Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Simple Minds . . . Progressive?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSimple Minds . . . Progressive?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Should Simple Minds Be Added to ProgArchives?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
6 [20.00%]
24 [80.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Simple Minds . . . Progressive?
    Posted: July 07 2005 at 09:56

In light of my recent post about SM's music (especially between 1979 and 1982) having many progressive elements, should Simple Minds be officially included on the ProgArchives site?

NOTE:  If you have not heard songs from Reel to Real Cacophany, Empires and Dance, Sons and Fascination / Sister Feelings Call, *and* New Gold Dream, your vote will not be valid because these are their most progressive albums.

Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2005 at 10:01
Sorry, but NOoooooooooooooooooooooo 
Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2005 at 14:32
What happened to my supporters?  Step up to the plate!
Back to Top
felixxx View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 260
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2005 at 15:46
why dont we add Wham! They are so prog 
Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2005 at 10:50

It's not like I'm asking to add the Backstreet Boys or something.  Simple Minds has written some serious music.  Very innovative and experimental.  I honestly wish that Brian Ferry had sung Don't You (Forget About Me).  Perhaps SM would have remained more progressive.

I don't see the problem.  You're including Asia.  Their music is no more progressive than SM's.  In fact, despite the all star line-up in the original Asia, SM's early music was more progressive than Asia's.

Furthermore, I certainly do not consider Supertramp a progressive band.  If you're going to include them, why not include Talking Heads?  Honestly, I really don't even think of Styx as a progressive band.  No more progressive than Boston and you did not include them.

It seems to me that there are a few inconsistencies in what is considered progressive.

Originally posted by felixxx felixxx wrote:

why dont we add Wham! They are so prog 

Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2005 at 12:33

Innovative: yes.

Do I like them? Yes.

Prog:  no.

IMHO: because they're too much song based. I think they're more like a warmblooded new wave band. They did have Peter Gabriel and Roxy Music as examples. But they're purely electronical (no acoustic instruments as I recall), don't have epics. They're not very far from prog, but not prog.

Still, it's hard to decide. For me it's clear though: great band, especially in the early days, but not prog.

Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2005 at 16:09
I don't think it's fair to label Simple Minds as New Wave.  They are nothing like Devo, OMD, A-ha, Art of Noise, or Thomas Dolby.  Their music had depth and was often much darker in tone.  Furthermore, although they may not have composed the longer epics like Yes and Genesis, they do have several songs over 6 minutes long; especially between 1979 and 1982.  Heck, Street Fighting Years has six songs that are over 6 minutes long!  They're not The Beach Boys!
Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2005 at 17:45

Originally posted by fractalman fractalman wrote:

I don't think it's fair to label Simple Minds as New Wave.  They are nothing like Devo, OMD, A-ha, Art of Noise, or Thomas Dolby.  Their music had depth and was often much darker in tone.  Furthermore, although they may not have composed the longer epics like Yes and Genesis, they do have several songs over 6 minutes long; especially between 1979 and 1982.  Heck, Street Fighting Years has six songs that are over 6 minutes long!  They're not The Beach Boys!

Hey, don't degrade the Beach Boys  . Listen to some of THEIR almost progressive tracks like Surf's Up and Heroes And Villains.  Brian Wilson's masterpiece Smile is almost prog .

And don't get me wrong: if I say new wave I'm not degrading the SM either. New wave is very broad and I think that the influences were there allright: the SM were children of their time. New wave is also Joy Division, The Cure and Cabaret Voltaire. But I have to admit: if you could them new wave, you could call them just as easily prog. Good point.

Maybe they were a genre of their own. But they did see a resemblance between themselves and U2 and Echo and The Bunnymen as well. Being positive sounds in an age of doom-mongering, I guess.

Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2005 at 08:59
OK, going by the studio releases, perhaps you guys are right.  However, if you listen to concerts from 1981-1983, they are incredibly progressive.  In fact, some of the songs are nearly unrecognizable.  A good example is Hunter and the Hunted which sounds totally different live.  Even songs like The American and I Travel are quite different live.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2005 at 09:27

Let's have the inclkusion of the Culture Club , Human League , Duran Duran , Split Enz , The The , ABC, Heaven 17 also then.......

Need I say more?????

Let's stop this bleeping nonsense, Please!!!!!

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2005 at 10:44

Hey, I was admitting that the majority may well be right.  You don't have to be a jerk about it!  Besides, the only band that you mention below that is the same caliber as SM is Duran Duran (although, their new album was very disappointing).

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Let's have the inclkusion of the Culture Club , Human League , Duran Duran , Split Enz , The The , ABC, Heaven 17 also then.......

Need I say more?????

Let's stop this bleeping nonsense, Please!!!!!

Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2005 at 10:56

that is an interesting poll

i like simple minds, and their street fighting years album nearly has  the prog style.

new gold dream is synth pop, while street fighting years is more atmospheric rock.

the fixx is more prog than simple minds though

 



Edited by greenback
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
Maike View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 06 2005
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2005 at 19:46
I love Simple Minds.
They have very interesting albuns and the partnership of Mr Kerr and Mr
Burchill have done wonders in pop and electronic music history. But are
they Prog? I guess not. Althought their first albuns might have had a blink
of an eye to the Prog Universe and Street Fighting Years is a wonderful
dark (in a good way) example of their skills as songwriters, I dont
consider them Prog. But if any of you who dont know the music and
wants to get in the Simple Minds world I recomend the Live in the City of
Lights double album. It has the popish tunes that made them famous
(dont you, alive & kicking etc) and they also have wonderful renditions
and reworks of other songs, more atmospheric pieces that dont come in
the studio versions - Someone Somewhere in Summertime and Big Sleep
are incredible atmospheric tunes. Oh jungleland, Ghostdancing,
Waterfront, Once upon a time, Promised you a miracle are closer to (hard,
but not that hard) rock. Book of Brilliant things has a wonderful acoustic
guitar solo and its just a great song, and if you measure prog by the
lenght of its tunes (which for me is rubish), most of them are over 7
minutes. You have to ear (several times actually) in order to inhale its
musical strength.
You wont find them prog in a YES or Jethro Tull way, but you will find
them more of a symphonic ensemble. The pop influences they got from
Velvet Underground and David Bowie (is that bad pop?) and the
atmospherics from Eno and Roxy Music and Peter Gabriel (as they often
state as their major influences). Not that prog for PROGGERS, but you'll
find in Simple Minds (at least in that live album) a group of musicians that
are pushing the envelope just a little bit harder than other New Wavers.
Thanks for reading it until here, and sorry for the long review.
Prog On.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 03:33
Originally posted by fractalman fractalman wrote:

Hey, I was admitting that the majority may well be right.  You don't have to be a jerk?!?!about it!  Besides, the only band that you mention below that is the same caliber as SM is Duran Duran (although, their new album was very disappointing).

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Let's have the inclkusion of the Culture Club , Human League , Duran Duran , Split Enz , The The , ABC, Heaven 17 also then.......

Need I say more?????

Let's stop this bleeping nonsense, Please!!!!!

Who is insisting on inclusion of SM?????

As I said in the other thread you posted in Bands Suggestions Forum , we have people insisting on band inclusion because they like prog and would like to have all of their tastes represented on this site. This is especially true for the younger generations who also monitor constantly the top 100 on the home page and are constantly worried about best of lists. I know , I was once young too!!!

 

True I do not like new wave bands !!!! They are responsible for the impoverishment of pop music with the awful rythm box-digital KB!!!! All those bands were concerned more with painting one fingernail black (or pink) than actually playing music , since it was all programmed in their synths. The early 80's were the sickest era as far as music is concerned. Late 80's a slight improvement and the 90's a big improvement.

I saw once Ultravox (around the Visage album era) and I saw five guys standing behind those synths pushing buttons and dancing behind it and that was it!!!!! For two hours!!!!!! Sure they took time to be synchronized and choreographed!!!! I went there as a bet with my-then-girlfriend as she wanted to convert me. I took her to see George Thorogood and The Destroyers and she danced rock'n roll for almost four hours, to the meanest sax-player/gunslinger on this side of the Pecos River! George was dripping sweat all over and when he spun around while playing his mean riffs , we were showered with his sweat (front row with our elbows on stage) but did not even feel it as we were all drenched anyway from our own and the neighbors. 

Lets George T & T D up for inclusion!!!! Just kidding of course.

She never once spoke of new wave groups again.

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Maike View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 06 2005
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 05:59
Sean

Most of the new wavers were really into painting their fingernails. Simple
Minds was nerver a "fingernail paiting" group. Thank God they were and
still are more interested in making music.

And by the way, for a long time thair drummer was a Mr Mel Gaynor, one
of the most exctiting drummers ever, with the same calibre of Collins,
Manu Katche, Bruford, but not with the same musical direction.

And Manu Katche recorded some of the drums & percussion on the Street
Fighting Years album in 1989. As Vinnie Collaiuta (dont know how to
write the name, sorry) recorded some drums on their Good news from the
next world album in 1995/6.

Thay used from time to time prog musicians or somewhat related to prog
music, in their albuns. At least its something positive in their behalf,
right?

cheers
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 08:38

Yes Simple Minds were not the most typical new wave group and certainly not the worst either.... I would take them out in a class along with other early 80's bands such as XTC, Squeeze , InXS, Echo & Bunnymen, OMD , The Cure as rather more correct pop of the times.

If I remember well , they are scottish along with the Levellers and Big Country but simply not in the same league as Pallas (which is prog and BTW , I loathe Sentinel).

Except for Marillion's script the 80's were a lost decade even more so for prog than for the rest of rock. I was 19 and a newbie in University when Script came out! But I headed to the 60's for musical explorations.....

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
fractalman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 08:43

Sean:

I am not *insisting*.  I am *suggesting*.  Two completely different terms.

While some bands did use digital keyboards in a negative way, they are *not* bad instruments.  Heck, there are many bands and hip-hop outfits that use analog keyboards in a negative way!  Don't blame the keyboard!  Blame the player!  On that note, Mick MacNeil is an extremely innovative keyboard player on the same caliber as Jim Gilmour.  Very talented.  It is a shame that he left Simple Minds.

Furthermore, while it may be true that 90% of the bands out there, regardless of musical genre, were producing crap and more interested in how they looked than how they performed, Simple Minds was always about the music.  If Simple Minds was New Wave at all, they were the gods of New Wave.  Bands like Devo, OMD, and countless others paled in comparison.

It may be true that the New Gold Dream album sounds more poppish, but the live renditions of the material from that album (as played back in 1983) were anything but pop!

Lastly, I cannot stand George Thorogood!  I'd rather listen to Jimmy Buffet --and I don't like him either!

OK, so SM may not be prog enough to include here, but a person would have to be deaf in order not to hear prog elements in their music.

 

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Who is insisting on inclusion of SM?????

As I said in the other thread you posted in Bands Suggestions Forum , we have people insisting on band inclusion because they like prog and would like to have all of their tastes represented on this site. This is especially true for the younger generations who also monitor constantly the top 100 on the home page and are constantly worried about best of lists. I know , I was once young too!!!

 

True I do not like new wave bands !!!! They are responsible for the impoverishment of pop music with the awful rythm box-digital KB!!!! All those bands were concerned more with painting one fingernail black (or pink) than actually playing music , since it was all programmed in their synths. The early 80's were the sickest era as far as music is concerned. Late 80's a slight improvement and the 90's a big improvement.

I saw once Ultravox (around the Visage album era) and I saw five guys standing behind those synths pushing buttons and dancing behind it and that was it!!!!! For two hours!!!!!! Sure they took time to be synchronized and choreographed!!!! I went there as a bet with my-then-girlfriend as she wanted to convert me. I took her to see George Thorogood and The Destroyers and she danced rock'n roll for almost four hours, to the meanest sax-player/gunslinger on this side of the Pecos River! George was dripping sweat all over and when he spun around while playing his mean riffs , we were showered with his sweat (front row with our elbows on stage) but did not even feel it as we were all drenched anyway from our own and the neighbors. 

Lets George T & T D up for inclusion!!!! Just kidding of course.

She never once spoke of new wave groups again.

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 08:58

^ George Thorogood is the essence of Rock'n roll !!!

Although he has not aged that well , nowadays.

Of course the players are to blame for bad music , but for the first time in music history, those synths allowed kids to do "music" without even writing a note and not even knowing how to hit a key properly..... Those synths produced the same sound whether you pounded on the key or even touched feeebly with your toe. They were more of computers remembering patterns and repeating them endelessly should you wish it.

 



Edited by Sean Trane
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
kirklott View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 23:29
Originally posted by fractalman fractalman wrote:

In light of my recent post about SM's music (especially between 1979 and 1982) having many progressive elements, should Simple Minds be officially included on the ProgArchives site?

NOTE:  If you have not heard songs from Reel to Real Cacophany, Empires and Dance, Sons and Fascination / Sister Feelings Call, *and* New Gold Dream, your vote will not be valid because these are their most progressive albums.

This is an excellent poll, and well-deserved.

Simple Minds is a brilliant band, totally underrated and under-appreciated. Virtually all their albums are great (and btw, while I have every one of their albums, I don't have a version of Don't You Forget About Me). I'd recommend starting with Reel to Reel Cacophony, Sons and Fascination/Sister Feeling Call, and Sparkle in the Rain. Round two would be Once Upon a Time, Good News from the Next World, and Cry.

If you like prog, if you like U2, this is a band worth checking out. Their #2 on my list of all-time concert attendance (6 times), 2nd only to Yes (25 times)

btw, new album Black and White 050505 is due early Sept

"Progressive rock is the key to the continuance of human evolution." - Charles Darwin
Back to Top
kirklott View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 623
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2005 at 23:33

Originally posted by felixxx felixxx wrote:

why dont we add Wham! They are so prog 

Ignorance is bliss.

"Progressive rock is the key to the continuance of human evolution." - Charles Darwin
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.