Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Waves of Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Waves of Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Waves of Prog?
    Posted: September 07 2020 at 10:27
Originally posted by Zeph Zeph wrote:

Absolutely. The world of music was more grouped together in the early days of prog, and a lot of movements made a big impact on the music that were to come. I imagine a tree with a thick trunk where the roots are the first forms of music ever made by man. As time goes the tree grows and new limbs emerge. Back in the 60's and onwards, there were a lot less diversity in the music available to people, and the ways to listen to it. Today you can access most of the musical world, most of what's ever been recorded, with a mobile phone.

During the decades from 60's and into 2000, a lot happened. Pop, prog, punk, metal, trance, house, rap etc. became a thing and each new style often found inspiration in what came before. This was also true within the prog genre, what we often call waves. It was easier to point them out since the world of music still wasn't that big and diverse, and a lot of the music were found in the mainstream. 

These days the mainstream music is about autotune and most of it sound very much the same, with the occasional surprise. It's more about money than musicality and creating something truly inspired.

Those main genres became large limbs on the tree and new sub-genres and crossovers sprouted every which way. Today the diversity is incredibly large, alsonwithin prog, which can be expressed in so many different ways. Sometimes a distinct new limb sprout, but it struggles to create a wave in the current world. The further we get from the 20th century, the more difficult it will be to create something unique and different. And when someone do, it will likely only be something a minority ever even know about.

The thoughts listed in this topic sounds reasonable and I agree that the 90's were the last wave where you got a distinct new sound that enough bands and artists could be grouped together in. From 2000 and onwards there's just so much music and diversity that it's difficult to say that all of these large bands are going in this new direction, let's call it a wave.

I love music from the early days of prog, but there is a lot of great music being made today. Many of them struggle with acceptance because they don't sound distinct enough, but that brings me back to a previous point about it becoming difficult to create distinct new music. Everyone draws inspiration from older bands and it's difficult to create something in 2020 without someone pointing out that the riff at 3:24 in the second song sounds very similar to that riff from [insert big 70's name here] 4:21 into [insert song name here].

If there are still waves, they are smaller and has less impact on what other bands are doing. The whole idea behind waves is that there's a commonality shared between a group of artists/bands that are popular enough to be named together. You could that a lack of waves today is a sign of many bands trying to do their own thing and now jumping on wagons.
An excellent post. This was what I was looking for when I made this thead. Smile
One point: You're right when you say prog today is so diverse we can't really call it one genre/sub-genre... but if you fish out the Crossover and Heavy Prog that seems to be going on a lot these days, and the neo prog revival that has happened; there is some more alternative, differant prog going on, that sounds reasonably similar and what some call "new" or "modern" prog. However, I believe it is too early to say at this stage.
Nevertheless, I'm optimistic. I think the new wave will happen, and that we - as I noted in the OP - are in the beginings of it. 
"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
Zeph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 16 2014
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 558
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Zeph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2020 at 05:31
Absolutely. The world of music was more grouped together in the early days of prog, and a lot of movements made a big impact on the music that were to come. I imagine a tree with a thick trunk where the roots are the first forms of music ever made by man. As time goes the tree grows and new limbs emerge. Back in the 60's and onwards, there were a lot less diversity in the music available to people, and the ways to listen to it. Today you can access most of the musical world, most of what's ever been recorded, with a mobile phone.

During the decades from 60's and into 2000, a lot happened. Pop, prog, punk, metal, trance, house, rap etc. became a thing and each new style often found inspiration in what came before. This was also true within the prog genre, what we often call waves. It was easier to point them out since the world of music still wasn't that big and diverse, and a lot of the music were found in the mainstream. 

These days the mainstream music is about autotune and most of it sound very much the same, with the occasional surprise. It's more about money than musicality and creating something truly inspired.

Those main genres became large limbs on the tree and new sub-genres and crossovers sprouted every which way. Today the diversity is incredibly large, alsonwithin prog, which can be expressed in so many different ways. Sometimes a distinct new limb sprout, but it struggles to create a wave in the current world. The further we get from the 20th century, the more difficult it will be to create something unique and different. And when someone do, it will likely only be something a minority ever even know about.

The thoughts listed in this topic sounds reasonable and I agree that the 90's were the last wave where you got a distinct new sound that enough bands and artists could be grouped together in. From 2000 and onwards there's just so much music and diversity that it's difficult to say that all of these large bands are going in this new direction, let's call it a wave.

I love music from the early days of prog, but there is a lot of great music being made today. Many of them struggle with acceptance because they don't sound distinct enough, but that brings me back to a previous point about it becoming difficult to create distinct new music. Everyone draws inspiration from older bands and it's difficult to create something in 2020 without someone pointing out that the riff at 3:24 in the second song sounds very similar to that riff from [insert big 70's name here] 4:21 into [insert song name here].

If there are still waves, they are smaller and has less impact on what other bands are doing. The whole idea behind waves is that there's a commonality shared between a group of artists/bands that are popular enough to be named together. You could that a lack of waves today is a sign of many bands trying to do their own thing and now jumping on wagons.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20250
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 06 2020 at 07:27
Tend to agree with you, the current scene is so diverse you can't really group them at all.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26283
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 06 2020 at 01:30
Only 3 waves for me. The last was the 90's prog revival which also included bands like Radiohead and Mansun as well as Angalgard and Spocks Beard. I would also include prog metal bands as well. What is called prog rock is now very diversified stylistically and can even draw from punk and new wave as well as classic. To call anything a 'wave' suggests there is a common mentality , I don't believe there is. the 90's revival of rock music (not just prog) was to a certain extent a reaction against the plastic production MTV dominated music of the 80's and prog benefited greatly from that.
Back to Top
Awesoreno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 2903
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Awesoreno Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 06 2020 at 00:37
Not to be confused with post-progressive. Which was an early 80s thing. Whereas Neo Prog recontextualized the romanticism of many of the symph/eclectic/cross groups of the previous decade in a synth-pop (or generalized 80s pop) way, post-progressive was typified by more of an influence from post-punk/new wave and minimalism. Many of Eno and Fripp's works at the time exemplify this. The 80s trio of KC albums are the perfect examples. 

This is why I think these waves we're talking about are kind of narrow and mostly focus on Anglo-American symph/neo/cross groups (and some eclectic and heavy).
Back to Top
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 05 2020 at 07:41
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

There was definitely a third wave in the 90's. After that it's somewhat debatable if there was another one but I think there was. To me the fourth wave happened when the Mars Volta made the album charts and then Porcupine Tree soon after. That was in the mid 2000's.
I classed the 90s and 00s as the same wave - for example, Porcupine Tree was active in both the 90s and 00s. I've called this era the general term "post-prog".
"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 16462
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 05 2020 at 07:02
There was definitely a third wave in the 90's. After that it's somewhat debatable if there was another one but I think there was. To me the fourth wave happened when the Mars Volta made the album charts and then Porcupine Tree soon after. That was in the mid 2000's.
Back to Top
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 05 2020 at 03:54
Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

Originally posted by FatherChristmas FatherChristmas wrote:

Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Hi,

Honestly I think that SW is simply about pop songs ... his days of tripping and doing some really nice and neat music are gone as far as I think, which could be incorrect, of course. but he has not done anything that is remotely even close to "progressive" for a long time, and his solo efforts are all about "songs" ... nothing else. 

Some nice stuff, no doubt, but I would not even consider him progressive anymore!


I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.

This is why Steve Wilson is classed as Crossover Prog. Though the dominant genre is prog rock in Wilson's music, he takes influence from many different genres, including jazz, pschedelic, and indeed pop.
A dominant genre in Wilson's music is Alternative rock, actually. Personally I don't like Alternative rock and that's the reason why I don't like him either, regardless of his "proggy" songs.
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

...
I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.

Hi,

It doesn't have anything to do with a 10+ minute song or a 4 minute song ... The Edgar Broughton Band, used a lot of small material, but it was always explosive and strong, and they even had a few pieces of music that were "hits", although at least one of them was kinda censored.

To me, SW, is about his fame ... and name ... and I think the music is becoming second rate ... so "crossover" is probably a good place for him ... but "progressive" is not a very good denomination for most of his work, specially when compared to the stuff form the 60's and then 70's ... it makes his material sound down right boring and poor!

Mind you, I don't dislike his work altogether ... but I get tired of his words ... and then spreading his fame ... like Uncle Elton is going to make him more progressive, when all it is doing is ... having some fun at your expense and mine, and I would not be surprised if that part be taken out or changed when the rest of the album comes out ... it was all little songs, and I think he got called on that! An album with 12, o3 13 pieces, all of them 4 or 5 minutes, I'm willing to bet you is not gonna sell and he is going to get trashed silly ... already not many people liked what he showed ... and I thought it was OK, but I would rather he used someone that meant a lot more as a person, than Uncle Elton! I think SW just wanted to have a bit of fun, and don't be surprised if that song is removed!




 
This, clearly, is a very debatable subject. And when in doubt, make a poll...
"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16355
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2020 at 21:34
Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

...
I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.

Hi,

It doesn't have anything to do with a 10+ minute song or a 4 minute song ... The Edgar Broughton Band, used a lot of small material, but it was always explosive and strong, and they even had a few pieces of music that were "hits", although at least one of them was kinda censored.

To me, SW, is about his fame ... and name ... and I think the music is becoming second rate ... so "crossover" is probably a good place for him ... but "progressive" is not a very good denomination for most of his work, specially when compared to the stuff form the 60's and then 70's ... it makes his material sound down right boring and poor!

Mind you, I don't dislike his work altogether ... but I get tired of his words ... and then spreading his fame ... like Uncle Elton is going to make him more progressive, when all it is doing is ... having some fun at your expense and mine, and I would not be surprised if that part be taken out or changed when the rest of the album comes out ... it was all little songs, and I think he got called on that! An album with 12, o3 13 pieces, all of them 4 or 5 minutes, I'm willing to bet you is not gonna sell and he is going to get trashed silly ... already not many people liked what he showed ... and I thought it was OK, but I would rather he used someone that meant a lot more as a person, than Uncle Elton! I think SW just wanted to have a bit of fun, and don't be surprised if that song is removed!



Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Boboulo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 21 2020
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 661
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Boboulo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2020 at 17:48
Originally posted by FatherChristmas FatherChristmas wrote:

Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Hi,

Honestly I think that SW is simply about pop songs ... his days of tripping and doing some really nice and neat music are gone as far as I think, which could be incorrect, of course. but he has not done anything that is remotely even close to "progressive" for a long time, and his solo efforts are all about "songs" ... nothing else. 

Some nice stuff, no doubt, but I would not even consider him progressive anymore!


I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.

This is why Steve Wilson is classed as Crossover Prog. Though the dominant genre is prog rock in Wilson's music, he takes influence from many different genres, including jazz, pschedelic, and indeed pop.
A dominant genre in Wilson's music is Alternative rock, actually. Personally I don't like Alternative rock and that's the reason why I don't like him either, regardless of his "proggy" songs.
Back to Top
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2020 at 17:08
Originally posted by Forgotten Son Forgotten Son wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Hi,

Honestly I think that SW is simply about pop songs ... his days of tripping and doing some really nice and neat music are gone as far as I think, which could be incorrect, of course. but he has not done anything that is remotely even close to "progressive" for a long time, and his solo efforts are all about "songs" ... nothing else. 

Some nice stuff, no doubt, but I would not even consider him progressive anymore!


I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.

This is why Steve Wilson is classed as Crossover Prog. Though the dominant genre is prog rock in Wilson's music, he takes influence from many different genres, including jazz, pschedelic, and indeed pop.
"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
Forgotten Son View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1355
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Forgotten Son Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2020 at 16:58
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Hi,

Honestly I think that SW is simply about pop songs ... his days of tripping and doing some really nice and neat music are gone as far as I think, which could be incorrect, of course. but he has not done anything that is remotely even close to "progressive" for a long time, and his solo efforts are all about "songs" ... nothing else. 

Some nice stuff, no doubt, but I would not even consider him progressive anymore!


I think you are wrong, whether you're using progressive as an adjective or a noun. Albums like Hand. Cannot. Erase. and The Raven That Refused to Sing lean even more heavily on traditional progressive rock influences than much of his prior material, but without being derivative. If you think an album dominated by 10+ minute songs fully of jazzy instrumental sections or a life-spanning concept album about the lonely death of a young woman aren't progressive I really don't know how to defend my case. Other than to also point out that pop and progressive aren't mutually exclusive.
Back to Top
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2020 at 11:11
^No one is, really. Some of the new bands from the 2010s say they're nu prog, some say new prog, some say modern prog, some say some other sub-genre, but most just say they're a prog rock band. Which is not at all helpful for classification maniacs like me. Wink

Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

  In my perception - maybe I'm wrong - this really looks like the OP actually wanted to do just another "best year in Prog" poll but that he has switched in the last minute and posted a non-poll topic.

Anyhow, I'll just repeat that I think that the 2010s "wave of Prog" was much better than "wave" in the 2000s. And in my opinion, 2010s would have been even better than the 1990s if Dream Theater had not happened.

You're wrong. He's discussing waves, it's not a poll.
Ok.
Don't worry. I may be a classification maniac, but not a poll maniac. I never intended this as a poll. Smile
 

"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 16462
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 19:24
Proto prog 66-69(not really a wave imo)
First wave 69-78
Second wave 82-89
Third wave 90- 2004
Fourth wave 2005- ?

I'm not sure about any more recent waves.
Back to Top
Boboulo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 21 2020
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 661
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Boboulo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 18:14
Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

  In my perception - maybe I'm wrong - this really looks like the OP actually wanted to do just another "best year in Prog" poll but that he has switched in the last minute and posted a non-poll topic.

Anyhow, I'll just repeat that I think that the 2010s "wave of Prog" was much better than "wave" in the 2000s. And in my opinion, 2010s would have been even better than the 1990s if Dream Theater had not happened.

You're wrong. He's discussing waves, it's not a poll.
Ok.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20250
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 17:18
Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

  In my perception - maybe I'm wrong - this really looks like the OP actually wanted to do just another "best year in Prog" poll but that he has switched in the last minute and posted a non-poll topic.

Anyhow, I'll just repeat that I think that the 2010s "wave of Prog" was much better than "wave" in the 2000s. And in my opinion, 2010s would have been even better than the 1990s if Dream Theater had not happened.

You're wrong. He's discussing waves, it's not a poll.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Boboulo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 21 2020
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 661
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Boboulo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 17:06
Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

Originally posted by Cristi Cristi wrote:

Originally posted by Boboulo Boboulo wrote:

2010s would be my choice due to so many great debut albums.


choice of what? Confused LOLthis isn't a poll. 
De facto this is like a poll, lol. Well I think that the 2010s "wave of Prog" was better than "wave of Prog" in the 2000s and let's say equal to the 1990s, although different because in the 1990s the new bands were still looking for a record label to release their debut album officially, while in the the 2010s it was mostly self-released stuff, more alike lovely folk-art. Personally I loved it.

again, not a choice to make, the OP is trying to figure out what's happened beyond classic prog years. 
In my perception - maybe I'm wrong - this really looks like the OP actually wanted to do just another "best year in Prog" poll but that he has switched in the last minute and posted a non-poll topic.

Anyhow, I'll just repeat that I think that the 2010s "wave of Prog" was much better than "wave" in the 2000s. And in my opinion, 2010s would have been even better than the 1990s if Dream Theater had not happened in the nineties.

Edited by Boboulo - September 03 2020 at 18:32
Back to Top
Awesoreno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 2903
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Awesoreno Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 14:28
It's kind of accurate if we're just looking at a few of the sub-genres and mostly looking at it through a more anglo-american focus.
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 12764
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 13:57
I wouldn't say waves, per se. More like puddles. Stomped through with muddy boots.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
FatherChristmas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2020
Location: LandofGrey&Pink
Status: Offline
Points: 2457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FatherChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2020 at 13:13
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by FatherChristmas FatherChristmas wrote:

^I was simply asking whether my idea of prog history is correct.

Hi,

For all intents and purposes there is no "correct" ... and the best we can do is evaluate what we see and study and hope that it makes sense.

One of the examples I like to use is the many posts here that are totally about a "song" and a "format" that is no where near what "progressive" started out to be ... and then calling this wannabe stuff ... progressive ... when it really isn't.

Along with this is the issue with long cuts and such ... and no one in the late 60's or into the 70's before FM RADIO in America became commercial (starts in '76/'77 or so ... I don't have an exact number), thought that the music was ....meeehhhhh ... or ... boring ... and one just enjoyed the trip as it went along ... I suppose that those same folks would say that it was all the dope at the time ... and goodness gracious ... I was not even a doper! And I loved the music, and every time I hear another bootleg of Quicksilver Messenger Service at the Fillmore, I nearly cry ... that is really good stuff ... and we think a guitar thrashing guy is better!!! They obviously never heard Alvin Lee, I'm sure!

I think, that when "thinking" and "lyrics" take over the music, the whole thing is over ... now it becomes a song about this or that ... and it takes the mystery, the curiosity and the wonder out of the whole piece of music for me, and many folks ... but folks complaining about long cuts and such ... is one of the weirdest things ever in the history of music ... like no Symphony or Concerto didn't even have that ... and no one is doubting the veracity of the script for many operas and how the music illustrates that ... but today's audience has to be spoon fed their Gerber ... and not have to listen attentively!

Yes, you are right. I ment if others felt it was correct.
"Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence" - Robert Fripp
"I am an anti-Christ" - Johnny Rotten
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.