Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Are Beatles Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAre Beatles Prog?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>
Poll Question: Are Beatles Prog?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
22 [12.72%]
102 [58.96%]
28 [16.18%]
21 [12.14%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
CRIMSONFROST View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 35 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2005 at 10:15
NO BECAUSE THEY ARE CRAP POP CANDYFLOSS YUCK
Scott c Wills
Back to Top
Olympus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 545 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2005 at 02:27
A couple are kinda' progy.
"Let's get the hell away from this Eerie-ass piece of work so we can get on with the rest of our eerie-ass day"
Back to Top
Steve View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 15 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 11:44
The trouble is people want to put labels on everything.  The Beatles were of course a Progressive band in the sense that from just 1962 to 1970 there is a massive shift in the style of the music they produced, in fact if they did not change the way that they did, they probably woudn't have lasted beyond 1965. 

This site on the other hand celebrates a style of music that covers a certain brand of music that came from psychedelia and 'progressed' into the music we all love. But if you're honest it  hasn't really progressed a great deal since.  I am a great fan myself, I wouldn't be a member of this site otherwise but it all revolves around the word 'Progressive', any music that is progressive in the literal sense can be deemed progressive.

It boils down to the musicianship, virtuoso musicians playing complex and engaging music that we can really enjoy. Do we really need to say that this band is prog and this band isn't, it doesn't really matter.

Edited by Steve
See The Swan Fly High
Back to Top
Prodigal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 18 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 116 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 15:27
Just some of their late stuff is kind of prog.
Back to Top
Wolf Spider View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 04 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1617 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 15:32
No god damn it! They are not prog, not ever grass smoking band of the 60`s/70`s is prog
Last.fm
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20071 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 15:37
As some of you will know I am a huge Beatles fan. They certainly help to pave the way for prog by giving up touring and concentrating on studio work. Tracks like "Tomorrow Never Knows" are important stepping stones on the road to prog. They were also one of the first bands to use a Mellotron. However, they only belong on this site in a "roots of prog" section as they are not prog.

And the person who sl*gged off "I am the walrus" should read Ian MacDonald's book "Revolution In The Head" to find the true meaning behind this protest song.
Back to Top
Philrod View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 319 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 16:59
No, but like it or not, this is the most important band ever!
Back to Top
BePinkTheater View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 17:26

Originally posted by Useful_Idiot Useful_Idiot wrote:

They've had some prog moments, but not enough to get listed in here.

Beautifully put

They opened the door, and peered in a little bit, but never went all the way inside.

However, i will state that the album "Magical Mystery Tour" is true prog and i belive this should be listed as the first moment of true prog( November 27th 1967, almost a full year before ITCOTKC which this site procalims as the first true prog album0

but.. to each his own,  i dont get worked up about such detatials
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20071 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 17:47
Originally posted by BePinkTheater BePinkTheater wrote:

Originally posted by Useful_Idiot Useful_Idiot wrote:

They've had some prog moments, but not enough to get listed in here.

Beautifully put

They opened the door, and peered in a little bit, but never went all the way inside.

However, i will state that the album "Magical Mystery Tour" is true prog and i belive this should be listed as the first moment of true prog( November 27th 1967, almost a full year before ITCOTKC which this site procalims as the first true prog album0

but.. to each his own,  i dont get worked up about such detatials


Good point, although I don't count MMT as a real Beatles album as it wasn't originally released as such in the UK. It's an EP with some singles stuck on side 2. I would go even further and say "Tomorrow Never Knows" is the beginning of prog and that was 1966.
Back to Top
BePinkTheater View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2005 at 17:58

Very true, but never the less i would call it an album.

 

Is that the only reason why it is nto considered progs birthdate? just cause its not a realy album?
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
Back to Top
MANTICORE View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 09 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 350 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 14:47

some glorious moments Of PROG..!!
I Think that they would have to occupy a place in Progarchives

 

The Beatles
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20071 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 15:44
Originally posted by BePinkTheater BePinkTheater wrote:

Very true, but never the less i would call it an album.

 

Is that the only reason why it is nto considered progs birthdate? just cause its not a realy album?


Could be - I think it tends to get overlooked in the UK as it wasn't an official album. Perhaps we could use the MMT EP instead, but Strawberry Fields Forever was recorded quite a while before that. I still think it goes back earlier than that (1966 - Pet Sounds and Tomorrow Never Knows).
Back to Top
magog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 06 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 218 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 12:06
I don't know...but I ask myself: are Back streets boys prog?
Back to Top
rockandrail View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 22 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 310 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 12:15
What about "I want you - so heavy" and Abbey Road's side 2?
Pierre R, the man who lost his signature
Back to Top
eriksalkeld View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2005
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 209 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 10 2005 at 22:58

 

Originally posted by MANTICORE MANTICORE wrote:

some glorious moments Of PROG..!!
I Think that they would have to occupy a place in Progarchives

 

I think The Beatles should be included as proto-prog. I don't think any prog band from the early 70's or late 60's have not been influenced by them, i'm sure all prog giants we love will refer to the beatles if they are asked for their roots.

Of course they aren't prog, deep purple or moody blues are not either. Proto-prog bands are those that directly settled the bases for what we now call PROGRESSIVE ROCK. Also, from a more intimate point of view, each member was so authentic with what they composed. We all know how they were: Paul, George, Ringo and specially John, each had a way of being and thinking quite unique, ideas that escaped to music standards and different life lines. Comercial success was never their main driving force, an example of that is that they stopped performing live in 1966 and they didn't mind for the money (well, at that point i'm sure the beatles were already richer than A. Onassis himself, but that's not the point i want to reach).

Now, this is surely the attitude that most prog rockers are looking for, this authenticity in being, doing and thinking is what Peter Gabriel, Peter Hammill, Jon Anderson and all those characters we admire had (have) as engine for creating what they have.

Those are some reasons I have for THE BEATLES to be included as PROTO-PROG, and only as that. I could write more but my english can't go that far.

http://www.progressiverock.com/timeline.asp?sYear=1967

Extremely important albums regarding to prog rock roots:
- Revolver
- Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band
- White Album
- Abbey Road



Edited by eriksalkeld
Autenticidad, actitud, pluralidad, espiritu e inteligencia, si es prog bien, si no, tambien.
Back to Top
eduardossc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2005 at 08:21

Yes they are prog, they are the father of progressive rock in the purest of the senses. ...If you are a Beatles hardcore fan, of course
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2005 at 08:46

 

  Some prog moments particularly second side of abbey road

 Mainly pop though

 Moody blues are also mainly pop and they got in
How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
krusty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2005 at 08:53
No, they were a 60's pop band, only of interest to those who were around at the same time.

Virtuoso musicians              = No
Experimental / Inventive     = No
Energy or Soul                    = No

Why does anybody who wasn't around when they were, like them? I know i don't... and I don't think of them as prog either.

Glad i got that of my chest




 
Humanism
Back to Top
eduardossc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2005 at 09:01
"I wanna hold your hand" and "baby you can drive my car" are Prog.
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20071 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 11 2005 at 09:13

Originally posted by krusty krusty wrote:

No, they were a 60's pop band, only of interest to those who were around at the same time.

Virtuoso musicians              = No
Experimental / Inventive     = No
Energy or Soul                    = No

Why does anybody who wasn't around when they were, like them? I know i don't... and I don't think of them as prog either.

Glad i got that of my chest

 

I hope you meant this as a joke, otherwise it's the biggest crock I've read in my short time on this forum.

Virtuoso musicians - no, they're not up to the standards of your average prog musician, but does that mean you can't make good music?

Experimental/inventive - come on, listen to "Tomorrow never knows" as just one example of many I could list.

Energy or soul - try "Twist and shout", "I'm down" etc etc.

I was around when they were, but I was only 9 when they split up, so I don't remember much of them at the time. To say "Why does anybody who wasn't around when they were, like them?" is a disservice to the most influential band of all time. Where would prog music be if The Beatles hadn't retired to the studio to make Revolver and Sgt. Pepper?

I agree with you that they are not prog, but as I said before they certainly opened the door for prog music.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.