Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2066
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 23:07 |
Remember when the batteries died? And they had some extra ones in the boat? But they were dead too? And the professor said "Sometimes batteries die even if you never used them?" So he made a battery out of a potato, I think?
That was awesome.
|
 |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65808
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 22:24 |
^ sweet; that thing was one of the most important characters in the show
|
 |
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2066
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 22:06 |
 I had the same radio as Gilligan. I was really proud of that.
|
 |
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7887
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 13:45 |
The.Crimson.King wrote:
Gerinski wrote:
And for the musicians themselves, maintaining a Mellotron in smooth working order required more dedication that a sick pet puppy, often a dedicated guy for the big bands which could afford it.
|
When King Crimson played San Francisco in '74 they had to limp through with only one of the two trons working. <span style="line-height: 1.2;">An aside...a friend was at the show and also on the bill was 10 Years After. While Crimso was on this girl behind him kept asking her boyfriend, "Is that Alvin Lee?" </span>  Anyway, remember how often your cassette or 8 track tape would get stuck in the rollers and spit out in a creased and folded mess? Multiply that by 35 more tapes and you have the nightmare that was the Mellotron...'course when it worked it was as if angels had descended to earth  |
I imagine it would be pretty hard to fix a busted tron. I wouldn't know where to begin.
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
 |
The.Crimson.King
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2013
Location: WA
Status: Offline
Points: 4596
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 13:11 |
Gerinski wrote:
And for the musicians themselves, maintaining a Mellotron in smooth working order required more dedication that a sick pet puppy, often a dedicated guy for the big bands which could afford it.
|
When King Crimson played San Francisco in '74 they had to limp through with only one of the two trons working. An aside...a friend was at the show and also on the bill was 10 Years After. While Crimso was on this girl behind him kept asking her boyfriend, "Is that Alvin Lee?" 
Anyway, remember how often your cassette or 8 track tape would get stuck in the rollers and spit out in a creased and folded mess? Multiply that by 35 more tapes and you have the nightmare that was the Mellotron...'course when it worked it was as if angels had descended to earth 
|
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 11:52 |
Dean wrote:
and to the radio on one of these:
Nostalgia is seeing the world through rose-tinted spectacles. |
I had an AM/FM mono portable radio kind of like that in the early '70's. That one looks like someone threw mud ad the speaker.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
silverpot
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 19 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 841
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 11:47 |
Dean wrote:
tamijo wrote:
Not to mention that the price of an album was very high campared to the wages of especialy younger people.
Making a collection of just 100 albums, was almost impossible for young people, most of had 30-50 albums to chose between.
The price was almost the same as today, but the wages was very low. |
Absolutely. The price of music has remained pretty much constant since the late 80s. I remember not buying Tales From Topographic Oceans when it was released simply because I could not afford it. Wages were such that if I behaved myself and was very careful with my budget I could just about manage to buy an album every two weeks. Of course that makes the 300+ albums I did buy between 1971 and 1980 all the more special. |
Yes it was a big deal to buy an LP then. You'd have to save up to be able to. On the other hand, there wasn't much else to spend money on, only books. It was always a dilemma, what do I want the most, a book or a record. Today there are so many expensive distractions from what's important in life. Can't believe how much money young people spend on clothes for instance, just because they want a certain brand.
|
 |
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5160
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 09:43 |
Dean wrote:
In the 60s most people listen to music on one of these:
and to the radio on one of these:
In the 1970s the "music centre" was the most common form of "hifi":
Nostalgia is seeing the world through rose-tinted spectacles. |
Let alone needing to have always ready your 'survival kit' with reserve stylus, stylus cleaning brush, disc cleaning / anti-static liquid and cloth, phillips screwdriver, scissors and cello tape for fixing the jammed cassette tapes... (which would result in a cut in the music which you reluctantly accepted), and the always lingering doubt whether it was better to keep the LPs in paper or plastic inner covers, and whatever was your opinion, your getting pissed off when you bought a new LP and it was protected by the sort of cover you thought was not the right one
And for the musicians themselves, maintaining a Mellotron in smooth working order required more dedication that a sick pet puppy, often a dedicated guy for the big bands which could afford it.
Edited by Gerinski - July 19 2013 at 09:45
|
 |
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2066
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 08:21 |
^ So true! The elation I felt when I made a good choice was matched only by the disappointment I felt when I made a bad one. Buying albums was a big deal back then. I remember waiting years (or so it seemed) to buy Living in the Past because it was a double album and cost 30% more than a single album. But when I did I was so thrilled with the music and the 12"x12" book of photos it ended up being the best $12.00 (or whatever it was) I ever spent. Compare that to the disappointment when I bought A, or Asia, or Duke, or Love Beach... of course it was the '80's by then and it happened a lot.
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 07:58 |
tamijo wrote:
Not to mention that the price of an album was very high campared to the wages of especialy younger people.
Making a collection of just 100 albums, was almost impossible for young people, most of had 30-50 albums to chose between.
The price was almost the same as today, but the wages was very low. |
Absolutely. The price of music has remained pretty much constant since the late 80s. I remember not buying Tales From Topographic Oceans when it was released simply because I could not afford it. Wages were such that if I behaved myself and was very careful with my budget I could just about manage to buy an album every two weeks. Of course that makes the 300+ albums I did buy between 1971 and 1980 all the more special.
|
What?
|
 |
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 07:30 |
Dean wrote:
In the 60s most people listen to music on one of these:
and to the radio on one of these:
In the 1970s the "music centre" was the most common form of "hifi":
Nostalgia is seeing the world through rose-tinted spectacles. |
Not to mention that the price of an album was very high campared to the wages of especialy younger people.
Making a collection of just 100 albums, was almost impossible for young people, most of had 30-50 albums to chose between.
The price was almost the same as today, but the wages was very low.
|
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
 |
stegor
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 2066
|
Posted: July 19 2013 at 07:12 |
What is now our Classic Rock station used to play an entire album at midnight, usually a new release. Not always prog of course, but often enough. The dj would take calls during it and people would comment on it and he would read the comments afterwards. I remember hearing a lot of Prog that way.
|
 |
The.Crimson.King
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2013
Location: WA
Status: Offline
Points: 4596
|
Posted: July 18 2013 at 23:26 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
I also think that anyone who was involved in making music at home on
an amateur budget between say 1980 and 1995, would remember the
revolutionary cassette based portastudio, which facilitated very limited multitrack overdubbing capability. The limitation was
that after you bounced more than once, everything sounded like it was
recorded in a wind tunnel. |
I remember buying a 4 channel Tascam Cassette Portastudio in '85. Their advert was the cover of Sgt Peppers with the caption..."What will you do with a 4 channel recording studio?" 
|
|
 |
Surrealist
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
|
Posted: July 18 2013 at 02:04 |
The A and R departments of the major record labels in the 60's and 70's did a MUCH Better job of finding talent than they have for the last 30 years.
The access of cheap multitracking on DAT and computers hasn't improved music.
The underground tape trading market place through magazines and word of mouth actually produced better final product once it was in the hands of producers and engineers who understood the art of analog tape recording, mixing and mastering.
Computers have ruined music because it's offering too many quick fix options.. and not FORCING the musicians to get their sh*t together.
Kids are spending WAY too much time on computers and dumb pods rather than grinding it out on their instrument of choice.
|
 |
jaycoh56
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 17 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 08:54 |
There were far more "indy" record stores and a lot were dedicated to "prog" music plus, you had the option of getting the domestic version or the imported version (or both). The radio stations were more likely to introduce you to those bands aw well (I first heard Gentle Giant "Three Friends" on the radio). Those were the days!
|
 |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 04:45 |
^ Until you could get access to a recording studio in the 60's and 70's you were effectively locked out from entering the market unless an A&R man caught you at a live show etc. I also think that anyone who was involved in making music at home on
an amateur budget between say 1980 and 1995, would remember the
revolutionary cassette based portastudio, which facilitated very limited multitrack overdubbing capability. The limitation was
that after you bounced more than once, everything sounded like it was
recorded in a wind tunnel. I guess what I'm trying to say is that there
are generations who did not have the luxury of being able to pursue the
facile debate that digital is harsh and cold v analogue is warmer etc. The increase in fidelity afforded by something like the advent of DAT was pure heaven to my ears at the time.
Edited by ExittheLemming - July 17 2013 at 04:48
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 03:35 |
In the 60s most people listen to music on one of these:
and to the radio on one of these:
In the 1970s the "music centre" was the most common form of "hifi":
Nostalgia is seeing the world through rose-tinted spectacles.
|
What?
|
 |
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 02:09 |
Surrealist wrote:
Computers ruined music.
|
It all went wrong with the invention of metal strings. Havent sounded natural for the last 160 years or so.
|
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
 |
Surrealist
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 01:38 |
Music across the boards.. from recordings to radio to concerts was better. Better.. I mean in a quality sense.. not convenient.
Concerts were affordable.. for most anyone. We were more concerned about GETTING to the concert than paying $10 for a ticket to see YES or Robin Trower.
Musicians had a much higher bar to compare themselves to. Whether rock or prog.. bands had to practice. Musicians had a lot less distractions. No internet, texting or cell phone calls during rehearsal. Music sound better because anyone who had a quality set up had BIG SPEAKERS and tube amps.. not thes cheap flimsy ipods and smart phone with plastic ear buds that most people are listening to.
Radio was better because you could find an educated DJ who had control of his show.. and would TURN PEOPLE ON to good stuff. You would follow a DJ's show.. and learn about stuff. If you got to know a DJ... you might be able to record some of his albums that you couldn't get onto a cassette tape and listen to it that way.. and it could SOUND GOOD on analog tape if you recorded it correctly.
Festivals were a great way to discover new bands.. you would see Gentle Giant playing with Black Sabbath or Santana.
Another important element is that there were HOT CHICKS who dug PROG.. believe it or not. I once met a 20 year old girl who loved to have sex to side one of Tales From Topographic Oceans. Find a girl like that now that age.. good luck.
Techno didn't exist yet.. nor did silly 80's hair metal bands.
Rush was a great band playing complex hard rock with wonderful compositions and execution.. not having to use computers as a crutch.
Bands were forced to keep it real and record onto tape machines.. not copy and pasting sound files on a computer and proclaiming to be musicians.
The college circuit offered a great way for more experimental bands to find a great audience. Now college radio is playing too much computer music.
Vinyl records helped you get into the band more.. all the great artwork.. lyrics.. posters.. etc. now it's a download of a crappy MP3 file. What a joke.
All the great bands did it without computers.
Computers ruined music.
|
 |
Metalmarsh89
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2013
Location: Oregon, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2673
|
Posted: July 17 2013 at 00:29 |
logoman wrote:
1970. Hardware shop selling albums at the back of the store. Ignorant 14 year old stumbles on this treasure trove of "contemporary music".
Life changing. Prog creeps into the blood. Vinyl albums offer multiple experiences.Sight,sound and even the smell of said vinyl. The artwork, gatefold sleeves, lyric sheets, music to challenge your mind,a whole world to be explored.
Now its all clinical. Too easy to access. No saving up hard cash for the next album experience. All readily found in a click.
This is more than an old git bemoaning times past it's a fundamental absence of much that made music exploration a pleasure.
|
Nah. I've got a twenty dollar bill pinned to the wall, saving for when Dream Theater's new album comes out.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.