Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hammill or Krause
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Hammill or Krause

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: Choose one
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
7 [53.85%]
3 [23.08%]
3 [23.08%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
ThyroidGlands View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2023
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ThyroidGlands Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Hammill or Krause
    Posted: 22 hours 17 minutes ago at 21:19
Today I was listening to Art Bears and thought of Krause as a sort of female version of Hammill. I love them both. Not sure what you all think.
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' about
You don't know nothin'
You don't know nothin' at all
Back to Top
Mellotron Storm View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 27 2006
Location: The Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 14589
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mellotron Storm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 hours 13 minutes ago at 22:23
I prefer Hammill to Krause. I'm still marvelling at how great Peter's voice was on those live BBC sessions. The guy can sing.
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 13015
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 hours 10 minutes ago at 23:26
Hammill's voice I can listen to for hours. While I can never finish an Art Bears album anymore because of Krause's particular singing style. I have nothing but respect her approach and artistic integrity, but it's presence gets in the way of the music for me.    
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18643
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 hours 1 minutes ago at 23:35
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:


...
While I can never finish an Art Bears album anymore because of Krause's particular singing style. I have nothing but respect her approach and artistic integrity, but it's presence gets in the way of the music for me.    


Hi,

I think the difference, for me, is that PH's handling of the lyrics is all personal and he knows instinctively how to interpret them, which is very theatrical at times and different than the average rock singer around.

Dagmar's singing, and interpretation of things, is more of an idea than a reality in my book. I don't find it "personal" and thus strong, like PH's, but maybe the issue with Dagmar is the music supporting her, which I'm not sure is helping her much, although in their style, it is not about a melodic content that is the usual in singing, but a complete juxtaposition to what would otherwise be written and performed. It is, a very academic thing, and is thought to be better musically because of it, whereas PH and VdGG are not even in the discussion when it comes to the academic thing, despite it very original composition of members and even after so many years and so much material still sounding fresh and good.

This makes the Art Bears, and Dagmar a touch listen for many of us that are not used to material that is not as clean cut as a single is, for example. Thus, listening to it, at first, is often a difficult experience.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24840
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote someone_else Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 hours 31 minutes ago at 01:05
Both are great in their own ways and both are acquired tastes.
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 13015
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 hours 12 minutes ago at 02:24
I think all of what you wrote made a whole lot of sense, but ending with this "tone" slightly taints an otherwise insightful post.
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

This makes the Art Bears, and Dagmar a touch listen for many of us that are not used to material that is not as clean cut as a single is, for example.

-and you taint your posts with a somewhat condencating tone all the time. This was really nothing, and I don't think you consider me to be someone who's not used to material that aren't as clean cut as a single*. But I thought I'd let you know as I suspect it's not really intentional.

*my main issue or difficulties with Dagmar's delivery is touched upon in what you write. Whenever Peter Hammill "goes theatrical", it never comes across as forced or inauthentic - because it always feel like he is following his musical instincts. Not unlike how an experienced jazz musician does, whether expressed through a saxophone, a trumpet or a flute... It's honest in the sense that it doesn't come from a school on how to communicate this or that spesific emotion - which is closer to acting.

Probably because most rhythmic music is first and foremost the sound of interplay to me, and the human voice mainly an instrument among the others - I soon lose interest in most "stage music" and the likes. With the odd exception, I might prefer Kobaļan over any language that I actually understand.

Listening to Dagmar Krause primarely as an instrument making sounds, doesn't gel all that well with the rest of what is happening musically. To me. While Hammill is the perfect voice and instrument for VdGG (and solo) - and vice versa. Like Wyatt on Rock Bottom or Soft Machine - Volume Two.
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 46770
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 hours 4 minutes ago at 03:32
Peter Hammill
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Online
Points: 21615
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 hours 37 minutes ago at 05:59
Going for Both, too different to pick one over the other and love both.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Syzygy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7142
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Syzygy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 hours 60 minutes ago at 08:36
I love both, but it has to be Dagmar for me. I have seen both of them live, Hammill with VDGG and Dagmar performing Brecht songs, with Slapp Happy and as part of the Robert Wyatt tribute Comicoperando. Hammill is remarkable, but Dagmar is in a class of her own.
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'

Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom


Back to Top
Rick1 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 14 2020
Location: Loughborough UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3133
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Rick1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 hours 37 minutes ago at 08:59
Dagmar is fantastic and I have been lucky enough to see her twice over the years. Her voice is more genuine and versatile although the comparison with Hammill is not straightforward. As a 14 year old, when I heard her screaming on Oslo (Henry Cow Concerts) I nearly shat myself. No other singer has done that!
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18643
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 hours 5 minutes ago at 09:31
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

I think all of what you wrote made a whole lot of sense, but ending with this "tone" slightly taints an otherwise insightful post.
...
and you taint your posts with a somewhat condencating tone all the time.
...


Hi,

The idea, probably not written clearly, is that (in general) the pop song is based on melody and it flows well, which makes it easier to listen to. The Art Bears, and Dagmar material is not exactly based on melody, the money side of the pop business.

I have several of their albums, and go much further back to the days of Bertold Brecht and Kurt Weill and the style of music that was originally thought to be for theater only. And, we were at the forefront of showing these albums on the air in Santa Barbara, when everything that was out from then was available as an IMPORT starting with Hopes and Fears which would have been 1978. And I do not recall anyone complaining about it, from the SPR shows that I have recorded (330 hours from 1974 to 1981 survived, out of about 500+hours). (Guy owns a copy of those shows now!)

I have a lot of music that is not "conventional" (for lack of a better word!), and always find that these efforts tend to help a lot of new music, which is always exciting for me.

Note: Guy Guden was an outstanding actor and got a lot of accolades at SBCC, including the production of 3 plays that he wrote and were also shown at the old theater ... sold out I might add! He ended up using his acting talent on radio doing comedy sketches and various stories. His voice and characterizations were huge, and some of them were even used for several commercials at the station. His best known perhaps was the Hindu mystic ... doing a commercial that ran for a long time ... lightness is an excellent alternative to darkness ... with an instrument from ____ .He was quite good at a lot of different styles, and the Brecht/Weill work did not go by him un-noticed, up to including The Doors doing one song ... but then, some of them were film students, and very well read from UCLA ... you did not get into that school by being a rock'n'roll person or someone with no grades. You still don't these days I assume.

Edited by moshkito - 10 hours 4 minutes ago at 09:32
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 38745
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 8 hours 55 minutes ago at 10:41
I like the vocals of both, but Peter Hammill for sure is more important to me; not just as a vocalist, but as a singer-songwriter and musician.
Watching while most appreciating a sunset in the moment need not diminish all the glorious sunsets I have observed before. It can be much like that with music for me.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.