Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report abuse here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Making a statement...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMaking a statement...
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12291 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2006 at 13:22
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Atkingani Atkingani wrote:

You're right, Iván... Smile
 
Due to the amount of reviews and lack of time, Bob and I go generally to the top of the Chart where the attempts of manipulation occur all the time. I can assure you (and others that come here) that the manipulation trend at the the top of the Chart (involving those acronyms you mentioned Big smile) is an everyday issue. I really wonder if the quantity of energy those manipulators waste should be better used!
 
Amazing to know it's an everyday issue, don't this people have something better to do???? How many ratings they need to alter one place being that ratings alone have a smaller weight among 400 or  500 reviews?
 
I'm a Genesis fan over Yes by large but honestly  feel more comfortable with CTTE or DSOTM than with SEBTP as a top album, but at the end who cares, I will love Foxtrot, Nursery Cryme, Hybris or Gothic Impressions over most of the usual suspects just the same.
 
Hybris for example could be a top 5 easily, my opinion about it and even less the real quality won't change if ANGLAGARD are not in the top ten.
 
I'm used to read charts since the 70's and rarely have seen a Prog album mentioned (Most of the times found Bee Gees, Michael Jackson, Madonna, etc) so why should it be different now if one masterpiece and not another is in the top?
 
Some people need to grow.
 
Iván
 
 
 
The algorhythm difference among the Top 10 is very close and a half dozen of wannabe manipulators may do the damage, unless we notice it.
 
I believe that these "attacks" come from website fanboyish clubs, be them from Genesis, Yes, Floyd, Tull, etc. They (the attackers) may simply combine and do their raids in a certain day or a couple of days. Some of them, knowing PA rules, write some lines hoping their reviews may count as "valids" and have a greater weight. Sad enough!Confused
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2006 at 13:33
Originally posted by Atkingani Atkingani wrote:

 
The algorhythm difference among the Top 10 is very close and a half dozen of wannabe manipulators may do the damage, unless we notice it.
 
Being it so close you have a hard job guys, I respect that a lot.
 
I believe that these "attacks" come from website fanboyish clubs, be them from Genesis, Yes, Floyd, Tull, etc. They (the attackers) may simply combine and do their raids in a certain day or a couple of days. Some of them, knowing PA rules, write some lines hoping their reviews may count as "valids" and have a greater weight. Sad enough!Confused
 
A paramilitar fanclub organization creating raids to manipulate information.
 
Holy sh!t, that's pretty scary. LOL This guys need to get a life, no wonder why people consider Prog fans nerds.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - October 21 2006 at 13:34
            
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2006 at 09:40
Ratings without reviews are a perennial issue. However, M@x is adamant that they must continue to be allowed, so that the site is accessible to all. He did however agree to the compromise arrangement where the value of such ratings is less than those of ratings with reviews. This lead to a slight increase in reviews which said nothing ("this albums brilliant, is that 50 words yet?"), but Guigo and I are watching for those too.
 
Perhaps we be able to get M@x to devalue further the influence of ratings without reviews in the future.
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2006 at 10:10
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Ratings without reviews are a perennial issue. However, M@x is adamant that they must continue to be allowed, so that the site is accessible to all. He did however agree to the compromise arrangement where the value of such ratings is less than those of ratings with reviews. This lead to a slight increase in reviews which said nothing ("this albums brilliant, is that 50 words yet?"), but Guigo and I are watching for those too.
 
Perhaps we be able to get M@x to devalue further the influence of ratings without reviews in the future.
 
You do know how I feel about that don't youSmile
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Toccata View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: November 16 2005
Location: Lithuania
Status: Offline
Points: 24 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2006 at 03:46
How come?! PoS Perfect Element managed to jump from 44 to 28 in one month period: 05.10.2006 it has 120 votes with 4,43 rtg and now there's 124 with 4,50.
If it'a a simple calculation, those four voters had to vote giving 6,6 average rtg Wacko
Is it OK?
The same for BMS Darwin!: 05.10.2006 it has 81 votes with 4,35 rtg and now there's 82 with 4,42. One voter had to give 10,1 rtg Shocked. And jumped 17 places up.
Also strange things with PoS Remedy Lane, Deep Purple Made in Japan. And especially with DT Live at Budokan: the same number of voters (76), but rating has changed from 4,39 to 4,35 which eventually thrown them down by 17 places.
Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2006 at 04:09
So you're saying that I could review EVERYTHING ELSE with one star in an attempt to get Under Wraps to the number one slot, eh? Hmm...
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12291 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2006 at 06:03
Originally posted by Toccata Toccata wrote:

How come?! PoS Perfect Element managed to jump from 44 to 28 in one month period: 05.10.2006 it has 120 votes with 4,43 rtg and now there's 124 with 4,50.
If it'a a simple calculation, those four voters had to vote giving 6,6 average rtg Wacko
Is it OK?
The same for BMS Darwin!: 05.10.2006 it has 81 votes with 4,35 rtg and now there's 82 with 4,42. One voter had to give 10,1 rtg Shocked. And jumped 17 places up.
Also strange things with PoS Remedy Lane, Deep Purple Made in Japan. And especially with DT Live at Budokan: the same number of voters (76), but rating has changed from 4,39 to 4,35 which eventually thrown them down by 17 places.
 
There are different weights for "ratings with reviews" and "ratings without reviews". Also, PA Collabs reviews have a greater weight. The issue cannot be solved by simple arythmetics!
 
Anyway, the algorythm used may have a flaw or a bug.  
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
zaxx View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2006
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 35 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2006 at 10:54
Ok here it goes (correct me if I'm wrong concerning the weights)...

AGALLOCH "Pale Folklore" reviews (I took a simple example)

Collaborators Reviews (weight = 3)
5* (1)
3* (1)

Guests Reviews (weight = 2)
5* (1)

Ratings Without Reviews (weight = 1)
5* (3)
4* (1)
2* (1)

Total = (5+3)*3 + 5*2 + (3*5+4+2)*1 = 55
Weighted votes = 2*3 + 1*2 + 5*1 = 13

Average rating = 55/13 = 4.23
Rating from PA = 4.33

Note that I calculated the same way the average for "The Mantle" and in that case it's the same as the one given by PA (4.39)... so where's the flaw?
Destiny... Infinity... Eternity...
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12291 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2006 at 13:09
Noted, zaxx... anyway, all this stuff will be checked/revised in early 2007. Smile
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2007 at 17:21
Perhaps we should give ratings with more words more credit...
 
So that my Tago Mago review (11 pages, double spaced) will push it back up to first place in Krautrock, where it belongs...Wink
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2007 at 18:15
^^

so now quantity comes before quality

Tongue


j/k mate, it's an excellent analysis
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.229 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.