Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Analog Synths sound dated?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAnalog Synths sound dated?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>
Author
Message
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 17:25
Originally posted by topographicbroadways topographicbroadways wrote:

i think it depends on the synth. The minimoog has influenced pretty much everything to come after it and has never really sounded dated because most things attempt to sound like it still today, it's a timeless instrument like the Les Paul and Stratocaster of Keyboards. 
But things like Arp's and early polysynths to me do sound dated at times. 

I agree!  Tony Banks made extensive use of the Arp Pro-Soloist, and that sounds very dated (even back then, I didn't care for the sound all that much).  He transitioned to the Poly-Moog on "And Then There Were Three," and got a very nice sound of out it. 

Moog is still in business, see: 

Generally, I find modern digital synth technology to be less fun than this old stuff!  It was great to grab a handful of oscillator & filter controls and wrongle the crap out of these things!

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 17:30
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by topographicbroadways topographicbroadways wrote:

i think it depends on the synth. The minimoog has influenced pretty much everything to come after it and has never really sounded dated because most things attempt to sound like it still today, it's a timeless instrument like the Les Paul and Stratocaster of Keyboards. 
But things like Arp's and early polysynths to me do sound dated at times. 

I agree!  Tony Banks made extensive use of the Arp Pro-Soloist, and that sounds very dated (even back then, I didn't care for the sound all that much).  He transitioned to the Poly-Moog on "And Then There Were Three," and got a very nice sound of out it. 

Moog is still in business, see: 

Generally, I find modern digital synth technology to be less fun than this old stuff!  It was great to grab a handful of oscillator & filter controls and wrongle the crap out of these things!

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!

The Roland Fantom is fantastic but i find those sorts of high end keyboards a little fiddly and in the end not worth the thousands you can spend on them.

If i was to go for a new Moog i'd definitely go out and buy the LittlePhatty it is a fantastic piece of kit that i saw Oliver Wakeman use with Yes and it had an incredible sound that cut through everything like a proper moog should.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 17:35
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by topographicbroadways topographicbroadways wrote:

i think it depends on the synth. The minimoog has influenced pretty much everything to come after it and has never really sounded dated because most things attempt to sound like it still today, it's a timeless instrument like the Les Paul and Stratocaster of Keyboards. 
But things like Arp's and early polysynths to me do sound dated at times. 

I agree!  Tony Banks made extensive use of the Arp Pro-Soloist, and that sounds very dated (even back then, I didn't care for the sound all that much).  He transitioned to the Poly-Moog on "And Then There Were Three," and got a very nice sound of out it. 

Moog is still in business, see: 

Generally, I find modern digital synth technology to be less fun than this old stuff!  It was great to grab a handful of oscillator & filter controls and wrongle the crap out of these things!

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!
 
I would think otherwise, Tony Bank's ARP use gave a new sound not heard often by Prog bands from the time, and the sound still sounds fresh today like the solos on Firth of Fifth and The Cinema Show.
The Mini-Moog on the other hand, the early stuff made by Emerson or other early users of the instrument, make it sound very dated.
 
But this is just pure subjective talk, not really the purpose of my thread...
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 17:41
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by topographicbroadways topographicbroadways wrote:

i think it depends on the synth. The minimoog has influenced pretty much everything to come after it and has never really sounded dated because most things attempt to sound like it still today, it's a timeless instrument like the Les Paul and Stratocaster of Keyboards. 
But things like Arp's and early polysynths to me do sound dated at times. 

I agree!  Tony Banks made extensive use of the Arp Pro-Soloist, and that sounds very dated (even back then, I didn't care for the sound all that much).  He transitioned to the Poly-Moog on "And Then There Were Three," and got a very nice sound of out it. 

Moog is still in business, see: 

Generally, I find modern digital synth technology to be less fun than this old stuff!  It was great to grab a handful of oscillator & filter controls and wrongle the crap out of these things!

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!
 
I would think otherwise, Tony Bank's ARP use gave a new sound not heard often by Prog bands from the time, and the sound still sounds fresh today like the solos on Firth of Fifth and The Cinema Show.
The Mini-Moog on the other hand, the early stuff made by Emerson or other early users of the instrument, make it sound very dated.
 
But this is just pure subjective talk, not really the purpose of my thread...

Tony definitely did some great innovative stuff with the arps like some of the Arp 2600 on songs like In That Quiet Earth but i think the Pro Soloist was as an instrument very influential but as a sound far from timeless, The Cinema Show and Firth of Fifth still sound great but i think others like Riding The Scree could definitely be outdone by later Synths.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 17:44

^yeah, Riding the Scree does sound a bit "dirty"/annoying at times.

But so did the Moog, Wakeman's use on Tales and Going for the One particulary shows some screechings.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18457
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2011 at 18:54
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 
 
Or even catch a bit of his stuff on the Refugee album ... not as blatant as it was on Relayer, but quite good.
 
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!
 
You almost don't need to buy a synthesizer with that much money ... go over to Arturia.com and play with the Jupiter 8V ... or go over to IKMultimedia and play with Miroslav Philharmonic and all that ... and all of a sudden, having some of those units is not really necessary, and the Jupiter 8V done as the VST, and through my Midi, is far more versatile than it was before, for example.
 
Mellotron and Hammond sounds are so well known, and so specific that it is hard to not think "original", but when it is being played and it is well done, I doubt that anyone would think that the version that was on the Fairlight was not good, or well used.
 
The Jupiter 8v software sounds excellent in a big system, and can easily make the old bands sound cheesy. Not to mention that carrying it around is much safer these days ... it's just a computer.
 
The nice thing about that workstation is that it is also a midi keyboard. I have almost all the controls on the Jupiter 8v software on my midi, on sliders and knobs (Oxygen 61 by M-Audio) and I can tell you that it is really hard to get bored ... and I have not yet clicked on the top portion to get to the sequencer or the effects I can add to the whole thing! It's endless!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 01:23
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

The MASTER of all that was, without a doubt, Patrick Moraz during "Relayer"!  I saw that tour twice, and my God, he seemed to nearly break the knobs off of that Mini-Moog!   Think of the synth solos on "Sound Chaser". 
 
Or even catch a bit of his stuff on the Refugee album ... not as blatant as it was on Relayer, but quite good.
 
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

I'm not much of a keyboard player, but these days, I'd want a top-notch workstation synth (like the Roland Fantom, see http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=589) for the Mellotron & Hammond patches, an analog synth with LOTS of knobs, and.....well, throw money!!
 
You almost don't need to buy a synthesizer with that much money ... go over to Arturia.com and play with the Jupiter 8V ... or go over to IKMultimedia and play with Miroslav Philharmonic and all that ... and all of a sudden, having some of those units is not really necessary, and the Jupiter 8V done as the VST, and through my Midi, is far more versatile than it was before, for example.
 
Mellotron and Hammond sounds are so well known, and so specific that it is hard to not think "original", but when it is being played and it is well done, I doubt that anyone would think that the version that was on the Fairlight was not good, or well used.
 
The Jupiter 8v software sounds excellent in a big system, and can easily make the old bands sound cheesy. Not to mention that carrying it around is much safer these days ... it's just a computer.
 
The nice thing about that workstation is that it is also a midi keyboard. I have almost all the controls on the Jupiter 8v software on my midi, on sliders and knobs (Oxygen 61 by M-Audio) and I can tell you that it is really hard to get bored ... and I have not yet clicked on the top portion to get to the sequencer or the effects I can add to the whole thing! It's endless!

Thanks!!  Great advice!  I've looked at the M-Audio & other software synths, but as a very poor keyboardist, I tend to focus on the bass & 6-string guitar stuff first!   Really good keys are fun to noodle around with! 
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 01:56
People riff on Tony Bank's ARP synth all the time, I really don't know what those people are smoking because I think ARP synth is goddamn awesome. His synth solos are my favorite thing about Genesis and that's saying a lot.
 
If anything, I actually think the ARP sounds less dated than other synths popular in the 70s, and yes that includes the moog. I find Banks' synth work to be pretty timeless, it doesn't sound "70s" to me at all. If anything I consider Genesis the least 70s sounding of the big prog bands of that era, save maybe King Crimson.
 
Keep in mind that when I use the term "dated" I simply mean something that's easily associated with a bygone era and is hardly modern. That is NOT the same as being bad or cheesy or whatever.
 
NES games are dated, they're also f**king awesome. Black Eyed Peas are not dated, and they suck. Many "dated" things are preferable to what we have now.


Edited by boo boo - February 12 2011 at 02:03
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 02:52
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

People riff on Tony Bank's ARP synth all the time, I really don't know what those people are smoking because I think ARP synth is goddamn awesome. His synth solos are my favorite thing about Genesis and that's saying a lot.
 
If anything, I actually think the ARP sounds less dated than other synths popular in the 70s, and yes that includes the moog. I find Banks' synth work to be pretty timeless, it doesn't sound "70s" to me at all. If anything I consider Genesis the least 70s sounding of the big prog bands of that era, save maybe King Crimson.
 
Keep in mind that when I use the term "dated" I simply mean something that's easily associated with a bygone era and is hardly modern. That is NOT the same as being bad or cheesy or whatever.
 
NES games are dated, they're also f**king awesome. Black Eyed Peas are not dated, and they suck. Many "dated" things are preferable to what we have now.

You may not find a lot of support re Banks because I guess, at least instrument wise, Hackett's solos are the favourite part of Genesis for most fans. Genesis's work doesn't sound so 70s-ish because it's less tied to many other 70s cliches.  Contrast them to Yes, especially circa Yes album/Fragile, or Kansas and the latter have some overlap with Deep Purple.  Genesis and King Crimson, or Gentle Giant for that matter, were more individualistic and harder to pin down in terms of era. But it's not imo Banks's synth tones that give Genesis that timeless quality you speak of and in many instances like Battle of Epping Forest it gives away the era (not that that's such a bad thing).
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:13

I just find something bizarre about someone claiming to be a Genesis fan and NOT liking Banks contributions, as they're such a dominant force in the band. It's like calling yourself a King Crimson fan but saying you hate Fripp's guitar work, it makes absolutely no sense at all.

Of course Banks didn't use synths (frequently at least) until Selling England, and IMO that was a crucial development in their sound. Banks' equipment upgrades were a huge part of what made that album sound so much grander in scope than previous albums.
 
I love the contributions of every member of the band. But I think Banks has always been the most irreplaceable. I still love Genesis without Gabriel, I even still love them without Hackett, but Genesis without Banks is just unfathomable.
 
Then again, when Phil left.............................................


Edited by boo boo - February 12 2011 at 03:15
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:17
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I just find something bizarre about someone claiming to be a Genesis fan and NOT liking Banks contributions, as they're such a dominant force in the band. It's like calling yourself a King Crimson fan but saying you hate Fripp's guitar work, it makes absolutely no sense at all.

Of course Banks didn't use synths (frequently at least) until Selling England, and IMO that was a crucial development in their sound. Banks' equipment upgrades were a huge part of what made that album sound so much grander in scope than previous albums.
 
I love the contributions of every member of the band. But I think Banks has always been the most irreplaceable. I liked Genesis without Gabriel, I even liked them without Hackett, but Genesis without Banks is just unfathomable.
 
Then again, when Phil left.............................................

I would qualify it as I unconditionally like Banks's contributions as composer up to W&W but am more selective with regard to his playing.  And it makes sense that people would mention Hackett more because in spite of having a less dominant role, his contributions shined better and it's hard to think of a better stand out moment in the capacity of individual musician for any of the Genesis members than the Firth...solo.  Banks was their most prolific composer but not their most talented player.  Re SEBTP (or Lamb for that matter), it wasn't just the change of equipment but much improved production that contributed to it.  I think some of their best playing is on Nursery Cryme but it's let down by poor production.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:37
I admit that Hackett is the most skilled player in the band.  I don't prefer Banks to him THAT much, he is one of my favorite guitarists after all.
 
Banks and Hackett were the two soloists of the band, and IMO their solos are equally awesome. But I don't mind Hackett's departure too much.
 
Contrary to popular belief, change isn't bad. It allowed Hackett to produce some stellar solo material without pressure from his former bandmates, and Genesis survived without him, for a while anyway.


Edited by boo boo - February 12 2011 at 03:40
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:40
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I admit that Hackett is the most skilled player in the band.  
 


Not so sure about that, let's not forget poor, much-maligned and much-bashed Phil Collins, by all means a monster drummer, but a monster capable of showing sensitivity (Cinema Show).  And re Hackett, I am happy Hackett left Genesis but not so happy that Genesis lost Hackett. LOL It took more out of them than what he lost by not being part of THE Genesis.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:45
Yeah, Collins skill is pretty underestimated.
 
I think leaving Genesis was a good thing for Hackett, and while it wasn't exactly a great thing for Genesis, I still think their post Hackett work is better than prog fans give it credit for.
 
I think ATTWT was decent, I think Duke/Abacab/Genesis made an excellent trilogy of pop music, I think Invisible Touch was mediocre but it had it's moments (The Brazilian, Land of Confusion), I won't defend We Can't Dance though. LOL
 
Good thing they never made another album after that.


Edited by boo boo - February 12 2011 at 03:46
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:49
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I just find something bizarre about someone claiming to be a Genesis fan and NOT liking Banks contributions, as they're such a dominant force in the band. It's like calling yourself a King Crimson fan but saying you hate Fripp's guitar work, it makes absolutely no sense at all.

Of course Banks didn't use synths (frequently at least) until Selling England, and IMO that was a crucial development in their sound. Banks' equipment upgrades were a huge part of what made that album sound so much grander in scope than previous albums.
 
I love the contributions of every member of the band. But I think Banks has always been the most irreplaceable. I still love Genesis without Gabriel, I even still love them without Hackett, but Genesis without Banks is just unfathomable.
 
Then again, when Phil left.............................................

I've never seen criticisms of his solo's around, in fact things like The Cinema show and In The Cage are some of the most positively mentioned Genesis moments, i absolutely adore the solos themselves when done on the Arp 2600 but some of the live versions switched to the Arp live, like robbery, assault and battery on seconds out just sound dated at times, this isn't saying i hate the solos or sound, just facing the facts that the Pro-Soloist was an early synth with a few dated sounds on it 
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 03:54
I recall that one Foxtrot review from Alitare where he said Tony Banks "sucks nard".
 
The main reason I returned to this forum is because I noticed that idiot's absence, as soon as he returns I'm gone. Because I can't cohabitate with someone like that without having a massive meltdown that destroys everything in it's path.


Edited by boo boo - February 12 2011 at 03:55
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2011 at 06:28
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I recall that one Foxtrot review from Alitare where he said Tony Banks "sucks nard".
 
The main reason I returned to this forum is because I noticed that idiot's absence, as soon as he returns I'm gone. Because I can't cohabitate with someone like that without having a massive meltdown that destroys everything in it's path.

sounds like a sh*te review but the internet is full of trolls i learn to tune it out
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 00:34
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I admit that Hackett is the most skilled player in the band.  
 


Not so sure about that, let's not forget poor, much-maligned and much-bashed Phil Collins, by all means a monster drummer, but a monster capable of showing sensitivity (Cinema Show).  And re Hackett, I am happy Hackett left Genesis but not so happy that Genesis lost Hackett. LOL It took more out of them than what he lost by not being part of THE Genesis.

Don't forget Rutherford, who was (is) an AMAZING bassist!!  

I enjoyed the simplicity of the keyboards in early Genesis.....the dual use of Mellotron/organ on the opening bars of "Watcher of the Skies" still sends chills up my spine!    Bank's Hammond solo during "Apocalypse in 9/8" is one of the best keyboard solos in prog, ever!  And, his piano solo in "Firth of Fifth" is nothing short of amazing!!  

Banks sensitive touch on the Mellotron was superior to nearly all of his contemporaries, and he also used a light touch on the synth.  I tend to overlook the occasional odd sounds that he obtained from the synth, and focus on the other keys. 

Frankly, I don't know if it IS possible to have a "dated" keyboard sound in prog!  The work of Tangerine Dream remains very vital, and artists such as John Hawken of the Strawbs did amazing things with harpsichord, Minimoog etc.  
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 01:21
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

 
Banks sensitive touch on the Mellotron was superior to nearly all of his contemporaries, and he also used a light touch on the synth.  I tend to overlook the occasional odd sounds that he obtained from the synth, and focus on the other keys. 

Frankly, I don't know if it IS possible to have a "dated" keyboard sound in prog!  The work of Tangerine Dream remains very vital, and artists such as John Hawken of the Strawbs did amazing things with harpsichord, Minimoog etc.  

Ditto, I prefer Banks's mellotron work or even piano work.  His synth stuff is also compositionally very interesting but I don't feel that I have to necessarily like the tones he uses to enjoy their music overall.  Yeah, Hawken's work for Strawbs is lovely. 
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2011 at 15:15
Regardless of which equipment he used, Banks did a hell of great music, no doubt about that!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.