy, Brain Salad from my standpoint.. Yes, it's a shame they have not done any really great work post their early period, but in their day they were amazing. I don't listen to them a lot these days, but once in a while I still enjoy their work. Keith Emerson was THE best keyboard player in his day, and has always been able to write circles around Wakeman. Currently Jordan Rudess seems to emulate Emerson more than anyone else- he has the chops and certainly more speed than Keith ever had, but not the originality. Hey, maybe in another 20-30 years when they're gone opinion's will change.
------------- Progfan1958
"Peace to you all"
"La paix est avec vous"
"Pax vobiscum"
"Al salaam a'alaykum"
"Vrede zij met u allen"
"Shalom aleichem"
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 11:38
ELP has some beautiful material. They also have some meandering weaker stuff. While their historical importance in prog is unquestioned, they don't have an album that matches CTTE, Foxtrot, or even Hybris. I don't personally think ITCotKC is a masterpiece either, though it is perhaps the most important prog album historically.
It is criminal to me that Devin Townsend's Terria is not in the top 10. But not everyone shares my opinion.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: SgtPepper67
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 11:59
crimson87 wrote:
SgtPepper67 wrote:
I completely agree but I think this
have been discussed many times. At least 4 of ELP albums definitely
deserve to be in the top 10, it's a shame they're not appreciated while
there's a lot of bands that I think are overrated here. |
We need more prog reviewers like SgtPepper67!!!
Honestly , while I agree that Brain Salad surgery is a top 1 album
I think that the top 10 should be diverse enough and including 4 ELP
albums would be quite the opposite.
But then some people may find weird having 4 ELP albums in the top
, but what about Genesis and Pink Floyd??? Those bands put together had
6 of the top 10 albums some months ago.
To the one that created this thread , I suggest sending your ELP reviews to the site as I did.
Anyway , don't feel bad if your 5 stars rating gets crushed by a 1
star review from a Collabaorator/ ProgReviewer saying: " Oh , this band
is so bombastic and over the top , synths are so cheesy , loads of
filler... Id rather put Moonmadness blah blah blah." 
|
Sorry, I meant top 100 actually, and I forgot about Pictures at an exhibition, so it makes 5 albums that deserve to be in the top 100. But anyway, I think any of those albums wouldn't be out of place in the top 10. I think there's a lot of people in the forum who aren't really that much into the classic prog bands and more into metal/tech/math/whatever it is called wich I don't like at all, and it's ok, but that would explain my disagreement with many opinions and reviews on the site. I'm mainly a big fan of the classic symphonic, hard rock or psychedelic prog bands like Floyd, Jethro Tull, Rush, Genesis, etc, and although all those bands except ELP have some albums in the top 100 I feel there's s lot of people who doesn't have much respect for them apart from a few of their albums, probably because most of them moved on a bit from prog or evolved to make some different music.
-------------
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 12:05
SgtPepper67 wrote:
crimson87 wrote:
SgtPepper67 wrote:
I completely agree but I think this
have been discussed many times. At least 4 of ELP albums definitely
deserve to be in the top 10, it's a shame they're not appreciated while
there's a lot of bands that I think are overrated here. |
We need more prog reviewers like SgtPepper67!!!
Honestly , while I agree that Brain Salad surgery is a top 1 album
I think that the top 10 should be diverse enough and including 4 ELP
albums would be quite the opposite.
But then some people may find weird having 4 ELP albums in the top
, but what about Genesis and Pink Floyd??? Those bands put together had
6 of the top 10 albums some months ago.
To the one that created this thread , I suggest sending your ELP reviews to the site as I did.
Anyway , don't feel bad if your 5 stars rating gets crushed by a 1
star review from a Collabaorator/ ProgReviewer saying: " Oh , this band
is so bombastic and over the top , synths are so cheesy , loads of
filler... Id rather put Moonmadness blah blah blah." 
|
Sorry, I meant top 100 actually, and I forgot about Pictures at an exhibition, so it makes 5 albums that deserve to be in the top 100. But anyway, I think any of those albums wouldn't be out of place in the top 10. I think there's a lot of people in the forum who aren't really that much into the classic prog bands and more into metal/tech/math/whatever it is called wich I don't like at all, wich is ok, but that would explain my disagreement with many opinions and reviews on the site. I'm mainly a big fan of the classic symphonic, hard rock or psychedelic prog bands like Floyd, Jethro Tull, Rush, Genesis, etc, and although all those bands except ELP have some albums in the top 100 I feel there's s lot of people who doesn't have much respect for them apart from a few of their albums, probably because most of them moved on a bit from prog or evolved to make some different music.
|
You could be onto something.
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 12:53
It's funny how it's always the new guy who has been here barely one day who decides to tell us what's wrong and what's right and blasts PA's current status-quo...
Even funnier that some people actually support him....
-------------
|
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 13:02
I like ELP to some dosis, but definitely deserve the spot in the Top 100 just like Yes, Genesis, Pink Floyd, and all the classics.
However, I really don't find Top 100 lists very useful, though interesting from time to time...
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 13:09
The T wrote:
It's funny how it's always the new guy who has been here barely one day who decides to tell us what's wrong and what's right and blasts PA's current status-quo...
|
Reminds me of The Emporer's New Clothes in a way.
-------------
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 13:11
The T wrote:
It's funny how it's always the new guy who has been here barely one day who decides to tell us what's wrong and what's right and blasts PA's current status-quo...
Even funnier that some people actually support him.... |
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 13:44
ELP are certainly a band that either attract unbridled adoration or complete antipathy (there just ain't no middle ground with this trio)
It should of course be taken on board that the charts on this site merely reflect a broad consensus (and ain't it funny how those individuals who would otherwise embrace democracy, abhor same in the arts when it contradicts their own tastes ?)
I love ELP to bits, but would say that those interpreting the charts as a reliable measure of a band's historical contribution to prog are at best, misguided. The charts are a dynamic phenomenon, i.e. they're gonna mirror contemporary developments in prog like tech/extreme metal etc.
I also share the belief that ELP as a band did not sit easily with the hippies that continue to ensure CTTE, SEBTP, TAAB etc ride high in the charts and this must have contributed to their being chosen as prog's sacrificial offering to the Punk monster, (as an embodiement of everything the latter held to be repugnant about the genre). The irony of this choice of victim will not be lost on you, as ELP were blamed for the lazy compositional indiscipline that steadily encroached into the work of Yes, Jethro Tull and Genesis. (before all three idealistic hippy combos became full time pop jingle writers rather than compromise their integrity yes ?)
-------------
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:10
It's simple, not enough guitars.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: mr.cub
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:16
ExittheLemming wrote:
ELP are certainly a band that either attract unbridled adoration or complete antipathy (there just ain't no middle ground with this trio)
It should of course be taken on board that the charts on this site merely reflect a broad consensus (and ain't it funny how those individuals who would otherwise embrace democracy, abhor same in the arts when it contradicts their own tastes ?)
I love ELP to bits, but would say that those interpreting the charts as a reliable measure of a band's historical contribution to prog are at best, misguided. The charts are a dynamic phenomenon, i.e. they're gonna mirror contemporary developments in prog like tech/extreme metal etc.
I also share the belief that ELP as a band did not sit easily with the hippies that continue to ensure CTTE, SEBTP, TAAB etc ride high in the charts and this must have contributed to their being chosen as prog's sacrificial offering to the Punk monster, (as an embodiement of everything the latter held to be repugnant about the genre). The irony of this choice of victim will not be lost on you, as ELP were blamed for the lazy compositional indiscipline that steadily encroached into the work of Yes, Jethro Tull and Genesis. (before all three idealistic hippy combos became full time pop jingle writers rather than compromise their integrity yes ?)
| Very good points but I don't think Ian ever steered Jethro Tull to the pastures that 80's Yes and Genesis grazed in.
ELP is not in the Top 100...oh well. I still love them (gave ELP a 5 and will review the rest of their early albums: thinking a Tarkus- 4, Trilogy-5 and BSS-3) and really don't lose sleep over that kind of thing
-------------
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:21
Let's keep this civil, please.
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:24
ExittheLemming wrote:
ELP are certainly a band that either attract unbridled adoration or complete antipathy (there just ain't no middle ground with this trio)
It should of course be taken on board that the charts on this site merely reflect a broad consensus (and ain't it funny how those individuals who would otherwise embrace democracy, abhor same in the arts when it contradicts their own tastes ?)
I love ELP to bits, but would say that those interpreting the charts as a reliable measure of a band's historical contribution to prog are at best, misguided. The charts are a dynamic phenomenon, i.e. they're gonna mirror contemporary developments in prog like tech/extreme metal etc.
I also share the belief that ELP as a band did not sit easily with the hippies that continue to ensure CTTE, SEBTP, TAAB etc ride high in the charts and this must have contributed to their being chosen as prog's sacrificial offering to the Punk monster, (as an embodiement of everything the latter held to be repugnant about the genre). The irony of this choice of victim will not be lost on you, as ELP were blamed for the lazy compositional indiscipline that steadily encroached into the work of Yes, Jethro Tull and Genesis. (before all three idealistic hippy combos became full time pop jingle writers rather than compromise their integrity yes ?)
|
What?!? Say it ain't so! There is no favoring here. That would bring integrity into question. 
-------------
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:27
Hippies were mentioned in this thread!
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:28
I would have thought that at least 50% of people who like Yes and Genesis also like ELP.
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 14:34
In the beginning the 6 string talisman gave power unto its holders, powers of influence over others, powers to move and shake the land. Soon enough had heard its call that new realms of music and fresh ways of thinking spread across the land. The world was ripe for change, led by the curvaceous beauty of the instrument.
And then came a proud group of musicians who instead worshipped an instrument of their own making. And still the 6 string blessed the ones that kept it in their midst. But then ELP came along, spurning the magic item that allowed their profession to exist. Turning away from some devout 6 string disciples, they invoked a curse upon their kind. Even the ungracious ELP was given rewards when the talisman was included, money and fame floating in their lucky laps.
But finally they rejected the master completely, and were left to rot on a humiliating beach to wither in the sun.
Let this be a warning to those who disparage the disciples of the 6 string, for lo, even now those disciples rule the PA, much to the chagrin of some. Do not follow the ways of the proud ELP.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 15:12
Negoba wrote:
In the beginning the 6 string talisman gave power unto its holders, powers of influence over others, powers to move and shake the land. Soon enough had heard its call that new realms of music and fresh ways of thinking spread across the land. The world was ripe for change, led by the curvaceous beauty of the instrument.
And then came a proud group of musicians who instead worshipped an instrument of their own making. And still the 6 string blessed the ones that kept it in their midst. But then ELP came along, spurning the magic item that allowed their profession to exist. Turning away from some devout 6 string disciples, they invoked a curse upon their kind. Even the ungracious ELP was given rewards when the talisman was included, money and fame floating in their lucky laps.
But finally they rejected the master completely, and were left to rot on a humiliating beach to wither in the sun.
Let this be a warning to those who disparage the disciples of the 6 string, for lo, even now those disciples rule the PA, much to the chagrin of some. Do not follow the ways of the proud ELP. |
Very good point and entertainingly expressed. I have no (cough)..axe to grind and do not use the term 'hippies' in a pejorative sense (or wish to undermine their integrity), but I have always detected both they and the prog community at large, viewed ELP with a reserved cynicism. It's almost as though they suspected that ELP were wearing suits under their stage outfits (like plain clothes policemen at a 'happening')
Hey ho....
-------------
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 20:02
ExittheLemming wrote:
ELP are certainly a band that either attract unbridled adoration or complete antipathy (there just ain't no middle ground with this trio)
|
Well, speaking as someone who currently like ELP but neither love them nor don't care about them, I'm going to have to take offense at that. 
I am firmly in the middle ground, seriously, or maybe I'm just weird.
I been listening to band's material for many the years and I still like it.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 20:21
ExittheLemming wrote:
ELP are certainly a band that either attract unbridled adoration or complete antipathy (there just ain't no middle ground with this trio)
|
That's the point, in my case i can't love more BSS and Trilogy and believe this two albums should be in a top 100 (Never cared about Tarkus), but they also have Works II which is awful, Love Beach even worst, In the Hot Seat...well.....And don't forget Brain Salad Perjury, which is an aberration.
If they had became POP as Genesis, people would simply split the Prog from the POP era and care only about the first one, but ELP was Prog almost always and had really bad albums.
Genesis had an excuse....Gabriel left, then Hackett, Collins hates Prog, Philistines vs Gabrielites, etc etc etc, so if you are a prog fan, very rarely buy Invisible Touch, blame Collins and still love the early albums.
The same happens with Yes, old progheads blame Rabin and forget 90125 or Big Generator existed and love the rest.
But almost every Prog fan (old enough) I know, bought Love Beach, and they didn't had an excuse for this they were the exact Emerson, Lake and Palmer,......... So who can you blame?,
Yes, they were tired, they had to honor some contracts, etc, but the fans were not guilty of this and we paid the bill because they were agry with Atlantic.
So the bad albums pull down the good ones.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 20:46
Love beach aint THAT bad , how can we people that listen to a record several times be fooled just by an album cover? I think it doesn't deserve the low rating it gets.
But ELP is like that , they took it to the extreme and were among the most challenging acts for the listener. But what I'll never get is why they are labeled as too pretentious , as if it were a sin within our music genre.
|
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 21:11
I'm one of those odd people in the middle ground regarding ELP as well. I don't dislike them, and I like Tarkus and parts of Brain Salad Surgery, but overall I'd have to give them the 3-star rating, "Good, but non-essential." Of course, that's just my opinion. One of the many, many things I love about prog is that so many people enjoy so many different styles of it, and that there's something to suit everyone. The fact that some of the classic albums catch the attention and love of a lot of people on here more than others doesn't bother me, and from the first time I visited this sacred website I realized the top 100 as what they are; a good representation of various bands which various people like to varying degrees and which may or may not be good starting points into prog, and which I may or may not like. It's just a matter of opinion.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 21:13
^completely agree! Love Beach is a OK pop album, just like Big Generator, Abacab and Genesis.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 21:29
cacho wrote:
^completely agree! Love Beach is a OK pop album, just like Big Generator, Abacab and Genesis. |
I disagree, Canario is good Prog, the best song in the album and Memoirs of an Officer and a gentleman is also Prog, not good but Prog.
There are a couple of bland Lake ballads, but overall is a prog album IMHO.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 22:12
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
cacho wrote:
^completely agree! Love Beach is a OK pop album, just like Big Generator, Abacab and Genesis. |
I disagree, Canario is good Prog, the best song in the album and Memoirs of an Officer and a gentleman is also Prog, not good but Prog.
There are a couple of bland Lake ballads, but overall is a prog album IMHO.
Iván
|
Then Abacab is also, having the title track and Dodo/Lurker, while not being full-blown Prog tracks, and by no means in the heights of their 70's stuff, it's Prog. Though of course, knowing very well your opinion on 80's Genesis, you disagree with me.
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 22:17
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 22:21
sleeper wrote:
I strongly disagree with BSS being a must have manly because I had it, listened to it about a dozen times over several months and got rid of it because I really dont like it, and if the majority dont like it then it really cant be a must have, cant it? (I dont think thats true, its probably more like half and half.)
I agree with you on the Santana bit, ELP do deserve at least one album in the top 100, but those that are saying "shame on you" for not rating their albums highly enough to get into the top 10 need to grow up.
|
A couple of months?? You gave it a lot of time, huh!!  I've listened to it atleast once a week for the last 30 some years... and I love it., so I guess you have some catching up to do.
I agree with the guy that said that ELP deserves 4 albums in the top 10. And I don't think I need to grow up to say that. Evidently since I was around to see ELP live in the mid-70s, means I'm evidently quite grown up already. It just seems to me that quite a lot of the reviewers here are young... and weren't around in the 70s when prog was... "really prog"... and your reviews of today's watered down prog... or whatever you're calling it these days... shouldn't be the meter for rating top prog records.
It doesn't really matter however, because most people in the prog industry and those of us olders who put together the prog festivals these days, know that there are some actual real up and coming prog bands out there, and we can ever so often get to see the prog masters from the past. I have tickets to 3 or 4 of Keith Emerson's upcoming shows.
So if you really want to experience prog... head to Nearfest, Rosfest... or even that 3 Rivers prog festival this year.
BTW... the Santana thing is just a shame!
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 01 2009 at 22:30
It is all an opinion. No album "deserves" to be the top. Same as all albums "deserve" it. It is too much an opinion.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 00:08
threefates wrote:
I've listened to it atleast once a week for the last 30 some years... and I love it., so I guess you have some catching up to do.
|
Seriously? While I question that ELP's music is so esoteric that it requires years of listening, I am genuinely baffled that someone could listen to any music that many times.
I think it's fair to say that if you don't like it after a dozen listens, you're probably not ever going to like it, unless you revisit it years later and your tastes have changed significantly in the interim. Why do you disagree? I would have almost any album almost completely memorized by that many listens.
threefates wrote:
It just seems to me that quite a lot of the reviewers here are young... and weren't around in the 70s when prog was... "really prog"... and your reviews of today's watered down prog... or whatever you're calling it these days... shouldn't be the meter for rating top prog records.
|
What is the difference between "really prog" and "watered down prog", and why is the distinction important?
SgtPepper67 wrote:
I think there's a lot of people in the forum who aren't really that much into the classic prog bands and more into metal/tech/math/whatever it is called wich I don't like at all, and it's ok, but that would explain my disagreement with many opinions and reviews on the site.
|
That is true, a lot of us have been listening to prog long enough that we've more or less moved on from classic prog--you can only listen to those albums so many times, you know.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 09:28
threefates wrote:
A couple of months?? You gave it a lot of time, huh!!  I've listened to it atleast once a week for the last 30 some years... and I love it., so I guess you have some catching up to do.
Hi Threefatess, glad to see you again here.
I agree with you in part, I understand Sleeper doesn't like BSS (even when i love it), but the "I don't like it so it's not transcendental" argument, is a bit arrogant, our personal tastes are not a good reference to say if an album is a must or not
I don't like Lark's Tongues in Aspic at all (Heard it at least countless times), but to use my taste as a parameter to say is an album is trancendental or not, is absurd, the album is horrendous FOR ME, but I can't deny that the touch of a genius is there.
I hate it, but Lark's is a must have for any person who wants to have a good collection, the same goes for Trilogy and Brain Salad Surgery.
BTW: Sleeper, bnever get riod of your classic albums, you may regret it some day, that's a thing I never do, I even have the copy of Invisible Touch a girlfriend gave me as a present, and I hate iot with all my guts.
I agree with the guy that said that ELP deserves 4 albums in the top 10. And I don't think I need to grow up to say that. Evidently since I was around to see ELP live in the mid-70s, means I'm evidently quite grown up already. It just seems to me that quite a lot of the reviewers here are young... and weren't around in the 70s when prog was... "really prog"... and your reviews of today's watered down prog... or whatever you're calling it these days... shouldn't be the meter for rating top prog records.
Honestly I don't believe 4 albums for the top 100, but I do believe Trilogy and BSS deserve a spot, even when I rated Pictures with 5 stars, i did it because the merit of that album is that they dared to play pictures COMPLETE in front of a group of kids who probably never heard Mussorgsky before, and have success, that's having balls.
But Trillogy and BSS IMO deserve a spot.
Cheers again 3fates
Iván
|
-------------
|
Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 10:17
Ah, the band people love to hate. Any of the four core albums (ELP, Tarkus, Trilogy, BSS) would be worthy of inclusion in the top 100. Unfortunately, none are great albums. There are great songs on all, but there always seems to be a throwaway cut or two. These 'throwaways' generally represent ELP's attempt to show us they are just another band, capable of humor, etc. When they stuck to their strong points -- making incredibly complex, challenging music, there was no better band. I've said it before, Emerson was the Hendrix of the Hammond organ, coaxing sounds out of the instrument that were unheard of at the time. For that alone they should be recognized, but what will be will be.
------------- Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 18:58
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
^ Ayreon too! |
I just quoted this bit to compare ELP with Ayreon and their respective ratings. I have always wondered why BSS is sometimes given 1 or 2 stars when has:
One of the genre defining moments of prog ( Karn Evil 9)
An incredible exprimental track ( Tocatta)
A powerful opener ( Jerusalem)
An OK ballad
The " Throwaway track"
How can 4 " bad" minutes of music spare 40 of sheer brillance I just don't know!!
Comparing with Ayreon , I won't go saying that " The Human Equation" is a mediocre record just because the only feature I did not like in more than 90 minutes of music : the "operatic" vocals of some singer I don't know his name. Do you know who he is???
The album is great , not perfect but very enjoyable ( athough I like Ayreon's debut more)
Probably some people just listened to the album a few times and gave up on it , if I did that I would have given " Awake" 2 stars Opeth's " Still life" 1 star as well as SFAM , but the point is I didn't , you can see my reviews if you feel like it.
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 19:10
Karn Evil 9 is an amazing tune.
-------------
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 19:50
Tarkus is brilliant. The rest is difficult to bear with ELP.
And their cd's are too full of filler... And BSS is an extremely uneven record....
No... ELP may be incredibly important but, besides Tarkus, never achieved real magnificence in my opinion. The don't hold a candle to Genesis or even Yes.
-------------
|
Posted By: SgtPepper67
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 20:44
I enjoy all their "throwaway tracks", they may not be as impressive as the rest of the stuff but in my opinion doesn't prevent those albums of being great. How is Brain Salad Surgery an uneven album just because it has Benny the bouncer wich I think it's no more than 3 or 4 minutes of the album?
-------------
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 02 2009 at 20:56
^BSS is an uneven record because it's MY opinion... of course I understand is perfect for others... For me, it's actually full of filler... "jerusalem" is nothing great... Toccata is acceptable version... The pother two just boring... and Karn Evil 9 is interesting but not masterpiece-status like Tarkus... again, IMO. IMO.
-------------
|
Posted By: UMUR
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 01:50
I´ve owned ELP´s discography since I first started listening to prog rock along with Genesis, Yes, King Crimson and so forth. But ELP never did much for me. They simply seem to lack emotional impact and Lake is a mediocre vocalist IMO ( and that might be stretching it). I understand why others feel that they are excellent and they certainly had a groundbreaking sound. That don´t mean that I enjoy it much though.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 09:12
Even though I can't agre that lake is a mediocre vocalist (I believe he has an outstanding voice), I do agree with the lack of emotional impact.
ELP always feklt a bit coldd, too technicall for my taste, despite this fact, I still believe BSS and trilogy are top 20 albums.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Lucent
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 09:43
They don't deserve a top 100 spot. Brain Salad Surgery had only one semi-decent song (Karn Evil 9), as the rest of their albums are overdone and pompous.
It's like they're the Dream Theater before Dream Theater, except Dream Theater actually released two good albums (Bless Kevin Moore)
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 10:24
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Even though I can't agre that lake is a mediocre vocalist (I believe he has an outstanding voice), I do agree with the lack of emotional impact.
ELP always feklt a bit coldd, too technicall for my taste, despite this fact, I still believe BSS and trilogy are top 20 albums.
Iván |
I think "Pirates" is way too emotional. But where I find emotion , others may find cheese.
By the way , Ivan I have read you review of Factor Burzaco and I really want to hear the record. The point is , although this is an Argentinean band , the album is almost impossible to find. Could you tell me where you got it??
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 11:16
I am a big fan of the song Black Moon.
-------------
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 15:53
threefates wrote:
sleeper wrote:
I strongly disagree with BSS being a must have manly because I had it, listened to it about a dozen times over several months and got rid of it because I really dont like it, and if the majority dont like it then it really cant be a must have, cant it? (I dont think thats true, its probably more like half and half.)
I agree with you on the Santana bit, ELP do deserve at least one album in the top 100, but those that are saying "shame on you" for not rating their albums highly enough to get into the top 10 need to grow up.
|
A couple of months?? You gave it a lot of time, huh!!  I've listened to it atleast once a week for the last 30 some years... and I love it., so I guess you have some catching up to do.
I agree with the guy that said that ELP deserves 4 albums in the top 10. And I don't think I need to grow up to say that. Evidently since I was around to see ELP live in the mid-70s, means I'm evidently quite grown up already. It just seems to me that quite a lot of the reviewers here are young... and weren't around in the 70s when prog was... "really prog"... and your reviews of today's watered down prog... or whatever you're calling it these days... shouldn't be the meter for rating top prog records.
It doesn't really matter however, because most people in the prog industry and those of us olders who put together the prog festivals these days, know that there are some actual real up and coming prog bands out there, and we can ever so often get to see the prog masters from the past. I have tickets to 3 or 4 of Keith Emerson's upcoming shows.
So if you really want to experience prog... head to Nearfest, Rosfest... or even that 3 Rivers prog festival this year.
BTW... the Santana thing is just a shame! |
I can form a decent jusgement of an album after a few listens, though of course discovering the detail work where the genious of many bands comes through takes many more listens. If its going to take 30 years of listening to an album once a week to come to love it then I dont think its going to be worth the effort to be honest, its sounds too much like hard work rather than listening enjoyment.
Does being born in the mid-eighties mean I'm not capable of deciding whats good or not for myself? If thats the case then I think we've just found proof that wisdom most certainly doesnt come with age. If you think that ELP deserve 4 albums in the all time top 10 of prog then fine, thats your choice and your free to make it, but if you think the rest of us need to follow suit then yes, you really do need to grow up.
There are some rally talented bands out there, your right, and they cover a massive span of styles and genres to the point that I think the 2000's have been the best decade for prog since the 70's.
I'd kill to get a chance to go to NEARfest, Rosfest or 3Rivers Prog, but being a student on the other side of the atlantic makes that impossible, instead I'll have to make do with Summers End where Huw and Steve are doing an amazing job of putting on the UK's only prog rock festivel, but the chances of them securing the likes of Le Orme, Banco, PFM, Magma, Echolyn and the majority of the bands that turn up in the states is non existent.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 16:03
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Hi Threefatess, glad to see you again here.
I agree with you in part, I understand Sleeper doesn't like BSS (even when i love it), but the "I don't like it so it's not transcendental" argument, is a bit arrogant, our personal tastes are not a good reference to say if an album is a must or not Personal tastes are the only refference that any of us really have to decide what is a must have album, though historical importance is a big decider on what should be at least heard IMO.
I don't like Lark's Tongues in Aspic at all (Heard it at least countless times), but to use my taste as a parameter to say is an album is trancendental or not, is absurd, the album is horrendous FOR ME, but I can't deny that the touch of a genius is there.
I hate it, but Lark's is a must have for any person who wants to have a good collection, the same goes for Trilogy and Brain Salad Surgery. This one definitely comes down to personal preferance, as things stand the total lack of ELP on my shelves certainly dosent hurt it.
BTW: Sleeper, bnever get riod of your classic albums, you may regret it some day, that's a thing I never do, I even have the copy of Invisible Touch a girlfriend gave me as a present, and I hate iot with all my guts. I still have it to some degree, stored as an MP3 on my external hard drive so that if I ever feel the need to listen to it again, maybe to see if my opinions on it have changed, I can and then buy the album on CD.
I used to have Peter Gabriels Secret World Live album on my old computer (borrowed from a friend) but the hard drive crashed, loosing that album was a big regret for me so I keep all music I get backed up on a hard drive, whether I like it or not, just in case....
Honestly I don't believe 4 albums for the top 100, but I do believe Trilogy and BSS deserve a spot, even when I rated Pictures with 5 stars, i did it because the merit of that album is that they dared to play pictures COMPLETE in front of a group of kids who probably never heard Mussorgsky before, and have success, that's having balls.
But Trillogy and BSS IMO deserve a spot.
Cheers again 3fates
Iván
Agree with them deserving a spot in the top 100, there too important not to.
|
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: The Hemulen
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 16:29
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
[ they dared to play pictures COMPLETE in front of a group of kids who probably never heard Mussorgsky before |
Sorry to be pedantic but this statement isn't true at all. ELP's "Pictures at an Exhibition" bypasses several movements of Mussorgsky's original suite (including several of my favourites - such as Bydlo, Ballet of the Unhatched Chicks, Market of Limoges, Catacombs etc. etc.) That's hardly a complete rendition, is it?
|
Posted By: inrainbows
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 17:43
BSS surely deserves a place in top 100 albums, but the voting is free and everyone put his favs which means that they just consider another 100 albums better than BSS. So what's the point if BSS does't reach top 100? It still deserves it
-------------
|
Posted By: SgtPepper67
Date Posted: May 03 2009 at 18:01
I disagree about Lake being a mediocre singer, he has an amazing voice, plus I think he was the one who add the emotional impact to their music, although like crimson 87 said, many people find his contribution to the band too cheesy.
-------------
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 08:49
sleeper wrote:
I can form a decent jusgement of an album after a few listens, though of course discovering the detail work where the genious of many bands comes through takes many more listens. If its going to take 30 years of listening to an album once a week to come to love it then I dont think its going to be worth the effort to be honest, its sounds too much like hard work rather than listening enjoyment. |
 Now who needs to grow up? I didn't listen to BSS for 30 years to learn to love it... I listened because I loved it from the first moment I heard it. If listening to any music is hard work for you, then maybe you just don't have an understanding of it.
sleeper wrote:
Does being born in the mid-eighties mean I'm not capable of deciding whats good or not for myself? If thats the case then I think we've just found proof that wisdom most certainly doesnt come with age. If you think that ELP deserve 4 albums in the all time top 10 of prog then fine, thats your choice and your free to make it, but if you think the rest of us need to follow suit then yes, you really do need to grow up.
|
I'm sure even tho you were only born in the mid-eighties, you're probably capable of deciding whats good for you. However, your baseline... what you've been raised on... your radio at the time... gives you a whole different starting point. And what you consider to be progressive music... is not really progressive music at all. So even though you are capable of deciding your own music, your starting point is most likely flawed. 
sleeper wrote:
There are some rally talented bands out there, your right, and they cover a massive span of styles and genres to the point that I think the 2000's have been the best decade for prog since the 70's. |
This is what I mean. Your idea of progressive music is flawed. There's not that many talented prog bands out there right now. I just came back from a weekend of current and past prog... Rosfest. The best band of the weekend was the 70s band "Barclay James Harvest". Wow... I can't believe someone who looks like my grandfather could play a guitar like that... incredible. And they sounded just as fresh as they did in the 70s. What a great show!!
However, there were a few new bands that were great there... but not all of them were really prog. I loved the band Frost. Their keyboardist, Jem Godfrey, is a very talented techie keyboardist.. and they are a lot of fun to watch. Another band you'd probably love is from France - Lazuli. Great band, even if they all look like they came from a sci-fi movie and its really not prog... but hey I bought their cd. Also all the Yesfans seemed to like the Swedish band, Moon Safari. They were ok, but they basically put me to sleep.
sleeper wrote:
I'd kill to get a chance to go to NEARfest, Rosfest or 3Rivers Prog, but being a student on the other side of the atlantic makes that impossible, instead I'll have to make do with Summers End where Huw and Steve are doing an amazing job of putting on the UK's only prog rock festivel, but the chances of them securing the likes of Le Orme, Banco, PFM, Magma, Echolyn and the majority of the bands that turn up in the states is non existent.
|
Thats too bad. Nearfest has VDGG, Gong, Steve Hillage Band, and PFM this year. Maybe I'll even find a new band I like. I've heard a bit of Beardfish, but I generally like bands more after i see them live. I think its funny that Nearfest lists their style as Symph/Zappa. I didn't realize that Zappa had his own style! My favorite Nearfest after 10 years was 2006... with the Keith Emerson Band. Tarkus still rocks!!!
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 09:15
Henry Plainview wrote:
Seriously? While I question that ELP's music is so esoteric that it requires years of listening, I am genuinely baffled that someone could listen to any music that many times. |
So how old are you? 
Why would that baffle you? When you're a musicolic, as you age, music tends to weave the fabric of your life. Its your internal soundtrack. I still listen to mostly 70s music because to me, it grounds me and reminds me where I came from. Its a part of me. May sound cheesey, but so true.
I will listen to current stuff when I feel the need to grow. But it, in no way, will ever replace whats come before. And I don't feel the need to call it prog either. 
Henry Plainview wrote:
I think it's fair to say that if you don't like it after a dozen listens, you're probably not ever going to like it, unless you revisit it years later and your tastes have changed significantly in the interim. Why do you disagree? I would have almost any album almost completely memorized by that many listens.
|
I have most albums I like memorized after 10 or so plays. But I don't toss it away afterwards. Not even stuff thats not my favorite. Actually I don't even toss things I don't like. It may grow on me later. Sort of like Gentle Giant. I wasn't fond of them in the 70s, but I so appreciate them now. Thank God, I didn't toss those vinyls...
Henry Plainview wrote:
What is the difference between "really prog" and "watered down prog", and why is the distinction important? |
To give a bible analogy (sorry, Tony  )... supposedly all humans are children of Adam and Eve. But after many generations, most of us are no longer middle eastern, jewish, hebrew, etc.... Just because new music might have been influenced by prog of the past... does not make them related. I just find it useless to keep labeling music progressive... just because you'd like to see it mentioned on this website.
Henry Plainview wrote:
That is true, a lot of us have been listening to prog long enough that we've more or less moved on from classic prog--you can only listen to those albums so many times, you know. |
Evidently not!
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 09:26
Oh.. and hello Ivan! 
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: cesar polo
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 16:15
Wanorak wrote:
I totally agree:) Brain Salad Surgery was way ahead of it's time and deserves to be in the top 10; nevermind Tarkus, ELP and Trilogy. Enough of the prog-metal already and give ELP their due!!! |
I completely agree
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 16:19
4/5/2009
ELP IS IN THE TOP 100.
REAL PROG HAS WON 
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 19:46
crimson87 wrote:
4/5/2009
ELP IS IN THE TOP 100.
REAL PROG HAS WON  |
AMEN!
-------------
|
Posted By: mr.cub
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 19:50
Hmm...I gave that album a five star rating last week...
Now....let the campaign for ELP in the Top 10 begin. I'm sure the PAC's and 527 groups are already lined out through the doors at PA headquarters
-------------
|
Posted By: StyLaZyn
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 19:54
mr.cub wrote:
I gave that album a five star rating last week...
Now let the campaign for ELP in the Top 10 begin |
Let's not go over-board. 
But then again, they have written material that is quintessential classic Prog rock, as in must have for any Prog connoisseur.
-------------
|
Posted By: mr.cub
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 20:01
StyLaZyn wrote:
mr.cub wrote:
I gave that album a five star rating last week...
Now let the campaign for ELP in the Top 10 begin |
Let's not go over-board. 
But then again, they have written material that is quintessential classic Prog rock, as in must have for any Prog connoisseur. |
I would agree totally. The rankings themselves don't bother me all too much since the majority of four star albums are all worthy of recognition. But its good to see ELP getting some recognition
-------------
|
Posted By: Alitare
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 20:15
Now, to campaign for ELP to be taken out of the site entirely. Call it diplomatic management. I mean, ELP fans are very cocky and bloated to begin with, what do you think will happen when these whack jobs get ELP in the top 10? You people can't possibly allow such to happen. The White House would be burned to the ground by Tarkus T-shirt wearing rebels! They'd change the bill of rights. "All men are created equally inferior to Greg Lake" The economy would crash even more, and the sun would explode.
Let us rise up to strike down this plague! Rally the troops, and build a BSS bonfire! Down with ELP!
|
Posted By: Losendos
Date Posted: May 04 2009 at 20:51
I've always been ambivalent about ELP. I wouldn't have any problems with ELP , Tarkus , Trology or BSS being in the top 100 . They were great pioneers and their contribution should not be ignored . But at the same time I was badly hurt when prog was taken out of the airwaves in the late 70s and ELP were one of the bands largely responsible for the perception of prog bands having their heads up their asses .It took Mike Oldfield , Alan Parsons and Genesis to try and rebuild the image
------------- How wonderful to be so profound
|
Posted By: 88melter
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 08:25
Were these the choices of readers, or some staffers? Brain Salad Surgery, or the 1st self-titled ELP, or Tarkus might make worthy candidates. But exclusion from that list does not make sense, unless the people who made the choices are under 30 years of age.
88melter, who is over 30...
------------- 88melter
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 09:49
Trouserpress wrote:
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
[ they dared to play pictures COMPLETE in front of a group of kids who probably never heard Mussorgsky before |
Sorry to be pedantic but this statement isn't true at all. ELP's "Pictures at an Exhibition" bypasses several movements of Mussorgsky's original suite (including several of my favourites - such as Bydlo, Ballet of the Unhatched Chicks, Market of Limoges, Catacombs etc. etc.) That's hardly a complete rendition, is it? |
Yes I know that, if you read the poll about classical music tastes, i'm crazy about the Russian nationalist Movement since I'm 15, and very familiar with Mussorgsky, Cui, Borodin, Rimsky Korsakov and Balakirev mainly.
I referred to ELP's whole and complete version of Pictures at an Exhibition, not Mussorgsky's.
Cheers
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 10:15
BTW: I'm a fan of BSS but mainly Trilogy, I believe they are top 20 more than just top 100, biut I don't like to see that a band has entered to the charts due to a thread complaining, it may look as manipulation, I would like to see not only how ELP 1970 has evolved, but also how the closest competitors have in the last few days, in order to avoid manipulation.
It's very silly to be so worried about a bloody chart that means nothing, and even childish to manipulate ratings, hope it hasn't hapened,
I would love Trilogy if it's in place 1 or place 500, I don't give a damn about charts.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 10:16
Having played Pictures at an Exhibition in a concert band an exhausting number of times, ELP's version is pretty pale.
It was ambitious though. No one ever said ELP weren't ambitious.
------------- You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 10:20
crimson87 wrote:
4/5/2009
BUBU IS OUT OF THE TOP 100.
REAL PROG HAS LOST  |
Fixed.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 10:55
Losendos wrote:
I've always been ambivalent about ELP. I wouldn't have any problems with ELP , Tarkus , Trology or BSS being in the top 100 . They were great pioneers and their contribution should not be ignored . But at the same time I was badly hurt when prog was taken out of the airwaves in the late 70s and ELP were one of the bands largely responsible for the perception of prog bands having their heads up their asses .It took Mike Oldfield , Alan Parsons and Genesis to try and rebuild the image |
Genesis rebuild the image of Prog after the late 70's?
Not even a hardcore fan like me would buy this.
After the 70's Genesis not only diidn't rebuilt Propg but played anything except Prog, while a member kept giving interviews about what kind of crap Progressive Rock was......80's Genesis was one of the bands who tried to destroy Prog.
Alan Parsons reached their peak in the debut IMO, still two excellent albums until 1978, but EVE, is one of the worst albums ever released, if it wasn't for ·"Damned if I Do", the album would be worth 0 stars.the rest of the albums were anything but Prog, good production, clear sound, some good, others bad, but not Prog
Mike Oldfield also reached his peak with his debut in 1971 with Tubular Bells, other good albums like Omadawn, but if you say ELP had their heads in their vbutts, what would you think of Amarok (1990) an album with one 60 minutes track and like 5 versions of Tubular bells to try to keep audience?
- Orchestal Tubular Bells (75)
- Tubular Bels II (1992)
- Tubular Bells III (1998)
- The Milleniumk Bell (1999)
- The Best of Tubular Bells (2001)
- Tubular Bells 2003
- The Complete Tubular Bells (2003)
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!
I like the muusic of the second two, but none of them rebuilt the image of Prog.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 15:26
I have been listening to ELP alot lately, and I do agree that they should be at least top 100. One of the major turn offs is there sense of humor, it's like Pink Floyd playing Arnold Layne half way through Echoes.
|
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 05 2009 at 18:24
threefates wrote:
 Now who needs to grow up? I didn't listen to BSS for 30 years to learn to love it... I listened because I loved it from the first moment I heard it. If listening to any music is hard work for you, then maybe you just don't have an understanding of it. |
Oh, the "you dont like it so you dont understand it" rubbish. I understand it perfectly, still doesnt mean I like it though.
I'm sure even tho you were only born in the mid-eighties, you're probably capable of deciding whats good for you. However, your baseline... what you've been raised on... your radio at the time... gives you a whole different starting point. And what you consider to be progressive music... is not really progressive music at all. So even though you are capable of deciding your own music, your starting point is most likely flawed.  |
I dont think there's ever been a period in my life where the radio has ever figured in my musical education. Except for a period of about a year and half where I listeneed to a fair bit of indie (along with Genesis and Floyd) Prog has always been the backbone of my listening experience. Arrogant today arent we?
This is what I mean. Your idea of progressive music is flawed. There's not that many talented prog bands out there right now. I just came back from a weekend of current and past prog... Rosfest. The best band of the weekend was the 70s band "Barclay James Harvest". Wow... I can't believe someone who looks like my grandfather could play a guitar like that... incredible. And they sounded just as fresh as they did in the 70s. What a great show!!
However, there were a few new bands that were great there... but not all of them were really prog. I loved the band Frost. Their keyboardist, Jem Godfrey, is a very talented techie keyboardist.. and they are a lot of fun to watch. Another band you'd probably love is from France - Lazuli. Great band, even if they all look like they came from a sci-fi movie and its really not prog... but hey I bought their cd. Also all the Yesfans seemed to like the Swedish band, Moon Safari. They were ok, but they basically put me to sleep.
|
I'd say it was your idea of prog that was flawed and outmoded, but since you've remained rather coy on why the modern bands are "watered down prog" I cant really start to pick holes in it yet. Oh, and your completely and utterly wrong about the lack of good prog bands around today. I've seen Frost*, there an OK band but nothing special, just following the old conventions of Yes and co. I probably would love Lazuli, the descriptions I've read make me quite interested but I've yet to find one of their albums for a reasonable price. Moon Safari are another band I need to check out, but their albums are very difficult to find.
Thats too bad. Nearfest has VDGG, Gong, Steve Hillage Band, and PFM this year. Maybe I'll even find a new band I like. I've heard a bit of Beardfish, but I generally like bands more after i see them live. I think its funny that Nearfest lists their style as Symph/Zappa. I didn't realize that Zappa had his own style! My favorite Nearfest after 10 years was 2006... with the Keith Emerson Band. Tarkus still rocks!!! |
Sounds like a good line up. Beardfish bored me silly on CD, though are a fair bit better on stage. The Zappa comment must be because they try to put a fair buit of humour into their music, and cringeworthy attempts they are IMO. WTF happened to the page?  ------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: May 06 2009 at 07:45
Negoba wrote:
Having played Pictures at an Exhibition in a concert band an exhausting number of times, ELP's version is pretty pale.
It was ambitious though. No one ever said ELP weren't ambitious. |
Being in a concert band in my early years... I doubt this is true. And since I'm pretty sure you didn't have a singer.. much less one with Greg's voice... I'm pretty sure thats not true. I'm also sure that your version didn't include "The Sage"... which is just so lovely... Of course, this is just MY opinion. 
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
|