Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
I couldn't agree more and it's good to see another new member here from merry old England.
I really enjoyed all the posts and comments regarding punk and the music media from Iain, Dean, Madan and Lewian. To say I learned a few things would be a bit of an understatement.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
Nuff said man!
And, except the punkers, anyone back then would take for granted that anarchist attitude just for the sake of it wouldn't ever go far......
.
Edited by Tillerman88 - December 06 2019 at 05:41
The overwhelming amount of information on a daily basis restrains people from rewinding the news record archives to refresh their memories...
Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
Seriously? Tell that to the surviving members of the Clash and the Sex Pistols. As much as we prog fans hate to admit it, Punk (either real or pseudo) has left an indelible mark on rock music.
As far as music "going back to basics", it never had to. Bands like the Seeds, and other garage rockers from the 60s, kept it going long before 1974.
I couldn't care less what those "survivng members" have to say. Punk wasn't only musically insignificant but also plagiarism.
But punks weren't buried due to plagiarism. On the contrary, punks were "allowed" to rip off whatever they want and being proclaimed as a "new big thing".
Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
Seriously? Tell that to the surviving members of the Clash and the Sex Pistols. As much as we prog fans hate to admit it, Punk (either real or pseudo) has left an indelible mark on rock music.
As far as music "going back to basics", it never had to. Bands like the Seeds, and other garage rockers from the 60s, kept it going long before 1974.
I couldn't care less what those "survivng members" have to say. Punk wasn't only musically insignificant but also plagiarism.
But punks weren't buried due to plagiarism. On the contrary, punks were "allowed" to rip off whatever they want and being proclaimed as a "new big thing".
As if prog never ripped off other genres. When you return with a sensible argument, I'll be happy to consider it.
Edited by SteveG - December 06 2019 at 06:30
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
It is probably also important that the attitude of some of the prog audience (and maybe some musicians) had changed. Or rather maybe there were various kinds of prog audience from the beginning. The end 60s and in countries that were a bit behind the early 70s were in some sense like the beginning of punk; it was a liberating and encouraging climate for everyone who wanted to play music. Take the beginnings of Amon Düül. In the beginning it was just, let's play some music, try whatever instrument you want, no skill, education and knowledge necessary. Amon Düül I's albums are all like this. Amon Düül II became more ambitious and later some of their musicians became very good, but on the Phallus Dei album they're still very pedestrian. Their beginning is the same though, spontaneous jamming out of the desire to do music and listening experience, no other background. Surely other bands that are listed here have a similar story. And the audience went with it. It was spontaneous and fun. By the way, legendary German proto-punk band Ton Steine Scherben was founded in 1970 and belonged to that same culture initially, and later became punk icons in Germany. As somebody wrote before, prog was rebellion. Later in the 70s a larger part of the prog audience went for admiring skill and complexity and part of them looked down on music that didn't have that. Probably these people looked down on early Amon Düül as well. I love a great deal of prog from later in the seventies and even early eighties, but it was pretty clear that in this way some of the prog culture had lost touch with the rebellious sentiment of the next generation. The issue is not how good some of the prog virtuosos were and that it was hard to get at their level, the issue was rather that many of those who were still proggers looked down on who didn't want to go that way. And I actually think that one thing the music press got right was to part company with these people.
I don't agree with your perspective at all. I think you're mis-identifying who the aggressors were. The only Prog musician I can think of that might have been prone to public condescension would have been Frank Zappa. I don't know of anyone who had a greater superiority complex than him, but he liked all sorts of music.
Surely it was more certain fans than the musicians (I didn't mean the term "progger" to refer to musicians in the first place). Regarding musicians I can't point the finger at anyone in particular but I remember having read negative opinions about punk and the musical tastes of the new generation of fans and musicians in interviews at the time. Maybe not that many. Surely I didn't mean Zappa. Chances are Frank Bornemann (Eloy) had the odd bitter comment on why the media would shred his music to tears and celebrate stuff that had much less to offer, but admittedly he was reacting on what the media did, and at least regarding his own music he was right pointing out that it was treated unfairly.
Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
Seriously? Tell that to the surviving members of the Clash and the Sex Pistols. As much as we prog fans hate to admit it, Punk (either real or pseudo) has left an indelible mark on rock music.
As far as music "going back to basics", it never had to. Bands like the Seeds, and other garage rockers from the 60s, kept it going long before 1974.
I couldn't care less what those "survivng members" have to say. Punk wasn't only musically insignificant but also plagiarism.
But punks weren't buried due to plagiarism. On the contrary, punks were "allowed" to rip off whatever they want and being proclaimed as a "new big thing".
As if prog never ripped off other genres. When you return with a sensible argument, I'll be happy to consider it.
LOL is it the same old story? I mean, when a prog-rock artist is inspired by e.g. Genesis, it's plagiarism, but when the punks build up the whole "genre" on two or three stolen songs, then that's the inspiration?Give me a break man.
Weren't punkers "snooty" actually? Weren't they considered themselves being something special?
No more than any other rock stars of that era.
Well perhaps, but unlike punkers, the real rock stars had a convincing "apology" for that attitude - so many great songs & albums of all genres. What punks achieved in 1976-1977, aside of all that hysteria made by the media? Nothing musically significant, I'm afraid. Just another "back to basics" that was nothing new as pub-rock went popular among hipsters already in 1973.
Seriously? Tell that to the surviving members of the Clash and the Sex Pistols. As much as we prog fans hate to admit it, Punk (either real or pseudo) has left an indelible mark on rock music.
As far as music "going back to basics", it never had to. Bands like the Seeds, and other garage rockers from the 60s, kept it going long before 1974.
I couldn't care less what those "survivng members" have to say. Punk wasn't only musically insignificant but also plagiarism.
But punks weren't buried due to plagiarism. On the contrary, punks were "allowed" to rip off whatever they want and being proclaimed as a "new big thing".
As if prog never ripped off other genres. When you return with a sensible argument, I'll be happy to consider it.
LOL is it the same old story? I mean, when a prog-rock artist is inspired by e.g. Genesis, it's plagiarism, but when the punks build up the whole "genre" on two or three stolen songs, then that's the inspiration?Give me a break man.
I gave you a break. It was to come up with a sensible argument. You didn't. Break time is over.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Btw, does anyone else here think that King Crimson never ripped off other genres when they created ItCotCK? Just curious.
You will get some smart arse who will claim that it is derived from a hour long epic performed by the congo delta pygmy tribe of limomo which was performed when the tribe caught a naughty crocodile.....
^ Or a smart arse could simply say that KC created the genres of Classical, Folk Rock, Jazz Fusion and the Advant Garde, which never really existed previously. I was speaking of genre appropriation Barney, not note per note plagiarism. But it wouldn't surprise me if that existed too, albeit accidentally.
Edited by SteveG - December 06 2019 at 10:50
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
^^ If the Congo delta pygmy tribe of Limomo can produce music as good as King Crimson, then I'd really like to hear them.
Hey don't be that "snooty" .... the truth is the other way round: King Crimson can produce music as good as the Congo delta pygmy tribe of Limomo, albeit accidentally!
Edited by Tillerman88 - December 06 2019 at 12:11
The overwhelming amount of information on a daily basis restrains people from rewinding the news record archives to refresh their memories...
^^ If the Congo delta pygmy tribe of Limomo can produce music as good as King Crimson, then I'd really like to hear them.
Hey don't be that "snooty" .... the truth is the other way round: King Crimson can produce music as good as the Congo delta pygmy tribe of Limomo, albeit accidentally!
That's no stretch. Can Crimson do Anarchy In The UK as good as the Sex Pistols, accidentally or not? Now that's the question.
Edited by SteveG - December 06 2019 at 13:14
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
I know somebody who was ACTUALLY at the famous free trade hall concert,...PUNK was fun while it lasted, thrash metal was launched off its raw power...and I enjoyed those gigs as a teenager...weird times...but prog gigs always beat the raw power...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.389 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.