Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 22:57 |
|
 |
Relayer09
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 20:17 |
The T wrote:
The evidence does show that Obama was brought up muslim, he attended mosque, studied the Koran, was enrolled in school as a muslim and his own family members claim their entire family was muslim.Yes, the evidence shos, as you say, that "Obama was brought up a muslim". Please, take a look at the verb. It's not Obama doing the action, it's somebody else. His family. He studied the Q'ran as part of his familiy duties (as much a family duty as probably wash the dishes or do the homework), was enrolled in a muslim school by muslim parents. Their family claims all of them were muslims. But Obama is not his family. Maybe he never believed in the fairy tale. Let me use my case again. Even as a child, I never, NEVER considered myself a catholic, in part because as a child I couldn't even understand the concept of religion well, but also because I never really got the ridiculous ideas in that faith. I went through three sacraments, baptism, first communion, confirmation. Those three ceremonies (well, in the first one I was 0 years old so that really doesn't qualify) I had to perform. And I never, for a minute, believed any of the useless #$%$ that I had to do or that the ritual was supposed to be about.
But I had a very catholic grandmother who was old-fashioned and very, very good and nice person. Even when i was old enough, I never told her "I'm an atheist. All you believe in is for me as believable as the Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires". What was the point? Did she NEED TO KNOW? DO WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE THINK IN THEIR MINDS? WHY DOES THE PRESS WORRY SO MUCH ABOUT RELIGION??? What people believe can be a huge motivating factor in how they vote on issues. Issues like abortion and gay marriage for example are entrenched in religious belief so someone's belief system is relevant.
Obama has been a Christian for at least 20 years but the question remains, why deny his muslim upbringing even if it were forced upon him as a child?As I said, we haven't proven he was a muslim himself. if he denies that his family was muslim, well, let's give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, in right-wing crazy-evangelist red America, saying you're a muslim could be the end of it. Hell, saying your best friend's uncle's brother's secretary's plumber's sister's dog' owner's girlfriend is a muslim could mean defeat for that matter. Aha! you said it! I was wondering how long it would take someone to actually say what the real issue is. Being viewed as being raised muslim while running for president in this age of radical Islamic groups such as Hamas and Al Qaeda could result in political disaster. Do I think Senator Obama would be sympathetic to such groups? Absolutely not. I would however like him to be more forthcoming about this aspect of his life. Being a muslim does not automatically make someone a terrorist.
I don't know about the rest of you but my vote isn't going to what religion Obama or McCain subscribe to but to where they stand on issues and which one I trust more in what they say. You brought this religion thing here. I agree with talking about real issues. Fantastic stories belong someplace else, not in politics. Actually, I didn't bring the religion thing up. I did however respond to another poster.
i'm happy to replied in a corteous manner. Sorry for my constant CAPS. i just need some emphasis sometimes. 
I appreciate being able to have a mature discussion with you. People having differing points of view and showing tolerance towards each other is very healthy. It also shows maturity and respect for both parties involved. |
|
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
|
 |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 19:31 |
Relayer09 wrote:
The T wrote:
Relayer09 wrote:
Was Obama Raised Muslim?
Consider the evidence:
As Barack Obama's candidacy comes under increasing scrutiny, his account of his religious upbringing deserves careful attention for what it tells us about the candidate's integrity. If he lied maybe. Religion doesn't tell us anything else about a person but that he/she believes in things he/she can't prove... I agree but why should he conceal his background? I don't care what religion he subcribes to but by not being forthcoming about it only makes me suspicious of him. IF he's doing it, well... he's a politician. And tries to win the white house to make some good. What would republicans say if Obama said "I was a muslim?"..... If nowadays, with just a senseless rumor, they use it against him, imagine if he actually said he was one at a point in his life.
Obama asserted in December, "I've always been a Christian," and he has adamantly denied ever having been a Muslim. "The only connection I've had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father's side came from that country [Kenya]. But I've never practiced Islam." Ok. His word against that of his detractors. Let's see...
In February, he claimed, "I have never been a Muslim.... other than my name and the fact that I lived in a populous Muslim country for four years when I was a child [Indonesia, 1967-71] I have very little connection to the Islamic religion." he had contact... i was raised in a Catholic country and I'm an Atheist.... Damn! Or am I lying about which fairy tale story I believe in? Well did you ever attend church or practice a form a Christianity and then convert to Atheism? If you did would you deny ever doing so if running for President? Maybe, if that country was a ferocious anti-catholic country....or if catholics have killed about 3000 people in an attack...
"Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation. But many biographical facts, culled mainly from the American press, suggest that, when growing up, the Democratic candidate for president both saw himself and was seen as a Muslim. I quote you: "Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation... except, of course, when it's your political rival. I have to agree both sides of a political campaign will try and smear each other. Unfortunately, that is the nature of politics.
• Obama's Kenyan birth father: In Islam, religion passes from the father to the child. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. (1936-1982) was a Muslim who named his boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. NO. Religion doesn't pass from father to child. IT'S NOT A GENE. A free person can CHOOSE. I can't belive that people have the nerve of saying things like "that's a catholic boy" or "she's a good christian girl" or "my 5 year old is a great muslim"... Why are we labeling children that don't yet have the reasoning capacity to MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES? So it's perfectly believable that Obama, a muslim son, was not a muslim. I agree wholeheartedly with your statement.
• Obama's Indonesian family: His stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was also a Muslim. In fact, as Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng explained to Jodi Kantor of The New York Times: "My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim." An Indonesian publication, The Banjarmasin Post, reports a former classmate, Rony Amir, recalling that "All the relatives of Barry's father were very devout Muslims." Damn! I should be a catholic! My whole family (except for my nuclear family, father,mother, sister, who CHOSE their individual paths) was catholic! Label me! Poor evidence. It comes down to Obama's denial of ever practicing Islam which recent investigations have revealed that in fact he did. I'm not here to label you but would you deny ever practicing Catholicism if in fact you had done so because your family initially exposed you to that religion? the same thing. He could have practiced a religion because of his background, but maybe he wasn't religious himself. To use my case, I have been to Mass about 10 times in my life... when i was a kid they took me to like 3 masses... do you think I believed in the fairy tale THEN any more than I believe now? And if I did, remember, I WAS A CHILD. Children believe in mighty blankets or the monster in the closet.
• Obama's Catholic school in Jakarta: Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press reports that "documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim" while at a Catholic school during first through third grades. Kim Barker of The Chicago Tribune confirms that Obama was "listed as a Muslim on the registration form for the Catholic school." If it was a "catholic school", I'm pretty sure it was standard to label children, therefore they had to label little Obama as his parents. Remember: FROM FIRST TO THIRD GRADE A CHILD'S MIND IS NOT READY TO CHOOSE BY HIMSELF.... Or maybe he was a prodigious child who enrolled himself... and maybe even paid himself... Agreed, a child is not capable of making that type of decision regarding a belief system at that age but that's also no reason to deny ever practicing different beliefs.
• The public school: Paul Watson of The Los Angeles Times learned from Indonesians familiar with Obama when he lived in Jakarta that he "was registered by his family as a Muslim at both schools he attended."Did you read that? Registered BY HIS FAMILY. HE WAS A CHILD. Haroon Siddiqui of The Toronto Star visited the Jakarta public school Obama attended and found that "Three of his teachers have said he was enrolled as a Muslim." DID HE ENROLLED HIMSELF? OR MAYBE HIS PARENTS ENROLLED HIM? Although Siddiqui cautions that "With the school records missing, eaten by bugs, one has to rely on people's shifting memories," he cites only one retired teacher, Tine Hahiyari, retracting her earlier certainty about Obama's being registered as a Muslim. There's still not ONE single piece of evidence that shows that Obama HIMSELF ever was a muslim. Only registrations made by HIS MUSLIM PARENTS. Why would his parents enroll him as a muslim if they weren't practicing that religion as a family?For sure they were practising, none denies that. But that doesn't mean Obama was a muslim. He was a child whose parents tried to raise muslim. They failed.
• Barack Obama's public school in Jakarta, Koran class: In his autobiography, Dreams of My Father, Obama relates how he got into trouble for making faces during Koran studies. Indeed, Obama still retains knowledge from that class: Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times reports that Obama "recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them [to Kristof] with a first-rate accent." Of course. We're talking about a boy, a child. he makes faces as any other child or even teenager. And of course he knew the Q'uoran.. After all, he was probably forced to learn it by his MUSLIM PARENTS. That is most likely the case.
• Mosque attendance: Obama's half-sister recalled that the family attended the mosque "for big communal events." Watson learned from childhood friends that "Obama sometimes went to Friday prayers at the local mosque." Barker found that "Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers." One Indonesia friend, Zulfin Adi, states that Obama "was Muslim. He went to the mosque. I remember him wearing a sarong" (a garment associated with Muslims). How old was Obama here? Was he at least 18 years old so that we can fully trust it was his own free will that made him to there? Or, even if he did, that it was his concious decision after the kind of analysis only an adult mind can do?
Well you better tell the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times they have their facts all wrong too. No... they have their facts right... the problem is, the facts don't prove anything.
I really don't care what religion Obama is. I do not for a minute think that he would undermine the country over a religious belief. The background check done by the Clinton campaign did bring his muslim ubringing to light. |
So why do you even mention this? To show his "lack of integrity" for having said he never was muslim
when maybe he "was" as a child? First. if he changed his religion, isn't he free to do it? Second, A CHILD CAN'T BE "ANYTHING". NOR CATHOLIC, CHRISTIAN, ATHEIST, SATANIST, MUSLIM, NOTHING. A child is.. a child. A child can't make that kind of heavy judgment yet. It's only society that allows the violence against children rights of labeling them with what their parents believe. So if your parents believe in the Mighty Apple and Lord Carrot, would you have been an "applecarroteist" when you were, say, 10 years old? If you're a christian, a catholic, a, atheist, whatever, is because you made that choice when you COULD. (not that believeing in apples or carrots is any less possible than the other beliefs....)
So here we have no evidence. Not at all. Please discuss politics, economics, policies... maybe you even have a point in those.... what people believe in their minds should remain there, and nowhere else.... |
The evidence does show that Obama was brought up muslim, he attended mosque, studied the Koran, was enrolled in school as a muslim and his own family members claim their entire family was muslim.Yes, the evidence shos, as you say, that "Obama was brought up a muslim". Please, take a look at the verb. It's not Obama doing the action, it's somebody else. His family. He studied the Q'ran as part of his familiy duties (as much a family duty as probably wash the dishes or do the homework), was enrolled in a muslim school by muslim parents. Their family claims all of them were muslims. But Obama is not his family. Maybe he never believed in the fairy tale. Let me use my case again. Even as a child, I never, NEVER considered myself a catholic, in part because as a child I couldn't even understand the concept of religion well, but also because I never really got the ridiculous ideas in that faith. I went through three sacraments, baptism, first communion, confirmation. Those three ceremonies (well, in the first one I was 0 years old so that really doesn't qualify) I had to perform. And I never, for a minute, believed any of the useless #$%$ that I had to do or that the ritual was supposed to be about.
But I had a very catholic grandmother who was old-fashioned and very, very good and nice person. Even when i was old enough, I never told her "I'm an atheist. All you believe in is for me as believable as the Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires". What was the point? Did she NEED TO KNOW? DO WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE THINK IN THEIR MINDS? WHY DOES THE PRESS WORRY SO MUCH ABOUT RELIGION???
Obama has been a Christian for at least 20 years but the question remains, why deny his muslim upbringing even if it were forced upon him as a child?As I said, we haven't proven he was a muslim himself. if he denies that his family was muslim, well, let's give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, in right-wing crazy-evangelist red America, saying you're a muslim could be the end of it. Hell, saying your best friend's uncle's brother's secretary's plumber's sister's dog' owner's girlfriend is a muslim could mean defeat for that matter.
I don't know about the rest of you but my vote isn't going to what religion Obama or McCain subscribe to but to where they stand on issues and which one I trust more in what they say. You brought this religion thing here. I agree with talking about real issues. Fantastic stories belong someplace else, not in politics.
i'm happy to replied in a corteous manner. Sorry for my constant CAPS. i just need some emphasis sometimes. 
|
|
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 14:51 |
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
Relayer09
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 13:00 |
The T wrote:
Relayer09 wrote:
Was Obama Raised Muslim?
Consider the evidence:
As Barack Obama's candidacy comes under increasing scrutiny, his account of his religious upbringing deserves careful attention for what it tells us about the candidate's integrity. If he lied maybe. Religion doesn't tell us anything else about a person but that he/she believes in things he/she can't prove... I agree but why should he conceal his background? I don't care what religion he subcribes to but by not being forthcoming about it only makes me suspicious of him.
Obama asserted in December, "I've always been a Christian," and he has adamantly denied ever having been a Muslim. "The only connection I've had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father's side came from that country [Kenya]. But I've never practiced Islam." Ok. His word against that of his detractors. Let's see...
In February, he claimed, "I have never been a Muslim.... other than my name and the fact that I lived in a populous Muslim country for four years when I was a child [Indonesia, 1967-71] I have very little connection to the Islamic religion." he had contact... i was raised in a Catholic country and I'm an Atheist.... Damn! Or am I lying about which fairy tale story I believe in? Well did you ever attend church or practice a form a Christianity and then convert to Atheism? If you did would you deny ever doing so if running for President?
"Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation. But many biographical facts, culled mainly from the American press, suggest that, when growing up, the Democratic candidate for president both saw himself and was seen as a Muslim. I quote you: "Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation... except, of course, when it's your political rival. I have to agree both sides of a political campaign will try and smear each other. Unfortunately, that is the nature of politics.
• Obama's Kenyan birth father: In Islam, religion passes from the father to the child. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. (1936-1982) was a Muslim who named his boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. NO. Religion doesn't pass from father to child. IT'S NOT A GENE. A free person can CHOOSE. I can't belive that people have the nerve of saying things like "that's a catholic boy" or "she's a good christian girl" or "my 5 year old is a great muslim"... Why are we labeling children that don't yet have the reasoning capacity to MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES? So it's perfectly believable that Obama, a muslim son, was not a muslim. I agree wholeheartedly with your statement. 
• Obama's Indonesian family: His stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was also a Muslim. In fact, as Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng explained to Jodi Kantor of The New York Times: "My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim." An Indonesian publication, The Banjarmasin Post, reports a former classmate, Rony Amir, recalling that "All the relatives of Barry's father were very devout Muslims." Damn! I should be a catholic! My whole family (except for my nuclear family, father,mother, sister, who CHOSE their individual paths) was catholic! Label me! Poor evidence. It comes down to Obama's denial of ever practicing Islam which recent investigations have revealed that in fact he did. I'm not here to label you but would you deny ever practicing Catholicism if in fact you had done so because your family initially exposed you to that religion?
• Obama's Catholic school in Jakarta: Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press reports that "documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim" while at a Catholic school during first through third grades. Kim Barker of The Chicago Tribune confirms that Obama was "listed as a Muslim on the registration form for the Catholic school." If it was a "catholic school", I'm pretty sure it was standard to label children, therefore they had to label little Obama as his parents. Remember: FROM FIRST TO THIRD GRADE A CHILD'S MIND IS NOT READY TO CHOOSE BY HIMSELF.... Or maybe he was a prodigious child who enrolled himself... and maybe even paid himself... Agreed, a child is not capable of making that type of decision regarding a belief system at that age but that's also no reason to deny ever practicing different beliefs.
• The public school: Paul Watson of The Los Angeles Times learned from Indonesians familiar with Obama when he lived in Jakarta that he "was registered by his family as a Muslim at both schools he attended."Did you read that? Registered BY HIS FAMILY. HE WAS A CHILD. Haroon Siddiqui of The Toronto Star visited the Jakarta public school Obama attended and found that "Three of his teachers have said he was enrolled as a Muslim." DID HE ENROLLED HIMSELF? OR MAYBE HIS PARENTS ENROLLED HIM? Although Siddiqui cautions that "With the school records missing, eaten by bugs, one has to rely on people's shifting memories," he cites only one retired teacher, Tine Hahiyari, retracting her earlier certainty about Obama's being registered as a Muslim. There's still not ONE single piece of evidence that shows that Obama HIMSELF ever was a muslim. Only registrations made by HIS MUSLIM PARENTS. Why would his parents enroll him as a muslim if they weren't practicing that religion as a family?
• Barack Obama's public school in Jakarta, Koran class: In his autobiography, Dreams of My Father, Obama relates how he got into trouble for making faces during Koran studies. Indeed, Obama still retains knowledge from that class: Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times reports that Obama "recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them [to Kristof] with a first-rate accent." Of course. We're talking about a boy, a child. he makes faces as any other child or even teenager. And of course he knew the Q'uoran.. After all, he was probably forced to learn it by his MUSLIM PARENTS. That is most likely the case.
• Mosque attendance: Obama's half-sister recalled that the family attended the mosque "for big communal events." Watson learned from childhood friends that "Obama sometimes went to Friday prayers at the local mosque." Barker found that "Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers." One Indonesia friend, Zulfin Adi, states that Obama "was Muslim. He went to the mosque. I remember him wearing a sarong" (a garment associated with Muslims). How old was Obama here? Was he at least 18 years old so that we can fully trust it was his own free will that made him to there? Or, even if he did, that it was his concious decision after the kind of analysis only an adult mind can do?
Well you better tell the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times they have their facts all wrong too. No... they have their facts right... the problem is, the facts don't prove anything.
I really don't care what religion Obama is. I do not for a minute think that he would undermine the country over a religious belief. The background check done by the Clinton campaign did bring his muslim ubringing to light. |
So why do you even mention this? To show his "lack of integrity" for having said he never was muslim
when maybe he "was" as a child? First. if he changed his religion, isn't he free to do it? Second, A CHILD CAN'T BE "ANYTHING". NOR CATHOLIC, CHRISTIAN, ATHEIST, SATANIST, MUSLIM, NOTHING. A child is.. a child. A child can't make that kind of heavy judgment yet. It's only society that allows the violence against children rights of labeling them with what their parents believe. So if your parents believe in the Mighty Apple and Lord Carrot, would you have been an "applecarroteist" when you were, say, 10 years old? If you're a christian, a catholic, a, atheist, whatever, is because you made that choice when you COULD. (not that believeing in apples or carrots is any less possible than the other beliefs....)
So here we have no evidence. Not at all. Please discuss politics, economics, policies... maybe you even have a point in those.... what people believe in their minds should remain there, and nowhere else.... |
The evidence does show that Obama was brought up muslim, he attended mosque, studied the Koran, was enrolled in school as a muslim and his own family members claim their entire family was muslim.
Obama has been a Christian for at least 20 years but the question remains, why deny his muslim upbringing even if it were forced upon him as a child?
I don't know about the rest of you but my vote isn't going to what religion Obama or McCain subscribe to but to where they stand on issues and which one I trust more in what they say.
Edited by Relayer09 - June 22 2008 at 13:04
|
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
|
 |
Relayer09
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 12:03 |
debrewguy wrote:
Relayer09 wrote:
debrewguy wrote:
Relayer09 wrote:
The election really lies in the big states that Hillary won. Texas, Florida, New York, Ohio and Michigan. Will these states vote for Obama without Hillary on the ticket? NOPE. The race at this point really comes down to is Hillary on the ticket for VP or not. Without Hillary on the ticket Obama will lose as bad as Mike Dukakis did.
People like myself who do not subscribe to any political party and like to think for myself will probably not vote for Obama without Hillary. Me personally, I will not vote for Obama over McCain even with Hillary on the ticket. Obama says the things people want to hear. That's only a good thing if he has a plan to back up those nice sounding things, which I don't believe he can do. There's been alot of skeletons to come out of the Obama closet already and may be more to come. McCain has kept his integrity intact even after being attacked by the New York Times with unfounded claims. So far for me the pendulum has swung towards McCain. Will it swing back? Doubtful at this point but we shall see. |
Aaahh. McCain's integrity. Proudly Stands with evangelical preacher one day, disowns him when the racist/homophobic/anti-immigrant/anti-poor statements reach the media.
You mean Jeremiah Wright? Wait a minute that was Obama.
DB - Actually the answer is Rev John Hagee. I'll leave it to you to do the reading as you seem intent on living in your own little reality. Wait, why strain your meager intellectual resources - John Hagee "God Damn America because it doesn't support new Israeli settlements in the occupied territory:. Rev Wright - "God Damn America for its' government's treatment of America's poor, its' black population, the Indian, the immigrantsand just about anyone that doesn't carry any electoral or financial heft". I can see why Rev Hagee's invoking God's wrath upon his country is O.K. (not)
Obama received Louis Farakhan's support just as McCain received Hagee's support but that in no way means that either of them agree with Farakhan or Hagee. Now it is quite a different story to be a member of Jeremiah Wright's chruch for twenty years.
Accuses Bush of being incompetent when campaigning against him, then eventually gives in and morphs into a quasi-supporter of the Bush administration. Why, well, to put it simply, so as to enable him to win the Republican nomination despite his past disagreements with the GOP's conservative wing on fundamental issues.
McCain doesn't tote the party line like a lemming is all that means. Obama votes the way his party tells him to vote, end of story. I'm voting for a leader not a follower.
DB - Again, your own little reality seems quite detached from the rest of the world. McCain has been questioned as to his change of heart re : many Dubya policies that he argues against years ago. The reason that some political analysts (including conservative wags) have given , is that he needs to show the GOP's right wing that he is one of them. Once more, if you're interested, please do some reading on McCain's stand on issues 4-5 years ago, then what he says he supports now. Just as Obama, he is a politician and has to play the "game". Please relate more than one occasion where Obama voted against his conscience. Oh, what you're voting for is a Republican, no matter what that Republican might have been. Admit it, give up the non-partisan facade that you seem to think no one can see through.
Obama has voted with his party 96% of the time. McCain has voted with his party 88% of the time during the Bush administration. Those are just the facts.
Just because I'll be voting for a Republican canidate this election does in no way make me an automatic Republican. This may be a hard concept for you but my voting record supports my non-partisan claims.
Frankly, I believe both parties have ended up with the best possible nominees. But only one is young. Only one, realistically, once in power, would bring in fresh blood into Washington. Who ? Obama. Why ? Because of his relatively short time as Senator has meant that he is still building up the insider relationships so necessary in the political system. And I don't mean this for McCain only. Clinton's presidency would have meant keeping the same old crowd in power.
The voters keep their Representatives and Senators in power. Obama has no more power over who sits in Congress than anyone else in Washington does. All that Obama and McCain for that matter can bring in are cabinet seats and those people have no voting power to get laws passed with the exception of Supreme Court nominees if a spot were to open up.
DB - er, can you explain the Presidency's seeming lack of power that you write about ?
What fresh blood did Bush bring into Washington? What roles did these people play? Powell, Rice & Gonzales all held cabinet posts. So enlighten me as to what fresh blood Obama will bring in and what roles will they play?
And as far as no plans to back up the rethoric, and unfounded claims ... well ... specific plans are never examined or discussed in detail during an election because the electorate just doesn't have the will or interest to do so. That's why the generalities, the so-called "values" are on display, for both sides. And for unfounded claims ... well ... if you think that is an Obama failing, please feel free to stand up and denounce/correct the following - Obama is muslim/is Arab/educated in Maddrassa (extremist islamic school/sworn in using Koran/radical black extremist/anti-whitey etc ...
Obama being a muslim for the first 31 years of his life is correct. His wife suggested that he convert to Christianity so that he could run for office.
DB - your claim of non-partisanship grows more & more unbelievable by the word. I wonder if you might be a follower or employee of Karl Rove, Mr. Clean-Issue -driven-politics-political organizer. For one who insisted on an issues based discussion, you might want to think about at least trying to hide your true colours. Not that admitting your bias would strengten your arguements, but at least they could be written off as the fringe positions that they are.
As you might recall, Hillary Clinton is a Democrat. her campaign dug into Obama's upbringing. Obama never participated in any radical movements but he was registred as a muslim in the schools he attended growing up. His own family members claim that he was a muslim. You asked me to correct your statement and I gave you the results discovered by journalists from several news papers, such as the New York Times and the Chicago Tribune.
Not that the Dems aren't capable at smearing the other side, but they unfortunately don't have idiots like Rush (I'm not a drug addict) Limbaugh, Bill (let's give everyone a chance to explain themselves) O'Reilly, Newt (adulterers don't belong in political office) Gingrich, the Right Wing Gospel of Prosperity Evangelical (what ever I say Jesus meant, is what Jesus meant) christian fanatics, and of course, the ever supportive big business and war mongerers.
Al Frankin, Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Code Pink, Arthur Sulzburger, Dan Rather, Katie Couric, Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell, Jack Cafferty and the list just keeps going. You are aware that the media today is predominatly liberal or did that just slip your mind?
DB - I guess everybody that criticizes your side is somehow liberal. This awareness you speak of is actually a fabrication. That "liberal" points of view exist is not a crime, and does not prove that it is overwhelming. Of course, for those who are fanatically inclined, any disagreement with their opinion is heretical. You may want to check out A certain Mr Rupert Murdoch's political leanings as an example of why your statement is, at best, a red herring intended to cast doubt about any criticism being based on something as simple as reality.
You claimed that only the conservative side of the media has fanatical personalities like Limbaugh and O'Reilly. Liberal media has just as many if not more fanatics also. I see fanatics on both sides whereas you can only see things from one side of the fence.
Oh, and by the way, for one who says you're not affiliated with any party, you sure seem to be tilting hard to one side, eh.
That is correct, I can only vote once. In past presidential elections I have voted for Ronald Reagan, Ross Perot, Bill Clinton and George Bush. I vote for the canidate not the political party. What about you?
DB - First, I spell it "candidate". Second, saying that you voted for Clinton sounds about as truthful as your initial claim to independent thought & non-partisanship. It seems more likely that you vote for the most simplistic right wing politician on the ballot.
Ah yes the grammer police strike again. That always adds something meaningful to a discussion. And now I'm a liar because you can't handle someone being capable of seeing both sides of the political arena and voting accordingly. You conviently avoided posting your voting record but it's apparent you only see things from one side.
| |
|
Edited by Relayer09 - June 22 2008 at 13:08
|
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
|
 |
debrewguy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 09:51 |
IVNORD wrote:
debrewguy wrote:
Beware ... the anti-troll patrol is on to you Mr R9 (which for a credit bureau means "write-off" or "bankrupt"). The anti-stupidity team is still trying to catch its' collective breath from laughing at your most recent posts. The reality sect has given up on saving your soul. Fox News , though, thinks you are a brilliant political anal-lyst, and would add to its' already globally reknowned bent for partisanship on a grand scale. Oh, Brit Hume, Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus, most of the Right Wing Evangelical radio & TV shows, Bill O Reilly, that female on Fox or CNN that looks like a horse ...
| You get too personal. Your comments on the merits of Relayer's posts reflect your personal opinion, thus they are subjective and may not conform to reality. I for one don't find his posts stupid. Your conduct does not help this discussion. |
IVnord, he started out by proclaiming how non-partisan and independent thinking he was. He then went into mostly anti-Obama smear mode, using unfounded lies and half baked thoughts to prove how right he was. At no point has he questioned or even criticized in the slightest anything that McCain has said or done, while raking Obama over the coals for actions that Senator John has also done. The merits of R9's arguements don't exist as he simply refuses to present factual or at least "real" information. The Obama is a muslim story ? Obama, but not McCain, flip flops ? The overwhelming Liberal & leftist biased media ? It all adds up to the typical GOP/Karl Rove game. Plant the seed of the biggest lie. Lazy back and watch as it spreads. Know that many of your supporters will not question anything negative about your opponent, no matter how flimsy or non-existent the evidence is to support it. If anything, my conduct is one of at least trying to present something called balance & intelligence into the debate. If you read my posts, you'll also find aspects that R9 has not even come close to presenting - actual support & criticism of BOTH SIDES. So when R9 offers something that can be considered to be true, I'll discuss with him. When he continues to troll ( and yes, conscious or not, that is what he is doing), I'll keep on flaming him as he well deserves. Read the posts, IVnord, read the posts.
|
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 09:39 |
 Perhaps this will help:
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 22 2008 at 14:51
|
 |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 09:31 |
IVNORD wrote:
NaturalScience wrote:
OK
a.) this country's entitlement programs are going to bankrupt us. b.) neither candidate nor party has any interest in solving this problem
therefore, at least this election is not very relevant. | Using this criteria for the past 20 years no election was very relevant.
NaturalScience wrote:
but by all means, think gay marriage or other non-issues are so critical as to influence your decision.
|
??? |
I was a bit tipsy when I wrote this, but things are not relevant for me because I fear fiscal conservatism is officially dead. Some tough choices are going to have to be made, but no one wants to make them now because the government waits until a problem is a crisis in order to act. Witness current energy problems where I don't see any real short term solution.
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 09:26 |
OK that was from 2004, things did get a little better in the past few years:
Job-destroying Democrats in action
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 22 2008 at 09:40
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 00:39 |
NaturalScience wrote:
OK
a.) this country's entitlement programs are going to bankrupt us. b.) neither candidate nor party has any interest in solving this problem
therefore, at least this election is not very relevant. |
Using this criteria for the past 20 years no election was very relevant.
NaturalScience wrote:
but by all means, think gay marriage or other non-issues are so critical as to influence your decision.
|
???
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 00:34 |
debrewguy wrote:
Beware ... the anti-troll patrol is on to you Mr R9 (which for a credit bureau means "write-off" or "bankrupt"). The anti-stupidity team is still trying to catch its' collective breath from laughing at your most recent posts. The reality sect has given up on saving your soul. Fox News , though, thinks you are a brilliant political anal-lyst, and would add to its' already globally reknowned bent for partisanship on a grand scale. Oh, Brit Hume, Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus, most of the Right Wing Evangelical radio & TV shows, Bill O Reilly, that female on Fox or CNN that looks like a horse ...
|
You get too personal. Your comments on the merits of Relayer's posts reflect your personal opinion, thus they are subjective and may not conform to reality. I for one don't find his posts stupid. Your conduct does not help this discussion.
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 00:16 |
Relayer09 wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
Relayer09 wrote:
If McCain were to choose Joe Leiberman as his VP choice ( which I hope he does ) he'll win easily. | What would happen then to McCain's conservative image he's trying to build for his right wing supporters? |
Do you really think conservatives are going to vote for Obama if McCain were to pick Leiberman? |
No I don't. But they may not vote at all.
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 00:13 |
Where did you guys find these graphs?? It's pure propaganda. Verify your sources before posting them.
Slartibartfast wrote:
And now for something completely different:
And speaking of graphs:

Countergraph me Relayer! 
|
Click on "Create Customized Tables" and I can guide you thru the selection criteria. When you look at the totals, the Clinton years show a job growth rate of 2% on average. This 20M jobs at the end of his second term is a cumulative number. It was achieved thru manipulation of the economy. We had a party now it's the paytime.
And the graph conveniently stops at the year 2003 for Mr. Bush although the economy added over 8M jobs since then. Not that I am a big fan of his, but you have to be fair.
Relayer09 wrote:
I counter with a Nixon-Ford! aha take that! So it seems apparent that the guys who get impeached are great at creating jobs, or something associated with a "job".  
Anyone for a cigar perhaps?  |
If you use the above customized tables, the Nixon-Ford administrations had a peak annual growth of 4% in 1973, and actual loss of jobs in 1975. The average is closer to 2%.
|
 |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: June 22 2008 at 00:00 |
OK
a.) this country's entitlement programs are going to bankrupt us. b.) neither candidate nor party has any interest in solving this problem
therefore, at least this election is not very relevant.
but by all means, think gay marriage or other non-issues are so critical as to influence your decision.
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 21 2008 at 23:53 |
Relayer09 wrote:
The voters keep their Representatives and Senators in power. Obama has no more power over who sits in Congress than anyone else in Washington does. All that Obama and McCain for that matter can bring in are cabinet seats and those people have no voting power to get laws passed with the exception of Supreme Court nominees if a spot were to open up.
|
The executive branch has an enormous power. What having no voting power has to do with it?
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 21 2008 at 23:48 |
debrewguy wrote:
Oh, by the way, governments actually have little real effect on the economy. Economic cycles come & go. Booms seem like they'll never end, and busts always get better. The only change from one to the other is the specific length of time. Bush's tax rebate will do little that wasn't going to happen anyway. The same that Clinton's presidency was not the main cause of the stock market surge in the 90s. |
I used to think this way too. A government can influence the economy in a profound way. The stock market bubble of the 80's was a result of Reagan's budget deficit policy to fight the cold war. Clinton engineered the bubble of the 90's to get re-elected. His first two years in office were uneventful and he was facing a one-term presidency. He brought in Rubin who most likely negotiated the lowering of the interest rates with Greenspan. The economy took off and the stocks went through the roof. We still feel the effects of that today.
|
 |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: June 21 2008 at 23:33 |
Starless wrote:
Reading all you Yanks moaning about budget deficits, tax cuts etc, makes me wonder how this compares - In the good 'ol UK we are currently paying an average of £1100 (about $2000) per annum on domestic fuel bills, with predicted increases of 40% (!!!!!) this winter. Also, we are paying arounf £1.20 (around $2? not sure, you'll have to check) a litre for petrol (gas). Don't know how many litres = 1 US gallon, but if you do the math, I'm sure you'll fall off your chair!
All politicians are b*****ds (some literally)
|
A US gallon is about 4 litres. Wholesale price of unleaded gasoline as of last Friday is about $3.44. It's the same in the US and the UK. The retail (what we pay at the pump) is around $4 in the US and close to $9 in the UK. We pay 40-50 cents in gasoline taxes. You pay $5. But your socialism costs money. That's just one of the ways you're paying for it.
|
 |
debrewguy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
|
Posted: June 21 2008 at 20:41 |
Beware ... the anti-troll patrol is on to you Mr R9 (which for a credit bureau means "write-off" or "bankrupt"). The anti-stupidity team is still trying to catch its' collective breath from laughing at your most recent posts. The reality sect has given up on saving your soul. Fox News , though, thinks you are a brilliant political anal-lyst, and would add to its' already globally reknowned bent for partisanship on a grand scale. Oh, Brit Hume, Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus, most of the Right Wing Evangelical radio & TV shows, Bill O Reilly, that female on Fox or CNN that looks like a horse ...
|
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
 |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: June 21 2008 at 19:26 |
Relayer09 wrote:
Was Obama Raised Muslim?
Consider the evidence:
As Barack Obama's candidacy comes under increasing scrutiny, his account of his religious upbringing deserves careful attention for what it tells us about the candidate's integrity. If he lied maybe. Religion doesn't tell us anything else about a person but that he/she believes in things he/she can't prove...
Obama asserted in December, "I've always been a Christian," and he has adamantly denied ever having been a Muslim. "The only connection I've had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father's side came from that country [Kenya]. But I've never practiced Islam." Ok. His word against that of his detractors. Let's see...
In February, he claimed, "I have never been a Muslim.... other than my name and the fact that I lived in a populous Muslim country for four years when I was a child [Indonesia, 1967-71] I have very little connection to the Islamic religion." he had contact... i was raised in a Catholic country and I'm an Atheist.... Damn! Or am I lying about which fairy tale story I believe in?
"Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation. But many biographical facts, culled mainly from the American press, suggest that, when growing up, the Democratic candidate for president both saw himself and was seen as a Muslim. I quote you: "Always" and "never" leave little room for equivocation... except, of course, when it's your political rival.
• Obama's Kenyan birth father: In Islam, religion passes from the father to the child. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. (1936-1982) was a Muslim who named his boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. NO. Religion doesn't pass from father to child. IT'S NOT A GENE. A free person can CHOOSE. I can't belive that people have the nerve of saying things like "that's a catholic boy" or "she's a good christian girl" or "my 5 year old is a great muslim"... Why are we labeling children that don't yet have the reasoning capacity to MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES? So it's perfectly believable that Obama, a muslim son, was not a muslim.
• Obama's Indonesian family: His stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was also a Muslim. In fact, as Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng explained to Jodi Kantor of The New York Times: "My whole family was Muslim, and most of the people I knew were Muslim." An Indonesian publication, The Banjarmasin Post, reports a former classmate, Rony Amir, recalling that "All the relatives of Barry's father were very devout Muslims." Damn! I should be a catholic! My whole family (except for my nuclear family, father,mother, sister, who CHOSE their individual paths) was catholic! Label me! Poor evidence.
• Obama's Catholic school in Jakarta: Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press reports that "documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim" while at a Catholic school during first through third grades. Kim Barker of The Chicago Tribune confirms that Obama was "listed as a Muslim on the registration form for the Catholic school." If it was a "catholic school", I'm pretty sure it was standard to label children, therefore they had to label little Obama as his parents. Remember: FROM FIRST TO THIRD GRADE A CHILD'S MIND IS NOT READY TO CHOOSE BY HIMSELF.... Or maybe he was a prodigious child who enrolled himself... and maybe even paid himself...
• The public school: Paul Watson of The Los Angeles Times learned from Indonesians familiar with Obama when he lived in Jakarta that he "was registered by his family as a Muslim at both schools he attended."Did you read that? Registered BY HIS FAMILY. HE WAS A CHILD. Haroon Siddiqui of The Toronto Star visited the Jakarta public school Obama attended and found that "Three of his teachers have said he was enrolled as a Muslim." DID HE ENROLLED HIMSELF? OR MAYBE HIS PARENTS ENROLLED HIM? Although Siddiqui cautions that "With the school records missing, eaten by bugs, one has to rely on people's shifting memories," he cites only one retired teacher, Tine Hahiyari, retracting her earlier certainty about Obama's being registered as a Muslim. There's still not ONE single piece of evidence that shows that Obama HIMSELF ever was a muslim. Only registrations made by HIS MUSLIM PARENTS.
• Barack Obama's public school in Jakarta, Koran class: In his autobiography, Dreams of My Father, Obama relates how he got into trouble for making faces during Koran studies. Indeed, Obama still retains knowledge from that class: Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times reports that Obama "recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them [to Kristof] with a first-rate accent." Of course. We're talking about a boy, a child. he makes faces as any other child or even teenager. And of course he knew the Q'uoran.. After all, he was probably forced to learn it by his MUSLIM PARENTS.
• Mosque attendance: Obama's half-sister recalled that the family attended the mosque "for big communal events." Watson learned from childhood friends that "Obama sometimes went to Friday prayers at the local mosque." Barker found that "Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers." One Indonesia friend, Zulfin Adi, states that Obama "was Muslim. He went to the mosque. I remember him wearing a sarong" (a garment associated with Muslims). How old was Obama here? Was he at least 18 years old so that we can fully trust it was his own free will that made him to there? Or, even if he did, that it was his concious decision after the kind of analysis only an adult mind can do?
Well you better tell the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times they have their facts all wrong too. No... they have their facts right... the problem is, the facts don't prove anything.
I really don't care what religion Obama is. I do not for a minute think that he would undermine the country over a religious belief. The background check done by the Clinton campaign did bring his muslim ubringing to light. |
So why do you even mention this? To show his "lack of integrity" for having said he never was muslim when maybe he "was" as a child? First. if he changed his religion, isn't he free to do it? Second, A CHILD CAN'T BE "ANYTHING". NOR CATHOLIC, CHRISTIAN, ATHEIST, SATANIST, MUSLIM, NOTHING. A child is.. a child. A child can't make that kind of heavy judgment yet. It's only society that allows the violence against children rights of labeling them with what their parents believe. So if your parents believe in the Mighty Apple and Lord Carrot, would you have been an "applecarroteist" when you were, say, 10 years old? If you're a christian, a catholic, a, atheist, whatever, is because you made that choice when you COULD. (not that believeing in apples or carrots is any less possible than the other beliefs....)
So here we have no evidence. Not at all. Please discuss politics, economics, policies... maybe you even have a point in those.... what people believe in their minds should remain there, and nowhere else....
|
|
 |