Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65864
|
Posted: February 03 2010 at 18:29 |
but Jeff those artists will be added to the archives if I know your hard-working
team (I mean isn't that a good thing?), and a discussion about some other band won't affect that
|
 |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17589
|
Posted: February 03 2010 at 18:32 |
If we have a PR category, and the plan is for the site to retain it, then having discussions about acts to add to are perfectly legit and should not be stifled by anyone.
Now, if Admin has already reviewed the Dead, and rejected them after review, then I agree.....as with Judas Priest, let it go for a while.
Can anyone tell us if Admin has reviewed the Dead formally?
|
|
 |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10743
|
Posted: February 03 2010 at 18:54 |
The Dead were voted on very recently and I believe it was 5 no and 1 yes, or something like that, all the same, I will check out the samples provided anyway and keep an open mind about it.
Re Hendrix: just for the record, I WAS TOTALLY JOKING. I like Jimi OK, but he's not even close to one of my favorites.
As I have mentioned many times before, my interest in him increased a lot when I saw he was missing from the site. After doing the research and listening to the music, my appreciation for him and his pre-prog credentials increased greatly, the rest is history, ha ha.
Edited by Easy Money - February 03 2010 at 18:54
|
 |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17589
|
Posted: February 03 2010 at 19:07 |
Oh cool, well, I'm glad they got the official review and I'll respect the decision. Thanks John. I love them, think they are actually more progressive than many of our bands on the site, but I'm perfectly happy to be my own personal deadhead
|
|
 |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 02:29 |
Easy Money wrote:
1) be a big influence on the development of prog in some corner of the globe, without being a total prog band.
|
That's the Dead, alright.
The GD (or Warlocks) were one of the very first psych bands - they're not just A psych band!
Prog arose from Psych.
I don't like the GD at all - boring, boring boring - and no, not progressive.
But their influence on Prog as a global phenomenon, and particularly Prog as it arose in England (a country always quick to pinch musical ideas from the Americans and play with them, as with Rock and Roll, Skiffle, the blues, Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys) is elemental and undeniable.
Prog-Related certainly - on a par with Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys, ie if one, then all three.
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
 |
ko
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 09 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 314
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 03:36 |
Negoba wrote:
Oh Miles belongs here if we're going to have a jazz-fusion category, which we should. He basically invented the genre with the Bitches' Brew era albums. But that was the point. Then what do you rate "Birth of the Cool?" It's a masterpiece, just not of prog.
For my part I doubt I'll review either. |
Yeah, Miles invented the fusion genre with Bitches Brew era albums, he shocked jazz purists and he won rock audience hearts. I rate Birth of the Cool so high. It's '50s jazz masterpiece, of course. It's nice thing that you gonna to review this album. His catalogue before that fusion would be to lighten also. I said that only prog related category would to contain the albums only; some albums by the bands as The Grateful Dead aswell. Same with The Who, or Queen. Some bands have to have only one album @PA as prog related (or proto prog) (i.e. The Stones' Their Satanic Majesty Request ) simply because their other works have absolutly nothing in common with Prog. I know it will never happen, but I though that's only way to avoid gibberish discussions.
Regards;
Edited by ko - February 04 2010 at 04:32
|
 |
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 03:47 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Easy Money wrote:
1) be a big influence on the development of prog in some corner of the globe, without being a total prog band.
|
That's the Dead, alright.
The GD (or Warlocks) were one of the very first psych bands - they're not just A psych band!
Prog arose from Psych.
I don't like the GD at all - boring, boring boring - and no, not progressive.
But their influence on Prog as a global phenomenon, and particularly Prog as it arose in England (a country always quick to pinch musical ideas from the Americans and play with them, as with Rock and Roll, Skiffle, the blues, Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys) is elemental and undeniable.
Prog-Related certainly - on a par with Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys, ie if one, then all three. |
How you can be so scrupulously objective about a band (notwithstanding their credentials for inclusion on PA) who are capable of sucking the very fruit out of home-made jam beggars belief. I salute you.
|
 |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10743
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 08:01 |
Sorry to divert the conversation for a bit, but Bitches Brew isn't even close to the first JR or fusion record.
This is revisionist history pushed by a massive publicity campaign by Columbia records.
You can read the PA definition of JR to learn about the first JR releases, the structure of the article needs to be fixed  but the info is there.
Edited by Easy Money - February 04 2010 at 08:11
|
 |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10743
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 08:21 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Easy Money wrote:
1) be a big influence on the development of prog in some corner of the globe, without being a total prog band.
|
That's the Dead, alright.
The GD (or Warlocks) were one of the very first psych bands - they're not just A psych band!
Prog arose from Psych.
I don't like the GD at all - boring, boring boring - and no, not progressive.
But their influence on Prog as a global phenomenon, and particularly Prog as it arose in England (a country always quick to pinch musical ideas from the Americans and play with them, as with Rock and Roll, Skiffle, the blues, Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys) is elemental and undeniable.
Prog-Related certainly - on a par with Bob Dylan and the Beach Boys, ie if one, then all three. |
Thanks for the endorsement, I just added all three. Next comes Cream, Velvet Underground and Quicksilver Messenger Service.
|
 |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 09:25 |
Lonnie Donegan next?
Actually, the GD make as much sense as Jefferson Airplane.
...still looking for Spooky Tooth and Graham Bond Organisation in the archives... 
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
 |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 09:31 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
How you can be so scrupulously objective about a band (notwithstanding their credentials for inclusion on PA) who are capable of sucking the very fruit out of home-made jam beggars belief. I salute you.
|
Is it possible that said essential property extraction capability could be considered progressive?
Certif1ed wrote:
I don't like the GD at all - boring, boring boring - and no, not progressive.
|
I didn't think at the time that my observations were objective in any way... but now you bring it to my attention, I can see you're right 
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
 |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10743
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 09:39 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Lonnie Donegan next?
Actually, the GD make as much sense as Jefferson Airplane.
...still looking for Spooky Tooth and Graham Bond Organisation in the archives...  |
Personally I think GD makes more sense than JA.
I totally missed out on the JA addition and not sure how they got here. In the words of our esteemed Ivan though, once an artist is here, not much point in arguing anymore, not that you were.
As I said before, I think there is a valid case for GD, there just aren't enough yes votes for them on the current PR or proto team. That could change later.
I haven't listened to all of the above samples, but Unbroken Chain is prog-rock, nice stuff.
Another band that I think deserves a serious look, and I know Dick Heath has said this too, is Simon and Garfunkel. Bookends could qualify as proto, and as Heath has pointed out, Save the Life of my Child is probably one of the first recorded prog songs.
Edited by Easy Money - February 04 2010 at 09:42
|
 |
earlyprog
Special Collaborator
Neo / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2171
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 09:42 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Actually, the GD make as much little sense as Jefferson Airplane.
|
Same meaning I suppose 
|
 |
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 10:30 |
While the point that some one got into prog from prog-related groups makes sense, I don't think anyone will find this site because of prog-related groups, and then discover actual prog. I really don't think the PR category serves any purpose other than allowing members to discuss non-prog bands they like. Obviously, if the majority of members want to do that, then it goes, but I am so sick of discussions about the merits of Metallica, the Dead, etc. who are already popular. NO ONE is going to discover those bands because of this site.
And it also seems that if someone makes a big stink, eventually the band ends up accepted regardless of merit anyway. Except SOAD for some reason.
I guess I've stirred enough caca. Do go on. I await the Dead reviews coming soon to a front page near you.
|
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 11:33 |
I'm surprised to see so little credit given to Jefferson Airplane. They were way ahead of their time. For example, in their 1967 album "After Bathing At Baxter's" they have a 9 minute + "avant" jam. Nobody did that!
Edited by harmonium.ro - February 04 2010 at 11:35
|
 |
earlyprog
Special Collaborator
Neo / Heavy Teams
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2171
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 13:36 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
I'm surprised to see so little credit given to Jefferson Airplane. They were way ahead of their time. For example, in their 1967 album "After Bathing At Baxter's" they have a 9 minute + "avant" jam. Nobody did that! |
Many others were just as far or even further ahead of their time. Just to mention some of the 9+ minute proto-prog songs that were recorded that year (not to mention all the extended versions played in the clubs):
PInk Floyd Interstellar Overdrive
Doors When the Music's Over
Soft Machine Lullaby Letter + Hope for Happiness + I've Should Have Known
Fifty Foot Hose Fantasy
Spirit Elijah (first Jazz Rock/Fusion?)
Procol Harum In Held Twas in I
Collectors What Love
I wouldn't even call JA's "Spare Chaynge" proto-prog. It's an example of how US Psyche developed into Space Rock and they didn't even do it very well.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 14:06 |
^ That's how you see it; to me it's the most ambitious thing created by a proto prog band in 1967 (Interstellar Overdrive is pure, mature prog so I don't find it relevant in this discussion; and there's also Sgt. Pepper who is also something completely different, having achieved the same goal of prog, the rock album as a work of art, by different means - no instrumentals, no jams, no avantgarde, no mini-epics, just... their own thing, which I don't know how to define). What makes it different to the other examples is that is has such a "theoretical" nature, visibly developed in as a technical experiment of construction and dissolution of musical form. Not just an intuitive, unwanted accomplishment, but a conscious "treatise" on the problem.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 14:16 |
So I'm listening to Anthem Of The Sun (1968) right now and what I can say is that though it lacks the "avantgarde" edge that JA's After Bathing At Baxter's has, I still think it would suit Proto-Prog.
|
 |
himtroy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 15:26 |
Don't really see how they're not prog related. They couldn't have influenced the psychedelic rock scene much more, and the psych scene to me seems like the prog scene before it became "prog"
|
 |
J-Man
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
|
Posted: February 04 2010 at 15:48 |
Atavachron wrote:
but Jeff those artists will be added to the archives if I know your hard-working
team (I mean isn't that a good thing?), and a discussion about some other band won't affect that
|
All I'm trying to get across is that there are hundreds of actual progressive rock bands out there that aren't on the archives. I am completely in support of Grateful Dead being added to PR, but it's already been discussed (and rejected) before. I think once that happens, it's time to forget about adding a band that's not even full-blown prog anyway. -Jeff
|
|
 |