Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Minus The Bear (post-rock or xover)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMinus The Bear (post-rock or xover)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Minus The Bear (post-rock or xover)
    Posted: March 13 2010 at 20:34
Hear me out, here. They are widely considered to be Math Rock and/or Post-Rock mixed with alt. rock. I have heard their proggiest album, ''Planet of Ice'', and while it's certainly got a lot of Pop leanings, the Prog influence is also heavily present. 

Xover might want to consider them more than the Post-Rock team, but either way, I think we should at least give them a serious listen before waving them off as simple pop music. There is a lot more depth to their music, and the complexity is also there, if not a little more subtle than some other bands of this type. 

At least one of their albums is actually considered 'Progressive Rock':

^ That album is the one I was talking about, and I'll post some of the proggier tracks from it below:


''Lotus'' 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22kne5dxOs0  <--My personal favorite, with a ton of psychedelic ambience, and a particularly Gilmour-esque solo around six minutes in.

"Dr. L'Ling" 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU-mQB7FWVc <--Very Peter Gabriel in the vocals department, and a lot of exciting musical changes along the way.

''White Mystery'' 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aim62BWz48c <--Really clever Psych-Pop Rocker of a song. 

''Ice Monster''
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv-QkZVYzQo <--Another pop-prog song that puts me in mind of Mansun quite a bit, but ends on a more 'Post-Rock' note.

^ Those are just a few examples of how this band has managed to blend Prog and Pop in (in my opinion) a very clever and interesting way. They are more immediately accessible than some others, but don't let that aspect fool you; these guys are a helluva lot more than just typical 'alt-rock' or 'indie rock'. They often include Math Rock elements, segue their songs together so they flow into each other, which makes me think they are more of an album-oriented band rather than just a collection of unrelated tracks, and have a ton of psychedelic and prog stylings weaved throughout their works. 

I don't know if they are Post-Rock enough for that team to consider them, but the xover team should definitely give them a shot if the former team declines them. I just think they are a strong contender for inclusion, here, and want to make sure a case is made on their behalf. I don't know if anybody here listens to these guys at all, but if there IS anybody else, you are welcome to give your thoughts, as well. I'm sure you'll agree with me that they are fairly eclectic.

Hope this gets some attention. Thumbs Up


Edited by JLocke - March 13 2010 at 21:59
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 20:42
Absolute support from me for crossover; I have 3 of their albums (Menos El Oso, Planet Of Ice and This Is What I Know About Being Gigantic).

Their debut (This Is What I Know...) actually has some metallic proggy sections, although the other two are definitely prog. Planet Ice is definitely a prog (probably post-rock) album, and Menos El Oso is more crossover sounding; they're all great discs though.

From those 3 albums I have, I think that crossover would be a better option; hopefully we'll have some input from some other members as to their best fit.

If needed, I'm happy to contribute a biography or help with adding the discography if they're approved.

Just my two cents

Edited by progkidjoel - March 13 2010 at 20:42
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 20:43
^ Cool! Thanks, Joel. We'll see what happens. Smile
Back to Top
Dominic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 02 2008
Location: Liberation Land
Status: Offline
Points: 651
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:03
I'm not the biggest fan of these dudes, but i believe that they're deserving of induction into the archives. 

btw, have you seen this neat MTB/Frippertronics vid JLocke? 




I was surprised how amazing they sounded together.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:11
^ Never saw that before. Pretty cool! haha. Thanks.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:17
Minus the Bear aren't a post rock band by any stretch of the imagination.
Me thinks you need to sit down with a whole bunch of post rock bands and listen to what the genre actually is.
Having post rock elements doesn't qualify a band for post rock. A band needs to be POST ROCK to be post rock, not have a few elements here and there.
I love Minus The Bear and I've listened to their stuff inside out backwards, but dude they're an indie rock band basically, that play around with math rock-ish elements and experimental rock elements.

How "prog" they are is perhaps questionable. I don't have any serious issues with the band being placed in the database, but nor am I strongly in favor of it either as to me (and probably most other fans) they are really an indie rock band that flirts with math rock-y and slightly proggy elements, and not a prog band that flirts with indie rock elements
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:47
Somehow, I'm not the least bit surprised that you would pop in here and not add anything of note whatsoever. You say you don't care one way or the other if they are added, yet you go out of your way to discredit my case for their inclusion? 

I'm glad you love the band, but 'dude', it would sure be nice if you could refrain from more or less calling me ignorant on the subject of Post-Rock just because you don't share my opinion about one band. 

But then again, asking you to not be an ass about something is like asking a dog not to be a dog, I suppose. 
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:48
I would support these guys for Crossover, for sure. 
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:58
^ Well, as I said, xover is probably the better fit. But since the band DOES have Post-Rock elements in their music, I thought I would mention both sub-genres. Apparently I can't do that without being chastised. 
Back to Top
angelmk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 22 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1955
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 21:59
i listened to the Planet of Ice album, and i am sure they won't fit in post rock. they do have some slight math hints here and there but not enough  to be placed under post or math rock. so JLocke,  would you like me to add them to progfreak charts for evaluation and see what other members say about them? 
www.last.fm/user/angelmk
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 22:03
^xover should probably take a look first. I think that's well been established by this point. But do whatever you think fits. I don't know what I'm talking about, anyway. 
Back to Top
angelmk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 22 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1955
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 22:12
^^ Ok,  i won't add them to post rock charts for now, It's the best Xover team evaluate them first. 
www.last.fm/user/angelmk
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 13 2010 at 23:32
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Somehow, I'm not the least bit surprised that you would pop in here and not add anything of note whatsoever. You say you don't care one way or the other if they are added, yet you go out of your way to discredit my case for their inclusion? 

I'm glad you love the band, but 'dude', it would sure be nice if you could refrain from more or less calling me ignorant on the subject of Post-Rock just because you don't share my opinion about one band. 

But then again, asking you to not be an ass about something is like asking a dog not to be a dog, I suppose. 


Not all of what I said is opinion.
They ARE an indie rock band and musically they don't share much in common with proper post rock.
Post rock is post rock, it's a set genre that like many other genres, has certain boundaries and limitations that make it post rock, before it might become an entirely different genre completely.
Minus The Bear, musically, doesn't fit into the definition of post rock. It's just a matter of fact here.

As for their inclusion, of course that will be up to the opinion of Xover or Post Rock.
Personally I may be inclined to agree with you they have potential for Xover due to their poppy-elements, experimental nature and somewhat quirky, different compositional style.
They may not be "prog rock" as per what we traditionally see as prog rock, but rather literally progressive in the sense of moving forward.
I guess Radiohead is a good example. Many tend to not see it as "prog rock" as such, but they innovated and pushed music into a modern, forward direction, much the same as Minus The Bear did for the 00s and now, as Radiohead did for the late 90s/early 00s, rather than the field of many "retro" prog bands who are "prog rock" but completely lack any degree of progressiveness at all (The Flower Kings et al).

And I meant by not caring or not was in that in the grand scheme of things it's not that important if they get added or not, but obviously I care enough to the extent I posted in here.

And I'll be the better man by refraining to comment and retaliating on your "asking you to not be an ass" comment and we'll leave it at that, as you can believe what you want, but many members around here do consider me a helpful, friendly member.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 00:17
^ I just think you have a tendency to jump in to threads, say little sh*tty things to put people down, then split. At times like that, I often wonder what was the point, other than to just get under people's skin. I've done it before, myself, so I'm certainly not guiltless, but I have recognized that about myself and tried to improve. I am NOT the only one here who has noticed this about you, so it's not just 'in my head'. You do come off that way at times, and I simply didn't appreciate it this time around. I have nothing against you personally, and as far as I am concerned, the air is cleared. 

Glad you agree that they might have a place here, anyway. 




Edited by JLocke - March 14 2010 at 00:21
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2010 at 06:07
Let's all remember that the post-rock/math rock page on PA has bands that are neither post-rock nor math-rock for the simple reason that the genre was once called "Experimental/Post-Rock" and it was intended as a place to be for the progressive bands of the indie scene.

Since it was needed to acknowledge math-rock as a proper, mature genre on PA the "experimental" label was drawn out of this page's description and now only post-rock and math-rock bands are accepted, which is a shame, especially considering the bands left there which are neither. BTW it's very annoying to see people describing in their reviews what kind of post-rock are Tortoise. They aren't!

This has been a problem for the addition of borderline bands, and from my own experience I've had this problem with Eivind Aarset, which was luckily taken by Jazz-Rock and Discordless, which are pending indefinitely. Something needs to be done to address this issue.

This being said, I'll take a listen to this band's stuff soon Tongue
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2010 at 09:16
Planet Of Ice is definitely progressive, beside being very good. My impression is that this is the kind of music Mastodon would play were they not a metal band.

Crossover Prog is my pick, too.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 21:57
^ Any current news regarding these guys? I can inform the xover team about them if they haven't already been added to the evaluation chart.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 17 2010 at 23:56
Alex posted this thread in the Xover team a few days ago, although I'm not sure if they're on the charts.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 18 2010 at 00:17
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

Alex posted this thread in the Xover team a few days ago, although I'm not sure if they're on the charts.

They aren't. I just checked. 
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 18 2010 at 07:21
Olaf said he's added them to the evaluation charts, maybe he typed the name in a different manner or maybe there was an error. I'll keep "monitoring" this, don't worry. Tongue 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.