Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
KoS
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
|
Posted: January 08 2010 at 23:47 |
Crash. It was supposed to be against stereotypes but all it was was stereotypes. Plus, it seemed totally contrived.
|
 |
Kestrel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
|
Posted: January 09 2010 at 05:27 |
From 2009, I'd say Star Trek and Avatar were the most overhyped. It seems like every nerd loved Star Trek when I don't think it was actually that good and I don't think Avatar is the revolution James Cameron claimed it would be.
|
 |
marktheshark
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
|
Posted: January 09 2010 at 11:09 |
Bitterblogger wrote:
marktheshark wrote:
Anybody ever heard of or seen any of the Billy Jack films. Four of them altogether starting with a 1967 biker exploitation film called Born Losers that introduced the character. These films were independently made by Tom Laughlin. Billy Jack (played by Laughlin) is a character that's a half-breed Indian, ex-Green Beret Viet Nam vet and martial arts expert. He comes to the aid of a hippy Freedom School on a reservation in Arizona. The films were horrendous and critically panned everywhere. But they touched a nerve with the counterculture in the early 70s and became box office sensations. Bad acting, bad directing, very pretentous and not to mention hypercritical. Always preaching peace and love and yet Billy just keeps beating the crap out of the rednecks that don't go along with that. They're really laughable now (and even then) and are hopelessly dated and eventually drifted off to obscurity, thank god! |
Seconded heartily--and was co-star and wife the ugliest "heroine" of all time or what? |
Seconded there too. Would you believe Laughlin is filming a 5th Billy Jack film? He's almost 80 years old! He must be a glutton for punishment. His wife Delores looked bad enough in the 70s, I can't imagine how she looks now.
|
 |
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: January 10 2010 at 12:54 |
marktheshark wrote:
Bitterblogger wrote:
marktheshark wrote:
Anybody ever heard of or seen any of the Billy Jack films. Four of them altogether starting with a 1967 biker exploitation film called Born Losers that introduced the character. These films were independently made by Tom Laughlin. Billy Jack (played by Laughlin) is a character that's a half-breed Indian, ex-Green Beret Viet Nam vet and martial arts expert. He comes to the aid of a hippy Freedom School on a reservation in Arizona. The films were horrendous and critically panned everywhere. But they touched a nerve with the counterculture in the early 70s and became box office sensations. Bad acting, bad directing, very pretentous and not to mention hypercritical. Always preaching peace and love and yet Billy just keeps beating the crap out of the rednecks that don't go along with that. They're really laughable now (and even then) and are hopelessly dated and eventually drifted off to obscurity, thank god! |
Seconded heartily--and was co-star and wife the ugliest "heroine" of all time or what? |
Seconded there too. Would you believe Laughlin is filming a 5th Billy Jack film? He's almost 80 years old! He must be a glutton for punishment. His wife Delores looked bad enough in the 70s, I can't imagine how she looks now. |
Maybe it's going to be like The Karate Kid movies with Billy Jack mentoring a young man.
|
 |
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
|
Posted: February 05 2010 at 21:39 |
Tony R wrote:
Interesting. The OP asks for the most over-hyped movie and people merely post about films they don't like.
I guess that over-hyped really means that there was general critical and popular acclaim but you as an individual could see no merit in it but in this sense it means movies where the trailer contained all the "best" bits I guess. No one could genuinely think that The Godfather was a bad movie.
2012 (absolutely atrocious, lazy film-making and bad science) The Day After Tomorrow (see above) The Star Wars Prequels (urinating on a favourite childhood memory) Transformers (even the lowest common denominator should feel insulted by the stilted dialogue and 1D characters)
|
I don't think anyone really rates those movies you list. I thought the general consensus on those films was that they were terrible?
|
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
 |
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
|
Posted: February 05 2010 at 21:42 |
Kestrel wrote:
From 2009, I'd say Star Trek and Avatar were the most overhyped. It seems like every nerd loved Star Trek when I don't think it was actually that good and I don't think Avatar is the revolution James Cameron claimed it would be. |
Really? I thought the new Trek was the best one they've done in years, since First Contact probably. It had something for both the fans and newbies. Avatar may not have been anything really new in the story department (Dances with Wolves, Pocahontas, or Last Samurai with aliens), but the technology really was breathtaking and stunning. I totally believed in the mo-cap creatures.
|
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
 |
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
|
Posted: February 05 2010 at 21:50 |
sleeper wrote:
The Star Wars films, all 6 of them. Its not that they're bad films because they arent, they're just massivly over hyped with every single aspect of them best described as OK. |
See, SW is like Pink Floyd for me. Sure, they're good. But ask a non-sci fi fan, or a non-progger, and they can only come up with Star Wars, or Pink Floyd respectively.
There's so much more sci fi than just Star Wars.
|
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
 |
TealFoxes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2008
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 152
|
Posted: February 06 2010 at 11:19 |
Scorsese films. His formula is beaten to death & never was that fascinating to me. I really like Age & Innocence, but besides that i think they're all just for the sake of sadism.
Now that i mention sadism, Mel Gibson directs & stars in very overhyped movies (I'll give a bit of credit to Ransom, though)
|
 |
Bitterblogger
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 04 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
|
Posted: February 08 2010 at 13:01 |
TealFoxes wrote:
Scorsese films.
His formula is beaten to death & never was that fascinating to me. I really like Age & Innocence, but besides that i think they're all just for the sake of sadism.
Now that i mention sadism, Mel Gibson directs & stars in very overhyped movies
(I'll give a bit of credit to Ransom, though) |
Can't go along on Scorsese (although I think his best is behind him), but you're right on about Gibson as an actor.
I'll add Braveheart to Ransom as worthy since he became a big star (though Hamlet, which I haven't seen, was evidently better than OK). Others are merely passable, or worse.
|
 |
jampa17
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
|
Posted: February 08 2010 at 14:22 |
KoS wrote:
Crash. It was supposed to be against stereotypes but all it was was stereotypes. Plus, it seemed totally contrived.
|
Exactly my words... 
|
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
|
 |
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: February 08 2010 at 15:46 |
Lots of sh*t movies out there these days. I yearn for a good old fashioned Godzilla movie with crappy models of Tokyo being stomped out by a guy in a cheap rubber suit. Those were the days of cinema at it's finest.
|
 |
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: February 11 2010 at 01:28 |
Yup, Eraserhead was pretty awful. I made it half an hour in before I bailed. I'm sure there's some reason Stanley Kubrik and Spielberg love it, but I'm not going to waste my time trying to figure it out.
I did like the mother lighting up a cigarette for the catatonic grandmother, and the soundtrack was effective, but otherwise, just no.
Edited by Henry Plainview - February 11 2010 at 01:36
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.