Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: March 25 2008 at 14:09 |
Clark Ashton wrote:
Tony R wrote:
I think that "The Lamb" polarises opinion amongst Genesis fans and therefore has received some less than favourable reviews. The Top 100 is based on reviews and on average "Script" has received more favourable reviews. I think that the "Marillion plagiarise Genesis" argument is overplayed. For starters Fish is supposed to imitate Peter Gabriel whereas any prog fan with the most basic knowledge and powers of hearing can hear a far stronger Hammill influence. VDGG appear to me to be a far bigger influence on Marillion overall than Genesis. I think that Script is a far better album than "The Lamb" and this is coming from someone who prefers Genesis to Marillion.
|
Thank you Tony for your pov, but VDGG is in my top 3 of all time, and I never saw a PH influence on Fish. Maybe he is, but it sounds to me like he's going for Gabriel. |
Fish is a big Hammill fan; it is not for nothing that the covers of 2 Hammil albums ("Fools Mate" and "Over") appear on the cover of "Fugazi". Fish also was Hammill's first choice for the role of Montresor in his opera "The Fall of the House of Usher"; however, he dropped that choice when auditions showed that their voices were too similar. as to comparing "Script" to "Lamb" my vote definitely goes to "Lamb". and this is coming from someone who is NOT a big Genesis fan. but "Lamb" was their best album, in my opinion. but I can see why fans of Genesis are not the biggest fans of "Lamb"; especially sides 3 and 4, or disc 2 in the CD version, are too experimental for their fans. these experiments, however, make the album interesting for me
Edited by BaldJean - March 25 2008 at 14:17
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
 |
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: March 25 2008 at 14:15 |
Okay, let me clarify what I meant . . .
Myabe 'under-produced' was not the best term to use. What I meant was, when compared to the Floyd albums before and after Dark Side, that album itself sounds slighty 'weaker', and not as 'punchy'. Difficult to epxlain, but while I think the actual production of it was fantastic for its time, I believe that when looking back on it, for me personally, the overall presentation, volume, clarity and sharpness of the sound isn't as good as it could have been.
That is merely a personal opinion, of course, and one that I am surely alone in.
|
 |
Fragile
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
|
Posted: March 26 2008 at 19:36 |
i love Fish as a singer,songwriter and lyricist.' Script' was a fine album.A major announcement after 4 or 5 years of the dreadful punk invasion that prog was still alive.I have no time for these silly tags like neo prog etc.To compare it with the sweeping brilliance of The Lamb is unfair.For me it was Gabriel's Genesis at the peak of their powers.ScrIpt as good as it is, cannot compare, nor should it.It stands up in it's own right as a refreshingly crafted album inspired by the Prog gems that had gone before.The painted face, the similarity to Gabriel albeit a watered down version is understandable.The one with Hammill is not.Whilst i love Fish his voice lacks the quality that seperates great singers from good singers.Fish is a good singer with a Gabriel inflection.Hammill on the other hand has a God given voice that no other can attain.His range,his galvanic roars,the dexterity in power to lullaby softness sets him out as unique.I saw Fish as recently as last November and his voice was much stronger and better than it has been for years.His latest album the 13 Star is a gem.We should rejoice that we still have people like them in prog today.Gabriel will always be one of my favourite vocalists.Hammill just has something in his voice that sets him apart.Then there is Jon Anderson my favourite singer of them all.
|
 |
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: March 27 2008 at 00:31 |
Clark Ashton wrote:
I don't post very much on the forum because I have no interest in arguing with people over personel opinion. But, really, wtf is wrong here? Lamb is one of the greatest works ever, and Script is wanabe material at best. |
You've got that a bit wrong. The Lamb is a major work, not one of the greatest works ever, and Script is wannabe material at worst, not best.
Still, The Lamb should be ahead of Script.
|
 |
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: March 29 2008 at 20:24 |
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
Clark Ashton wrote:
I don't post very much on the forum because I have no interest in arguing with people over personel opinion. But, really, wtf is wrong here? Lamb is one of the greatest works ever, and Script is wanabe material at best. |
You've got that a bit wrong. The Lamb is a major work, not one of the greatest works ever, and Script is wannabe material at worst, not best.
Still, The Lamb should be ahead of Script. |
At least the man speaks some sense, though. He may feel that Lamb is a better album than Script, but at least admits that the latter is a great work unto itself.
ghost, I find you to be a most interesting fellow. Your words make much sense to me,  ,,,
|
 |
Xanadu3737
Forum Groupie
Joined: January 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 66
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 10:30 |
I don't see the problem here, I'd say Script is the better record.
|
|
 |
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 10:34 |
Xanadu3737 wrote:
I don't see the problem here, I'd say Script is the better record.
|
explain yourself a little bit more.
|
 |
Nightfly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 01 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3659
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 11:53 |
BaldJean wrote:
Clark Ashton wrote:
Tony R wrote:
I think that "The Lamb" polarises opinion amongst Genesis fans and therefore has received some less than favourable reviews. The Top 100 is based on reviews and on average "Script" has received more favourable reviews. I think that the "Marillion plagiarise Genesis" argument is overplayed. For starters Fish is supposed to imitate Peter Gabriel whereas any prog fan with the most basic knowledge and powers of hearing can hear a far stronger Hammill influence. VDGG appear to me to be a far bigger influence on Marillion overall than Genesis. I think that Script is a far better album than "The Lamb" and this is coming from someone who prefers Genesis to Marillion.
|
Thank you Tony for your pov, but VDGG is in my top 3 of all time, and I never saw a PH influence on Fish. Maybe he is, but it sounds to me like he's going for Gabriel. |
Fish is a big Hammill fan; it is not for nothing that the covers of 2 Hammil albums ("Fools Mate" and "Over") appear on the cover of "Fugazi". Fish also was Hammill's first choice for the role of Montresor in his opera "The Fall of the House of Usher"; however, he dropped that choice when auditions showed that their voices were too similar. as to comparing "Script" to "Lamb" my vote definitely goes to "Lamb". and this is coming from someone who is NOT a big Genesis fan. but "Lamb" was their best album, in my opinion. but I can see why fans of Genesis are not the biggest fans of "Lamb"; especially sides 3 and 4, or disc 2 in the CD version, are too experimental for their fans. these experiments, however, make the album interesting for me
|
I think you've hit the nail on the head there. I'm a big fan of early Genesis and although I hold The Lamb in high regard I don't like it as much as the previous three albums, possibly Trespass too for the reasons you say. I still think it's a far superior piece of work to Marillion's debut though which although decent enough is not spectacular IMO.
|
 |
Clark Ashton
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 05 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 133
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 12:28 |
Look, there is something you Marillion fans need to understand. Eventhough Sleep and Witchfinder General brought back doom-metal in the 80s; to me, they will never be Black Sabbath. So stop preaching about how great Script is. To me it is wannabe. Nothing else. It's on my playlist but far from the top. Everything under the sun has it's fanboys.
|
And he took the stars
In his hands
And as he scattered them he’d shout
“I’m the joker of the universe
I’m what it’s all about”
|
 |
sleeper
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 13:33 |
Clark Ashton wrote:
Look, there is something you Marillion fans need to understand. Eventhough Sleep and Witchfinder General brought back doom-metal in the 80s; to me, they will never be Black Sabbath. So stop preaching about how great Script is. To me it is wannabe. Nothing else. It's on my playlist but far from the top. Everything under the sun has it's fanboys. |
Your living proof of that.
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
 |
Xanadu3737
Forum Groupie
Joined: January 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 66
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 14:16 |
cacho wrote:
Xanadu3737 wrote:
I don't see the problem here, I'd say Script is the better record.
|
explain yourself a little bit more. |
Like most Genesis I find Lamb to be a very good album, but nothing spectacular or overly special. On the other hand Script was ground-breaking, fresh, and one of the best debut's in my collection. Fish delivers on the album better than Peter does on Lamb (Flame shield on), and in general the music on Script is simply better than that on Lamb. I will give Lamb credit as being much more epic as an entire unified piece, however the better music remains on Script.
|
|
 |
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 14:23 |
Xanadu3737 wrote:
cacho wrote:
Xanadu3737 wrote:
I don't see the problem here, I'd say Script is the better record.
|
explain yourself a little bit more. | Like most Genesis I find Lamb to be a very good album, but nothing spectacular or overly special. On the other hand Script was ground-breaking, fresh, and one of the best debut's in my collection. Fish delivers on the album better than Peter does on Lamb (Flame shield on), and in general the music on Script is simply better than that on Lamb. I will give Lamb credit as being much more epic as an entire unified piece, however the better music remains on Script. |
Ha good explanation...Although I don't like Marillion, just cause a fact of taste, I must admit what you've just said is true, Script is much more groundbreaking than Lamb, and of course a splendid debut no doubt of that. Some clappies
|
 |
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 14:43 |
cacho wrote:
Xanadu3737 wrote:
cacho wrote:
Xanadu3737 wrote:
I don't see the problem here, I'd say Script is the better record.
|
explain yourself a little bit more. | Like most Genesis I find Lamb to be a very good album, but nothing spectacular or overly special. On the other hand Script was ground-breaking, fresh, and one of the best debut's in my collection. Fish delivers on the album better than Peter does on Lamb (Flame shield on), and in general the music on Script is simply better than that on Lamb. I will give Lamb credit as being much more epic as an entire unified piece, however the better music remains on Script. |
Ha good explanation...Although I don't like Marillion, just cause a fact of taste, I must admit what you've just said is true, Script is much more groundbreaking than Lamb, and of course a splendid debut no doubt of that. Some clappies  |
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 30 2008 at 20:38 |
Clark Ashton wrote:
Look, there is something you Marillion fans need to understand. Eventhough Sleep and Witchfinder General brought back doom-metal in the 80s; to me, they will never be Black Sabbath. So stop preaching about how great Script is. To me it is wannabe. Nothing else. It's on my playlist but far from the top. Everything under the sun has it's fanboys. |
Love the condescending tone there.
|
|
 |
kenmartree
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 14 2007
Location: oregon
Status: Offline
Points: 356
|
Posted: March 31 2008 at 00:20 |
As usual we are talking about this subject, 34 to 25 years removed from when the music came out. How does this color our perception? What other factors color our perception such as do we like one band more than the other. Since I like Genesis more than Marillion, I think you've got to throw my opinion out, even though Marillion are one of my favs. I'd be interested in hearing for someone who likes these bands equally and preferably was around when each album came out. Also we are comparing a debut to the last album before the lead singer left. Maybe a more appropreate comparision would be The Lamb to Clutching at Straws or From Genesis to Revelation to Script.
|
 |
Xanadu3737
Forum Groupie
Joined: January 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 66
|
Posted: March 31 2008 at 00:24 |
I can't speak for the debut match-up, as I've never heard From Genesis to Revelation, however Clutching at Straws hands down destroys Lamb. In my opinion CaS is not only Marillion's best album, it is their masterpiece.
|
|
 |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 31 2008 at 00:28 |
I'll say this, The Lamb has a much more earthy feel and a sensual tone to it Script lacks. Script has more energy and power, and a higher concentration of good songs. For an album I'd want to hunker down and listen to on vinyl, The Lamb wins.
|
|
 |
Cesar Inca
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 19 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 4888
|
Posted: March 31 2008 at 09:43 |
Clark Ashton wrote:
Tony R wrote:
I think that "The Lamb" polarises opinion amongst Genesis fans and therefore has received some less than favourable reviews. The Top 100 is based on reviews and on average "Script" has received more favourable reviews. I think that the "Marillion plagiarise Genesis" argument is overplayed. For starters Fish is supposed to imitate Peter Gabriel whereas any prog fan with the most basic knowledge and powers of hearing can hear a far stronger Hammill influence. VDGG appear to me to be a far bigger influence on Marillion overall than Genesis. I think that Script is a far better album than "The Lamb" and this is coming from someone who prefers Genesis to Marillion.
|
Thank you Tony for your pov, but VDGG is in my top 3 of all time, and I never saw a PH influence on Fish. Maybe he is, but it sounds to me like he's going for Gabriel. |
Image-wise and as a lyricist, Marillion-era Fish started as a Gabriel-influenced poet (except for the "Clutching" album, which finds him exploring other types of lyric writing). But as a singer, besides the tone thing, definitely he is very hammillesque. In his Genesis days, Gabriel always revealed a vulnerable "feminine" side to his voca ldeliveries, while Fish's style was more focused on "tossing" the words as if they were things he needed to spit out of his soul, sometimes not even singing them, but whsipering them, narrating them, explicating them - that's a very Hamill-esque thing. The moments in which he seems to resemble Gabriel are very few in comparison.
Just pay attention to some examples: 'The Web', 'Forgotten Sons', 'Assassing', 'Jigsaw', 'Incubus', 'Fugazi' - all of them are more Nadir-like than Rael-like. A singer's tone and make-up usually are not the main features of his style.
Kind regards.
|
 |
kenmartree
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 14 2007
Location: oregon
Status: Offline
Points: 356
|
Posted: March 31 2008 at 23:41 |
Xanadu3737 wrote:
I can't speak for the debut match-up, as I've never heard From Genesis to Revelation, however Clutching at Straws hands down destroys Lamb. In my opinion CaS is not only Marillion's best album, it is their masterpiece. |
This is very strange, you say The Lamb is destroyed by CAS, yet I have both in my collection. Yes The Lamb is still there despite my having CAS. I'm sorry your copy of the Lamb is destroyed, in time you might have come to appreciate it.  BTW, I love CAS, quite agree with you. Maybe you could elaborate more on your love for it than using inflamatory language. Remember for some of us The Lamb is our fav, I personally would never resort to such language, I may not like some piece of music but that wouldnn't destroy it.
Edited by kenmartree - March 31 2008 at 23:46
|
 |
Xanadu3737
Forum Groupie
Joined: January 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 66
|
Posted: April 01 2008 at 16:27 |
If destroys is inflammatory language this place must be right proper. :lol
I will say right off that 95% of the time I don't pay attention to, or care about lyrics. To me music is about the music itself, and for singers, the vocal melody and delivery. However Clutching manages to deliver one of the only all around emotional punches in my entire collection. With the exception of White Russian and Incommunicado the entire album comes together to take the listener on a very amazing ride. And those two songs are both in their own right some of the best songs Marillion has ever done. I see Clutching as one large masterful piece of art every time The Last Straw kicks in. That song is the perfect album closer... and I don't know another album in which the final track sums up the emotion of the album both musically and lyrically so well.
Lamb is a very good album, but to me it does not musically or emotionally equal the perfection of Clutching at Straws.
|
|
 |