Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
burritounit
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 18 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 2551
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 10:43 |
I think people here are judging by preferences and how how overrated or underrated these drumers are rather than analyzing there tremendous muscisianship,talent and originality. Besides these commonly know drummer there are many other who surpass these two the problems is that they aren't that known as Mike or Danny. As for me it's a though one but clearly I liked more Portnoy.
|
 |
dpedal1
Forum Groupie
Joined: September 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 70
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 11:30 |
Danny for me!
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21817
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 11:49 |
Portnoy for me. Yes, his playing tends to be a bit "verbose", but I really dig it.
|
|
 |
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 12:51 |
They are two very different types of drummers, so this comparison really isn't fair, but I chose Carey. Why? If you really listen, I mean really listen to the way Danny plays, it's clear that Mike can't hold a candle to him in terms of style and originality. Mike has a huge-ass kit and plays super-fast, but Danny has a moderate-sized kit and can play everything Mike does and more. To me the more talented of the two is obvious. Not to knock Portnoy, either, but Carey is definately much more "progressive" in his playing style.
What's funny is . . . the fact that Portnoy is a big fan of Danny's doesn't seem to stop the arguments among each drummer's respective fans. The musicians themselves can respect one another, why can't more fans do the same?
Edited by p0mt3 - February 05 2008 at 12:53
|
 |
King Crimson776
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 18:08 |
StyLaZyn wrote:
King Crimson776 wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Because he stated he is not an improvisational drummer does not mean he can't. Don't take it out of context. Peart's strength is on composition. His solo's are so structured because that's the way he wants it. He desires them to be strictly formatted. | Of course he can, I didn't say he couldn't, he just sucks at it. I didn't take it out of context. If the solos are structured and strictly formatted, they aren't solos. Solos are improv, not structured runs. He's a good drummer, not a good soloist. |
Can you give us proof of him "sucking" at it? I gave an example of him NOT sucking at it.
Improv is improv. Solos are solos. There is really no comparison. A solo can be improv'd. Improvisation is a type of solo or playing. A solo, like the previous poster notes, is one person playing, whether structured or off the cuff. |
Well, it is true that some of my favorite musicians completely plan out their solos in studio. The point I'm making I guess is that he's bad at improv, every time I've seen him improv, it was bad. You didn't give proof of him not sucking, you referenced some demo tape that I can't hear. I gave an example of him saying that he's not an improvisational drummer, which could mean he's still alright at it, but every time I've heard him solo, whether structured or not, it's uninteresting, for me at least. The video imo was proof of him sucking, but that was actually pretty planned. It's subjective though so maybe you like his solos (improv or not), that he sucks at it is my opinion. But him stating that he's not an improvisational drummer should tell you enough about what he thinks of that aspect of his playing.
|
 |
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: February 05 2008 at 18:50 |
King Crimson776 wrote:
Well, it is true that some of my favorite musicians completely plan out their solos in studio. The point I'm making I guess is that he's bad at improv, every time I've seen him improv, it was bad. You didn't give proof of him not sucking, you referenced some demo tape that I can't hear. I gave an example of him saying that he's not an improvisational drummer, which could mean he's still alright at it, but every time I've heard him solo, whether structured or not, it's uninteresting, for me at least. The video imo was proof of him sucking, but that was actually pretty planned. It's subjective though so maybe you like his solos (improv or not), that he sucks at it is my opinion. But him stating that he's not an improvisational drummer should tell you enough about what he thinks of that aspect of his playing. |
http://www.billysheehan.com/audio/rushsoundcheck_hi.ram Non-suckage factor. Total improv.
|
|
 |
King Crimson776
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: February 06 2008 at 00:23 |
^^ it didn't work, it just gave me a blank doc. You probably have a windows. Look, I believe you, the guys a professional, I'm sure he can pull some decent sh*t off from time to time. His solos have always bored me though.
|
 |
tardis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 14378
|
Posted: February 10 2008 at 17:23 |
This guy:
|
 |
CryoftheCarrots
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 29 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 674
|
Posted: February 10 2008 at 21:17 |
I think Portnoy is the better conventional type of drummer which is why he is so sought after for session or guest work.Carey has a much darker tribal style that I personally find more appealling and he gets my vote.However I saw DT live the other week and must say throughout the concert my eyes kept getting drawn back to watching Portnoy.
|
"There is a lot in this world to be tense and intense about"
MJK
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.