![]() |
Reviews discussion |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 178179180181182> |
Author | ||||||
The Miracle ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: May 29 2005 Location: hell Status: Offline Points: 28427 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
So... it's appropriate enough to stay then?
Edited by The Miracle - October 19 2006 at 19:26 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
The Miracle ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: May 29 2005 Location: hell Status: Offline Points: 28427 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I agree, very close minded and biased review.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
sleeper ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: October 09 2005 Location: Entropia Status: Offline Points: 16449 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I have problems with this review:
LIQUID TENSION EXPERIMENT — Liquid Tension Experiment 2 Review by jasusgabrielbrea
The first two paragraphs do nothing but lambast prog metal, the second sentance of which is nothing but a lie (does this guy realise that a lot of prog-metal is played by classically trained musicians?). If he doesnt like the album thats fine, but I dont like him using a review to bad mouth a genre here on the front page. Edited by sleeper - October 19 2006 at 18:45 |
||||||
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Certif1ed ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
IRON MAIDEN — Iron Maiden
Review by G_Bone (Graeme) From a progressive standpoint, this album would rank pretty low. But I'm going to rate it as music, not necessarily prog. Site Guidelines 6 - Try to write reviews that will be of real use and interest to other progressive music fans, who can benefit by finding new avenues for their musical exploration. I'm getting pretty fed up of people who use the review system as a kind of cheap "rate your music" instead of adhering to the spirit of this site - and bothering to read our guidelines. This is, of course, one of oh so many - but in this case, the reviewer blatantly spells out his intention to not bother following them. Is this a Progressive music site or not? Edited by Certif1ed - October 19 2006 at 03:48 |
||||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
you are right it doesn't adress the music really, but i don't think it's really a problem, no problemo for me, I tend to agree with him that it's a collection of middle of the road songs, which does say something of the music.
I think it's a valid review, though he says he doesn't describe the tracks because the reader knows them is slightly for the wrong audience, for people who know the album have no use for a review.
people who don't know the album will realise that this is a more popular release than previous albums.
at least this review explains his three star rating.
|
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Angelo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Just an idea, to avoid confusion like Peter's: I think, but I'm not sure, that the Web Wiz Forums software that is run to create this forum supports automatic addition of the word 'Moved' pr something similar to any posts moved. If not, never mind, otherwise, it could be useful here... |
||||||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Australian ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 13 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3278 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Posted edited "Song for America" Review by KANsaS
Edited by Australian - October 16 2006 at 03:52 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
This thread is for discussing reviews. There's no rules for this thread, you can talk about good reviews, bad reviews, reviews which have been reported in the Reviews reporting thread etc.
The reviews reporting thread is intended to be a simple thread where people can report a review they feel is "inappropriate". Posts in that thread will be acknowledged by the admin team from time to time, but it is not intended that any discussion will take place there. (In the interest of fair play, the reviewer as the right to post a defence there).
What we (Guigo and I) are trying to do is keep the reviews reporting thread clean and focused. The previous "inappropriate reviews" thread tended to go off on tangents, and sometimes reported reviews got missed among the discussion.
The first post in each of the threads has the details.
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tardis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 02 2005 Location: Victoria, BC Status: Offline Points: 14378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Oops! I just noticed that...sorry Pete!
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
^ See? Tardis seems to have posted in the "wrong" reviews thread too! (He's quoting my post from the other thread. Is this a technical glitch?)
![]() |
||||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Atkingani ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Peter, this review has much less than 50 words or 200 characters, it did not go to the PA homepage and doesn't appear in the album page. It counts as a rating-without-review.
![]() EDIT: Anyway, this thread split is new. One for the inappropriate reviews and the other to discuss the content (or not) of some reviews. With time, I guess that people will be used to both. Edited by Atkingani - October 15 2006 at 15:39 |
||||||
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() (So I'm sorry if I posted/responded in the wrong thread. I have now also posted my prior post in the other reviews thread. Perhaps this thread needs a new title -- something like "Review Writing.")
![]() |
||||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tardis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 02 2005 Location: Victoria, BC Status: Offline Points: 14378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Agreed. It's lazy and extremely unhelpful. I'm interested in getting the listener's original perspective on an album! |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() Negative reviews can be useful, and are normally among the most concise -- or even humourous. (I have written one or two similar reviews in my time -- see Renaissance "Camera Camera.") I think that even a fan of "alternative" music (and/or Radiohead) can get a feel of what this disk sounds like, from this review.
It's a tough call, but I wouldn't have cut this one. What are his other reviews like? Edited by Peter Rideout - October 15 2006 at 15:14 |
||||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Not so much censored Angelo, I just don't like giving such reviews ongoing publicity once they have been dealt with.
![]() Starve them of oxygen and they'll hopefully go away!
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Angelo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Figured that, I even got censored by Bob when quoting the review... ![]() |
||||||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Atkingani ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Mandy's rival?
![]() |
||||||
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Fassbinder ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: May 27 2006 Location: My world Status: Offline Points: 3497 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Priceless!!! A challenging reading though... Kind of semi-phonetical style...
Seriously, though, why not to check a review before posting? Some misspellings might be avoided...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
chopper ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20069 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
This one wins the prize for the worst spelling ever (e.g. "Masterpiece! that is a word you culd yuse to describe this 70's classis"
http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=89876 Also an almost total lack of punctuation makes it even harder to read. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
As you'll see from the wording, it says 75 words recommended.
There has been no change to the parameters for checking review length (which is actually 200 characters), and no current proposal to do so.
|
||||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 178179180181182> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |