Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Did the Beatles really Invent Prog? Or not?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDid the Beatles really Invent Prog? Or not?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 11>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
 Rating: Topic Rating: 2 Votes, Average 3.50  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
odinalcatraz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 347
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:42
Originally posted by LearsFool LearsFool wrote:

I'd hate to rain on the preceding "Beatles-inspired-Crimson" parade, especially due to the truth within, but ultimately the Beatles weren't the chief influence on Crimson. Obviously Fripp, like many rock artists at the time, was inspired by their knack for experimentation, but what would go into Crimson's sound is instead indebted to an oft forgotten early prog band I've mentioned earlier in the thread: Clouds. Early in Clouds's career, when they were known as 1-2-3, they headlined the Marquee, where Fripp, Wakeman, and Emerson all watched them on multiple occasions. What Fripp was struck by in their sound was their penchant for inspiration from and use of orchestral and jazz styles and melodies, and this kind of composition would be key to early Crimson, easily covering In The CourtIn The Wake, and even Lizard.

Plus, it is known that when they got their mellotrons, their use of them was in light of Mike Pinder's use of it on The Moody Blues's records, not any of the Fab Four's uses of it. Also, there is no evidence that In The Court was constructed with Sgt. Peppers in mind.

As I said already, Fripp may be wrong or lying here:
Robert Fripp- wanted King Crimson to emulate the Beatles' proclivity for packing many strands of meaning into a song, so that a record could stand up to repeated listening: "The Beatles achieve probably better than anyone the ability to make you tap your foot first time round, dig the words sixth time round, and get into the guitar slowly panning the twentieth time." Fripp wished Crimson could "achieve entertainment on as many levels as that.
http://www.corvusstone.com
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:39
Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

Originally posted by LearsFool LearsFool wrote:

I'd hate to rain on the preceding "Beatles-inspired-Crimson" parade, especially due to the truth within, but ultimately the Beatles weren't the chief influence on Crimson. Obviously Fripp, like many rock artists at the time, was inspired by their knack for experimentation, but what would go into Crimson's sound is instead indebted to an oft forgotten early prog band I've mentioned earlier in the thread: Clouds. Early in Clouds's career, when they were known as 1-2-3, they headlined the Marquee, where Fripp, Wakeman, and Emerson all watched them on multiple occasions. What Fripp was struck by in their sound was their penchant for inspiration from and use of orchestral and jazz styles and melodies, and this kind of composition would be key to early Crimson, easily covering In The CourtIn The Wake, and even Lizard.

Plus, it is known that when they got their mellotrons, their use of them was in light of Mike Pinder's use of it on The Moody Blues's records, not any of the Fab Four's uses of it. Also, there is no evidence that In The Court was constructed with Sgt. Peppers in mind.
All the bands at the time were experimenting. Everyone was wondering what new sounds and ideas they could add to rock and roll. Prog was born out of this exploration and when it was it formed slowly from a little bit of this that and the other that was floating around. It did not spring fully formed from the head of Zeus (or Fripp), no instead it was created by many different people in many different places and at the time no one could have known that it was Prog. It was just Rock with a little something extra.

I therefore don't see why it would be of any importance to try and trace the specific elements of KC's sound to specific bands. No doubt they were influenced by many, many things both consciously and subconsciously. In fact many of the bands that influenced them may have never even been recorded and thus we will never know what impact they might have had. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that their music exists, that it is unique, and that there were many others like them producing many similar things, and others who followed after influenced by these bands.

I only note this for truth. It's a known fact that Clouds influenced Crimson, and a known fact that their use of 'tron built off of Pinder's use of it - in that case not so much because they wanted to, but because it was workable. And when you've got posters acting as if the Beatles were Zeus, what I said only reveals the primordial soup's whole.


Edited by LearsFool - July 10 2015 at 12:39
Back to Top
history nerd View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:35
Originally posted by LearsFool LearsFool wrote:

I'd hate to rain on the preceding "Beatles-inspired-Crimson" parade, especially due to the truth within, but ultimately the Beatles weren't the chief influence on Crimson. Obviously Fripp, like many rock artists at the time, was inspired by their knack for experimentation, but what would go into Crimson's sound is instead indebted to an oft forgotten early prog band I've mentioned earlier in the thread: Clouds. Early in Clouds's career, when they were known as 1-2-3, they headlined the Marquee, where Fripp, Wakeman, and Emerson all watched them on multiple occasions. What Fripp was struck by in their sound was their penchant for inspiration from and use of orchestral and jazz styles and melodies, and this kind of composition would be key to early Crimson, easily covering In The CourtIn The Wake, and even Lizard.

Plus, it is known that when they got their mellotrons, their use of them was in light of Mike Pinder's use of it on The Moody Blues's records, not any of the Fab Four's uses of it. Also, there is no evidence that In The Court was constructed with Sgt. Peppers in mind.
All the bands at the time were experimenting. Everyone was wondering what new sounds and ideas they could add to rock and roll. Prog was born out of this exploration and when it was it formed slowly from a little bit of this that and the other that was floating around. It did not spring fully formed from the head of Zeus (or Fripp), no instead it was created by many different people in many different places and at the time no one could have known that it was Prog. It was just Rock with a little something extra.

I therefore don't see why it would be of any importance to try and trace the specific elements of KC's sound to specific bands. No doubt they were influenced by many, many things both consciously and subconsciously. In fact many of the bands that influenced them may have never even been recorded and thus we will never know what impact they might have had. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that their music exists, that it is unique, and that there were many others like them producing many similar things, and others who followed after influenced by these bands.
-hn
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:28
I'd hate to rain on the preceding "Beatles-inspired-Crimson" parade, especially due to the truth within, but ultimately the Beatles weren't the chief influence on Crimson. Obviously Fripp, like many rock artists at the time, was inspired by their knack for experimentation, but what would go into Crimson's sound is instead indebted to an oft forgotten early prog band I've mentioned earlier in the thread: Clouds. Early in Clouds's career, when they were known as 1-2-3, they headlined the Marquee, where Fripp, Wakeman, and Emerson all watched them on multiple occasions. What Fripp was struck by in their sound was their penchant for inspiration from and use of orchestral and jazz styles and melodies, and this kind of composition would be key to early Crimson, easily covering In The CourtIn The Wake, and even Lizard.

Plus, it is known that when they got their mellotrons, their use of them was in light of Mike Pinder's use of it on The Moody Blues's records, not any of the Fab Four's uses of it. Also, there is no evidence that In The Court was constructed with Sgt. Peppers in mind.
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:24
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^I think that a Day In The Life is pretty prog but not symphonic. Even if it did feature the famous orchestra crescendos. Weird, huh? Wacko 
I would call ADitL more "crossover" than Mr Kite and SFF.
Back to Top
emigre80 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:20
Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

Originally posted by emigre80 emigre80 wrote:

Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

it bloomed out of the zeitgeist
 
Wow...you really are a history nerd.LOL
Why would I lie to you? LOL
You wouldn't. I'm convinced.
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:19
Originally posted by Friday13th Friday13th wrote:

Interesting. I think "Mr. Kite" is squarely in the psychedelic realm. "A Day in the Life" is frightening though, which is something that psychedelic rock just isn't and baroque pop is rarely. 
That intro and the way of singing in A Day in the Life is, let's say, "not enough symph" for these ears. 
Back to Top
Kati View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:17
Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

Bah, Prog was not and never needed to be invented. It was not the product of some great men with a vision. No, it was formed by many people more or less independently, it bloomed out of the zeitgeist. A time and place where certain ideas and certain influences coalesced into a unique and distinguishable sound... When we look back we might label this or that Prog, but the artists did not set out with such grand and noble intentions. They played the music that the culture of their day created. It should then be no surprise that the Beatles, despite having made their name in earlier trends would be caught up in the spirit of the time. And we should all be happy they did!
I love what History Nerd said! Clap I second that too! ApproveHug
Back to Top
history nerd View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:15
Originally posted by emigre80 emigre80 wrote:

Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

it bloomed out of the zeitgeist
 
Wow...you really are a history nerd.LOL
Why would I lie to you? LOL
-hn
Back to Top
emigre80 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:11
Originally posted by history nerd history nerd wrote:

it bloomed out of the zeitgeist
 
Wow...you really are a history nerd.LOL
Back to Top
history nerd View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 12:08
Bah, Prog was not and never needed to be invented. It was not the product of some great men with a vision. No, it was formed by many people more or less independently, it bloomed out of the zeitgeist. A time and place where certain ideas and certain influences coalesced into a unique and distinguishable sound... When we look back we might label this or that Prog, but the artists did not set out with such grand and noble intentions. They played the music that the culture of their day created. It should then be no surprise that the Beatles, despite having made their name in earlier trends would be caught up in the spirit of the time. And we should all be happy they did!
-hn
Back to Top
Kati View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 11:59
Originally posted by samus88 samus88 wrote:

Don't take it personally and you'll be fine.
I usually forget the next day Smile plus hug everyone too!
Your name is cute tho' remind me of Shamu :) the orca or rather the orcas. I do not like sea world but the name and the orcas are a awesome tho' :) hugs to you, samu88 
Back to Top
samus88 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: September 05 2008
Location: Buenos Aires
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 11:50
Don't take it personally and you'll be fine.
Can you tell me where my country lies?
Back to Top
Kati View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 10:56
Originally posted by samus88 samus88 wrote:

So because Fripp was a fan of St Pepper's that makes it prog? The only argument you should make is based on the music itself. RPI has lots of classical influences, does that make classical music prog rock as well?

I don't think any of the Beatles albums are prog rock. Of course this is sujective, but to reply to my post quoting Fripp on the relevance of St Pepper's is redundant. Everyone knows how important that album is, but that doesn't make it prog in and of itself.
Samu88, that was an added conversation for fun in relation to what was previously said. Read what was discussed prior please. Right now you sound silly really.
P.S. Redundant is a very nice word however it does not quite fit in here.


Edited by Kati - July 10 2015 at 10:59
Back to Top
samus88 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: September 05 2008
Location: Buenos Aires
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 10:43
So because Fripp was a fan of St Pepper's that makes it prog? The only argument you should make is based on the music itself. RPI has lots of classical influences, does that make classical music prog rock as well?

I don't think any of the Beatles albums are prog rock. Of course this is sujective, but to reply to my post quoting Fripp on the relevance of St Pepper's is redundant. Everyone knows how important that album is, but that doesn't make it prog in and of itself.


Edited by samus88 - July 10 2015 at 10:43
Can you tell me where my country lies?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 09:48
@Friday13th: There's definitely many reasons why ADITL is the highlight of Sgt. Pepper's and it's dark lyrics are part of it, but the "I'd love to turn you on" phrase is what puts it squarely in the psych rock canon. It's not always about the music in Psych rock. But it helps.

Edited by SteveG - July 10 2015 at 09:51
Back to Top
odinalcatraz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 12 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 347
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 09:47
It is interesting, to say the least, that Court of the Crimson King (considered by many as THE prog album), was designed by Fripp, with Sgt Pepper in mind. Sgt Pepper was a massive progression, as far as the general public were concerned and Court was a progression again, with Sgt Pepper firmly in the mind of the composer.

http://www.corvusstone.com
Back to Top
Friday13th View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 30 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 09:42
Interesting. I think "Mr. Kite" is squarely in the psychedelic realm. "A Day in the Life" is frightening though, which is something that psychedelic rock just isn't and baroque pop is rarely. 
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 09:28
^I think that a Day In The Life is pretty prog but not symphonic. Even if it did feature the famous orchestra crescendos. Weird, huh? Wacko 
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2015 at 09:25
Originally posted by Friday13th Friday13th wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by Friday13th Friday13th wrote:

Well Strawberry Fields IS strange in a good way even to modern ears now. "Strawberry fields...nothing is real." The notes hit on those words are chromatic and dissonant, and not to mention the outro. That doesn't mean no one had done that sort of thing before or that you could say "HERE! THE BIRTH OF PROG!" Psychedelic/Baroque pop had many comparable examples since '66. Good Vibrations was released earlier and is equally radical for its time, so to arbitrarily put a stake on Strawberry Fields doesn't work for me.
Strawberry Fields Forever is 'haunting' (strange-in-a-good-way, but not for everybody at that time) nothing less than e.g. Entangled by Genesis in 70s since we know how big difference in the equipment, technology of recording etc. actually is between 60s and middle of 70s, even in the case when The Beatles use that Indian harp (i.e. swarmandal, Hindustani Classical music instrument) to underline that haunting atmosphere.
 





Smile

Regarding Psychedelic and Baroque pop the tags, both tags are not quite suitable for Strawberry Fields Forever. Tomorow Never Knows is the great psych, and we could even describe that one as 'progressive psychedelia' aswell, but it's a 'psychedelic experience', not that haunting, pastoral and moony atmosphere of Strawbery Fields Forever.
The Beatles' songs like Yesterday and (or) Eleanor Rigby, simply due to that usage of the strings, were called Baroque pop. By the other bands, as an example of Baroque pop, I'd like to mention Walk Away Renee (1966) by NYC band The Left Banke. So everybody can hear that Baroque pop have nothing to do with Strawberry Fields Forever, i.e. SFF is not something derived from Baroque pop.
In lack of the term 'Symphonic rock' that will be coined some years later, Strawberry Fields Forever used to be and still to be wrongly tagged as a "Psych" and "Baroque pop", although both tags never ever work well for Strawberry Fields Forever  because Strawberry Fields Forever  already was something else, a new subgenre; The Beatles were move ahead. 








And that's it. Just born English Symphonic rock.

I love The Left Banke! "Pretty Ballerina" is one of my all time favorite songs. I don't say SFF is baroque pop as a derogatory term. If there were a "Baroque Pop Archives" I would be an equally proud and opinionated member LOL I also understand why you say SFF took that kind of music to the next level since I agree. I just don't agree that that is where you draw the line for where psychedelic rock/baroque pop ends and symphonic prog begins. To me it's still the former though admittedly at one of its most sophisticated peaks. "A Day in a Life" I think is more clearly distinct from a psychedelic rock/baroque pop tag. 

It's really just a difference in boundaries. My boundaries for what constitutes as prog are smaller than yours, whereas my boundaries for what counts as psychedelic rock/baroque pop are wider. All are awesome genres and it doesn't diminish their value. Fair enough? 

I've also never heard an actual prog artist specifically single out "Strawberry Fields Forever" as the most influential on prog. Robert Fripp on the other hand HAS specifically mentioned "A Day in the Life" as the big moment. Sgt. Pepper's is usually mentioned by most prog artists, and I can only assume it's due to that epic final track. 
LOL! I do like the statements by Mr Fripp, since he is the leader of my all time favourite foreigner prog band.
However, I often disagree with him. For example, in my humble opinion that A Day in the Life  is a least prog song from all above three The Beatles' songs that for me represents that birth of English Symphonic rock; actually, only these three The Beatles' songs are Symphonic rock by whole The Beatles' catalogue.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.154 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.