sugarloaf

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Why  Sugarloaf  isnt in progarchives, I can see, Queen, Stix, Ambrosia, and many more,they are not, 50% progressive than, Sugarloaf. three record and not less than, ten  progressive songs:

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
pakal Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum Newbie Joined: May 22 2012 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 1	Topic: sugarloaf Posted: May 24 2012 at 17:21
	Why Sugarloaf isnt in progarchives, I can see, Queen, Stix, Ambrosia, and many more,they are not, 50% progressive than, Sugarloaf. three record and not less than, ten progressive songs:

Icarium Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34050	Posted: May 24 2012 at 23:11
	becouse you post this in the wrong section, mate, try suggest new bands thread, aslo helps with some links or youtube clips to the music of the band ;)


Logan Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: @ wicker man Status: Offline Points: 32685	Posted: May 24 2012 at 23:43
	Actually, Sugarloaf was re-suggested a couple of months ago, and is on the Heavy Prog team chart at: http://progfreak.com/Sugarloaf-152853.html?path=pa/recent This is the most recent thread, you could show your support/ argument for the band in this: Sugarloaf (re-started topic) but it is under evaluation anyway. I don't know many bands the Heavy Prog team are dealing with, but commonly there are backlogged ones to deal with first as there aren't that many volunteers working for each team and some teams get a lot of suggestions.