Author |
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 16215
|
Posted: June 26 2015 at 11:31 |
PrognosticMind wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Creativity over record sales. Creativity over looking cool. Creativity over getting laid. Creativity over everything. |
This! Also, I love when I feel like I'm listening to a surrealism painting, or something super abstract. I'm one of those proggies who abides by the axiom "the more crazy-creative, the better!". Trout Mask Replica and Bitches Brew immediately come to mind. I like feeling like I'm listening to a Chirico or Pollock painting. Prog is the only genre that really exemplifies this quality for me.
|
With one problem ... music has been "progressive" for at least 2000 years ... what we describe here, half the time, is nowhere near "progressive" and in fact it is a gross distortion of the term, and the time and place when it was first observed. And surrealism, btw, by the time you define it, is no longer surrealism, and even Bunuel had problems with his friends about this!
Edited by moshkito - June 26 2015 at 11:32
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: June 26 2015 at 11:34 |
moshkito wrote:
PrognosticMind wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Creativity over record sales. Creativity over looking cool. Creativity over getting laid. Creativity over everything. |
This! Also, I love when I feel like I'm listening to a surrealism painting, or something super abstract. I'm one of those proggies who abides by the axiom "the more crazy-creative, the better!". Trout Mask Replica and Bitches Brew immediately come to mind. I like feeling like I'm listening to a Chirico or Pollock painting. Prog is the only genre that really exemplifies this quality for me.
|
With one problem ... music has been "progressive" for at least 2000 years ... what we describe here, half the time, is nowhere near "progressive" and in fact it is a gross distortion of the term, and the time and place when it was first observed. And surrealism, btw, by the time you define it, is no longer surrealism, and even Bunuel had problems with his friends about this!
|
This is correct. I was just trying to define it within the general framework of what I consider "progressive rock" from the late 1960's onward. You are correct with your assertions here.
Still, I like to hear paintings, lol
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
|
Posted: June 26 2015 at 13:17 |
The idea of "expect the unexpected". The idea that now you are listening to some folky chords and songs, but the next minute heavy guitars may be coming in, or a sudden salsa (the "I am senor Valasco" part of Spock's Beard's The Light), or some jazzy blues part may come out of nothing (like in "Yours Is No Disgrace").
Maybe you can also call it "adventure". That would be my nr. 1 prog element. Maybe "unpredictability" is also a good description. I always named for myself the three best elements in music: power, beauty and adventure.
Edited by Moogtron III - June 26 2015 at 13:20
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: June 26 2015 at 16:44 |
The things I look for in prog are the things I look for in any other genre.
HackettFan wrote:
•Innovation in timbre •Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general •Freedom from composition/free-form/improvisation •Innovation in time, rhythm, meter, polyrhythms... •Exceptional musicianship, well-demonstrated capability with instruments •Incorporation of varied styles and genres •Innovative lyrics, subject matters, themes •...Other |
For the most part, this list looks like a list of bonuses to me. However, from that list two things in prog stand out for me:
HackettFan wrote:
•Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general | Jesus, if you can do that, you are my hero. If you can create new, great textures, you can do pretty much anything. I'll never get tired of listening to you.
+ Other: Exploration of harmony. If you can tastefully pull it off in a manner that does not allow quirkiness, then I'm sold. Fancy chords and chord changes are the pieces of the key to my soul.
Edited by Dayvenkirq - June 26 2015 at 16:44
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: June 27 2015 at 02:11 |
Instrumentals, especially guitars (mostly), but also love drums, beautiful cymbals sound, Hammond and fantastic bass :) I love the piano tunes and brass instruments too hug
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: June 27 2015 at 02:35 |
^ Nothing more specific, like how these instruments are used (as broken down in the OP's list)?
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
|
Posted: June 27 2015 at 19:56 |
•Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general •Freedom from composition/free-form/improvisation
Out of the characteristics that I noted, these two are directly at odds with each other. A lot of people avidly seek strong and complex compositions in what they listen to. I like that too quite a bit, but I also appreciate a lot of free-form music, so I'm willing to exchange one for the other without great sorrow. I've always been intrigued by the metrical complexity of Zappa's phrasing, especially on guitar. He doesn't just have odd time signatures that change frequently, but his notes are accented in unpredictable ways. A lot of things that I listen to do not go down that road to such an extreme, and that's okay to an extent. The question of this thread is not whether you appreciate all the properties of Prog identified, but which characteristic do you find most essential? I'm sure everyone likes good musicianship, but if a musician is a little under skilled yet makes up for it with imaginative ideas, is that alright with you? I really am interested in people's reflections.
|
|
presdoug
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8115
|
Posted: June 27 2015 at 21:04 |
The characteristic about prog that I most value is the connection between it and composers from several centuries ago. I really dig it when prog musicians transcribe music of composer's like Bach or Beethoven or Mozart for a prog band. Then I kind of feel I am getting the best of several worlds in one, as I love Classical and Romantic orchestral (mainly symphonic) and keyboard music very much.
This is not the only thing I value, but what I value most.
Edited by presdoug - June 27 2015 at 21:04
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
|
Posted: June 27 2015 at 23:23 |
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: June 28 2015 at 03:24 |
HackettFan wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
For me, prog rock is way more fun than all other genres. | What makes it the most fun for you? |
HackettFan wrote:
•Innovation in timbre •Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general •Freedom from composition/free-form/improvisation •Innovation in time, rhythm, meter, polyrhythms... •Exceptional musicianship, well-demonstrated capability with instruments •Incorporation of varied styles and genres •Innovative lyrics, subject matters, themes •...Other |
|
|
lostrom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
|
Posted: June 28 2015 at 20:54 |
The classical music influences, the not straight forward drum playing and the quite parts.
|
lostrom
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
|
Posted: June 28 2015 at 23:08 |
lostrom wrote:
The classical music influences, the not straight forward drum playing and the quite parts. |
Duly noted and welcome aboard!
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: June 28 2015 at 23:13 |
|
|
lostrom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
|
Posted: June 29 2015 at 14:54 |
HackettFan wrote:
lostrom wrote:
The classical music influences, the not straight forward drum playing and the quite parts. | Duly noted and welcome aboard! |
Many thanks! :)
|
lostrom
|
|
lostrom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
|
Posted: June 29 2015 at 14:55 |
Cheers to that!
|
lostrom
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 6768
|
Posted: June 29 2015 at 15:06 |
Rickenbacker basses, properly strung with RotoSound round-wound strings and played with a pick!
RIP, Christopher Squire!
|
|
Rosscoe
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 29 2015
Location: Huddersfield
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: June 30 2015 at 06:18 |
Hi everyone •Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general•Exceptional musicianship, well-demonstrated capability with instruments•Innovation in time, rhythm, meter, polyrhythms... •Incorporation of varied styles and genres For me, these 4 sum it up, probably in that descending order. Overall, I like to be taken on a musical journey - not all round the world, but to move from section to section, not knowing what may be round the next bend. I like unusual time signatures, and unexpected key/chord changes - BUT only if it benefits the music. I've listened to a number of solo albums by virtuoso musicians, and they can be like "This one is written in the Phrygian mode". However, it sounds rubbish. There's no point setting out to write something in a certain mode, or time signature, if the result doesn't work. I see exceptional musicianship as the glue that makes these 2 things work (innovation in song construction and time). But again, the musicianship should serve the music, not the musician. There is a line where music becomes too self-indulgent, and I like prog in that it tends to let all the instruments take their turn, and not let one dominate.
|
|
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23098
|
Posted: June 30 2015 at 06:24 |
I don't think about music like this. Interesting read though. With some bands the focus is on complex structures whilst others take the loose and esoteric route - some even mix the two. I love it all if it's done right. The most important thing for me is passion, and that goes for any kind of music.
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
|
terramystic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 776
|
Posted: June 30 2015 at 10:30 |
Imagination and skill is characteristic for prog and art in general. I value these two but art is also a beautiful form of communication. Otherwise it's just an interesting experiment or show off. I have to feel some vibe, something I can connect to. And prog can have a very special vibe (I hope I'm using the right word).
|
|
HackettFan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
|
Posted: June 30 2015 at 11:56 |
Rosscoe wrote:
Hi everyone •Innovation in structure/composition/juxtaposition of material in general •Exceptional musicianship, well-demonstrated capability with instruments •Innovation in time, rhythm, meter, polyrhythms... •Incorporation of varied styles and genres For me, these 4 sum it up, probably in that descending order. Overall, I like to be taken on a musical journey - not all round the world, but to move from section to section, not knowing what may be round the next bend. I like unusual time signatures, and unexpected key/chord changes - BUT only if it benefits the music. I've listened to a number of solo albums by virtuoso musicians, and they can be like "This one is written in the Phrygian mode". However, it sounds rubbish. There's no point setting out to write something in a certain mode, or time signature, if the result doesn't work. I see exceptional musicianship as the glue that makes these 2 things work (innovation in song construction and time). But again, the musicianship should serve the music, not the musician. There is a line where music becomes too self-indulgent, and I like prog in that it tends to let all the instruments take their turn, and not let one dominate. |
Thank You, Rosscoe. Welcome aboard. We've learned a fair amount about your tastes all in one post, which is what delights me about this thread. Best.
Edited by HackettFan - June 30 2015 at 11:59
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.