Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
ES335
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 168
|
Topic: The Beatles - the solo works Posted: December 16 2007 at 19:15 |
John all the way. And while John Lennon: Plastic Ono Band is a great album, Yoko Ono: Plastic Ono Band is an experimental masterpiece.
|
 |
electricsilence
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 13 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 78
|
Posted: December 15 2007 at 11:19 |
Lennon was the most consistent at producing quality material through out his carrer, with Imagine being one of the best rock albums ever. I haven't heard any Ringo really, Paul and Wings I mostly dislike, and the first Harrison albums were pretty good, but after Dark Horses he just bored me.
|
 |
Nightfly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 01 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3659
|
Posted: December 13 2007 at 10:29 |
I couldn't really get excited about any solo albums. Sure they all had their moments, apart from Ringo but there was too much bland stuff IMO.
|
 |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46843
|
Posted: December 12 2007 at 19:18 |
George Harrison.... anyone who hasn't heard All Things Must Pass is missing a truly .. special album. but McCartney runs a close second... micky loves him some McCartney solo..errr..Wings. That voice... and always a man whore for a Rick player
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
 |
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 20:53 |
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 19:31 |
I think they all did their best solo work within the Beatles and it was always the Lennon songs that I admired the most.
After the split, I'd say it was a close call between Harrison and Lennon, I never could cope with McCartney's solo stuff and there are too many songs I just cannot forgive him for.
Back Off Boogaloo wins it for me as being the best solo single. (but I vote Lennon) 
|
What?
|
 |
Syzygy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7141
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 18:55 |
Harrison gets my vote. John and Paul both released some excellent material, and even Ringo had his moments (largely thanks to input from his 3 ex bandmates) but George was the only one whose solo work exceeded expectations.
|
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
|
 |
laplace
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 18:49 |
GentleSibarit wrote:
You cannot really understand Lennon's work without Ono's influence. She was an accomplished avant-garde artist (read about her and the fluxus art movement), plus she was no stranger to music as she was married to a Jazz musician before she wed Lennon. Her talent is hard to understand cos' it really touches the most arcane and obscure places of expression and should not be to distant for the eyes and sensibility of a prog head.
"Revolution number nine" and the "two virgins" album are "Lennono's" work all the way. I don't read those works as poppish as most people see it.... I would dare to say that Ono is more akin to the prog world than any of the fabfour were.
For Ono's influence I go with Lennon's solo carreer. (ok kill me if you want) LOL
|
strongly agreed with this. I have no ideas why supposed prog-heads buy into the yoko hating nonsense.
|
 |
The Doctor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 18:46 |
Lennon all the way. I did enjoy some of McCartney's stuff too and some of Harrison's, but I love Lennon's work. Imagine (the album) is a masterpiece.
|
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
 |
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 18:37 |
No better album that McCartney's Ram.
|
 |
GentleSibarit
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 30 2007
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 7
|
Posted: December 02 2007 at 03:29 |
You cannot really understand Lennon's work without Ono's influence. She was an accomplished avant-garde artist (read about her and the fluxus art movement), plus she was no stranger to music as she was married to a Jazz musician before she wed Lennon. Her talent is hard to understand cos' it really touches the most arcane and obscure places of expression and should not be to distant for the eyes and sensibility of a prog head. "Revolution number nine" and the "two virgins" album are "Lennono's" work all the way. I don't read those works as poppish as most people see it.... I would dare to say that Ono is more akin to the prog world than any of the fabfour were.  For Ono's influence I go with Lennon's solo carreer. (ok kill me if you want) LOL
|
How can I speak when I'm dry and my throat is burning?
|
 |
A'swepe
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 590
|
Posted: October 02 2006 at 10:33 |
George Harrison - All Things Must Pass
Paul McCartney - McCartney & Ram
John's albums were always too angry for my taste although Imagine was very good. Double Fantasy had some good songs as well.
After Yoko got her hooks into him, he was never the same. At least Linda McCartney was unobtrusive musically (most of the time).
|
David - Never doubt in the dark that which you believe to be true in the light.
http://www.myspace.com/aardvarktxusa - Instrumental rock
http://www.soundclick.com/aardvarktxusa
|
 |
Kleynan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2006
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 720
|
Posted: September 27 2006 at 09:20 |
Yeah, Paul is my choice. Especially if you count Wings. Overall I think that all of their solo careers were pretty dissapointing.
|
You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks.
|
 |
Zoot Allures
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 20 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 127
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 22:12 |
Uuuummmmm! I guess Paul
|
The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. - Hunter S. Thompson
|
 |
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Online
Points: 46767
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 15:38 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Ringo is the obvious choice - his voiceovers for "Thomas the Tank Engine are legendary  |
Cynical.
|
 |
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 15:36 |
Ringo is the obvious choice - his voiceovers for "Thomas the Tank Engine are legendary
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
 |
blbx93
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 92
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 13:57 |
As an avid Beatles fan this is a toughie. Ringo is out of the picture, but still have 3 solid choices. As much as I like All Things Must Pass, Harrison's other works are not nearly as complete. I enjoy Lennon and McCartney's music, but I find Lennon's music too depressing most of the time.
Paul McCartney would have to be the victor. Band on the Run, as well as his work with the wings are very good. Band on the Run is second only to All things must pass. McCartney has had the luxury of time though, and that is a little unfair, but his work is superior.
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 09:10 |
1. Paul
2. John
3. George
Although the best song amongst them is by Lennon (#9 dream).
|
Blog this:
http://artrock2006.blogspot.com
|
 |
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 09:03 |
I love Harrison's solo work, but it is very inconsistent. Even "All Things Must Pass" could be cut down to a double (vinyl) album. Paul's work is well known, but I've only been interested in having his latest albums. Ringo is a fun diversion. Lennon gets the vote for the outstanding "Plastic Ono Band," "Imagine," and "Walls and Bridges." Then you have to take in to account the best songs from "New York City," "Mind Games," and "Double Fantasy."
|
|
 |
salmacis
Forum Senior Member
Content Addition
Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
|
Posted: September 25 2006 at 06:24 |
Yeah, I think their solo careers were pretty weak, imo. Its only because of the achievements of The Beatles that a lot of their output sold anything as (McCartney's especially) it's mostly rather bland soft rock.
'All Things Must Pass' is by far the best, as perhaps it's because there was a wealth of stuff Harrison had to offer as he'd never got the chance before.
As for Lennon, there is hardly anything of worth bar 'Plastic Ono Band' and 'Imagine', save the odd single.
McCartney's first two albums- the eponymous and 'Ram'- have aged well as they lack the bombast of his work with Wings. 'Band On The Run' aside, I find little of worth in Wings.
And Ringo Starr?? I think it's better one doesn't comment.
I think Harrison gets my vote- he never released much as bad as McCartney or Lennon's worst works.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.