Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The 2010 NFL Season Thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe 2010 NFL Season Thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5051525354 62>
Author
Message
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:35
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Would prefer playing the team that beat the Pats eh?

I wanted a Packer/Jets SB but now I am almost sure of it.
Maybe a close game, but the Jets are better then the Steelers and playing out of their minds right now.
 
 
How exactly?
The only thing they have on the Steelers is a better secondary.
The really big difference in these teams is that the Steelers have a QB with two rings and the Jets have a QB in his second year with an 0-1 record in championship games. 

Much better offensive line for the Jets.
 
 
I'd give them that, on paper.  They haven't had to block against a team with an actual pass rush in the last two weeks, though, whereas the Steelers' line had to handle Baltimore.  I don't see Sanchez having the same pocket he did this week which for him, in a game this big, could present problems.  Ben, on the other hand, is used to making plays, in huge games, while running for his life.

I agree, but the O-Line is more than just better on paper. It plays better. They probably have the second best center in the game this season. 

They are really outmatched at QB. I don't like Ben, but he's much better than Sanchez especially at extending plays. 
 
 
Funny, center might be the one spot on the line where they don't have a major advantage.  Pouncey is a pro-bowler and rightfully so


Time always wins.
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:36
God, I feel like I'm jinxing things. 
 
That's why I didn't make predictions this past week and won't this week.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:36
Yes, Big Ben is much better.
I think we all agree it'll be a tight game, and hopefully a good one.


Pouncey was good, no doubt and it's tough to rank o-linemen but Nick Mangold is up their with the best.


Edited by JJLehto - January 16 2011 at 22:37
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:48
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Would prefer playing the team that beat the Pats eh?

I wanted a Packer/Jets SB but now I am almost sure of it.
Maybe a close game, but the Jets are better then the Steelers and playing out of their minds right now.
 
 
How exactly?
The only thing they have on the Steelers is a better secondary.
The really big difference in these teams is that the Steelers have a QB with two rings and the Jets have a QB in his second year with an 0-1 record in championship games. 

Much better offensive line for the Jets.
 
 
I'd give them that, on paper.  They haven't had to block against a team with an actual pass rush in the last two weeks, though, whereas the Steelers' line had to handle Baltimore.  I don't see Sanchez having the same pocket he did this week which for him, in a game this big, could present problems.  Ben, on the other hand, is used to making plays, in huge games, while running for his life.

I agree, but the O-Line is more than just better on paper. It plays better. They probably have the second best center in the game this season. 

They are really outmatched at QB. I don't like Ben, but he's much better than Sanchez especially at extending plays. 
 
 
Funny, center might be the one spot on the line where they don't have a major advantage.  Pouncey is a pro-bowler and rightfully so

Not from the games I've seen him play. Profootball focus actually named him the worst probowl selection. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:49
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:


Not from the games I've seen him play. Profootball focus actually named him the worst probowl selection. 


Oh snap.
What? Even worse than O'Hara who played 6 games? And when he did play was worse then the guard who filled his spot?
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:53
See here

Ray Lewis is on the list which should make MoM happy though.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 22:57
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

See here

Ray Lewis is on the list which should make MoM happy though.


I agree with Lewis (though he's borderline) as well as Steven Jackson, though I like him a lot and DeAngelo Hall and Gonzalez.
Timmons really should have been in the Pro Bowl.
Actually, a good amount of pro bowlers are undeserving IMO.




Edited by JJLehto - January 16 2011 at 23:00
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:00
I thought Timmons didn't make the pro-bowl?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:01
Sorry Pat, I worded that horribly. Fixed.


Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:03
Ah yes. I believe he also made their pro-bowl snubs list. Although I don't remember that full list.

Speaking of snubs: No Trent Cole? Really? 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:04
So bored, must resist urge to make my own pro bowl list.

Although some of those stats they gave were impressive and not as readily available so it's difficult.

Trent Cole had a great year, but was he a top 2 DE? (For a 4-3 system)

I wish I had the number on how many hits/pressures they all had but for right now using nfl.com John Abraham had more sacks, and Justin Tuck has more sacks, overall tackles, and forced fumbles. If Cole made it on though can't say it'd really be an upset. I don't think I'm happy with Julius Peppers making it...


Edited by JJLehto - January 16 2011 at 23:09
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:12
Best 4-3 DE in the NFC. Never seen a DE play the run like he does. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:15
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Best 4-3 DE in the NFC. Never seen a DE play the run like he does. 


Hmmm that is another interesting point to take into consideration, but how can that be determined? Watch every game of ever team and note how well they push back/get around tackles or move the runner around?

We need a dedicated team of people doing all this just to make an accurate pro bowl!


Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:24
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Best 4-3 DE in the NFC. Never seen a DE play the run like he does. 


Hmmm that is another interesting point to take into consideration, but how can that be determined? Watch every game of ever team and note how well they push back/get around tackles or move the runner around?

We need a dedicated team of people doing all this just to make an accurate pro bowl!



I watch a lot of Eagles film. It's one position I always look at. It's my favorite position in the game. 

Of course I don't see every team frequently. Of course I have imperfect information. I rely on other opinions partly too. I look at stats. In the NFC I can't think of a better DE working from the 4-3.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:27
We need a team doing just that though, so our pro bowl can be 100% accurate! It may be dull but beats my current job.

I used to always be DE when playing football video games but later changed to MLB.
No doubt, Cole is a beast. You think even better then Tuck though?
And when it comes to really observing where people may not notice....I think Barry Cofield is a very unheralded DT.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:32
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

We need a team doing just that though, so our pro bowl can be 100% accurate! It may be dull but beats my current job.

I used to always be DE when playing football video games but later changed to MLB.
No doubt, Cole is a beast. You think even better then Tuck though?
And when it comes to really observing where people may not notice....I think Barry Cofield is a very unheralded DT.

I agree with Cofield. Although his stupid sack celebration pisses me off.

Yes I think Cole's better. That's not a knock on Tuck though. If you were to through Cole on your line, it would be insane. The man is unfortunately constantly doubled and tripled because there's absolutely nothing working on the other end of him. Also, the 2 gap system our DTs are forced to use prohibits them from really getting any pressure. Not that they're really guys that can generate a ton of pressure, but regardless the scheme doesn't help. Cole basically works solo on our line.

It's insane how much he gets blatantly held too. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2011 at 23:38
I'll agree with that, Cole does put up impressive numbers with pretty much no help.
We've been lucky to always have 2 good pass rushers, and usually more that we can sub in and out.


OH! How was Tamba Hali snubbed!?



Edited by JJLehto - January 16 2011 at 23:47
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2011 at 01:02
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:


Not from the games I've seen him play. Profootball focus actually named him the worst probowl selection. 
 
Hmmm, he's been pretty damn impressive in the games I've watched him play in, but that was only 17. Wink
 
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

See here

Ray Lewis is on the list which should make MoM happy though.
 
 
Ray is one of those picks that makes it on established name alone.  This is why fans shouldn't be allowed to vote.  What's funny is that even the tv guys can't accept that he's slipping.  The only tackles he figures in anymore take place down field, after a gain, and usually with someone else already draped on the player.  Even that "forced fumble" he had in the KC game was a gift: the RB was in the process of completely plowing over him and basically flung the ball out of his own hand.
 
The problem with all the bad picks for the Pro-Bowl, every year, is that people use selections to bolster their Hall of Fame cases.  Junior Seau, for instance, made the Pro-Bowl 12 times and probably actually deserved the selection 4 or 5 times.  You certainly can't leave a 12 time pro-bowler out of the Hall, right?


Edited by manofmystery - January 17 2011 at 01:03


Time always wins.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2011 at 01:04
Well, hopefully HoF voters will be more realistic.

Being a loser, I actually kinda care about pro bowl voting, but it is utterly useless.
The HoF is a different story, and hopefully do a better job selecting. I'm sure some poor choices are in there, but not nearly as much as the pro bowl which is a big joke.
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2011 at 01:29

Since we are speaking of Pouncey and centers... they showed an amazing stat during one of our games this year and had to track it down again.  I'm sure everyone knows that the Steelers have only had 3 head coaches since 1969 but even more impressively the Steelers only had 3 starting centers from 1974-2006.

Mike Webster 1974-1988
Dermontti Dawson 1989-2000
Jeff Hartings 2001-2006
 
I just found this really interesting and hadn't found a way to work it into conversation until now.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5051525354 62>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.