Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Political discussion thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPolitical discussion thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3334353637 303>
Author
Message
IVNORD View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 18 2008 at 21:18
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

[
 Some moderate republicans can actually stand the idea of a black president, but they abhor the name "Clinton"....
Because they know what it would be under Clinton. And not only moderate republicans -- lots of independents too.


Edited by IVNORD - June 18 2008 at 21:41
Back to Top
IVNORD View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 18 2008 at 21:40
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Aaahh. McCain's integrity. Proudly Stands with evangelical preacher one day, disowns him when the racist/homophobic/anti-immigrant/anti-poor statements reach the media.
Please, who counts preachers?
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Accuses Bush of being incompetent when campaigning against him, then eventually gives in and morphs into a quasi-supporter of the Bush administration. Why, well, to put it simply, so as to enable him to win the Republican nomination despite his past disagreements with the GOP's conservative wing on fundamental issues.
Don't all politicians do that?
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Frankly, I believe both parties have ended up with the best possible nominees. But only one is young. Only one, realistically, once in power, would bring in fresh blood into Washington. Who ? Obama. Why ? Because of his relatively short time as Senator has meant that he is still building up the insider relationships so necessary in the political system.
Bill Clinton brought in a lot of fresh blood too. Still bleeding.
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Not that the Dems aren't capable at smearing the other side, but they unfortunately don't have idiots like Rush (I'm not a drug addict) Limbaugh, Bill (let's give everyone a chance to explain themselves) O'Reilly, Newt (adulterers don't belong in political office) Gingrich, and of course, the ever supportive big business and war mongerers.
Bill Clinton is the man. Though he's far from being an idiot. He alone is worth those three. As for the big business, he did so much for the corporate America that no one could even dream of.  Just take the stock market and the repeal of the Glass Seagal Act.
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Oh, and by the way, for one who says you're not affiliated with any party, you sure seem to be tilting hard to one side, eh.
We all have our preferences. Why is it a sin?
Back to Top
Starless View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 29 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 85
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2008 at 07:27
Reading all you Yanks moaning about budget deficits, tax cuts etc, makes me wonder how this compares - In the good 'ol UK we are currently paying an average of £1100 (about $2000) per annum on domestic fuel bills, with predicted increases of 40% (!!!!!) this winter. Also, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair!
 
All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)
 
Angry
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2008 at 19:59
Note to IVnord ...
Please read Relayer's post. That is what I was reacting to.
For once, I believe the U.S. actually has two good candidates. By that, I mean that both draw voters to them, rather than by trying to make the other guy repelling.
But my main point with Relayer was his claim of independance, while stating that Obama's rep was finally taking the deserved shots, while McCain somehow was above the usual political missteps.
Karl Rove, the GOP dirty trick genius, managed to get a Vietnam vet passed of as coward, while his boss' lack of comparable front-line service was conveniently kept off the media & the public's radar.
The Dems are not perfect, and Ralph Nader has more than a few solid opinions as to why the Dems & the Reps can easily be seen as Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum.
But to state that you're not partisan, and then present a clearly one-sided take on the candidates is not really a balanced approach that a person's supposed fairness should bring out.
Re-read his post and wonder if he would really bother to believe anything positive about Obama.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2008 at 20:25
Originally posted by IVNORD IVNORD wrote:

Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Aaahh. McCain's integrity. Proudly Stands with evangelical preacher one day, disowns him when the racist/homophobic/anti-immigrant/anti-poor statements reach the media.
Please, who counts preachers?

DB's reply - Depends - if they help your side, you do. If they hurt the other side, you do. The GOP has enjoyed the unquestioned support of the Right Wing Evangelicals, while not having to question or distance themselves from some of the more extreme positions held by many (not all of them). Obama's former preacher gets 5 minutes edited from an hour long sermon. The media glare is glued to those 5 minutes, with little mention of the context, nor the remainder of said sermon. MacCain gets the endorsement of an Evangelical preacher, only to refuse it days later when some very distressing comments popped up from this preacher. How much of a splash did this preacher's ill-advised rants make compared to Obama's former preacher ??? Please compare and tell me how biased the American press is - you know - leftist, liberal, anti american values. Does this give lie to that opinion ?
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Accuses Bush of being incompetent when campaigning against him, then eventually gives in and morphs into a quasi-supporter of the Bush administration. Why, well, to put it simply, so as to enable him to win the Republican nomination despite his past disagreements with the GOP's conservative wing on fundamental issues.
Don't all politicians do that?

DB - AH, but Relayer's post insinuates that only Obama is playing politics.
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Frankly, I believe both parties have ended up with the best possible nominees. But only one is young. Only one, realistically, once in power, would bring in fresh blood into Washington. Who ? Obama. Why ? Because of his relatively short time as Senator has meant that he is still building up the insider relationships so necessary in the political system.
Bill Clinton brought in a lot of fresh blood too. Still bleeding.

DB's refers to Slartibartfast's graphs. Financially speaking, which party has bled the U.S. the most ?
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Not that the Dems aren't capable at smearing the other side, but they unfortunately don't have idiots like Rush (I'm not a drug addict) Limbaugh, Bill (let's give everyone a chance to explain themselves) O'Reilly, Newt (adulterers don't belong in political office) Gingrich, and of course, the ever supportive big business and war mongerers.
Bill Clinton is the man. Though he's far from being an idiot. He alone is worth those three. As for the big business, he did so much for the corporate America that no one could even dream of.  Just take the stock market and the repeal of the Glass Seagal Act.

DB's take on this - Clinton & the Dems surrounding him finally learned how to play in the big leagues. The GOP still has more support, mostly because of its' emphasis on issues that matter to business, but also on its' ability to distract the voters from other issues that should matter more to the average American.
Oh, by the way, governments actually have little real effect on the economy. Economic cycles come & go. Booms seem like they'll never end, and busts always get better. The only change from one to the other is the specific length of time. Bush's tax rebate will do little that wasn't going to happen anyway. The same that Clinton's presidency was not the main cause of the stock market surge in the 90s. Remember, he came in just as the recession that started during Bush Sr's term was coming to an end. Coincidence is the only thing either party can claim when things are going well.
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


Oh, and by the way, for one who says you're not affiliated with any party, you sure seem to be tilting hard to one side, eh.
We all have our preferences. Why is it a sin?

DB's answer - No sin, except when you start by saying you're independant of thought, then proceed to find many faults on one side, while overlooking or dismissing the same faults on the other side.
I feel that for the first time in a long time, that the U.S. has two good candidates, but also two good politicians facing off. Obama's sheen is coming off as more is known about him. McCain's "volte-face" on many issues will hopefully garner its' fair share of the media spotlight so as to offer the public a balanced view of both. Meaning that both should have to answer and explain their shortcomings, as well as put forth their strengths.
So what does this all mean ... I hope McCain's Straight Talk Express gets back on track. I have never believed it realistic that a politician should be all things to all people. And agree or disagree with McCain's pre-primary positions, you at least knew that he believed it.
So let's look at this thing honestly, by saying that a politician plays the game as required by the reaction it garners from voters. But if Americans finally have two people who might make this an election based on real issues, let's hope that the Party machines don't take over once more.


Edited by debrewguy - June 19 2008 at 20:35
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 07:19
Had to share this:

June 19, 2008
Tom Tomorrow:

On talk radio lately, it’s an accepted fact that the Chinese either are currently or are about to start drilling for oil sixty miles off our coastline. If they can do it, outraged talkers ask, why can’t we? This is part of a larger argument that the current energy crisis is entirely the fault of Democrats and environmentalists, and no one should harbor any ill feelings toward the oil industry, or be concerned with conservation.

Just one problem.

Yet no one can prove the Chinese are drilling anywhere off Cuba’s shoreline. The China-Cuba connection is “akin to urban legend,” said Sen. Mel Martinez, a Republican from Florida who opposes drilling off the coast of his state but who backs exploration in ANWR.

“China is not drilling in Cuba’s Gulf of Mexico waters, period,” said Jorge Pinon, an energy fellow with the Center for Hemispheric Policy at the University of Miami and an expert in oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico. Martinez cited Pinon’s research when he took to the Senate floor Wednesday to set the record straight.

* * *

China’s Sinopec oil company does have an agreement with the Cuban government, but it’s to develop onshore resources west of Havana, Pinon said. The Chinese have done some seismic testing, he said, but no drilling, and nothing offshore.

Western diplomats in Havana tell McClatchy that to the best of their knowledge, there is no Chinese drilling in or around Cuba.

“I’ve never heard anything about this,” said one diplomat from a country in the hemisphere.

Nonetheless, talk radio callers are very concerned about the Chinese drilling — and, I kid you not, the possibility that the Chinese may use their imaginary drilling rigs as a platform from which to launch nuclear missiles at the U.S.

It’s a wonder that this country functions as well as it does, given that at least a third of our fellow citizens are clinically insane.

… on a related note: drilling in ANWR solves all our energy problems, if you inflate estimated oil production by 7000 percent.

Uncategorized | -->

posted by Tom Tomorrow at 4:49 PM | link



Edited by Slartibartfast - June 20 2008 at 18:40
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 08:25
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

The election really lies in the big states that Hillary won. Texas, Florida, New York, Ohio and Michigan. Will these states vote for Obama without Hillary on the ticket? NOPE. The race at this point really comes down to is Hillary on the ticket for VP or not. Without Hillary on the ticket Obama will lose as bad as Mike Dukakis did.
 
People like myself who do not subscribe to any political party and like to think for myself will probably not vote for Obama without Hillary. Me personally, I will not vote for Obama over McCain even with Hillary on the ticket. Obama says the things people want to hear. That's only a good thing if he has a plan to back up those nice sounding things, which I don't believe he can do. There's been alot of skeletons to come out of the Obama closet already and may be more to come. McCain has kept his integrity intact even after being attacked by the New York Times with unfounded claims. So far for me the pendulum has swung towards McCain. Will it swing back? Doubtful at this point but we shall see.


Aaahh. McCain's integrity. Proudly Stands with evangelical preacher one day, disowns him when the racist/homophobic/anti-immigrant/anti-poor statements reach the media.
 
You mean Jeremiah Wright?  Wait a minute that was Obama.

Accuses Bush of being incompetent when campaigning against him, then eventually gives in and morphs into a quasi-supporter of the Bush administration. Why, well, to put it simply, so as to enable him to win the Republican nomination despite his past disagreements with the GOP's conservative wing on fundamental issues.
 
McCain doesn't tote the party line like a lemming is all that means.  Obama votes the way his party tells him to vote, end of story. I'm voting for a leader not a follower.

Frankly, I believe both parties have ended up with the best possible nominees. But only one is young. Only one, realistically, once in power, would bring in fresh blood into Washington. Who ? Obama. Why ? Because of his relatively short time as Senator has meant that he is still building up the insider relationships so necessary in the political system. And I don't mean this for McCain only. Clinton's presidency would have meant keeping the same old crowd in power.
 
The voters keep their Representatives and Senators in power. Obama has no more power over who sits in Congress than anyone else in Washington does. All that Obama and McCain for that matter can bring in are cabinet seats and those people have no voting power to get laws passed with the exception of Supreme Court nominees if a spot were to open up.

And as far as no plans to back up the rethoric, and unfounded claims ... well ... specific plans are never examined or discussed in detail during an election because the electorate just doesn't have the will or interest to do so. That's why the generalities, the so-called "values" are on display, for both sides.
And for unfounded claims ... well ... if you think that is an Obama failing, please feel free to stand up and denounce/correct  the following - Obama is muslim/is Arab/educated in Maddrassa (extremist islamic school/sworn in using Koran/radical black extremist/anti-whitey etc ...
 
Obama being a muslim for the first 31 years of his life is correct. His wife suggested that he convert to Christianity so that he could run for office.

Not that the Dems aren't capable at smearing the other side, but they unfortunately don't have idiots like Rush (I'm not a drug addict) Limbaugh, Bill (let's give everyone a chance to explain themselves) O'Reilly, Newt (adulterers don't belong in political office) Gingrich, the Right Wing Gospel of Prosperity Evangelical (what ever I say Jesus meant, is what Jesus meant) christian fanatics, and of course, the ever supportive big business and war mongerers.
 
Al Frankin, Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Code Pink, Arthur Sulzburger, Dan Rather, Katie Couric, Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell, Jack Cafferty and the list just keeps going. You are aware that the media today is predominatly liberal or did that just slip your mind?

Oh, and by the way, for one who says you're not affiliated with any party, you sure seem to be tilting hard to one side, eh.
 
That is correct, I can only vote once.  In past presidential elections I have voted for Ronald Reagan, Ross Perot, Bill Clinton and George Bush. I vote for the canidate not the political party. What about you?

If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 08:27
Originally posted by IVNORD IVNORD wrote:

Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

  If McCain were to choose Joe Leiberman as his VP choice ( which I hope he does ) he'll win easily.
What would happen then to McCain's conservative image he's trying to build for his right wing supporters?
 
Do you really think conservatives are going to vote for Obama if McCain were to pick Leiberman?
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 18:36
And now for something completely different:



And speaking of graphs:



Countergraph me Relayer! LOL


Edited by Slartibartfast - June 21 2008 at 01:07
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 22:56
I counter with a Nixon-Ford! aha take that! So it seems apparent that the guys who get impeached are great at creating jobs, or something associated with a "job". LOLClown
Anyone for a cigar perhaps? Embarrassed
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 23:27
Cursory research shows that things are not the same as they used to be. Whether or not he will swing back moderate if President is not a question any of us can really answer.
Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

Obama being a muslim for the first 31 years of his life is correct. His wife suggested that he convert to Christianity so that he could run for office.

I read this and stopped reading your post. If you are believe this, you are obviously well beyond the grasp of reasoning, so I am done with this thread.

Edited by Henry Plainview - June 20 2008 at 23:28
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 23:33

By Caren Bohan Fri Jun 20, 7:19 PM ET

JACKSONVILLE, Florida (Reuters) - Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama said on Friday he expects Republicans to highlight the fact that he is black as part of an effort to make voters afraid of him.

"It is going to be very difficult for Republicans to run on their stewardship of the economy or their outstanding foreign policy," Obama told a fundraiser in Jacksonville, Florida. "We know what kind of campaign they're going to run. They're going to try to make you afraid.

"They're going to try to make you afraid of me. He's young and inexperienced and he's got a funny name. And did I mention he's black?"

Obama pulls the race card out on himself!!!!  Either this guy is paranoid or he's the second coming of Nostradamus.
 
I am very proud of how far our country has come since the civil rights movement. I was proud that America had grown up and gotten past the ignorance of descrimination by race. I thought it was great that a black man and a woman were battling it out to be the Democratic nominees for President. And what does this jackass do? He takes two steps backwards and calls foul before any foul has been commited. I just lost all respect for the man. Thumbs%20Down
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 23:43
Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

I was proud that America had grown up and gotten past the ignorance of descrimination by race.

OK, I try to respect people's views because we all have our perspectives, but only an idiot or the most sheltered white person on the planet would think for a second that discrimination no longer exists. Hell, race has already been proven a factor in voters in states like West Virginia. Rumors have spread that he is a Muslim based on his name, and Geraldine Ferraro had to be dumped b the Clinton camp for saying that Obama was only winning because he was black and white people felt guilty (the dumbest thing I've ever heard, but then I'm not old enough to remember Quayle).

Now, I agree it was a poor move to say that race will be used against him, but you can bet that his race, name, and that lingering claim of being Muslim (my parents actually think he's one after they talk about his pastor. idiots) will come up, perhaps not from McCain himself, but from every conservative pundit and every far-right activist out there.
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2008 at 23:58
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Cursory research shows that things are not the same as they used to be. Whether or not he will swing back moderate if President is not a question any of us can really answer.
Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

Obama being a muslim for the first 31 years of his life is correct. His wife suggested that he convert to Christianity so that he could run for office.

I read this and stopped reading your post. If you are believe this, you are obviously well beyond the grasp of reasoning, so I am done with this thread.
 

Was Obama Raised Muslim?

Consider the evidence:

As Barack Obama's candidacy comes under increasing scrutiny, his account of his religious upbringing deserves careful attention for what it tells us about the candidate's integrity.

Obama asserted in December, "I've always been a Christian," and he has adamantly denied ever having been a Muslim. "The only connection I've had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father's side came from that country [Kenya]. But I've never practiced Islam."

In February, he claimed, "I have never been a Muslim.... other than my name and the fact that I lived in a populous Muslim country for four years when I was a child [Indonesia, 1967-71] I have very little connection to the Islamic religion."

"Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation. But many biographical facts, culled mainly from the American press, suggest that, when growing up, the Democratic candidate for president both saw himself and was seen as a Muslim.

• Obama's Kenyan birth father: In Islam, religion passes from the father to the child. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. (1936-1982) was a Muslim who named his boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

• Obama's Indonesian family: His stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was also a Muslim. In fact, as Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng explained to Jodi Kantor of The New York Times: "My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim." An Indonesian publication, The Banjarmasin Post, reports a former classmate, Rony Amir, recalling that "All the relatives of Barry's father were very devout Muslims."

• Obama's Catholic school in Jakarta: Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press reports that "documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim" while at a Catholic school during first through third grades. Kim Barker of The Chicago Tribune confirms that Obama was "listed as a Muslim on the registration form for the Catholic school."

• The public school: Paul Watson of The Los Angeles Times learned from Indonesians familiar with Obama when he lived in Jakarta that he "was registered by his family as a Muslim at both schools he attended." Haroon Siddiqui of The Toronto Star visited the Jakarta public school Obama attended and found that "Three of his teachers have said he was enrolled as a Muslim." Although Siddiqui cautions that "With the school records missing, eaten by bugs, one has to rely on people's shifting memories," he cites only one retired teacher, Tine Hahiyari, retracting her earlier certainty about Obama's being registered as a Muslim.

• Barack Obama's public school in Jakarta, Koran class: In his autobiography, Dreams of My Father, Obama relates how he got into trouble for making faces during Koran studies. Indeed, Obama still retains knowledge from that class: Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times reports that Obama "recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them [to Kristof] with a first-rate accent."

• Mosque attendance: Obama's half-sister recalled that the family attended the mosque "for big communal events." Watson learned from childhood friends that "Obama sometimes went to Friday prayers at the local mosque." Barker found that "Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers." One Indonesia friend, Zulfin Adi, states that Obama "was Muslim. He went to the mosque. I remember him wearing a sarong" (a garment associated with Muslims).

Well you better tell the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times they have their facts all wrong too.
 
I really don't care what religion Obama is. I do not for a minute think that he would undermine the country over a religious belief. The background check done by the Clinton campaign did bring his muslim ubringing to light.
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 00:06
Originally posted by 1800iareyay 1800iareyay wrote:

Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

I was proud that America had grown up and gotten past the ignorance of descrimination by race.

OK, I try to respect people's views because we all have our perspectives, but only an idiot or the most sheltered white person on the planet would think for a second that discrimination no longer exists.
 
I never said racism has ceased to exsist. Thanks for taking that all out of context.  America in broad terms has gotten past descrimination. News Flash! There is a black man running for President and he's getting alot of white votes and he has a very good chance of winning. What more proof do you need?
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 00:07
Originally posted by StarlessAlso, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair!
<div> </div>
<div>All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)</div>
<div> </div>
<div><img src=http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley7.gif height=17 width=17 border=0 alt=Angry /></div>[/QUOTE StarlessAlso, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair!
 
All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)
 
Angry
[/QUOTE wrote:




UK = smaller than the US

Use a bike, a lot of us can't.


UK = smaller than the US

Use a bike, a lot of us can't.


Edited by stonebeard - June 21 2008 at 00:08
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 00:19
Then there's that nasty rumor floating around that Obama has fathered not just one, but two black children. Shocked LOL

Edited by Slartibartfast - June 21 2008 at 09:17
Back to Top
Starless View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 29 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 85
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 04:54
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by StarlessAlso, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair! 
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><img src=http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley7.gif height=17 width=17 border=0 alt=Angry /></DIV></td></tr></table><BR><BR>UK = smaller than the US<BR><BR>Use a bike, a lot of us can't.<BR>[/QUOTE StarlessAlso, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair!
 
All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)
 
Angry


UK = smaller than the US

Use a bike, a lot of us can't.
[/QUOTE wrote:

 
Actually, I don't drive. I was just making the point that the US has had ridiculously cheap energy for decades, they should try the prices over here for size!
 
Obama - WTF does it matter if he's Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Martian. It's his policies he should be judged on not his religion. Christian right wingers are responsible for more misery in this world than Muslim extremists could ever hope to achieve.
 
Actually, I don't drive. I was just making the point that the US has had ridiculously cheap energy for decades, they should try the prices over here for size!
 
Obama - WTF does it matter if he's Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Martian. It's his policies he should be judged on not his religion. Christian right wingers are responsible for more misery in this world than Muslim extremists could ever hope to achieve.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 05:12
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Then there's that nasty rumor floating around that Obama has fathered not just one, but two black children. Shocked LOL
My father insists that he has heterosexual tendencies.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2008 at 06:55
Originally posted by Starless Starless wrote:

 
Obama - WTF does it matter if he's Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Martian. It's his policies he should be judged on not his religion. Christian right wingers are responsible for more misery in this world than Muslim extremists could ever hope to achieve.


Yeah!  Freakin' amatures. Tongue




Edited by Slartibartfast - June 21 2008 at 09:18
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3334353637 303>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.264 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.