Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - most unwanted popgroups/artists on PA
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedmost unwanted popgroups/artists on PA
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Poll Question: which commercial bands would we like to disappear from the site ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
1 [0.41%]
12 [4.90%]
48 [19.59%]
8 [3.27%]
2 [0.82%]
19 [7.76%]
1 [0.41%]
23 [9.39%]
3 [1.22%]
2 [0.82%]
1 [0.41%]
5 [2.04%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
14 [5.71%]
0 [0.00%]
25 [10.20%]
55 [22.45%]
2 [0.82%]
1 [0.41%]
3 [1.22%]
2 [0.82%]
2 [0.82%]
3 [1.22%]
13 [5.31%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 06:23
See I wouldn't think of stirring up angst by constructing such a poll for starters many of those artists on this list deserve to be here on the site I think but my vote goes to ...  was a toss up between bowie and the doors and I went with Bowie  , though he's a class act the reasons I enjoy his material isn't prog related at all.  

How Mike Oldfield ended up on the list is a mystery to me ???  you are aware he really moved the  prog spirit forward back in his day ? Like a launching pad for those who never heard anything like it to explore deeper and start to develop that prog way of thinking.    


Edited by Yorkie X - August 11 2008 at 06:36
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24803 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 06:11

I agree with you that the prog content of most of the acts you mentioned is a matter of debate, but some of them have found their right place here because of their influence on prog bands (Beatles) or because their music can properly be called prog (Procol Harum, Mike Oldfield), despite their commercial success.

Anyway, I think it's an error to define a band as prog because of their (lack of) commercial success.

One can choose between a strictly dogmatic point of view on prog (in this case some of these bands may be discarded from PA) or go really out of bounds (in case we may welcome the Spice Girls, the Sugarhill Gang or some more trash metal bands which have noting to do with prog sooner or later).

I withhold my vote...

 
Back to Top
russellk View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 782 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 06:10
How can the appearance of a band you don't think is prog possibly mar your experience of the site?

Why is commercial success considered any sort of yardstick as to a band's progressiveness - apart from snobbish reasons?

Really, just really, how about we stop worrying about territory and start enjoying ourselves?

I don't have the slightest problem with a any of the bands I've heard on this site. Give me more! I want more!
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 06:02
Hold on, just because these bands aren't full-blown prog bands doesn't mean they aren't at least partially prog. I mean look In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida By Iron Butterfly, Abbey Road By The Beatles, Tommy By The Who. Those are all pretty much full-blown prog albums. And Also without albums like Sgt. Pepper or The Doors, we probably wouldn't have prog. So just because they're not prog, doesn't mean they didn't create prog for future artists (although, I'm with on Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden). 

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 06:01
Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

You forgot Nightwish.
Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 05:59

delete



Edited by erik neuteboom - August 11 2008 at 06:12
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 05:20
You forgot Nightwish.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Kotro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 16 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 05:15

Commercial or not, the fact is most of those bands (if not all - well, maybe not Radiohead) have produced great music (better that A LOT of full-blown prog bands), and did so before even thinking about making a few bucks - and while I agree that not all of them show elements of prog, I would classify a lot of them as Art-Rock. For the others, well, I guess that's why I have Prog-Related and Proto-Prog.



Edited by Kotro - August 11 2008 at 06:12
Bigger on the inside.
Back to Top
progrules View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 14 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 958 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2008 at 04:20
Ever since I visit this website the only real flaw I can think of is the presence of a lot of (more or less) commercial bands and artists. Above you find 25 of them, I probably forgot quite some of them but I think these are the most significant ones.
Problem I have with them is the fact they are (or at least have been) commercial during a part of their carreer and their progressive grade is debatable. As most of us know one of the features of progressive music is that the bands/artists don't really care for commercial success, they just want to produce great music, a fact we all thank them for, don't we ?
I know Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd also have been/are commercial but these great bands are so significant for progressive music that these are a different story.
I have to admit I have done some reviews of abovementioned bands but my statement doesn't mean I hate all the bands in this poll, I am even a fan of a few. But still it's my opinion they shouldn't be here.
 
Anyway my believe is that many of the above mentioned bands could be removed if I had to say anything about it. But I am curious if I'm the only one who feels like this and maybe it proves to be so that most of us really like their presence on Progarchives. In that case, please do response in a comment !!
If you don't want them around you can vote for as many bands if you like, even for all 25!
So, I'd say: have a go and give your opinion !
A day without prog is a wasted day
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.