Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How The Movie Industry Changed
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

How The Movie Industry Changed

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
MortSahlFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 01 2018
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote MortSahlFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: How The Movie Industry Changed
    Posted: October 28 2021 at 16:23
Editor’s Note: On Nov. 14, 2005, Variety published the following interview with Mort Sahl. The revolutionary comedian, who died on Oct. 26, provided an unfiltered view on the entertainment industry, from Depression-era cinema and the Hollywood blacklist to how current films tackle race, politics and culture.

For half of the last century and on into the next one, Mort Sahl, 78, has been the comedic conscience of America. Since 1968, when he debuted at San Francisco’s legendary Hungry i nightclub, he’s been walking onstage in his trademark V-neck sweater, a newspaper tucked under his arm, serving notice to every pundit and politician from Eisenhower through Bush that there was nowhere to hide.

He was the original truth-teller, pioneering a new kind of stand-up — barbed bipartisan political humor — paving the way for everyone from Lenny Bruce to Woody Allen to Chris Rock.

In 1958, he co-hosted the Oscars. In 1960, Time magazine put him on the cover, calling him the most notable American political satirist since Will Rogers and “the patriarch of a new school of comedians.”
Woody Allen, speaking in Robert Weide’s PBS American Masters documentary, Mort Sahl: The Loyal Opposition, said his own training as a stand-up comic “came largely from watching Mort Sahl.”
In Allen’s view, Sahl “made the country listen to jokes that required them to think. He was the best thing I ever saw. He was like Charlie Parker in jazz. There was a need for a revolution, everybody was ready for a revolution, but some guy had to come along who could perform the revolution and be great. Mort was the one.”
What follows is Sahl’s stock-in-trade lacerating humor with a twist—instead of simply critiquing our society and our political leaders, Sahl has turned his attention to the entertainment business and Hollywood, the place he’s lived and worked and tried to believe in for most of his life.
The Depression — optimism vs. reality
The movies were all cotton candy. Shirley Temple and everything like that. Then, somehow, we went from the saccharine to the profane without crossing home plate. That’s what’s wrong now; now it’s hopeless. During the Depression, there was still hope. There was still optimism. Sure, we saw a lot of formulaic junk that wasn’t true. But we had a place to hang our hopes.
WWII— heroic dreams
World War II was the last time I was in the majority, and I’ll tell you what, I liked it, I really liked it. I volunteered for the service, I wanted to be a hero. I wanted girls to admire me for it. We were gonna make a great trade-off. We were gonna be brave because the brave win the fair, and the fair, their reward is to be loved. And I believed all that because I saw it in the movies. In other words, the movies dreamed well back then. I’ll tell you how well they dreamed — I was in the ABC movie Inside the Third Reich, the Albert Speer story, and I remember when we were doing research for it we found out that Hitler was watching Astaire and Rogers every night.

Holocaust and the movies
Well, Hollywood has never really stopped talking about the Holocaust. But that’s the easy way out. It’s easier to be a good Jew that way than it is to have what your grandfather told you was a real Jewish conscience. A conscience would mean standing up to the threat now, not 40 years ago.
Remember Mephisto? That picture shows you what happens to guys who cooperate with the devil. It lets you know that it’s tempting, but they get you in the end.
There’s another movie called Birgit Haas Must Be Killed, made by Laurent Heynemann. In that picture, Philippe Noiret and Jean Rochefort not only show you what the Secret Service does to move world politics and public opinion, but they show what it costs — that a man who loves has a better life than a man who kills and doesn’t love.
I don’t know what happened here. Everybody keeps saying, “Well, everything changed when the conglomerates bought the studios,” but really I don’t remember them (the studios) being all that wonderful before.


McCarthy and the Blacklist
We went from making really honest and heroic movies like The Best Years of Our Lives and then four years later we got the blacklist, which was the defining moment in Hollywood. Suddenly, Goldwyn is making I Want You and Dorothy McGuire is telling Farley Granger he can’t eat at the table ’cause he doesn’t want to go to Korea.
And I believe that the guilt people felt about letting their friends be hung out to dry has haunted them ever since. They never got past it. The results are a Hollywood that wants to appear noble — so we’ve got people who adopt a Lithuanian child and go to see the Dalai Lama and wear a ribbon for AIDS. It’s all to take their minds off what they’ve really become.
Kennedy, Garrison, Stone and Arnold
I was an investigator in (New Orleans DA and Kennedy assassination investigator Jim) Garrison’s office for 10 years and afterwards tried to get a script going. I must have talked to 80 people and they all kept telling me about Lee Harvey Oswald or that it was too tough to touch. And then Oliver Stone was big enough to do it. But he didn’t mention anything I was witness to. I’m still waiting for that movie.
I’ll tell you how insane America is. The other night, I was at Cafe Roma and I saw (California Governor Arnold) Schwarzenegger in the cigar room. I was standing with Jim Garrison, talking about who killed Kennedy, and those are Schwarzenegger’s in-laws, and now he’s running for a second term as a Republican. The whole thing is maddening.
Madison Ave. to Vietnam
Well, the networks were doing the job of calling people to conscience. But the movies were a different story. We had a whole period of espionage films like Charade and Masquerade. A bunch of those, where the guy would say: “I’m a CIA agent. No, I’m not. I’m your uncle. No, I’m not.” They take another rubber mask off, and say “I’m your father.” They called it intrigue. But it wasn’t the truth of what was happening.
The right had decided to play hardball. They killed the kids at Kent State, they killed Bobby (Kennedy), they killed Martin Luther King, they killed Jack (Kennedy). And as far as I’m concerned, they executed him publicly as a lesson to anyone who was virtuous. The government was using Madison Avenue focus-group, demographic techniques to brainwash people. You could say the mind is a terrible thing to wash. So this was all going on in the country, and it wasn’t documented. If you go to see an Italian picture, the guy says “This is a fascist country” and he makes a movie about it.
We make a movie about Vietnam and the director says, “There’s no doubt we made a terrible mistake going there, but we’re not fascists. We just make mistakes.” Hollywood stopped believing in themselves, and they forgot how to tell the truth.




Nukes, Strangelove and Cheney
Hollywood certainly didn’t do too well when Sidney Lumet made Fail Safe, in which the president, to show the Russians that he’s sincere, orders a bomb dropped on New York while his wife is out shopping. Sincere? It showed that he was totally out of his head.
I don’t think we did too good with Dr. Strangelove either, because Strangelove minimizes the risk of fascists. It’s like, “these guys are pretty ridiculous, and they’ll fall apart of their own weight.” Well, Dick Cheney hasn’t. He shows no indications of doing so either, at least not in the near future.
Reagan and his progeny
You know, Gore Vidal wanted to be a senator from here. Gregory Peck did. Norman Lear did. Robert Vaughn did. Paul Newman wanted to run in Connecticut. So how come the dumbest guy, Ronald Reagan, got elected twice, and nobody in this town even thought he was a good actor?
Race and the Trump card
The movies have dissolved the Black man as a political force. The Black man has become a guy who just wants to get his necklaces and his tennis shoes and run a record company, so he can be as good as Donald Trump. You know what Preston Sturges would have done with Trump? He would have been Rudy Vallee, and he would have been a joke. But look where it is now. A guy who’s in Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Atlantic City is telling people what it is to be a failure. And there’s nobody on the air to satirize it.

Give ’em hell, Harry
Look back at the first “Dirty Harry“; it was written by Harry Julian Fink, who was a real fascist, but he believed, in his heart, that it took that to clean up the streets. By the time they make the fifth one, sure Dirty Harry says, “Make my day,” but Harry’s as bad a hoodlum as the guy he’s chasing. They turned it around. By that time, they were in the money business.
At least, in the ’70s, they were trying. Is there anybody like Jerome Hellman or Hal Ashby today? Are there any guys that want to raise hell?
We don’t need another Hollywood hero
Critic Manohla Dargis in the New York Times the other day was talking about the movie Stealth. She says: “The heroes in Stealth continue the love affair Hollywood, that hotbed of liberalism, has long had with militarism.”
Well, my heroes aren’t the guys in the Stealth plane. My heroes are the guys who went to Canada so they won’t have to do that.
For instance, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was at the UN recently. Listen to him. He doesn’t sound like anybody in an American movie. I saw that movie about him, The Revolution Will Be Televised. It was made by some BBC students. Pretty good documentary, with great stuff. And, uh, they showed it at the Nuart, naturally. (Sahl laughs boisterously.)
What happened to Butch?
Gregory Peck and William Holden look fit on the bridge of a battleship. Bedford does not look believable on a bridge, and Eastwood doesn’t even look like an officer. He’s a sergeant, maybe — a buck sergeant. There’s something that happened here. The most masculine actor we have, Sean Connery, is not an American.
Peckinpah was great. Get him together with (Steve) McQueen, he could do no wrong. Sam’s films were violent because he thought that we were hypocrites and that we were presenting another face to people than what we saw in the mirror. And that’s the reason that in The Wild Bunch, Bill Holden gets up at the prostitute, sees the baby crying and it’s literally, “cut to suicide.” He’s had enough of himself. And you see it. Most Westerns, most movies, don’t present that kind of complex hero.
Sam was wild. He’d strike terror in people’s hearts. I brought him to Newman. I brought him to Eastwood. They were plenty scared. He was a great man. And he was nuts. And he had his own way of looking at things. He went to shoot a picture in Vegas once and a guy from Variety said to him, “Do you gamble?” And he said, “Yes, I get up every day.”
He was a real American. A real one, and with McQueen, it was the best combination you could find. They got it down to the bare-bones truth.
Musical chairs and the fountain of youth
I don’t know the studio chieftains now. You know, they’re gone before you get to know them. It’s been an amazing development. They don’t become institutions anymore, they become prisoners of an agent’s hysteria, too.
I think that started with CAA packaging everything. That probably started 30 years ago, with those guys that came out of the Morris office. And the Morris office didn’t want to do anything. If you were on The Andy Griffith Show, they wanted to let you die there.
Now it’s all about the youth, the whole idea of youth. Only youth will support the movies. Well, they won’t support anything very long. They’re good and they’re generous, but they’re fickle. You drop off the side of the mountain, the youth don’t come look for you. They don’t miss you.
Women in showbiz
You open up a magazine and it says, “The new women who arc the new story editors at the studios.” And they show a bunch of skinny chicks in black pantsuits whose fathers were agents. And they’re all sort of equine looking at a distance. There was a time when comedy would have been savage enough to take that on, you know, not only The Sun Also Rises, but the daughter also rises. Instead of that, they’re telling you it was an even competition. I mean, did it help women for Sigourney Weaver to be a spaceship commander in Alien?
Activism and Arnold redux
Politics in Hollywood has become about going to the Hollywood Bowl wearing those ribbons so that Norman Lear or somebody like him will see that and know they’re a good person who deserves a job. Take Schwarzenegger. Who’s going to run against him? Meathead? Rob Reiner is going to run against him? Warren? Who’s going to run against him? Those guys are good for about one dinner at the Beverly Hilton, but that’s it.
Nets, the King of Pop and Baretta
All three networks have gotten rid of any kind of foreign news coverage. You don’t even have real honchos like (CBS founder Bill) Paley anymore. I don’t think their shows are about anything. Now they’re gonna make E-Ring. You don’t really believe Dennis Hopper thinks the Pentagon is virtuous.
I just don’t know why more people don’t take a chance. Something that would touch your heart instead of all three networks having a guy that comes on at 11:30 and ridicules Michael Jackson and Robert Blake for a year and a half. That’s some kind of town.

“About” actors
There are some very talented actors in this town. There’s Kevin Kline and William Hurt and Laura Linney and some others, but look, if Jack Nicholson had made pictures like About Schmidt at the beginning of his career, he never would have been Jack Nicholson.
Wesley and Moore
Latin America has Che Guevara and we have Michael Moore. When Moore finally found a presidential candidate he approved and endorsed General Wesley Clark, a guy whose greatest political statement was to advocate the bombing of the bridges on the Danube, Moore’s political position became clean he’s on the left-side of the fascist wing,
Belting the “bible”
On my TV show years ago, Jack Riley walked on the set and saw me reading Variety. He said, “I’m surprised to see you reading that publication!” I asked him why and he said, “Because I thought you had more of a world perspective than that.” I said, “If there’s no world news in Variety this week, that just means the president didn’t buy an ad.”
Morality and action movies
All you have to do is look at the movies and you can feel the bankruptcy. Instead of trying to change the world for the better, Americans are saying life is a bowl of mud. We went from a time when we couldn’t address anything of substance to where we go to a movie now and treachery is a given. Everybody’s shooting everybody. It seems we’ve convinced the American public that truth is darkness. Once you buy into that, then the war’s over.
Hope against hope
Where have we come? Where the hell are we? I don’t expect young people should have any hope, based on what they’ve seen, but I’m cursed. I saw something better.




https://variety.com/2021/film/news/m...od-1235098938/
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List
Back to Top
MortSahlFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 01 2018
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote MortSahlFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2021 at 16:24
I just found this. The interview was from 2005, but outside of "There Will Be Blood" and a few decent foreign movies, things seemed to have gotten worse. I'd add that they don't re-make em like they used to. People seem tired of the re-boots, and the few who I've talked to who watch them only do so because of nostalgia. I've always felt that one of the reasons they make so many comic book superhero movies is that they know a 7-yr old can't go to a theater by themselves, so they think "The parents are going to have to come, maybe the siblings, maybe friends, so in the very least 300%".

Then there's the sequels. I actually couldn't wait for a sequel to Trainspotting, and then I saw the trailer, and it was great! I thought it would be similar in quality, except the emphasis on technology dehumanizing society (and perhaps a reason people turn to drugs, which now are called "deaths of despair" since they're so common), but "T2" was awful. It seemed like it was all in slow motion, with Spud being the mastermind, but making sure they had all the returning characters for legitimacy. 20 years for THAT?

I think it all starts with the writing, and how little respect there is for writers. I remember names from the past, but I can't think of any now. Are they buying great books? Are they just not adapting properly? Then of course you have acting, and if you can't believe the person on the screen, or like any of the characters in the movie, I can imagine it being difficult to get into newer movies.

I haven't seen many movies (old or new), for many reasons, but if I am, chances are I'll go with an older movie because I only dedicate so much time a month to even give a movie a chance, and I have to go with the probability hoping I can find a good (or great) movie to get me out of this slump. I thought there was some promise in the mid-late 90s, and thought that with cheap cameras, online communities to find a cast and crew, and then sites like YouTube, that some talented people would come out with some amazing stuff, and see an exodus, similar to the growth of independent media in response to the gossip and trivia (and lies) from the mainstream media.
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 30093
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 04:20
Perhaps Hollywood lost it's nerve back in the 1950's and never got it back.
However contrary to that is the lyric in the Jon and Vangelis song The Friends of Mr Cairo. 'Citizen Cain came fast and quickly , conquering all New York City''. That's not really how it was though.

The recent films Joker and Parasite seem to buck the trend. I haven't seen the latter but its gained a massive amount of praise as well as the best film Oscar.  Joker is that thought provoking film that are desperately rare sadly. I do curse all the horrible franchises that are death to creativity. We have been duped! 


Edited by richardh - October 31 2021 at 04:22
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 06:02
Thank you for pointing us to this interview with Mort Sahl, an interesting, albeit very personal and subjective, take on many things - a way to know a bit better who he was.
(BTW, I doubt you asked permission from Variety to republish this article, so to avoid copyright issues for PA I'd suggest that you trim it to just the intro and incite readers to follow the link)

On your assessment of the state of the film industry, I'm a bit surprised you that you make it when at the same time you say that "I haven't seen many movies". How many of the 814 feature films produced in the US in 2019 have you seen to be able to make such an assessment? Not to talk about the 2446 in made in India, 1037 in China, 689 in Japan, 1881 in Europe...

Furthermore, I completely disagree with your assessment. Film production, since it's very beginnings in the late 19th century, or since Hollywood started in 1912 if you prefer, has always consisted of - say - 90-95% of average, mediocre to bad films and 5-10% of good to excellent films (this is my very personal and subjective assessment, but I have seen many films - it's part of my job). Nothing has changed about that since 1895 or since Hollywood started. Maybe the cinemas near you prefer to secure ticket sales instead of programming "good" films, but when you go to film festivals you can often discover many good films, but of which many have difficulties to find a proper distribution ("not in the cinema near you"). Disney still dominates the markets (7 of the 10 films that sold the most tickets in the USA were Disney films). So, in my opinion, the movie industry hasn't changed at all.

It is not that when there is a year that you, or I for that matter, have seen more great/bad films than the year before that it reflects a trend. Most of the film industry is aiming at mere and basic entertainment, not to make art films. And despite the fact that France has a reputation in making aesthetically interesting films, maybe 10 to 15 of the 250 films produced last year were really interesting from an (my) artistic point of view. Maybe 10 to 15 more films were also (or mainly) entertaining...

PS: I got the statistics from a publication by the European Audiovisual Observatory - see here. Last years statistics are behind a paywall, but earlier years are freely available in pdf.



Edited by suitkees - October 31 2021 at 06:26

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
MortSahlFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 01 2018
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MortSahlFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 07:27
Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

Thank you for pointing us to this interview with Mort Sahl, an interesting, albeit very personal and subjective, take on many things - a way to know a bit better who he was.
(BTW, I doubt you asked permission from Variety to republish this article, so to avoid copyright issues for PA I'd suggest that you trim it to just the intro and incite readers to follow the link)

On your assessment of the state of the film industry, I'm a bit surprised you that you make it when at the same time you say that "I haven't seen many movies". How many of the 814 feature films produced in the US in 2019 have you seen to be able to make such an assessment? Not to talk about the 2446 in made in India, 1037 in China, 689 in Japan, 1881 in Europe...

Furthermore, I completely disagree with your assessment. Film production, since it's very beginnings in the late 19th century, or since Hollywood started in 1912 if you prefer, has always consisted of - say - 90-95% of average, mediocre to bad films and 5-10% of good to excellent films (this is my very personal and subjective assessment, but I have seen many films - it's part of my job). Nothing has changed about that since 1895 or since Hollywood started. Maybe the cinemas near you prefer to secure ticket sales instead of programming "good" films, but when you go to film festivals you can often discover many good films, but of which many have difficulties to find a proper distribution ("not in the cinema near you"). Disney still dominates the markets (7 of the 10 films that sold the most tickets in the USA were Disney films). So, in my opinion, the movie industry hasn't changed at all.

It is not that when there is a year that you, or I for that matter, have seen more great/bad films than the year before that it reflects a trend. Most of the film industry is aiming at mere and basic entertainment, not to make art films. And despite the fact that France has a reputation in making aesthetically interesting films, maybe 10 to 15 of the 250 films produced last year were really interesting from an (my) artistic point of view. Maybe 10 to 15 more films were also (or mainly) entertaining...

PS: I got the statistics from a publication by the European Audiovisual Observatory - see here. Last years statistics are behind a paywall, but earlier years are freely available in pdf.



I meant to say I haven't seen many movies lately (old or new), but I've probably seen 3,000.

Forget about bad movies.. When I think of the best 100 movies, 99% are from the 1930-70s, and not the past 40 years. I don't think they are even comparable.
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote omphaloskepsis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 08:14


Edited by omphaloskepsis - October 31 2021 at 08:15
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 08:18
^^ Yes, I understood that much, but I continue to find it odd that you imply that the film industry hasn't made as many good films these last 15-25 years compared to before when stating that you haven't seen many films recently.

What I wanted to point out is that I think that the percentage of "good" films has not changed that much over film history. What we retain from film history however are mostly the films that found some/high critical acclaim, but we take not into account the sheer mountain loads of rubbish films that were made at the same time - just because they didn't make the history books (but many of those had bigger box offices results than the critically acclaimed films!)

I don't mind you have a prejudice against modern film making and a preference for older films, but I do mind that you translate it into a general fact, where I think you just haven't seen the many good films that have been made these last 40 years.




Edited by suitkees - October 31 2021 at 08:19

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 09:12
@Cindy: I had already seen that video and he raises some interesting points of critique. Some extra-filmic though and more sociological, but still interesting. But it is not a reliable assessment of the quality of film-making in the new millennium compared to the previous century. It is just laying bare his watching behaviour. That is: the choice of films one watches (and those one doesn't/cannot watch, for whatever reason) and what are possible points of observation to say something about the quality of the film (or what we like or not).
Again, there have been many splendid films made these last 40 years, and also these last 20 years - I've seen many very good films. And I still watch many films nowadays, although I try harder to avoid the bad or mediocre films... Saying that there are less good films made nowadays than before is based on nothing but gut feeling and personal preferences. Not on facts.


Edited by suitkees - October 31 2021 at 09:15

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
MortSahlFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 01 2018
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MortSahlFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 11:44
Big deal, I haven't seen many movies in the last year. I've tried, and if I'm not into it, I turn it off.

1930-70s vs. 1980-2020 is a no-brainer. And it's not just the classics - there's a ton of great movies from every country, low-budget, independent, ones on IMDB with lower than 1,000 votes. That's just the way it is. Fact.
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List
Back to Top
Shadowyzard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shadowyzard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 13:03
^ Sorry, but your assessment is like the neverending, "the new generation is degenerate," type of attitude. This has been going on for millennia, and clearly is a fallacy. 

The problem today, or for the last 2 decades is... you now can make a film without professional support. Grab a good camera, learn some technology. That's enough. Same is in the music industry. In the past, you had no option but to work with some real professionals/studios. Today's standards, for sure, catalysed the "crap industry"; but this doesn't necessarily mean that the whole film/music industry is doomed to produce garbage. Also, today; you have no option but to spend a fortune to compete with the high-budget films. There are exceptions of course, like The Blair Witch Project; but there are exceptions in virtually anything in life.

Apotheosing and emblazoning the past is OK; but instead of taking one through the path of the facts, it hinders his/her perception of neutrality by misting the optics up.

Edited by Shadowyzard - October 31 2021 at 14:51
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2021 at 14:22
Originally posted by MortSahlFan MortSahlFan wrote:

Big deal, I haven't seen many movies in the last year. I've tried, and if I'm not into it, I turn it off.

That's why I said above that your assessment is more the result of watching behaviour (which films you see/don't see) than based on statistics...
Quote 1930-70s vs. 1980-2020 is a no-brainer. And it's not just the classics - there's a ton of great movies from every country, low-budget, independent, ones on IMDB with lower than 1,000 votes. That's just the way it is. Fact.

Well, I think you take your gut feelings for facts. But if you have the facts, don't hesitate to share them with us...

Let's do a thought experiment and take as example the USA (since you are there; I guess the figures would be worse for other countries): how many of the 400 or so films produced in the US in, say, 1934 have you seen? How many of the 400 or so in 1942? in 1953? How many of the 500 or so of 1965 or how many of the 600 or so of 1973?

Since you are a film buff and have seen about 3000 films I guess you may have seen about 2% to 5% (since you've also seen foreign films) of the films produced in each year since 1930. Let's be generous and say you have seen 10% of each year (which you haven't). This still means that you haven't seen 90% of all the films produced in the USA. So, which films of the 1930-70s have you seen? I guess you weren't born in 1910 so the films of that period you have seen are those that have been bubbling up thanks to film historiography (film historians, film criticism, film archives...): those that are recognized as the most interesting (aesthetically, story-tellingly), and reprogrammed in the theatres or available on DVD or through streaming. Those films that stand out compared to the large majority of the average, mediocre or bad films produced in those same years.

We have distorted picture of the quality of film production in the past, because we mainly see those films that stand out, not the mediocre films that continue to sleep in the film archives, if they're not lost and forgotten, but of which some made nice box office figures...

That's why I maintain that the average quality of film production in % has never really changed, and that today there are still as many good films produced (I've seen some of them...)...
(What has changed for the film industry is the means of production and the distribution of films, but that's another discussion).


The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.