Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hating Dream Theater
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHating Dream Theater

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 891011>
Author
Message
valravennz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 10 2005 at 23:32
Originally posted by NetsNJFan NetsNJFan wrote:

Originally posted by Lateralus_66 Lateralus_66 wrote:

Hating Dream Theater..! What pathetic subject..!  If some people hate them, simply ignore them. Do not buy their music. Do not pay attention to their music… They do not deserve your precious time…

Come on, It's fun

Come on!! After a while it gets sooooo tiring   - arguments just go round and round and round in circles - lets face it there will always be the diehard DT fans (of which I am not) and those who will never have them in their top ten prog groups (of which I am). Time to leave this forum me thinks and find intelligent discussion elsewhere


"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp


Back to Top
decypher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 06 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 157
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2005 at 02:13
you are such poor idiots.

a) ELP-worshipping is great but definitely lead into death
b) genesis&yes-worshipping... see a)
c) my god, are there so many old people around here, can you really survive by listening to all that old hammond organ crap?

'when dream and day unite' was a revolution.... everything else, hm, ok, was good. and still good enough to mention with all this conservative playalongthing like genesis or rush.
Back to Top
mortsboslim View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2005 at 08:28

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I love hearing how people got into prog! Hey I'm only two years younger than you, and my first experience of prog was probably in 1980 - at the age of 11 - with Pink Floyd (The Wall) unless of course you count my run in Jeff Waynes War of the Worlds two years before.

Same for me! 1980 - at the age of 11 - Pink Floyd! My first exposition to prog. (If you don't count Alice Coopers "Halo Of Flies" as prog?)

DT sounds a little too much metal to me, but I am interested in giving them a try. Mikes Transatlantic project is fabulous.

 

Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2005 at 09:43
Originally posted by decypher decypher wrote:

you are such poor idiots.

a) ELP-worshipping is great but definitely lead into death
b) genesis&yes-worshipping... see a)
c) my god, are there so many old people around here, can you really survive by listening to all that old hammond organ crap?

'when dream and day unite' was a revolution.... everything else, hm, ok, was good. and still good enough to mention with all this conservative playalongthing like genesis or rush.


How was the Dream Theater Debut more revolutionary and inovative (and proggy) than the works of ELP, Yes and Genesis, the three pillars of the genre. 
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 07:20
Simple ..it wasnt.
Back to Top
Jim Prog Wizard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 07:43

I would say the three pillars of the genre (if prog can be called a genre) were Genesis, Yes and King Crimson, since ELP were at best inconsistent.

What's more, just because DT's roots are in metal rather than rock/jazz/folk/psych, doesn't mean they're any less prog than the afore-mentioned bands.  And besides, what does it matter?  If you like them, listen to them, if not, don't.

"Progressive Rock is the ultimate form of music" (Mikael Akerfeldt, 2003)
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 08:01
Originally posted by Jim Prog Wizard Jim Prog Wizard wrote:

I would say the three pillars of the genre (if prog can be called a genre) were Genesis, Yes and King Crimson, since ELP were at best inconsistent.

I disagree.  While yes, everythign ELP did after 1974 was more or less garbage, from 1970-1974, they were a much bigger prog outfit than King Crimson.  King Crimson is easily in the 4th spot, but I think ELP makes it in into the big three wiht YEs & Genesis because of their crossover appeal as well.

Back to Top
Jim Prog Wizard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 08:05

Appeal has nothing to do with it.  In pure musical terms, Yes, Genesis and KC were the holy trinity.  ELP, while sometimes brilliant, were also capable (during the "golden era" of 1970-74) of committing considerable crimes against music.

"Progressive Rock is the ultimate form of music" (Mikael Akerfeldt, 2003)
Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 08:11

With the exception of 'Yes', I would say that ELP released the most consistent albums throughout the 70's. As for live shows, ELP could blow any band off stage. Again, only 'Yes' could boast of similar record breaking tours and attendences. Whilst both King Crimson & Genesis released classic songs, most of their 70's albums contained a few 'fillers' to make up an album. Genesis were never 'that' big in the 70's compared to the bands you mentioned. They were still playing universities whilst ELP were selling out stadiums!

Back to Top
Jim Prog Wizard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 08:22

Once again, ticket sales and venues have nothing to do with the MUSICAL merits that I'm basing my assertions on.  It is my firm belief that ELP were never quite in the same league, musically, as the other three bands. 

If you want to talk about filler, what about the second side of "Tarkus", or anything off "BSS" which isn't "Karn Evil 9" or "Toccata".  The only truly consistent albums ELP had were their debut and "Trilogy".

"Progressive Rock is the ultimate form of music" (Mikael Akerfeldt, 2003)
Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 08:50

You have to base arguments on facts or it's just subjective and based on oppinions. ELP's 70's albums and tours sold far more than Genesis or King Crimson or any other band of that genre with the exception of Yes & Pink Floyd. That makes them one of the three biggest bands of that genre. FACT!

As for musical consistency, it is all down to musical preference. The whole of the second side of 'Lamb' is filler IMO. I think Genesis more than any other band used filler material to make up 'time' on an album. Robert Fripp would fill up half an album just with improvisation to complete an album. Again, it's all down to individual musical preferences. The ELP 70's albums along with Yes are about the only one's I can listen to without skipping tracks. My preference of course but you can't ignore the facts!



Edited by Progger
Back to Top
Jim Prog Wizard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 09:01

I take your point, but I must repeat yet again that as far as I'm concerned, financial success is irrelevant, only the music matters.

Of course, this means that my argument is based on preference, but that is inevitable, really.  I don't believe Genesis used any great deal of filler on any album before 1977, and the only instance of KC blatently using it was "Moonchild" on ITCOTCK.  Improvisation does not automatically constitute filler. 

"Progressive Rock is the ultimate form of music" (Mikael Akerfeldt, 2003)
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 12:34
Originally posted by King of Loss King of Loss wrote:

Originally posted by Manunkind Manunkind wrote:

 

 

 

King, why did you edit my comment out from the quote? I don't want anyone here to think I post photos of swastikas for the hell of it.

For everyone's information - I posted this photo earlier in this thread with the following comment: "Now here's one band I hate". 'Nuff said.

 

"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:15
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Robert Fripp would fill up half an album just with improvisation to complete an album.

...once?

Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:22
Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Robert Fripp would fill up half an album just with improvisation to complete an album.

...once?

Just about every album since Discipline is reminescent of 'jazz' improvisation where every sounds as if they are all doint their own thing. My oppinion of course

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:32

Progger wrote:

Quote Genesis were never 'that' big in the 70's compared to the bands you mentioned. They were still playing universities whilst ELP were selling out stadiums!

Sorry Progger but your argument is absurd because in that case we must assume that The Bee Gees, Donna Summer, Tina Charles and all the staff of Saturday Night Fever were greater than any Progressive band because they filled stadiums and sold millions of albums more than any of the big 5 except maybe Pink Floyd during the 70's.

And in this case we should also assume that the Genesis who released ABACAB, Shapes or Invisible Touch was the greatest progressive band ever because they had more financial success than any other prog band, what we know is absurd because neither they were progressive at that point beither they were barely close to Early Genesis.

If you want to judge or evaluate Genesis (Gabriel era) you shopuld start twith some easy facts, they released the most complex and respected Conceptual album (The Lamb) that definedthe genre or they released the best epic ever (Supper's Ready) according to most progressive fans.

Jim Prog Wizard wrote:

Quote Once again, ticket sales and venues have nothing to do with the MUSICAL merits that I'm basing my assertions on. 

I have to agree with Jim at this point, if tickets sales mean something, well lets be fans of N'Sync or Britney Spears because they sell much more than any progressive band today.

Those of us who are progheads for decades, know that the genre was not popular from the start and w're fands despite that fact, so don't use the massive sales argument because it means absolutely nothing.

About ELP, I absolutely respect and like what they did up to BSS or even Welcome Back my Friends.. it's in the same level of Genesis, Yes or King Crimson, if we have to choose one band over the other, it's only because of Personal taste and nothing more.

For that reason, saying ELP is lower than Yes and Genesis or Genesis wasn't musically as great as Yes or King Crimson it's ridiculous, if you say I like more Yes, Genesis or even ELP, I accept oit, but otherwise is absurd.

Iván

            
Back to Top
Siloportem View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 14 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 216
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:49

Everybody hating Dream Theater gets boring. If nobody minds I'd like to expand the subject matter a bit.

Does anybody hate:

Liquid Tension Experiment (much better than Dream Theater and I like them)

Mullmuzzler

Jordan Rudess

Transatlantic

Planet X

If I come up with anything else involving (ex) members of Dream Theater I'll post it.

Thanks !! Your topics always so good and informative. I like you talk.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:53
Originally posted by Siloportem Siloportem wrote:

Everybody hating Dream Theater gets boring. If nobody minds I'd like to expand the subject matter a bit.

Does anybody hate:

Liquid Tension Experiment (much better than Dream Theater and I like them)

Mullmuzzler

Jordan Rudess

Transatlantic

Planet X

If I come up with anything else involving (ex) members of Dream Theater I'll post it.

OSI

Petrucci and Rudess

Platypus

Back to Top
JMCecil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:58
Originally posted by Siloportem Siloportem wrote:

Everybody hating Dream Theater gets boring. If nobody minds I'd like to expand the subject matter a bit.

Does anybody hate:

Liquid Tension Experiment (much better than Dream Theater and I like them)

Mullmuzzler

Jordan Rudess

Transatlantic

Planet X

If I come up with anything else involving (ex) members of Dream Theater I'll post it.

I don't hate DT but Liquid Tension is WAAAAAY better than DT.

All the rest is of that stuff is anywhere from crap to unlistenable or just plain drivle. 

Mullmuzzler is crap to the 50th power.

Jordan Rudess is boring off the charts

Transatlantic is stupid lyrics and retread themes that last way too long.  It's like the worst of SB and FK epics piled together for an extended play.

No comment on Planet-X...can't listen to them for more than 3 minutes without wanting to shoot my CD player.

Back to Top
Siloportem View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 14 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 216
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2005 at 14:07
JMCecil I totally agree with you although I do like feeding the wheel and some of the stuff on bridge across forever. But I don't really know much FK & SB. For me it was just hey DT members. Mullmuzzler sort of proves that DT is about music. Only heard the sample track for Planet X and hated it (I really, really hate silences in the middle of songs, still have to edit the mp3 from SiyS (which I do like, as long as it lasts).
Thanks !! Your topics always so good and informative. I like you talk.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 891011>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.