Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - VDGG, why the world loves them or hates them?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedVDGG, why the world loves them or hates them?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 12:57
Quite unique as a band. I love them, if only for Hamill's voice and tyhe wonderful weirdness and off the wall approach to music which certainly jars sometimes, and makes it understandable why people won't go near them.

I still regularly play The Wave during one of my Saturday night drinking/music sessions. I love that track and the intensity of Hamill sets him apart from a lot of other vocalists.


Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 15:45
It took me three tries to appreciate them.  At first, I found them a bit slow and lugubrious (Godbluff was my first listen).  Then a while later, I tried out "H to He...", and was bored by the lack of guitar, and again the slowness of the material.
 
Then I decided to investigate Peter Hammill himself.  All at once, I bought a few classic Hammill albums, along with a few early VdGG albums.  My verdict is that in order to appreciate VdGG, you have to accept and understand Hammill.  He'll make or break it for you.  His delivery, his lyrics, and his dark outlook are a huge part of what makes them tick.  Once I became a Hammill fan, then I was easily able to digest the VdGG stuff.  Even now, though, I prefer the solo albums to the band albums, for the most part.  Although Pawn Hearts blows my mind.
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 18:32
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

It took me three tries to appreciate them.  At first, I found them a bit slow and lugubrious (Godbluff was my first listen).  Then a while later, I tried out "H to He...", and was bored by the lack of guitar, and again the slowness of the material.
 
Then I decided to investigate Peter Hammill himself.  All at once, I bought a few classic Hammill albums, along with a few early VdGG albums.  My verdict is that in order to appreciate VdGG, you have to accept and understand Hammill.  He'll make or break it for you.  His delivery, his lyrics, and his dark outlook are a huge part of what makes them tick.  Once I became a Hammill fan, then I was easily able to digest the VdGG stuff.  Even now, though, I prefer the solo albums to the band albums, for the most part.  Although Pawn Hearts blows my mind.

I am a bit amazed that you speak about the "slowness of material" on "Godbluff"".unless you come from Speed Metal: what is slow about songs like "Sleepwalkers" or "Scorched Earth"? and I would not call "Undercover Man" or "Arrow" exactly slow either. Van der Graaf Generator certainly don't try to impress the listener with flashy runs on their instruments, but to call the songs "slow" is a bit off the mark. and if you listen to the nuances of the instrumental play you will notice that the lack of flashy runs is definitely not due to the lack of skills on their instruments. being a keyboarder myself I certainly can detect what a fine player Hugh Banton is. and Friede, who is a drummer, says the same about Evans


Edited by BaldJean - July 16 2009 at 18:49


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 18:46
The slowness of VdGG? Well, not as slow as the first Black Sabbath.
Back to Top
mrgd View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 02 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 20:13
All this talk about of lack of guitar , but , for me I find it hard to get enthusiastic about any band that does not have a dedicated rhythm section of at least bass guitar and drums, and by dedicated, I don't mean a multi-instrumentalist who might pick up a bass some of the time - that's not a dedicated rhythm section.

So without a permanent and specialist bass player, you have an incomplete rhythm section and , dare I say it, an incomplete sound.

I'm a little surprised that some of our existing or past band members out there have not mentioned - what I might call an inadequacy in the bands complement.

I looked at the bands latest live release in this regard and remain dismayed . Call me old fashioned........
Looking still the same after all these years...
mrgd
Back to Top
PROGMONSTER2008 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 21:06
Originally posted by mrgd mrgd wrote:

All this talk about of lack of guitar , but , for me I find it hard to get enthusiastic about any band that does not have a dedicated rhythm section of at least bass guitar and drums, and by dedicated, I don't mean a multi-instrumentalist who might pick up a bass some of the time - that's not a dedicated rhythm section.

So without a permanent and specialist bass player, you have an incomplete rhythm section and , dare I say it, an incomplete sound.

I'm a little surprised that some of our existing or past band members out there have not mentioned - what I might call an inadequacy in the bands complement.

I looked at the bands latest live release in this regard and remain dismayed . Call me old fashioned........
Hugh Banton is the bass player Tongue
He used the bass pedals on the organ doesn't he?
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 22:16
Depends on the album, Nic Potter was around up until The Least...

And seriously, the lack of permanent "just" bass player ruins the songs for you despite the top notch songwriting? 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 22:23

Yes, Equality, because rock snobs are the worst type of snobs. :P

if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 22:31
I've tried very hard, because there is definitely some magic that they capture that I wish I could really just appreciate. But it's hard. Hammill's voice is not pleasant, and the instrumentation is not either. I'm open to alot of music, but they just don't quite work for me. Yet.
 
The best reasons I can come up with are when I listen to Discipline's Unfolded Like Staircase. Everything VdGG does, they do, but on pitch, and with a more sonic awareness. It's like VdGG are poets trying to be musicians and Discipline is the reincarnation with musicians trying to be poets. And that doesn't quite capture it, but it points in the right direction.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
XunknownX View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2009 at 23:02
Real art devides.
Back to Top
mrgd View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 02 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 02:14
My comments above are made in the full knowledge of the roles played by Hugh Banton and , for instance, Nic Potter , in the bands history esp. in the recording studio.

Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong , but Hugh Banton seems to me to be an organist/kbd player first and foremost, and without wanting to sound too flippant people, last time I looked it was pretty difficult to play a keyboard instrument and a bass guitar at the same time and do justice to either.

Regarding the use of pedals, as atmospheric and mellow bottom-endy as pedals may be, they don't cut the mustard in ' rhythm section ' terms imo. It was one of the disappointments for me of THE DOORS, esp. in live performance [ yes, i'm aware they used session players on some albums e.g. ' The Soft Parade '. They must have realised something ] ! In this regard, most drummers I know prefer to drive the rhythm with the augmentation or assistance of a bass.

Perhaps then, the many VdGG enthusiasts out there could be asked whether they consider the band has a complete rhythm section and if so , what it is comprised of. If not, what do they consider is missing . They could be asked, but will they respond ?
Looking still the same after all these years...
mrgd
Back to Top
Kestrel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 02:32
To me, Evans is such a confident drummer that a permanent bassist is superfluous. It is hard for me to describe in words what exactly that means, but hopefully someone else does. Smile

Side question: Does the song Sleepwalkers have bass guitar? I can't tell...


Edited by Kestrel - July 17 2009 at 02:36
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 03:31
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

I've tried very hard, because there is definitely some magic that they capture that I wish I could really just appreciate. But it's hard. Hammill's voice is not pleasant, and the instrumentation is not either. I'm open to alot of music, but they just don't quite work for me. Yet.
 
The best reasons I can come up with are when I listen to Discipline's Unfolded Like Staircase. Everything VdGG does, they do, but on pitch, and with a more sonic awareness. It's like VdGG are poets trying to be musicians and Discipline is the reincarnation with musicians trying to be poets. And that doesn't quite capture it, but it points in the right direction.

they are mostly not supposed to be pleasant. I would rather have a singer who is able to capture what the lyrics are about than a singer who sings everything pleasantly. Hammill's voice can be very pleasant, I assure you of that, but only when the topic is right for it.. have a look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHP_tZHyFAg
still not convinced of his voice? then nothing ever will convince you


Edited by BaldJean - July 17 2009 at 03:40


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
infandous View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2447
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 08:00
Originally posted by mrgd mrgd wrote:

My comments above are made in the full knowledge of the roles played by Hugh Banton and , for instance, Nic Potter , in the bands history esp. in the recording studio.

Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong , but Hugh Banton seems to me to be an organist/kbd player first and foremost, and without wanting to sound too flippant people, last time I looked it was pretty difficult to play a keyboard instrument and a bass guitar at the same time and do justice to either.

Regarding the use of pedals, as atmospheric and mellow bottom-endy as pedals may be, they don't cut the mustard in ' rhythm section ' terms imo. It was one of the disappointments for me of THE DOORS, esp. in live performance [ yes, i'm aware they used session players on some albums e.g. ' The Soft Parade '. They must have realised something ] ! In this regard, most drummers I know prefer to drive the rhythm with the augmentation or assistance of a bass.

Perhaps then, the many VdGG enthusiasts out there could be asked whether they consider the band has a complete rhythm section and if so , what it is comprised of. If not, what do they consider is missing . They could be asked, but will they respond ?



Well, Banton actually plays bass on the studio tracks, I think all the one's after Potter, but I'm not completely certain.  I don't miss it in any case.  Live, he actually did play bass on at least one song (on the DVD released a while ago of the Godbluff show).

As far as guitar, there is guitar on nearly every song..........either Hammill's acoustic (early 70's) or electric (mid to late 70's) or Fripp (on The Emperor in his War Room solo and the entire Pawn Hearts album).  In any even, I don't notice any lack in that area or bass guitar for that matter.

Also, Potter played on H to He, about half the tracks, with Banton playing the bass on the rest.



Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 08:11
For the sake of the Peace and good will, ill put Pawn Hart on when i get home Hug 
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 08:18
This is one of those bands I can't get into. Sure there are one or two decent songs. Overall, I find the music bland and the vocal texture bothersome. Some bands just click with people. And I also find with the music coming out today, it's more difficult to get into older Prog bands that I am not already a fan of, regardless of their importance. 
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 08:21
I love VDGG, but I guess many people will dislike it because of arrangements and the sound.

They sound raw. They sound sharp. They're nowhere near smooth symphonic layers of mellotron melted with guitar solo. They sound like forcing to put bones of a dinosaur, a pig, a human and a rhino into a unique skeleton. But I like it.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 13:05
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

I've tried very hard, because there is definitely some magic that they capture that I wish I could really just appreciate. But it's hard. Hammill's voice is not pleasant, and the instrumentation is not either. I'm open to alot of music, but they just don't quite work for me. Yet.
 
The best reasons I can come up with are when I listen to Discipline's Unfolded Like Staircase. Everything VdGG does, they do, but on pitch, and with a more sonic awareness. It's like VdGG are poets trying to be musicians and Discipline is the reincarnation with musicians trying to be poets. And that doesn't quite capture it, but it points in the right direction.

If you want voices to be pleasant VdGG is the wrong address for you. Hammill wants you to feel the feelings the songs are about, and those are rarely pleasant feelings. The right attitude to listen to Hammill's singing is to let him take you on a ride on the emotional rollercoaster called life. And there are a lot of unpleasant feelings on that ride. If you are not ready for that, beware of VdGG.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2009 at 22:20
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

 
If you want voices to be pleasant VdGG is the wrong address for you. Hammill wants you to feel the feelings the songs are about, and those are rarely pleasant feelings. The right attitude to listen to Hammill's singing is to let him take you on a ride on the emotional rollercoaster called life. And there are a lot of unpleasant feelings on that ride. If you are not ready for that, beware of VdGG.

I agree with this post, not only in relation to VDGG but in general.  I love pleasant singing where it's appropriate but I don't go looking for a pleasant/unpleasant voice, whether the singer's treatment of the material is convincing or not is more important to me.  I want to ask a question to all VDGG fans at large:  how many of you are reminded of Halford in the 70s when you listen to Hammill...or rather, does Halford remind you of Hammill, depending on who you heard first?  The first thing that struck me when I heard VDGG for the first time was that he sounded so much like my metal God Halford, but in a completely different context and that was reason enough to keep visiting VDGG for me. Smile
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2009 at 01:26
Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

 
I dont find the singer very interesting, he simply bores me a little, besides of that, i actualy dont know why. 



Must be because you haven't been paying attention.

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

 
Some albums are easier than others to get a better feel for his voice. In a way some of the earlier ones are really intense (Silent Corner Empty Stage), and they will often alienate a listener ... it's hard to understand something like St. Bernina or Red Shift ...
 
Try listening to the album "Skin" which is a bit softer, but also more emphatic and detailed and a bit smoother ... and after that one can start catching Godbluff or Still Life ...
 


That's truly the worst advice you could come up with, moshkito. Silent Corner... is probably the easiest soloalbum to get into. Its got a full band and magnificent guitarplaying by Spirit's Randy California (you know, for all the rockers), and you are reccomending stuff to progrock-fans here. Starting with Skin would be the wrong advice to almost anyone I guess, and definitely to someone who's already a fan of some kind of experimental rock.

What's so hard to understand about Red Shift? Its spacerock and just about as catchy as Hammill gets.

H to he... is obviously the safest album to start with. Its got guitar and bass (not that i care), a singalong antem like Killer, a stunning ballad, none of the harsh vocals Still Life is full of and nothing too extreme like Arrow or A Plague... + its filled with classics.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.379 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.