Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 14:07 |
Why do people refer to prog musicians as "good/great/amazing players?" Surely if everyone who played music had to have a high level of musicianship, then prog musicians would not be in any higher echelon. All would be equal.
|
|
 |
Chus
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 14:02 |
TheLamb wrote:
Chus, Technical dosen't mean cold... neither does being slow mean you are emotional :P
Lots of Jazz gods are technically brilliant and also emotionally great... I don't say DT are cold because they are technically brilliant... Its just because they are kinda cold IMO. There are many people especially in Jazz who have both technique and emotion... Hiromi Uehara, John McLaughlin, basically all the Jazz-Fusion artists... and of course Charlie Parker and his contemporary straight forward bebop people :P
If you like Jazz, you probably like Thelonious Monk... That guy was far from a technical master... infact he was pretty mediocre... as a pianist.... but he was nonethless a genius, dont you think?...
Technique Can go hand in hand with emotion... no one said otherwise... But sometimes using technique in certain ways makes music sound cold... and cold music can be apprecaited to more extent by musicians... because they understand whats going on... thats all Im saying... |
Another minimalist piano player who deserves mention is Count Basie; great musician (I believe it's been about 20 years since he died, if not more); and of course by mentioning people like McLaughlin you're giving me great examples of technical virtuosos who can play emotionally, although some of the Mahavishnu stuff like Noodward Race leaves me a bit cold.
|
Jesus Gabriel
|
 |
Chus
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 13:51 |
[QUOTE=con safo]I never meant to imply that being a technically proficient player will somehow make you record only cold technical music. Like was said there are some amazing jazz artists who play with alot of emotion and skill. Coltrane is a perfect example, the guy was a technical monster but he didnt feel the need to show it at every chance he got. The best virtuosos are the ones who can step back and add to the overall feel to the music, instead of just showing how proficient they are and overtaking the music. It really depends on the person, if you're not a very creative person you might use your talent as a crutch (see: Yngwie Malmsteen)or you may use your talent towards brilliant and innovative music, without feeling the need to always show how fast you can play. See: Steve Hillage, Chris Cutler, Eric Dolphy, Tony Williams, Robert Fripp, David Jackson, Guy Evans, Charles Mingus... the list goes on and on. /QUOTE]
Well of course, that's what I meant with "general public" 
Edited by Chus - March 11 2007 at 13:52
|
Jesus Gabriel
|
 |
con safo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1230
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 12:49 |
I never meant to imply that being a technically proficient player will somehow make you record only cold technical music. Like was said there are some amazing jazz artists who play with alot of emotion and skill. Coltrane is a perfect example, the guy was a technical monster but he didnt feel the need to show it at every chance he got. The best virtuosos are the ones who can step back and add to the overall feel to the music, instead of just showing how proficient they are and overtaking the music. It really depends on the person, if you're not a very creative person you might use your talent as a crutch (see: Yngwie Malmsteen)or you may use your talent towards brilliant and innovative music, without feeling the need to always show how fast you can play. See: Steve Hillage, Chris Cutler, Eric Dolphy, Tony Williams, Robert Fripp, David Jackson, Guy Evans, Charles Mingus... the list goes on and on. As for the topic at hand.. people enjoy music in many different ways, some people get alot out of the technical side of music, and some people enjoy the obscurity of not knowing what the musicians are doing, simply getting lost in the sound and atmosphere. Prog is for everyone.
|
|
 |
TheLamb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 12:41 |
Berlioz didn't play instruments? didn't know that.... Well I agree with every word, mr. thellama73.
|
|
 |
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 12:33 |
To me, being a "musician" requires no further qualifications than the
attempt to make music. This can range from simply banging pots and pans
together, to Ramones style minimalism, to jazz virtuosity without an
active understanding of theory, to Horiwitzian prowess of both the
intellectual and physical aspects of music. Your instrument can be a
laptop or even an orchestra itself (many great composers, such as
Berlioz, didn't play instruments, or at least not well.)
To say you have to the underlying principles of music and be a virtuoso to be aa "musician" is, to me, elitist and wrong.
|
|
 |
TheLamb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 12:30 |
Chus, Technical dosen't mean cold... neither does being slow mean you are emotional :P
Lots of Jazz gods are technically brilliant and also emotionally great... I don't say DT are cold because they are technically brilliant... Its just because they are kinda cold IMO. There are many people especially in Jazz who have both technique and emotion... Hiromi Uehara, John McLaughlin, basically all the Jazz-Fusion artists... and of course Charlie Parker and his contemporary straight forward bebop people :P
If you like Jazz, you probably like Thelonious Monk... That guy was far from a technical master... infact he was pretty mediocre... as a pianist.... but he was nonethless a genius, dont you think?...
Technique Can go hand in hand with emotion... no one said otherwise... But sometimes using technique in certain ways makes music sound cold... and cold music can be apprecaited to more extent by musicians... because they understand whats going on... thats all Im saying...
|
|
 |
Chus
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 12:00 |
TheLamb wrote:
Whoever says to be a musician requires Knowledge in Theory is just a not very serious person... I study classical piano since a very young age. I practice 10 hours a day when I have the time... Believe me, I know a hella lotta theory and It has helped me in the technical part of composing and improvising, but music is all about spirit, and feeling what your doing... Not knowing everything... If you are as talented as a rat and you study theory like crazy does that does not make you a musician... To tell you the truth, someties I feel I would have done better off without theory... Whoever says Jimmy Hendrix is not a musician is just unworthy of... listening to music in general.
As for Prog.... It depends which type of prog... Bands like Dream Theater could be farther appreciated by Musicians because their music sometimes seems cold and mathy... technical, even scientific. If you understand the theory and technical aspect of what they are doing it just gives you an edge on people who don't... where as bands who are more atmospheric and warm, who use complexity and "proginess" to actually create an atmosphere rather than a very impressive piece, DT style... these bands could be basically appreciated by anyone...
Of course i am makng bold generalizations, and don't start being narrow minded about this post, nothing is 100%. there are always exceptions... in everything... |
Well perhaps calling him a non-musician at the expense of lacking knowledge of theory is a bit harsh, but I believe I make my point calling him an amateur musician. I never wanted to put down Jimi Hendrix as an influential guitarist with innate talent. In fact, I enjoy his music to an extent and his phrasing is fantastic, but I would never call him a professional musician because of his bare influence
And to the general public: since when someone who recognises technical skill is bound to like cold, mathematical music? I think that's a stupid generalisation. Some people rely on technical skill alone (licks), some rely on musicianship and technical skill (notes), else how would you put the infamous Charlie Parker, perhaps one of the most amazing jazz improvisers? is he a mathematical musician just because he's technically good? I believe his playing transmits even more than a simple so-called "emotional" lick by Gilmour. Making just a couple of notes on a measure doesn't make a player more emotional, it makes him "raw" or "direct"; I believe people like Charlie Parker are able to make a very profound musical poetry, he could embellish the measure putting more notes on it, without it all sounding like w**kery. And about DT not being emotional: that's all subjective. I, for one, believe they could be emotional at times, but I don't necessarily have to share the emotions they convey.
|
Jesus Gabriel
|
 |
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:57 |
Floydian42 wrote:
Asyte2c00 wrote:
Floydian42 wrote:
Can we just settle on the Prog expirience is enhanced if your a musician? |
No, we cannot sttele upon that unfounded notion because it is wrong.
I started playing guitar a year and a half ago. I feel once a person begins playing an instrument whther it b e drums or piono, the person focuses more on their instrument within the song, and fails to appreciate the desired ambiance of the artist
you lose the complete effect of an album if you focus on one particualr instrument rather than the album as a whole |
Really? I find myself finding it much more interesting listening to a song if I know how to play it or if I'm learning, it just shows how each piece is perfectly crafted to fit the song.
|
Music is meant to be enjoyed, personally, I detest classical music; I belive it is pompous, pretentious and exceedingly repetitive, so i do not listen to it.
I will not listen to You Are What You Is and try to identify the time signature in each song; I will enjoy the meldoy, lyricis,a nd musicanship displyed throughout the album.
|
 |
TheLamb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:46 |
How could you know anyways? How can one know how someone else experinces music? Its sortof silly......
|
|
 |
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:46 |
Asyte2c00 wrote:
Floydian42 wrote:
Can we just settle on the Prog expirience is enhanced if your a musician? |
No, we cannot sttele upon that unfounded notion because it is wrong.
I started playing guitar a year and a half ago. I feel once a person begins playing an instrument whther it b e drums or piono, the person focuses more on their instrument within the song, and fails to appreciate the desired ambiance of the artist
you lose the complete effect of an album if you focus on one particualr instrument rather than the album as a whole |
Really? I find myself finding it much more interesting listening to a song if I know how to play it or if I'm learning, it just shows how each piece is perfectly crafted to fit the song.
|
 |
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:43 |
Floydian42 wrote:
Can we just settle on the Prog expirience is enhanced if your a musician? |
No, we cannot sttele upon that unfounded notion because it is wrong.
I started playing guitar a year and a half ago. I feel once a person begins playing an instrument whther it b e drums or piono, the person focuses more on their instrument within the song, and fails to appreciate the desired ambiance of the artist
you lose the complete effect of an album if you focus on one particualr instrument rather than the album as a whole
|
 |
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:35 |
Can we just settle on the Prog expirience is enhanced if your a musician?
|
 |
TheLamb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:26 |
Whoever says to be a musician requires Knowledge in Theory is just a not very serious person... I study classical piano since a very young age. I practice 10 hours a day when I have the time... Believe me, I know a hella lotta theory and It has helped me in the technical part of composing and improvising, (no but music is all about spirit, and feeling what your doing... Not knowing everything... If you are as talented as a rat and you study theory like crazy does that does not make you a musician... To tell you the truth, someties I feel I would have done better off without theory... Whoever says Jimmy Hendrix is not a musician is just unworthy of... listening to music in general.
As for Prog.... It depends which type of prog... Bands like Dream Theater could be farther appreciated by Musicians because their music sometimes seems cold and mathy... technical, even scientific. If you understand the theory and technical aspect of what they are doing it just gives you an edge on people who don't... where as bands who are more atmospheric and warm, who use complexity and "proginess" to actually create an atmosphere rather than a very impressive piece, DT style... these bands could be basically appreciated by anyone...
Of course i am makng bold generalizations, and don't start being narrow minded about this post, nothing is 100%. there are always exceptions... in everything...
Edited by TheLamb - March 11 2007 at 11:50
|
|
 |
The Wizard
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:18 |
Asyte2c00 wrote:
As a auspicious guitarist, I belive those who play an instrument will be able to indentify with the music, especially the instrument he/she plays, to a greater extent than a person who does not play an instrument.
But no, music is for everyone. |
I think that counts with all music, not just prog. If you play guitar and like punk or metal, then you will identify with the guitar since you play that instrument.
|
|
 |
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:16 |
As a auspicious guitarist, I belive those who play an instrument will be able to indentify with the music, especially the instrument he/she plays, to a greater extent than a person who does not play an instrument.
But no, music is for everyone.
|
 |
The Wizard
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 11:12 |
I consider myself a musician. I know little about music theory and can barely read music, but I play keyboards in a garage band. I listened to prog way before I started playing keys and I appreciated it just as much as I do now. Prog rules!
|
|
 |
Sasquamo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 828
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 10:19 |
Atavachron wrote:
Chus wrote:
con safo wrote:
okJimi Hendrix was not a musician? |
GREAT guitar player and bluesman, but I wouldn't know if he had enough understanding of music theory to be called musician per se.
|
|
He's right, you know. I doubt he knew a whole lot if anything about music.
|
 |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65774
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 00:29 |
Chus wrote:
con safo wrote:
okJimi Hendrix was not a musician? |
GREAT guitar player and bluesman, but I wouldn't know if he had enough understanding of music theory to be called musician per se.
|
|
 |
Mikeypoo
Forum Groupie
Joined: November 21 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 75
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 00:29 |
con safo wrote:
Trickster F. wrote:
I am still surprised why most are not only absolutely sure, but even insist that skill of playing an instrument is the main aspect of playing prog. Surely there must be something more important to it, don't you think? | Yes, like creativiy and song writing ability. What tends to bug me about alot of prog fans is that they put musical technicality above those things. They tend to judge music on how complex or fast it is. In fact, you don't have to be a musician to appreciate good music, you don't even have to much of a musician to make music - some of the simplest music is the most effective.
As for musicians being close minded - i see it alot too, i think its the "if i can play it its not very good" mentality. .
I'd rather a band practice some degree of subtlety rather than just bashing you over the head with complexity and fast playing (See: Dream Theater )
|
exhibit A: the beatles. i dont think anyone can argue the greatness of the beatles. one of the most popular bands ever, if not the most popular of all time. Today, almost 40 years after they made it big, radio stations world wide still play the beatles and people eat it up. why? because they wrote good songs. they definatley were not the musicians Jordan Rudess, John Pertucci, and Mike Portney are, but somehow they are still considered musicians and are infinatley more popular than dream theater will ever be. songwriting, to me, is everything. you can be the most amazing guitar player the world has ever seen but if you write crappy songs, no one will listen to you except maybe the few who admire your playing. the rest will tune up the beatles and listen, not to the minute details of the playing, but to the songs as a whole regardless of the complexity.
|
"music expresses that which cannot be put into words, and that which cannot remain silent"
|
 |