Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17614
|
Posted: April 11 2013 at 19:12 |
I've also heard that many of those jobs are fairly lame ones historically, based on the incomes they provide. But I've not been job hunting so I'm not sure how salaries look these days.
|
|
 |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 09:08 |
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 18:53 |
Capitalism makes us miserable...aside from basic consciousness.
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 18:59 |
^BAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 19:24 |
manofmystery wrote:
^BAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
And the deluded laugh as the world implodes.
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
The Doctor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 19:26 |
They believe very strongly in the "market" here in this thread. Sadly, the invisible hand of the market has been too busy giving hand jobs to CEOs, Wall Streeters and bankers to regulate the economy.
|
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
 |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:03 |
^Doc, even you would agree that Zumacraig's first-ever post on this thread was quite a little less than... inspiring. Or intelligent. Or anything. MoM's answer was quite appropiate.
|
|
 |
The Doctor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:12 |
^Yeah, all right. I will admit that. I've just been wanting to use that hand job line for awhile now and finally got the chance.
|
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:27 |
You're delusional if you're chosing to blame the market's invisible hand when clearly it's the quite visible hand of government action that strokes big business.
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:48 |
The problem seems to be, in this thread, that the self-labelled "liberals" come in and vaguely blame the nonexistent free market, we point out that there is no free market because the government is clearly involved, the liberals ignore that and stick to the script they've been taught, and we spin in circles because the wheels are only turning (providing something useful) on one side. It gets rather exhausting. I imagine it's the reason we don't see some of our former regulars (talking about you, equality  ) in here too often anymore. Feels like a lot of wasted time trying to get the blind to see what's right in front of their eyes. This is why I chose to laugh derisively at another troll post (I like to call them "slartis") instead of wasting time and effort on it. If he would like to provide some examples of how he thinks the nonexistent free market has created specific issues then we can address that.
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:49 |
The T wrote:
^Doc, even you would agree that Zumacraig's first-ever post on this thread was quite a little less than... inspiring. Or intelligent. Or anything. MoM's answer was quite appropiate. |
You guys are as predictible as I thought you'd be. Reality can be uninspiring. And calling my assertion un-intelligent? Every aspect of your life has been soiled by the market and you're completely unaware. I know I'll be dismissed here. The truth is not fun. Libertarian complaints are on point, but your solutions have dire consequences. Just the harm issue to start. I understand that there is diversity among libertarians, so some claims may not fit everyone. But to say out loud that there is some salvation in the market is complete delusion. Government will never go away, incidentally. It's job is to funnel money from all of us to the already rich.
BTW-my initial comment was supposed to be a joke. 
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:50 |
Then it seems odd that laughter wasn't your desired response.
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:53 |
manofmystery wrote:
The problem seems to be, in this thread, that the self-labelled "liberals" come in and vaguely blame the nonexistent free market, we point out that there is no free market because the government is clearly involved, the liberals ignore that and stick to the script they've been taught, and we spin in circles because the wheels are only turning (providing something useful) on one side. It gets rather exhausting. I imagine it's the reason we don't see some of our former regulars (talking about you, equality ) in here too often anymore. Feels like a lot of wasted time trying to get the blind to see what's right in front of their eyes. This is why I chose to laugh derisively at another troll post (I like to call them "slartis") instead of wasting time and effort on it. If he would like to provide some examples of how he thinks the nonexistent free market has created specific issues then we can address that. |
Of course the market isn't free. I'm, in part, blaming capitalism and people's inability to understand ideology or their aporia.
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 20:55 |
manofmystery wrote:
Then it seems odd that laughter wasn't your desired response. |
Who said it wasn't? My response to your laughter was also in jest. 
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 21:03 |
That kind of joking doesn't translate well in plain text, you know. Really needed to couple it with a picture of a grumpy cat.
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 21:21 |
manofmystery wrote:
That kind of joking doesn't translate well in plain text, you know. Really needed to couple it with a picture of a grumpy cat. |
Good point. I think was planning to do that, but forgot before I posted.
Seriously though, Libertarians and those of the left persuasion agree on many things. Taxes for war, drugs, etc. I personally cannot get past the fact that labor is exploited and alienating in a market economy. The profit motive doesn't seem to lean towards being the best, but more towards cutting any and all corners to increase the bottom line.
BTW, you're avatar pic, is it from No Country for Old Men? That character is one of the most compelling i've seen in years.
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 21:36 |
zumacraig wrote:
manofmystery wrote:
That kind of joking doesn't translate well in plain text, you know. Really needed to couple it with a picture of a grumpy cat. |
Good point. I think was planning to do that, but forgot before I posted. All my points are good  Seriously though, Libertarians and those of the left persuasion agree on many things. Taxes for war, drugs, etc. I personally cannot get past the fact that labor is exploited and alienating in a market economy. The profit motive doesn't seem to lean towards being the best, but more towards cutting any and all corners to increase the bottom line.
That seems to be what happens right now, in a non-market economy. I would, and have on many many occasions (how many pages are we up to now?), argue that the increased competition of a truely free market would drive quality up as businesses would need to be constantly innovating to meet the ever changing demands of consumers before someone else does it better. Instead what we have now are preset regulatory bars that provide cover for existing companies to be lazy because they make it near impossible for new businesses to break into an existing market and also set a minimum standards that are "just good enough" and are often written into law by lobbiest for the businesses. BTW, you're avatar pic, is it from No Country for Old Men? That character is one of the most compelling i've seen in years. On this we are in complete agreement. Bardem was brilliant. |
|
 Time always wins.
|
 |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 23:02 |
manofmystery wrote:
zumacraig wrote:
manofmystery wrote:
That kind of joking doesn't translate well in plain text, you know. Really needed to couple it with a picture of a grumpy cat. |
Good point. I think was planning to do that, but forgot before I posted. All my points are good  Seriously though, Libertarians and those of the left persuasion agree on many things. Taxes for war, drugs, etc. I personally cannot get past the fact that labor is exploited and alienating in a market economy. The profit motive doesn't seem to lean towards being the best, but more towards cutting any and all corners to increase the bottom line.
That seems to be what happens right now, in a non-market economy. I would, and have on many many occasions (how many pages are we up to now?), argue that the increased competition of a truely free market would drive quality up as businesses would need to be constantly innovating to meet the ever changing demands of consumers before someone else does it better. Instead what we have now are preset regulatory bars that provide cover for existing companies to be lazy because they make it near impossible for new businesses to break into an existing market and also set a minimum standards that are "just good enough" and are often written into law by lobbiest for the businesses. BTW, you're avatar pic, is it from No Country for Old Men? That character is one of the most compelling i've seen in years. On this we are in complete agreement. Bardem was brilliant. |
|
Could you say more about min. standards? Are these different than regulations?
I'm with you on the current climate. EVERYTHING seems to be cheap, but marketed so well that we buy anyway. The lowest common denomonater seems to be decreasing by the day. I just tend to fall on the other side of the argument. If there was no regulation then what we see now would be nothing compared to what might come. The other thing is that there really isn't a level playing field and never has been. Of course, state run capitalism masqurading as communism doesn't work either. I also come from a concern for consumerist culture and it's implications for human well-being, relationships, life satisfaction etc. Anyway, thanks for the response. Yes, this thread is a monster!
RE: Bardem...I could watch that scene in the gas station over and over. It's creepy, compelling and oddly satisfying. 
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
 |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: April 12 2013 at 23:46 |
The thing is, when the markets are opened up, small and medium sized enterprises reap the benefits initially and grow quickly. Eventually, though, big business shuts them out (and this big business might include erstwhile medium sized companies) out of the market, either by bleeding them in price wars or buying them out. A govt that really wants free markets should create conditions that help SMEs to thrive because they are the heart of the economy. Big business can always make noises about 'poor' investment climate if they don't like some tax cases and shift their operations elsewhere...and they are often more capital intensive than SMEs. But whether in Western capitalist nations or back home, I am not sure I see much evidence of policies that promote the growth of SMEs, only a lot of shameless sucking up to big business. A tycoon is allowed to let his airline bleed to death and even try desperate tactics to block lenders from selling pledged shares of his other group companies to recover their loans. While the Central Bank refuses easy loans to small textile firms that are struggling to compete with other exporting nations. Where's the love for the free market here? What was promoted as free market economics in the 80s has either always been or has morphed into crony capitalism.
Edited by rogerthat - April 13 2013 at 02:33
|
 |
King of Loss
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 17081
|
Posted: April 13 2013 at 08:54 |
The Doctor wrote:
They believe very strongly in the "market" here in this thread. Sadly, the invisible hand of the market has been too busy giving hand jobs to CEOs, Wall Streeters and bankers to regulate the economy.
|
My friend who works at Goldman Sachs had this to say about the invisible hand: "The superrich use the invisible hand to f**k the ass of us, the proletariat, who work for peanuts at their temples".
And he made a million or so last year too! 
Edited by King of Loss - April 13 2013 at 08:54
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.