Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Singers that take an acquired taste to get into?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Singers that take an acquired taste to get into?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Greenmist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 10 2020
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 294
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Greenmist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Singers that take an acquired taste to get into?
    Posted: June 11 2022 at 09:42
I dont know if this one can count, but i would say Brian Johnson of AC/DC
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18993
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2022 at 07:11
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

...
And yes, agreed that given Jon doesn't even feature on every Yes album, the question of exactly how indispensable he is is up for debate.  And for another, even if he is, it doesn't mean that I am conflating something I dislike in the band's writing with dislike for his singing.  It is possible that I recognize what they are doing and that the way it comes out in his specific voice and singing doesn't completely satisfy me.  

Hi,

I wonder about this.

I think that Jon had a nice path going, and was ready for more and he did with CTTE and then TFTO ... but then, when RW and the media trashed TFTO because it was not a pop song, his idea of something better and stronger than just a song, went out the window, with some thanks to Mr. Curry and Cape for his comments which were really sad, considering that what he added to CTTE and TFTO was vastly superior than the over rated material he did as a "solo" artist ... 

It was a sad time, and I did not dislike RELAYER but you could see the effect right away that Mr. Curry and Cape's comments added to the record company wanting something that would get played on radio a lot more, and sadly, I think this took its toll. RELAYER, is not, in many ways, an improvement on TFTO at all, and I tend to think that some parts in the album are simply allowing a player or two to go totally crazy and that was that. While there is a lot to like from Mr. Howe, I would think that if he had toned it down some, it might make a better album, but at that time, the golden god guitarist from Mars was more important to the music business than the music itself.

To me, what was meant as "progressive music" was hurt and destroyed right there. The "meaning" was now meaningless and no lyrics were EVER going to save it!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Spacegod87 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 16 2019
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1107
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Spacegod87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 11 2022 at 07:04
^ It really does fit and his voice is unlike anything else. It probably shouldn't be pleasing to the ear, but it strangely is, to me anyway.

In saying that..I understand that Cardiacs in general is a hard pill for most people to swallow. I've given up convincing anyone around me to listen to more than one of their songs let alone try to like them.
Levitating downwards,
atomic feedback scream.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15508
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 08:44
Originally posted by Ronstein Ronstein wrote:

As others have said, a great vocal delivery does't necessarily require great singing ability or technique, it just needs to 'fit'. For me, the late Tim Smith of Cardiacs is a great example.



You're so right. It's about placing the vocal style in the proper context of the music. Tim Smith's vocals were absolutely an essential ingredient for creating that bizarro effect that Cardiacs excelled at.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15508
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 08:43
Geddy Lee from Rush was a tough pill to swallow at first but now i love his style.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18993
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 08:07
Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

...
Top choices for 'difficult' vocalists I've come to love over time

Dagmar Krause
Robert Wyatt
Peter Hamill
...

Hi,

There are a couple of others, these days, but they are kinda lost in the shuffle, and folks are not that great about listening to new things. In the Space Pirate Radio show, there are a couple of things that are insane, and have vocals that challenge the best of FZ and other "weird" or "strange" kind of vocals. Nobody else, but Guy Guden will play these things, since most folks don't know how/what to follow it up with ... oh yeah ... let's play this YES piece, which tells you that those folks don't know music from farts! And farts make excellent music backwards ... ask Guy about that!

Dagmar, for me, is a left over from the Brecht/Weill school of music, that also went on to develop its own version in France with Ange doing Jacques Brel as well.

Peter Hammill, in my own words, is the best of the "pure" actors and I think that everything he does is just so well defined, which tells you that all the lyrics are written off his own expression first, not his ideas. I don't think he can write a song about this or that ... he just seems to write and if it is about this or that, oh well, so it is ... but it's hard to see this in Bernina and some of the material at that time, but when you hear his album that includes noises and such, you get the idea that he learns about expression by experimenting, and some new things always arrive.

Robert Wyatt, for me, is the ultimate kid in a sandbox ... and his playfulness and appreciation for it all is crazy, and sometimes it is difficult to appreciate ... for most rock fans, and even jazz fans. But his intuitive side, and ability to do something different (all the time!!! You must read his book!!!!!) is probably second to none, and my guess/bet is that he will even do it onstage to take the safe side out of most musicians simply reading a script! 

Play with heart, not a script!


Edited by moshkito - June 09 2022 at 08:08
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 21858
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 07:51
Originally posted by Cosmiclawnmower Cosmiclawnmower wrote:

Someone not yet mentioned who's voice was described in the music press of the time (amongst other things..) as 'challenging' and 'an acquired taste' is Roger Chapman from Family,

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

Frank Bornemann of Eloy because of his horrible German accent. why do they not sing in German?

These two are certainly two I've never gotten to the point of acquiring a taste for. They put me off enough to continue to avoid. Though I do own a couple of Eloy albums.

Top choices for 'difficult' vocalists I've come to love over time

Dagmar Krause
Robert Wyatt
Peter Hamill

Thinking Plague's vocalists Susanne Lewis, Deborah Perry & Elaine Di Falco all get flack for but they are singing the way Mike Johnson writes the material & I love it.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18993
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 07:47
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

...
The problem is with the over-emphasis on 'sound' in rock.
...
Jazz groups go through all kinds of permutations and routinely collaborate and the greatest jazz players surely have at least as much personality as the greatest rock players, if not more.  
...
FWIW KC demonstrated that this is not the case at all, going through jazz-like upheavals and reinventions of the lineup and succeeding with most of the iterations. 
...
 

Hi,

I've always thought that this is the case because of the record companies and their advertising, and eventually, the fans "believe it" ... there is no record company in the last 50 years that was not going to take advantage of Ozzy and his this or that on the stage ... which helped sell a lot more albums than anyone expected.

As you mentioned and I have stated it several times, the fan base of these things is all about the "sound" and many of them do not care about anything else ... and, you know that is true, when they make their favorite statement and say absolutely nothing about the music and its mechanics. Ozzy may be this and that, but BS was not exactly a 2nd rate band, and they made a lot of their work come alive very well, and they deserve the credit for it. 

In my book, specially for a location like PA, I would like to see the ADMINS do a bit more making sure that folks learn how to discuss music, instead of likes and dislikes and no comment, or worse yet, the comment about someone else's comment that has nothing to do with the music or the artist ... which even a couple of "admins" abuse many times, which (in my book!) needs to stop, but some folks think they are bigger than cheesecake and take advantage of their "power", and this is the case for a lot of record companies and specially rock music, that has always been "based" on its live appeal, and insane moments ... like you find a lot of books on groupies for jazz folks ... but there are hundreds (if not thousands) of these on rock bands, and you can just about tell how many of them are fake ... not that miss "now I'm a do goodie wife", is not as fake and silly as all the others. Their books would have been better with the complete sexy shenanigans, to help dispel something or other about the band ... and instead, it perpetuates the myth, by hiding the real thing. 

The one sad thing, when you really look at the top listings for the past 40 years, is that not very many singers are actually that good, and in fact, many of them can not carry a note. Suddenly you hear a Joe Cocker or a Roger Chapman, and you don't even realize that they did not need to carry a note ... they were ACTORS that also sang ... or as Meatloaf said in his bio ... "I happen to be an actor that sings. You have a problem with that?" .... and it is really easy to say ... yep ... "fans" have massive problems with that because they got attached to something that was not there in the first place!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Enchant X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 31 2014
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 949
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Enchant X Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 09 2022 at 06:42
I'll take Geddy lee over that horrible camel singer any day. 
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2022 at 15:00
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

I would say Geddy on early Rush albums. He calmed on Permanent Waves and Signals.


Except for "... ooooooaaah salesmen!!!"
Back to Top
Floof-AN View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2021
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Floof-AN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2022 at 14:55
Oh boy, there's a lot...

I'll start with one of the vocalists I despise most, Robin G. Suchy in Gerard. He sounds like his lyrics: cringeworthy and utterly annoying. I cannot understand who would even want to listen to his voice, it's as if all the sound was coming through his nose. Gerard has always been better without vocals, or with Japanese vocals, hiring a Canadian singer with Grade 3 writing skills was quite a bad move. It might come off as really personal but I simply cannot stand his forced edgy, nasally, overblown, and faux-operatic vocals.

After that comes Demis Roussos. High speed handpiece, nothing more to say.


Edited by Floof-AN - June 02 2022 at 14:58
Back to Top
Hugh Manatee View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2021
Location: The Barricades
Status: Offline
Points: 1587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hugh Manatee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 22:28
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

But on a technical level, Jon isn't on the same planet pretty much as Hammill.  

Rick Wakeman said of Jon Anderson "He is the only guy I know who is trying to save this planet while living on another one."
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 22:07
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Like Peter Hammill, Jon Anderson to me is one of the great prog singers. They're not just good, they bring something absolutely unique and personal to the music. I think even those who don't like their voices will agree with that. I can be very picky when it comes to singing and voices, so I can identify with anyone with whom one of the generally acknowledged singers or voices doesn't click. It's just like that, at the end it boils down to taste, and some stuff rubs us the wrong way for reasons that we often don't understand ourselves.

Still, I may not be the biggest Yes fan around, but Jon's singing is an absolute selling point for me. (Maybe it helps that I normally don't care much for lyrics. Wink)

I am not going to argue uniqueness which is a subjective concept.  But on a technical level, Jon isn't on the same planet pretty much as Hammill.  It's always intrigued me how people overrate his abilities. Hamill is a powerhouse and a monster and I can comfortably recognize that without being a huge fan of his.  Jon mostly sings in the same dynamic level with very little by way of modulation.  So it's more that what he does fits the band's sound well (which is why the replacements Yes scouted for also tended to approximate his voice to the extent possible) than that he is doing something incredible with his voice.  He's the anti-Hammill/Gabriel/Fish in that sense.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 22:01
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

^^ I really like both Maiden albums with Blaze, and they are both a hell of a lot better to my ears than the two Brung sung albums that preceded them. Unlike a lot of Maiden fans, I was actually quite disappointed when Bruce rejoined the band, because I was quite enjoying the Blaze era. But once I heard the new material I was appeased. Some of my favourite Maiden albums have been made after Bruce’s return. But while he was away, his solo albums and Maiden’s albums without him were all more enjoyable to my than No Prayer and Fear.

[EDIT] And I love the Maiden albums with Dianno, too.

[Second EDIT] Going back to Seattle, since I mentioned Alice in Chains in my earlier post, and to echo your thoughts that just because someone seems indispensable or crucial to a band, does not necessarily mean they are, I can remember huge ructions when Screaming Trees changed drummer, or when Alice In Chains changed bass player, or when Soundgarden changed bass player, etc. etc., with people suggesting that those people were so crucial to the band that they were never going to sound the same or as good. And while you could say they don’t sound the same, because different players do have different sounds and styles, those grumbles and moans never really continued in any great way. People simply got used to the new configurations.

I understand saying Robert Fripp is crucial to Krimson, eg, but that to me is a very different situation to saying Jon is crucial to Yes (not least because Jon does not feature on every Yes album).


W.r.t Fripp, I meant that other than Fripp, there is no common element among all the KC lineups at all and even he says that his contribution is kind of intangible and abstract. So he is sort of like Miles or Mingus, like a jazz band leader setting the tone for how the new project is going to pan out, with brilliant musicians who only need to be nudged and guided rather than told exactly what to play as per one guy's overpowering vision. So in essence, he gave the lie to the indispensability myth a long time.  

And yes, agreed that given Jon doesn't even feature on every Yes album, the question of exactly how indispensable he is is up for debate.  And for another, even if he is, it doesn't mean that I am conflating something I dislike in the band's writing with dislike for his singing.  It is possible that I recognize what they are doing and that the way it comes out in his specific voice and singing doesn't completely satisfy me.  
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 6052
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 15:39
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Like Peter Hammill, Jon Anderson to me is one of the great prog singers. They're not just good, they bring something absolutely unique and personal to the music. I think even those who don't like their voices will agree with that. I can be very picky when it comes to singing and voices, so I can identify with anyone with whom one of the generally acknowledged singers or voices doesn't click. It's just like that, at the end it boils down to taste, and some stuff rubs us the wrong way for reasons that we often don't understand ourselves.

Still, I may not be the biggest Yes fan around, but Jon's singing is an absolute selling point for me. (Maybe it helps that I normally don't care much for lyrics. Wink)

Tastes cannot be argued.

Anyway, my opinion is that Jon Anderson is certainly a great singer, but not a champion. He is still part of the Beatles generation, and his singing is still very much set in a classic way. In the late 1960s, Paul and John also began to sing more freely and expressively (like Mick Jagger), but they, like Jon Anderson, could not match singers like Eric Burdon, Van Morrison, Tim Buckley, Bob Dylan, Captain Beefheart, Robert Plant, Roger Chapman, and ... precisely Peter Hammill. Peter Hammill has an expressionist and existentialist way of singing, and as far as I'm concerned, he belongs to the category of champions. In short, Jon Anderson is a great singer, Hammill is a genius.

My opinion! ;-)

PS I love Paul and John Voice. I think John was more given than Paul, but both were excellent singers and thier voice is wonderful. I'm just saying that only towards the end of the sixties did they begin to let the voice go wild.




Edited by jamesbaldwin - June 01 2022 at 15:45
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 15752
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 15:03
Like Peter Hammill, Jon Anderson to me is one of the great prog singers. They're not just good, they bring something absolutely unique and personal to the music. I think even those who don't like their voices will agree with that. I can be very picky when it comes to singing and voices, so I can identify with anyone with whom one of the generally acknowledged singers or voices doesn't click. It's just like that, at the end it boils down to taste, and some stuff rubs us the wrong way for reasons that we often don't understand ourselves.

Still, I may not be the biggest Yes fan around, but Jon's singing is an absolute selling point for me. (Maybe it helps that I normally don't care much for lyrics. Wink)


Edited by Lewian - June 01 2022 at 15:04
Back to Top
The Anders View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 02 2019
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3535
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Anders Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 14:09
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Jon Anderson's voice greatly affects listening to Yes's songs.

It's a voice definitely not suitable for rock. His over-acute tone, practically a "contralto" tone, makes it much more suitable for new age, meditative music, it clashing with rock because it is not warm in any way.


I guess it might explain why Yes doesn't resonate so well with me. I always found their sound very polished, and maybe it can be cooked down to the singing after all. The music itself is clearly not uninteresting...


Edited by The Anders - June 01 2022 at 14:09
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 09:57
^^ I really like both Maiden albums with Blaze, and they are both a hell of a lot better to my ears than the two Brung sung albums that preceded them. Unlike a lot of Maiden fans, I was actually quite disappointed when Bruce rejoined the band, because I was quite enjoying the Blaze era. But once I heard the new material I was appeased. Some of my favourite Maiden albums have been made after Bruce’s return. But while he was away, his solo albums and Maiden’s albums without him were all more enjoyable to my than No Prayer and Fear.

[EDIT] And I love the Maiden albums with Dianno, too.

[Second EDIT] Going back to Seattle, since I mentioned Alice in Chains in my earlier post, and to echo your thoughts that just because someone seems indispensable or crucial to a band, does not necessarily mean they are, I can remember huge ructions when Screaming Trees changed drummer, or when Alice In Chains changed bass player, or when Soundgarden changed bass player, etc. etc., with people suggesting that those people were so crucial to the band that they were never going to sound the same or as good. And while you could say they don’t sound the same, because different players do have different sounds and styles, those grumbles and moans never really continued in any great way. People simply got used to the new configurations.

I understand saying Robert Fripp is crucial to Krimson, eg, but that to me is a very different situation to saying Jon is crucial to Yes (not least because Jon does not feature on every Yes album).



Edited by nick_h_nz - June 01 2022 at 10:06
Back to Top
Ronstein View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 13 2020
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1280
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ronstein Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 09:44
As others have said, a great vocal delivery does't necessarily require great singing ability or technique, it just needs to 'fit'. For me, the late Tim Smith of Cardiacs is a great example.

Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2022 at 09:44
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Every individual member of a band is crucial.  It's easy to say you don't need a Nick Mason to play drums in order for a Pink Floyd to exist, or that a Cliff Burton can simply be replaced in a band like Metallica and that it will continue as before, but that's just untrue.   

But that is exactly my point. They are all crucial to A sound of Yes, but not to THE sound of Yes. You keep putting words in my mouth, and are inferring from what I’ve written things I never intended. I never said someone could simply be replaced, or that a band will continue as before.

But I enjoy Yes albums with Bill on drums, and with Alan on drums; with Rick on keys, with Patrick on keys, and with Geoff on keys. Yes has continued on and on, perhaps not “as before”, but enough to show that no one band is crucial to the band.

I have never said Jon is not a rock singer. That was someone else. I have never said his voice does not suit the band. That was someone else. I have simply said that I don’t like his voice myself, and perhaps the reason people don’t think he suits the band is more because they don’t like his voice, than because he actually does not suit the band.

I think his vocals DO suit the band. I just don’t like them. So I could quite happily hear someone else sing them, or for there to be no singing at all.

I love Alice In Chains, and I know a lot of their fans were not happy with the band coming together again after Layne’s death (even if it was many years after), and a lot of people for whom Layne’s voice was the main attraction of Alice in Chains - but I think the three post-Layne albums are all really good. Sure, they’re different - but as you’ve said, you can’t expect someone to simply be replaced, and that the band will continue as before. They sound different, because they are different, but they still sound like Alice In Chains. Yes has continued to sound like Yes, with or without Jon.


The problem is with the over-emphasis on 'sound' in rock.  Like you take Ozzy out and you bring in a fabulous singer like Dio and people still have a problem because it doesn't 'sound the same' anymore.  Jazz groups go through all kinds of permutations and routinely collaborate and the greatest jazz players surely have at least as much personality as the greatest rock players, if not more.  Yet, it's only in rock that we have this carping that "oh, it's not XYZ band without ABC singer/player".  FWIW KC demonstrated that this is not the case at all, going through jazz-like upheavals and reinventions of the lineup and succeeding with most of the iterations. But the myth is now well-entrenched.  

Like you, I know Jon has a role much beyond merely singing the lines for Yes songs and is pivotal to the band.  That prior knowledge does not make it any easier to listen to some of his singing (a lot of it does work for me, but the parts that don't, I have to live with and tolerate). 
Meanwhile, Genesis let go of a singer with as much personality as Gabriel and yet did just fine with Collins.  If anybody wants to stick their nose up at Trick of the Tail/Wind and Wuthering, be my guest.  But the vocals are hardly what's holding back either of those albums. And didn't Marillion too have a long, long run without the singer of their first four albums?  I couldn't develop a liking for Hogarth's voice and I didn't dig the new direction so much.  But that's me and it worked for many others. 

Bands are perfectly capable of moving on without members previously thought to be indispensable...given the chance by listeners and, yes, given that the replacements bring something distinctive in their own right (Fleetwood Mac's another).  You can't blame fans for the failure of the Blaze Bayley-Maiden albums because he was simply not a good fit.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.539 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.