Zeppelin and the Occult

mikedevilsfan wrote: Pixel Pirate wrote: Accepting as absolute fact something for which there exists no evidence whatsoever is probably as good a definition of stupid as you're likely to find,actually. Ok I stand corrected- JS Bach "Moron" "Pixel Pirate" from the prog Archives- Genius. Michael

Of course I don't mean a 24 hours a day,complete moron,gaga stupidity but stupid as far as certain areas of his life was concerned. And when did I ever say i was a genius? You really can't take it,can you when someone points out the one glaring,huge,massive,overwhelming flaw in religious reasoning:

THERE'S NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF IT!

Unless of course you have absolute proof of the existance of god,in which case I think there are quite a few people who would like to hear it! Me for one.

James Lee wrote: Yep, they're all foolish. There's a difference between believing in a deity and believing that they talk directly to you. A lot of the speculation on this thread has sounded more like the latter. Of course Zeppelin has had occult influences! They were also influenced by Robert Johnson, but nobody's claiming that you can feel the supernatural power of the King of the Delta Blues if you play "The Lemon Song" backwards.

James that’s borderline retarded my friend.  If you can make the leap of the possibility of a deity, why can you go an extra inch and believe that the deity talks to people? That’s like saying, “You can believe in libraries, but believing that there are books inside is another thing all together.”

Robert Johnson believed in the Devils enough to sell him his soul. Is the “King of Blues” also stupid? I am starting to get the picture hear: ¾ of the world are stupid, and the three pinheads on this board are not. Gotcha.

Accepting as absolute fact something for which there exists no evidence whatsoever is probably as good a definition of stupid as you're likely to find,actually.

Why?