Print Page | Close Window

Right/Left stereotype

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General discussions
Forum Description: Discuss any topic at all that is not music-related
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=52971
Printed Date: April 26 2025 at 15:03
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Right/Left stereotype
Posted By: BroSpence
Subject: Right/Left stereotype
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 01:06
I've been thinking about this a fair bit lately.  The stereotype here in the USA is that the left wants big government and they're all a bunch of atheists.  Where as, the right are God loving/fearing people that want much less government.  

This makes no sense to me as:

1. Religion dictates laws unto its followers, God is omnipresent, and your fate is determined by the likes of God.  Therefore, it is an overbearing government that sees into all aspects of your life.

2. Jesus/God/most Religions taught of many good qualities to be.  Treat others as you would have them treat you.  Thou Shalt not Kill, Thou shalt not steal.  Then there was that whole thing where Jesus broke up a loaf of bread and a few fish and shared it with a WHOLE bunch of people (wealth was spread).  

3.  If God governs all, and "thou shalt worship no other gods" then wouldn't the fact the government is the governing body be controversial and against the teachings of the religion?  Shouldn't the followers be more of an anarchist group (at least in terms of an organized earthly government)? 

4. Even in the case of a government set up to follow the laws of the religion, those in the government still determine the law of the land on the people, rather than God.  

I hope this isn't offensive, or becomes a big argument or anything because both politics and religion are quite personal.   I'm just curious as to how these two types of institutions can exist together and/or mesh together.  And to get back to my original premise of the left/right religion stereotype, I am confused as to how a stereotype could emerge.    Discuss if you can.



Replies:
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 02:36
There are other aspects to the right/lest spectrum, such as economics and freedom from government.

I've been thinking a lot about religion. (In fact, I wrote a Facebook note earlier tonight saying I agree with Kant and that people are not acting morally when they follow religion's codes just because the religion says so.)

Regarding religion, generally as education rises, strict adherence to religion falls. My friend told me yesterday that Blue states have higher college degree rates than Red states, and I believe it. Needless to say (yet I'm doing so now because someone would point it out otherwise), being conservative does not mean your stupid. I believe most morally conservative people think the Bible told them so, that's true, and anyone who tries to convince them otherwise is the devil. These people are crazy.




-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: Tapfret
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 03:17
Using logic is pointless.  The mechanisms of the U.S. political system are made to polarize. A polarized society cannot move against the those who have set their roots deep within the power structure to continue sapping resources vital to healthy economic and social growth.  Right wing, left wing; does not matter which you are, without the other wing you just fly in circles, or not at all.

I agree with everything you guys are saying, but reason is seldom the most audible voice.  For that trait, we are at no unique point in history.


-------------
https://www.last.fm/user/Tapfret" rel="nofollow">
https://bandcamp.com/tapfret" rel="nofollow - Bandcamp


Posted By: mystic fred
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 04:27
Politics and Religion are a dubious mix, any politician spouting the Bible would be viewed with suspicion in this country, though it is acceptable for them to be seen attending Church on Sunday morning or various Religious Festivals.
 
Right wingers are religious hypocrites with their  "every man for himself monopoly / capitalism" politics - the so-called Left wing Socialists are more in tune with TRUE religious  doctrines, where Governments should help and protect the weak and unfortunate and benefit society as a whole -  If things seem bad now, voting back in right wing political parties to Government with their selfish policies protecting the well off minorities will be the dawn of a meaner, darker age to come....Evil Smile
 


-------------
Prog Archives Tour Van


Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 04:48
Originally posted by BroSpence BroSpence wrote:


4. Even in the case of a government set up to follow the laws of the religion, those in the government still determine the law of the land on the people, rather than God.

This is because the law needs to be the same for everyone, and not everyone recognizes the law of God or people may have differing views about it. The problem is that everyone who doesn't want to end up in jail must not only follow the law of God (or moral law) but also the laws determined by the government even if those laws differ from or even contradict with the law of God. This is why I believe it would be better if there were no states at all and everyone could freely follow the laws they consider right.


Posted By: Neil
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 07:36
I do not think that religion should be the basis of any modern government.  I also dislike the heavily polarised right/left politics.  I'd probably put my self more in the conservative camp than labour in the uk but there are good and bad sides to both.  The problem with socialism is, as Orwell put it: "everyone is equal but some are more equal than others".


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: October 30 2008 at 08:13
Somebody's had a little too much to think. LOL

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: BroSpence
Date Posted: October 31 2008 at 00:10
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Somebody's had a little too much to think. LOL 

HAHA! Good one. 


Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

Originally posted by BroSpence BroSpence wrote:


4. Even in the case of a government set up to follow the laws of the religion, those in the government still determine the law of the land on the people, rather than God.

...This is why I believe it would be better if there were no states at all and everyone could freely follow the laws they consider right.

An anarchist society is usually frowned upon by many people, especially those in the government as they would be out of a job.  The common reason behind it being that if there is no government, there are no laws, and anyone can do whatever they want.   Of course the latter part of that saying is always in reference to the worst type of situations such as, murder/assault, stealing, and any other immoral activity.    I agree with you in part because I don't think as many people would go nuts in that kind of set-up, but sure there are people out there that want to do bad things, but they also do those bad things when there is government.  

There are people that may do the bad things (when they haven't before) because they are no longer governed by the idea that they will be punished for doing whatever things those may be.  Sure that is also a possibility.  I'm pretty confident that the majority of people on this planet know the difference between common "wrong" and "right".  I'm quite sure that that is part of our nature.  It is not born from going to church or being involved in a religion, but from our environment.  Environment and human nature are inseparable in my mind.  

I'm not advocating an anarchist society by any means, but I don't think things would be nearly as chaotic as it is often believed.  To be more clear, just because there would be no central body does not mean there would not be law.  





Posted By: fusionfreak
Date Posted: November 01 2008 at 07:40
Interesting debate!I will be a leftist  till my last breath.That said,I'm not sectarian:right versus left seems to be a cliché when one sees most european left wing governments settling Market based right wing policies
alongside with authoritarian means(phonetapping when Francois Miterrand was in power) and global economic crisis destroying many people's lives whatever right or left.Actually the difference is made between militants from both sides depending on their wages,families,education...For me religion has nothing to do with politics since it always weakens dreams of equality and policies to reach this goal.Moreover religious authorities often are corrupted and scornful towards the poor.Too bad we keep electing people who don't respect us!I hope Obama will do a great job in America and I'm looking forward to have a good president in 2012:1 and a half year of Nicolas Sarkozy is too much!


-------------
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 01 2008 at 11:47
Politics should be separate from Religion should be separate from Law should be separate from Economics - the four are not mutually compatible. When one dictates the doctrine of the other then real anarchy ensues. An anarchy where the philosophy of a select few decides policy regardless of the needs or desires of the majority. Voting for a party by placing an {X} on a ballot sheet is not granting a waiver to the winning team to do whatever they please, it does not mean we agree with every policy within their manifesto or with every decision they will make in the future, but we disagree less with them than with the other lot. No Political party ever gains power by a true numerical majority, and even if they did, it would still mean that a significant proportion of the population was against them. So when a vocal and powerful minority faction within a party holds sway then they are even further removed from what the real majority actually wants.
 
Socialism has little to do with politics, but is more a precept of being human: most of the world's religions are based upon socialistic ideals and principles, even if the doctrine of those religions is as far removed from practical Socialism as you can possibly get. There is nothing to prevent a truly right-wing government from having socialist policies anymore than a left-wing government can have a capitalist policies; people with left-wing views can be religious, right-wingers can be atheists, Capitalism is not the diametric opposite of Socialism any more than to be irreligious means you are also amoral.


-------------
What?


Posted By: fusionfreak
Date Posted: November 01 2008 at 12:38
Well said Dean!I'm always looking forward to stay true to my ideas:peace,freedom,understanding,a real social policy and a Market which doesn't dominate politics.But it's so hard and I'm most of the time sceptical towards what's going on now:save the banks instead of saving people?There is something wrong in the world!

-------------
I was born in the land of Mahavishnu,not so far from Kobaia.I'm looking for the world

of searchers with the help from

crimson king


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 01 2008 at 14:43
Romans chapter 13, verses 1-7:

1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. 4For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. 6This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. 7Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.




Careful not to rip that passage out of context.  Wink


Posted By: BroSpence
Date Posted: November 02 2008 at 02:46
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Romans chapter 13, verses 1-7:

1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. 4For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. 6This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. 7Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.




Careful not to rip that passage out of context.  Wink

Bush really was chosen to be Prez, by the big man.  



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk