![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |||
Ofur ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 17 2005 Status: Offline Points: 139 |
![]() Posted: March 15 2006 at 21:30 |
||
Keep up the good work admins. After all discussing the inclusion of bands is not allowed, so closing my thread was the right thing to do. I've decided to change my signature to reflect the spirit of this site.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
mrgd ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 02 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 822 |
![]() |
||
I agree with your topic header, but for vastly different reasons. Wouldn't be a case of our senior member wanting to get the last word in? ON REFLECTION please,nobody respond.A reprise of this is more than anyone could stand IMO!
|
|||
Looking still the same after all these years...
mrgd |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
That discussion was futile, it was taking nowhere, you didn't wanted to listen anything, so waht was the point, that thread was going to end terribly. And believe me, I'm one of the most stubborn purists here, I made six or seven pages threads against the inclusion of a determined bend as many other members, but the difference is that we all were able to listen reasons and give arguments. Go to any other Prog place from the Progressive Web Ring and you'll find that Proto Prog is a well recognized sub-genre and that Iron Butterfly is included:
Even though they go too far (Quadrophenia is too late to be considered Proto Prog and Uriah Heep is 100% Prog), the similarities are amazing BTW: If you don't like the politic of this place, the doors are wide open you won't be the last one to leave and for sure not remotely the last one to join the forum. Iván |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Ivan....as for Quodrophenia being too late to be regarded as proto prog, your highlighted quote (now in red) covers that point nicely. In regards to Uriah Heep being 100% Prog, well thats very dubious to say the least. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Yes I admit about Uriah Heep being dubious, not for me, but there's no certain truth. But proto means Pre....before. Proto: 1 a : first in time <protohistory> b : beginning : giving rise to <protoplanet> An album released well advanced the 70's during the peak of Prog, can't be considered Proto Prog. In that case will probably be Art Rock or tghis new invention called Prog Related. Iván |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Yes I understand the meaning of ythe term "Proto", but there is an explanatory proviso highlighted in red. Its your qouye from another site. |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |