Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 46851
|
Posted: February 11 2015 at 00:24 |
Enchant X wrote:
I assure you Kansas output is very relevant .. this thread comes about from Kansas being so underrated . Kansas themselves have given me plenty of prog happiness through the years, its something worth defending with extreme opposition if needs be , Kansas are not just another band , they come from a special planet where great bands come from , its sad for me to see so many people miss the opportunity of enjoying their music based solely on ignorance ... what are you afraid of they might be better than what you hold so dear ... get a copy of Leftoverture and give it the three play rule if its not happening for you then at least you tried. 
|
a lot of people like Kansas, you'd be surprised, but the whole thing of being mad they are not in top 100 or whatever is ridiculous, irrelevant, of no importance yes, they are a great band, I even love their 80s work! this thread should have been done with after micky's line and I quote: "this forum really does have FAR too many Genesis fans, definitely too
many Camel fans, not enough trolls, and DEFINITELY not enough tits". None of us can beat that, so might just as well stop
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30370
|
Posted: February 11 2015 at 01:48 |
There seems to be a lot 'taking it very personally' that Kansas are not more respected around here. That's a shame. For me they didn't record a masterpiece and that's not a problem at all and is the sole reason why I believe they do not get more recognition than they may deserve. However this silly obsession with the top 100 is getting annoying. I did suggest earlier in the thread we would be better off without it but there were no takers. A top ten would suffice although I guess there would then be more complaints that Gentle Giant or Rush or whoever are not in but really it just doesn't matter. Get a grip! Kansas had many great songs and pieces of music and that is way more important. They made the definitive US symphonic prog track Song For America which is an absolute beauty. They can be justifiably proud of that and the fact the album it came from is not in the TOP 100 hit parade is entirely irrelevant. I also like a lot of the 'crossover' material they excelled at and again in general this kind of material does not pick up the 5 star ratings which is quite understandable. I also don't believe in the anti-USA bias although perhaps that comment was meant as tongue in cheek. I hope it was. I love many albums by USA bands including the likes of Chicago, Mountain , Love , The Tubes and one of my favourite bands of recent times is Glass Hammer who I like more than Kansas . Sorry but that is a matter of taste only (or lack of in my case perhaps). BTW I would recommend seeing Kansas live. I saw them 10 years ago and they rocked!! One of the best gigs I ever saw. They came off that stage sweating buckets!
Edited by richardh - February 11 2015 at 01:49
|
 |
WrytXander
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 09 2014
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 237
|
Posted: February 11 2015 at 03:28 |
To me, Kansas is a much a prog band as Yes or Genesis are. Option 2.
|
20+ prog bands discovered and explored in 3 years, still going strong...
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30370
|
Posted: February 11 2015 at 14:56 |
...but the argument is not whether they are 'prog' or not (ignore the WUM's !) but whether they have albums that are masterpieces. imo not.
|
 |
irrelevant
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382
|
Posted: February 11 2015 at 20:33 |
Epignosis wrote:
Stool Man wrote:
I'm one of those people who don't consider Kansas to be prog at all.
|
You mean, "wrong?" 
|
How could anyone not consider Kansas prog? This strange thing disturbs me. Aside from a couple of more standard tracks that tend to appear on each of their albums (well, the five albums I know) they're as prog as they come folks.
|
|
 |
proggman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 14 2013
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 1458
|
Posted: February 15 2015 at 19:03 |
Yes, along with one or more of Kansas's other albums.
|
When he rides, my fears subside. For darkness turns once more to light. Through the skies, his white horse flies. To find a land beyond the night.
|
 |
iluvmarillion
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 09 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
|
Posted: February 16 2015 at 21:21 |
richardh wrote:
There seems to be a lot 'taking it very personally' that Kansas are not more respected around here. That's a shame. For me they didn't record a masterpiece and that's not a problem at all and is the sole reason why I believe they do not get more recognition than they may deserve. However this silly obsession with the top 100 is getting annoying. I did suggest earlier in the thread we would be better off without it but there were no takers. A top ten would suffice although I guess there would then be more complaints that Gentle Giant or Rush or whoever are not in but really it just doesn't matter. Get a grip! Kansas had many great songs and pieces of music and that is way more important. They made the definitive US symphonic prog track Song For America which is an absolute beauty. They can be justifiably proud of that and the fact the album it came from is not in the TOP 100 hit parade is entirely irrelevant. I also like a lot of the 'crossover' material they excelled at and again in general this kind of material does not pick up the 5 star ratings which is quite understandable. I also don't believe in the anti-USA bias although perhaps that comment was meant as tongue in cheek. I hope it was. I love many albums by USA bands including the likes of Chicago, Mountain , Love , The Tubes and one of my favourite bands of recent times is Glass Hammer who I like more than Kansas . Sorry but that is a matter of taste only (or lack of in my case perhaps). BTW I would recommend seeing Kansas live. I saw them 10 years ago and they rocked!! One of the best gigs I ever saw. They came off that stage sweating buckets!
|
Their best album is their live album which I think says something about the lack of cohesiveness in any of their studio albums.
|
 |
Stool Man
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2007
Location: Anti-Cool (anag
Status: Offline
Points: 2689
|
Posted: February 16 2015 at 22:56 |
They're less prog than Funkadelic, or Sun Ra
|
rotten hound of the burnie crew
|
 |
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 12 2011
Location: Melb, Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 00:09 |
Absolutely `Leftoverture' deserves to be in the top 100, as well as pretty much the self titled debut, `Song for America' and `Point of No Return' (but not so much `Masques'). Although those album had more straight-forward moments, the proggiest stuff on them is really almost up their with anything off the early Genesis/Yes albums, and Kansas completely had their own style that sounded like no-one else, completely unique. I tend to think that those who don't really consider them prog actually haven't properly listened to any of those above mentioned albums fully. Their first few albums are LOADED with prog greatness! Oh, and those that write the band off due to `Carry On Wayward Son', that's seriously one of the greatest `proggy' pop singles that had commercial success ever!
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30370
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 02:04 |
iluvmarillion wrote:
richardh wrote:
There seems to be a lot 'taking it very personally' that Kansas are not more respected around here. That's a shame. For me they didn't record a masterpiece and that's not a problem at all and is the sole reason why I believe they do not get more recognition than they may deserve. However this silly obsession with the top 100 is getting annoying. I did suggest earlier in the thread we would be better off without it but there were no takers. A top ten would suffice although I guess there would then be more complaints that Gentle Giant or Rush or whoever are not in but really it just doesn't matter. Get a grip! Kansas had many great songs and pieces of music and that is way more important. They made the definitive US symphonic prog track Song For America which is an absolute beauty. They can be justifiably proud of that and the fact the album it came from is not in the TOP 100 hit parade is entirely irrelevant. I also like a lot of the 'crossover' material they excelled at and again in general this kind of material does not pick up the 5 star ratings which is quite understandable. I also don't believe in the anti-USA bias although perhaps that comment was meant as tongue in cheek. I hope it was. I love many albums by USA bands including the likes of Chicago, Mountain , Love , The Tubes and one of my favourite bands of recent times is Glass Hammer who I like more than Kansas . Sorry but that is a matter of taste only (or lack of in my case perhaps). BTW I would recommend seeing Kansas live. I saw them 10 years ago and they rocked!! One of the best gigs I ever saw. They came off that stage sweating buckets!
|
Their best album is their live album which I think says something about the lack of cohesiveness in any of their studio albums. |
Indeed and part of the reason for this is that Kansas struggled to find their own clear identity. For instance you have the folky Dust In The Wind alongside the ELP influenced The Spider. What are ( or who are) Kansas trying to be? It was all a bit trying to gate crash a party that was already over.
|
 |
Roj
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 02:28 |
The album Two For The Show is indeed one of the finest live albums ever. That would be in my all-time top 20, never mind top 100.
|
 |
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23147
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 05:29 |
Does it matter? Between thousands of different prog bands we're bound to leave some people's faves off the list. I'm not really a Kansas fan myself. It's not like I have anything against them (certainly not because they're American  ), I just don't appreciate their music outside of the debut.
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
 |
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 08:29 |
despite having a few of their albums, I don't really know much Kansas other than the 2 big hits. Listened to the whole of Leftoverture in the car yesterday and found it quite unremarkable. It was like Yes-Lite, half the instruments, double the vocals. I found the songs (other than Wayward Son) were structured a lot like Yes, especially the keyboards running around in little circles under the vocals ... I didn't dislike it, I just didn't find anything that would stick for me personally.
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
 |
Cailyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2014
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 120
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 09:05 |
Seriously??? Prog? Not prog? Kansas is/was brilliant/great/not so bad/awful/American/blah blah blah. These are all subjective opinions. There is no objective way to measure progginess and there is no objective way to measure which albums are great and which are not. The top 100 at best is a flawed consensus of the members who bothered to rate the albums there. I like Kansas. I think they're proggy. Good for me. So I play Kansas albums and I go to their concerts and I waste no energy worrying about what the good people of PA think of Kansas.
|
http://www.cailynmusic.com
|
 |
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 09:54 |
Music is not competition.
|
 |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 10:56 |
Walton Street wrote:
despite having a few of their albums, I don't really know much Kansas other than the 2 big hits.Listened to the whole of Leftoverture in the car yesterday and found it quite unremarkable. It was like Yes-Lite, half the instruments, double the vocals.
|
Half the instruments?
Kansas played in those days with double guitar (Robbie and Kerry), double keyboards (Kerry and Steve), bass, drums and violin.
As a fact they used more instruments than Yes.
Yes, they had two vocalists and that was good, Steve had an amazing range on those days and Robby made awesome second vocals.
Songs like Cheyenne Antheme, Magnum Opus and Miracles Out of Nowhere are real masterpieces...They have no connection with Yes, they blended Symphonic (Genesis influenced), Hard Rock and a hint of Country.
If you listen with prejudices, you won't find what's great of them.
|
|
 |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46843
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 11:11 |
perhaps he meant half the instrumental skill... double the vocal talent
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
 |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 11:16 |
micky wrote:
perhaps he meant half the instrumental skill... double the vocal talent 
|
LOL
Guess what
|
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30370
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 14:56 |
Cailyn wrote:
Seriously???
Prog? Not prog? Kansas is/was brilliant/great/not so bad/awful/American/blah blah blah.
These are all subjective opinions. There is no objective way to measure progginess and there is no objective way to measure which albums are great and which are not. The top 100 at best is a flawed consensus of the members who bothered to rate the albums there.
I like Kansas. I think they're proggy. Good for me. So I play Kansas albums and I go to their concerts and I waste no energy worrying about what the good people of PA think of Kansas.

|
Burn the heretic
|
 |
Cailyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2014
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 120
|
Posted: February 17 2015 at 15:59 |
richardh wrote:
Cailyn wrote:
The top 100 at best is a flawed consensus of the members who bothered to rate the albums there.
...and I waste no energy worrying about what the good people of PA think of Kansas.
|
Burn the heretic |
Let the auto-da-fé begin....
Edited by Cailyn - February 17 2015 at 16:00
|
http://www.cailynmusic.com
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.