Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why even american prog bands dont have good vocals
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy even american prog bands dont have good vocals

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>
Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 16:01
Originally posted by desistindo desistindo wrote:

 
What to say about Pavlov´s Dog singer LOL

I  believe that David Surkamp has a terrible voice, but he's an amazing singer who has an excellent technique.

He has created that strange falsetto at the end of some words that resembles the style of Edith Piaff....Pavlov's Dog is an outstanding band but without Surkamp, would only be another melodic USA band with nothing special.

Now about Jon Anderson

Even when the Contralto was some kind of a joke, i don't believe he's a countertenor, because I read on another site that  his working range is around the two octaves from E3 to E5 (reaches one and one third octaves above middle C while Counter Tenor only reaches one octave above middle C).

This is more or less the same range that Alessandro Moreschi reached in 1905 who  was catalogued as equivalent to Mezzo Soprano and even Contralto by some musicologists.

There's another term called SOPRANIST (male soprano) that describes a male singer  that reaches the ranges of a mezzo soprano, contralto or in some cases a soprano, don't know if this would be more acurate.

Interesting issue.

Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - October 06 2011 at 16:30
            
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 17:41
There are some really good vocalists in American prog like Neal Morse and the guys in Echolyn for example.


Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 17:46
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by desistindo desistindo wrote:

 
What to say about Pavlov´s Dog singer LOL

I  believe that David Surkamp has a terrible voice, but he's an amazing singer who has an excellent technique.

He has created that strange falsetto at the end of some words that resembles the style of Edith Piaff....Pavlov's Dog is an outstanding band but without Surkamp, would only be another melodic USA band with nothing special.

Now about Jon Anderson

Even when the Contralto was some kind of a joke, i don't believe he's a countertenor, because I read on another site that  his working range is around the two octaves from E3 to E5 (reaches one and one third octaves above middle C while Counter Tenor only reaches one octave above middle C).

This is more or less the same range that Alessandro Moreschi reached in 1905 who  was catalogued as equivalent to Mezzo Soprano and even Contralto by some musicologists.

There's another term called SOPRANIST (male soprano) that describes a male singer  that reaches the ranges of a mezzo soprano, contralto or in some cases a soprano, don't know if this would be more acurate.

Interesting issue.

Iván

Thank you for your excellent contribution!  I also find it rather amazing that the band Yes has featured TWO such vocalists, e.g. Anderson and Squire!   

What's with the Brits, is it in the water supply (or beer)??   Howe had a reasonable voice for backing vocals (I think he was pure tenor), but I never cared for his vocals on his solo works.  

Back to Top
colorofmoney91 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 17:58
America has some great vocalists, but they tend to avoid prog for some reason :\
Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 18:25
This has caused quite a stir among people on here which is good.A little bit too much of tenor and contralto and wanderings into other areas.It doesn't matter how much training a singer has, he or she either has a voice to listen to or not.Trained singers can acomplish so much but natural singers with a gift from God and the voice is the only natural gift.You can either sing or you can't.Musicians through practice can reach varying degrees of proficiency but the voice is the only thing that doesn't need endless practising.

cstack there is nothing in the water. Yes only had one vocalist the great Jon Anderson,Squire is a good harmony singer and amazing bass player.Anderson remains my favourite singer but Hamiill has the voice that can do almost anything.I think rogerthat sort of compared Bob halford to the great man but he is a shadow singer by comparison.I may be wrong there he may just have been eluding to effect.

Subjectivity at the end is all that matters,my Dad is bigger than your Dad,but it is good to debate on here an issue that is particularly close to my heart.


Ivan you little Peruvian Genesis mad man ' Como esta?'







Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 18:27
This has caused quite a stir among people on here which is good.A little bit too much of tenor and contralto and wanderings into other areas.It doesn't matter how much training a singer has, he or she either has a voice to listen to or not.Trained singers can acomplish so much but natural singers with a gift from God and the voice is the only natural gift.You can either sing or you can't.Musicians through practice can reach varying degrees of proficiency but the voice is the only thing that doesn't need endless practising.

cstack there is nothing in the water. Yes only had one vocalist the great Jon Anderson,Squire is a good harmony singer and amazing bass player.Anderson remains my favourite singer but Hamiill has the voice that can do almost anything.I think rogerthat sort of compared Bob halford to the great man but he is a shadow singer by comparison.I may be wrong there he may just have been eluding to effect.

Subjectivity at the end is all that matters,my Dad is bigger than your Dad,but it is good to debate on here an issue that is particularly close to my heart.


Ivan you little Peruvian Genesis mad man ' Como esta?'







Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 19:08
Respectfully disagree Fragile, singing requires practice and technique.

Guys as Gabriel don't have the natural voice of a vocalist like John Wetton, but Gabriel has made of his weakness an advantage, Peter has problems with the really high ranges,but he created that semi yodeling that sounds like a moaning and adds drama to the song, and makes him able to transmit not only a message, but strong feelings, like love, hate, fear, etc.

David Surkamp without training, would never had singed in a pro band, he made of his terrible timbre something exotic and unique with technique., 

I'm not a particular fan of Jon Anderson, but he has a natural talent, probably with a better technique, would had been able to modulate more his voice, lets remember that he sounds much better in Yes than in his solo albums, because he has Chris Squire to support him.

Nothing in life can be well done without practice and training, if you don't know how to breathe well, you can't sing, if you use only your throat, you will never be able to sing more than 20 minutes, without being  totally raspy and almost unable to be listened.

If you want to be a Pub singer, you don't need too much training, but if you want to sing in a real band, it's almost  impossible.

Iván
            
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 19:25
Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:


cstack there is nothing in the water. Yes only had one vocalist the great Jon Anderson,Squire is a good harmony singer and amazing bass player.

The way that Yes structured their vocals, they often had a duet/trio approach vs. Jon Anderson as conventional "lead" vocalist.  

Squire's vocals on "Fish Out of Water" show that he had the pipes to be an excellent lead singer, if he wanted to be.   I guess he chose to focus upon bass first, vocals second. 

Regarding Gabriel....I had met the great guitarist Michael Hedges a few years before he died, and he laughed about how awful Gabriel's voice sounded before they added delay in the studio!!    Gabriel was not a pure, operatic vocalist like Freddie Mercury, and I quite enjoyed the overall sound of his voice.  

In his prime, Ian Gillian may have been the best rock vocalist.  His work on "Jesus Christ, Superstar" was uncanny.  

Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 20:11
A great tone is always better to listen to (duh!) but bear in mind a great tone itself may be the product of much refinement and honing.  Annie Haslam said she sounded like Joni Mitchell and Joan Baez before she underwent training. If you sound like Joni Mitchell, you are already special but that tells you how much your voice can change with training.  Further, great technique and, most important, proper breathing, makes the same voice sound much better because it's being released/delivered the way it should be. You don't have to take it from me, take it from this tutor who was kind enough to post clips of how he sounded early on in his career and how much his singing transformed with diligent effort:





Edited by rogerthat - October 06 2011 at 20:14
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 22:13
Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:

I think rogerthat sort of compared Bob halford to the great man but he is a shadow singer by comparison.I may be wrong there he may just have been eluding to effect.

 
No, I alluded to the TONE. The effect, in fact, is very different, of course, because Halford is the archetypal heavy metal singer and strongly influenced by Gillan while Hammill's style is more theatrical. Possibly, Hammill's voice sounds more booming to you because it's not being drowned out by heavy distorted guitars and loud drums. But don't mind me Wink, for I don't exactly count myself among the fans of Hammill's singing.


Edited by rogerthat - October 06 2011 at 22:14
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 22:21
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Now about Jon Anderson

Even when the Contralto was some kind of a joke, i don't believe he's a countertenor, because I read on another site that  his working range is around the two octaves from E3 to E5 (reaches one and one third octaves above middle C while Counter Tenor only reaches one octave above middle C).

This is more or less the same range that Alessandro Moreschi reached in 1905 who  was catalogued as equivalent to Mezzo Soprano and even Contralto by some musicologists.

There's another term called SOPRANIST (male soprano) that describes a male singer  that reaches the ranges of a mezzo soprano, contralto or in some cases a soprano, don't know if this would be more acurate.

Interesting issue.

Iván
 
Actually, a tenor's working range goes up to C5.  I must clarify though that I don't go strictly by a classical categorization and rely more on the essential voice type to classify singers because from the 70s and 80s onwards, lots of metal tenors hit notes above C5.  Jon's natural pitch seems to be higher than a tenor but lower than a soprano or mezzo soprano. A mezzo soprano would be able to reach G5, I believe (and C6 for a soprano)?  So countertenor sounds fair to me but at any rate, we are essentially saying the same thing  - that he is not a TENOR proper.
 
That said, you have a point re mezzo soprano. If you can find the song Reaching Out off the lone Inter Galactic Touring Band album to which Annie Haslam contributed lead and backing vocals, she sounds very nearly a dead ringer for Jon Anderson. Tongue  I was relieved when the closing parts of the song with the soaring chorus and all made matters clearer because like you, I am not a fan of Jon Anderson's singing LOL and hate it when Annie is dubbed "like Jon Anderson" Ouch.    
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2011 at 22:47
Roger one question:

I always thought that the perfect  demonstration of a counter tenor (In Spanish contratenor, so I feel more comfortable with this denomination) would be Francesco del Giacomo from Banco:del Mutuo Soccorso:


And IMO is still much lower than Anderson (we agree in all the rest):

Iván






            
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 00:05
I filmed this with my own (somewhat shakey) hands, about one month ago.  Jon displays his range nicely in this song, and considering that he is nearly 67 years old, I think his voice is remarkable!  


Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 04:36
Ivan, I would have to check that to be completely certain, which would have to be later. I have heard that song and I am familiar with his (Francesco) singing.  We need to get into voice texture here - as in, there are dramatic as well as light/lyric sopranos and there are likewise lyric tenors too.  Mariah Carey is classified as a soprano but you could just as well call her a contralto who goes really high because her voice essentially has a husky quality, ditto Minnie Riperton (though the latter very noticeably does a lot of her singing in the prime range of the soprano, i.e, around F4 and upwards while Mariah only reaches for big, booming highs mostly). My guess is that Anderson is a countertenor with a very light voice and light voices tend to be more high pitched naturally.  His operating range though still seems to me to be that of a countertenor rather than a mezzo soprano.  I don't know that he has ever sung above E5 and that doesn't quite cover the upper range of a mezzo soprano.  Another comparison: Peabo Bryson is a tenor, I guess, and his voice is much lighter than Roger Daltrey who has a really big, powerful tone.  With that told, this is not a 100% factual assessment and I am relying on judgment and hunches here, especially considering a singer with as effeminate a voice as Jon Anderson. 
 
Another possibility: if he indeed didn't partake of much formal training, it is possible he was a mezzo soprano (!) but didn't develop the full range of one.  As in, ladies can hit notes above C5 without much training and maybe Anderson too could hit up to E5 easily and could have expanded his upper range with some work on his voice. Who knows.
Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 13:18
 
Ivan you're right about the breathing bit but the voice is the only natural gift. All the great singers breathe effortlessly.The best exponent of singing ,breathing was Francis Albert Sinatra.

rogerthat how disappointed am I that the great Lord Hammill isn't high on your likes list.No matter whether you like or dislike his singing no one can question that he has one of the most diverse voices in Prog.The track 'Still life' from the eponymous album of the same is a vocal exercise that only a singer of his magnitude could do.

cstack his voice is quite remarkable and carries more emotion in a single line than some singers could manage in a lifetime.


Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 14:13
Who said Peter Hammill is not high on my likes?

I have an incredible respect for PH as vocalist, lyricist and translator (he did an amazing job with Felona and Sorona, unlike Pete Sinfield who butchered Per un Amico and La Isola di Niente).

I'm not a fan of VDGG, but I have a lot of respect for Hamill, when the rumour that he was going to replace Gabriel in Genesis was heard, I was extremely happy..

Iván 
            
Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 14:43

Hey Ivan  I think Peter is not high up on rogrthat's like,not yours amigo.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 17:04
Many of my favourite singers don't tick any of the boxes required to be deemed 'technically proficient'

e.g. John Cale, Robert Forster, Stan Ridgway, Robert Smith, John Lydon, Mark E. Smith (not a whole lot of Prog in there and just one american)

By way of contrast the following would probably tick those boxes:

Greg Lake, Francesco DiGiacomo, Ian Gillan, Demetrio Stratos, Arthur Brown (a lot of Prog in there and not a single american)

Perhaps 'Prog' is less forgiving of limited technique for vocals? (due to the relative complexity of the underlying musical accompaniment perhaps)

Either way, for me singing is about communicating emotion and neither a conservatory trained or 'naturally musical' voice is any guarantee the singer will be remotely equipped to move a listener.

Choose whatever keeps yer eyes moist pilgrims.


Edited by ExittheLemming - October 07 2011 at 17:05
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 17:11
Whaaats ehhh aaaa wrrrong ehh with John Lydon's vocaaals ehhh?

Vocals are overraated, I only listen to instrumental music. Tongue

Edited by Slartibartfast - October 07 2011 at 17:18
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2011 at 21:39
Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:

 

rogerthat how disappointed am I that the great Lord Hammill isn't high on your likes list.No matter whether you like or dislike his singing no one can question that he has one of the most diverse voices in Prog.The track 'Still life' from the eponymous album of the same is a vocal exercise that only a singer of his magnitude could do.





I have heard Still Life of course. I am sorry, but his emoting is just way too overwrought.  If it works for you, fine, but emotions are quite important to me in singing, the most important thing in fact, and Hammill consistently overshoots the mark as far as I am concerned. If it was only about technical ability, I should have to respect Mariah Carey too and I don't. Not saying of course that he is THAT bad, heavens no, but I am not exaggerating when I say his singing is sometimes like nails to a chalkboard for me. I'd much rather listen to the much more limited but sincere Peter Gabriel or Fish.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.