Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
Forum Description: Make or seek recommendations and discuss specific prog albums
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=117903 Printed Date: June 15 2025 at 07:03 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Family: Music In A Doll's HousePosted By: SteveG
Subject: Family: Music In A Doll's House
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 11:13
Prog rock pioneer or a psychedelic coincidence?
Replies: Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 12:03
I don't know... It sure made an impression and probably opened some sonic doors for other young british rockers. Its most definitely progressive but so many were that aren't nessecarely "prog rock pioneers". I associate the whole approach/sound/feel with UK early protoprog/progrelated and might have guessed 1970 rather than 1968. But its mainly a great "anything goes" rock-album that stands out with lots of personality, solid songwriting and slightly eccentric arrangements.
Posted By: Snicolette
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 12:23
Certainly there are pretty deep roots in prog stemming from psychedelia. And the following LPs, Fearless and Bandstand are undoubtedly progressive..Certainly ahead of it's time. However, still far from being an expert in all of the subgenres herein, that is what I have to contribute to the conversation at this point. Good topic for discussion.
------------- "Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Posted By: TheGazzardian
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 12:51
Who knows, listening to it for the first time because of this topic though and it's very enjoyable!
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 14:55
More psych than prog imho....always liked Family and the first might be their best.
I play this and the second one from time to time.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 16:43
Just today I have written my review of Music From...
This is the beginning:
The Family with this album have influenced Genesis, the singing of Peter Gabriel, Jethro Tull, Yes, Gentle Giant and who knows how many other progressive bands. It was 1968: the Beatles published the White Album, the Rolling Stones Beggar's Banquet, the Who Tommy, and the Kinks Village Green Preservation Society; the Pink Floyd Saucerful of Secrets. The Family published a collage album where there was rock, folk, blues, space rock like Pink Floyd's sound, symphonic music, and gypsy and Indian sounds: in fact, with this album the Family, invented the various genres of the progressive rock. The Beatles of Sgt Pepper and the Floyds of The Piper were completely overcome in the progressive sense and art rock: nothing is trivial here, nothing is pop, as well as arranged, as in those two albums of 1967.
In my opinion, Family are great prog pioneers.
------------- Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Posted By: Snicolette
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 18:18
I saw that, and wondered which came first, your review or this thread? Nontheless, thank you for a thoughtful and knowledgeable review.
------------- "Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 20:30
SteveG wrote:
Prog rock pioneer or a psychedelic coincidence?
Psychedelic coincidence? Not sure what you mean.It is an example of a psych album that took elements of what later became known as prog. How's that? Or how about just proto prog(much of which had psych elements anyway).
Posted By: AFlowerKingCrimson
Date Posted: December 03 2018 at 20:32
jamesbaldwin wrote:
Just today I have written my review of Music From...
This is the beginning:
The Family with this album have influenced Genesis, the singing of Peter Gabriel, Jethro Tull, Yes, Gentle Giant and who knows how many other progressive bands. It was 1968: the Beatles published the White Album, the Rolling Stones Beggar's Banquet, the Who Tommy, and the Kinks Village Green Preservation Society; the Pink Floyd Saucerful of Secrets. The Family published a collage album where there was rock, folk, blues, space rock like Pink Floyd's sound, symphonic music, and gypsy and Indian sounds: in fact, with this album the Family, invented the various genres of the progressive rock. The Beatles of Sgt Pepper and the Floyds of The Piper were completely overcome in the progressive sense and art rock: nothing is trivial here, nothing is pop, as well as arranged, as in those two albums of 1967.
In my opinion, Family are great prog pioneers.
Yeah, only Tommy was released in 69 not 68. The Who actually had a rock opera before Tommy called A quick one while he's a way. Also, the Pretty Things released an album some call early prog(also considered a rock opera)called S.F. Sorrow in 1968.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 00:59
I certainly acknowledge its influence but I guess I think considering Doll's House "the beginning" is a bit of a stretch... I think some tend to look back and overestimaste the impact some of these early entries had - including Clouds and The Nice. By the time of its release The Mothers of Invention had already released four hugely influential albums that were actually noticed, bought and played by people. Listening to From Genesis to Revelation I associate it more with Moody Blues/Bee Gees than Family. On Trespass you can hear that King Crimson had released (the much more influential) In the Court... in between.
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 01:31
one of Genesis' more overt influences for their FGTR along with Traffic's Mr Fantasy
(mich more so than Bee Gees, IMHO)
Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 03:49
AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Prog rock pioneer or a psychedelic coincidence?
Psychedelic coincidence? Not sure what you mean..
I don't know what I mean either. ;)
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 07:43
Hi,
I like ANYWAY a lot more and find this period (which had John Wetton in his early days) not as exciting for me, and then the last 3 albums being totally exciting and far out, and that Guy in Santa Barbara wore out all of these albums senseless, because they were/are excellent all around with magnificent guitar work, which continued with Chappo in STREETWALKERS.
NP: Take Your Partners
NPA: (afterwords) Buffet Tea For Two
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 08:34
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I certainly acknowledge its influence but I guess I think considering Doll's House "the beginning" is a bit of a stretch... I think some tend to look back and overestimaste the impact some of these early entries had - including Clouds and The Nice. By the time of its release The Mothers of Invention had already released four hugely influential albums that were actually noticed, bought and played by people. Listening to From Genesis to Revelation I associate it more with Moody Blues/Bee Gees than Family. On Trespass you can hear that King Crimson had released (the much more influential) In the Court... in between.
With "The beginning" I meant the beginning of my review, that I have copied down the phrase.
I agree with you that there were many influences: if we consider only UK, Nice, Procol Harum and Moody Blues on one side, and Pink Floyd and Family on the other. But I guess The Family's music in the 1968
was very ecletic, not only psychedelia. In my opinion Music from a Doll's House contains the seeds of almost every genre and form develop in the progressive rock. So, If I had to think of the real beginning of progressive, I would choose In The Court of... 1969.
PS Peter Gabriel said he took inspiration from the singing of Roger Chapman.
------------- Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 08:39
Snicolette wrote:
I saw that, and wondered which came first, your review or this thread? Nontheless, thank you for a thoughtful and knowledgeable review.
I posted my review at 10,37 and, as you can see, SteveG created this thread at 11.13.
------------- Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Posted By: Snicolette
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 13:04
Funny how things can happen that way.
------------- "Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 15:11
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: jamesbaldwin
Date Posted: December 04 2018 at 17:04
------------- Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Posted By: Cosmiclawnmower
Date Posted: December 05 2018 at 14:55
A perennial favourite lp from one of my all time favourite groups; and in my mind tops Family Entainment which followed.. It was 'Entertainment' along with ITCOTCK and some Procol Harum lps that Richard MacPhail brought to the Cottage where Genesis all lived together prior to recording Trespass..
One of the things that set Family a bit apart was the provincial background of the band, coming from the area around Leicester- the 'Scene' (using that phrase in its 60's meaning) was predominantly London based and very much middle class, Art School.. Family were (to use their phrase) a bunch of 'Scruffy Herberts' from the sticks.. before becoming Family (The Family) they were The Farinas and then the Roaring 60's.. much more hard R&B like the Pretty things and at one point they used to wear Italian mafia get ups! Roger Chapman's aggressive stage persona and the strange selection of instrumentation made audiences nervous and they had to work REALLY hard to get some of the limelight which came so easily to others. I think this provincial 'hunger' and work ethic to get noticed also applied to the Moody Blues..
Music in a dolls house benefited from Dave Mason's involvement in that (A) Traffic were a big deal (B) he helped and guided them through the production process (C) had access to Mellotrons and Sitars and probably most importantly(D) he had access to the best weed.. The only downside to Mason's involvement is the song he 'contributed' 'Never like this' which is the weakest on the lp and much like what he was writing for Traffic at the time. Of course they had the 2 best engineers of the era looking after things in the forms of Eddie Kramer and George Chkiantz..
Its a period piece; there is no other lp quite like it.. is it prog etc etc? who cares. Was it influential? yes definitely but subtly though they were always a bit too eccentric and rough around the edges for the mainstream to accept. John Peel really rated Family right from the start and (unlike some bands) stayed with them right through their career.. He appreciated that rough edge as sign of genuine passion and creativity.
My final comment is that the 1967 first single 'Scene through the eye of a lens' which didn't make it on to the original lp is just fantastic, one of the most telling debuts from any band.
-------------
Posted By: Cosmiclawnmower
Date Posted: December 05 2018 at 15:24
The original photo insert that went with the first batch of pressings..
-------------
Posted By: Cosmiclawnmower
Date Posted: December 05 2018 at 15:25
''Strange looking band were we''
-------------
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: December 06 2018 at 07:49
Hi,
I am of the opinion that FAMILY became a much better band once John Wetton left and they went into a much more rock oriented sound and their work got tighter and stronger, even though we don't consider it "progressive music", at the very least the strong, and very well defined guitar style for this band, was always excellent, and it continued in the STREETWALKERS material and even then after that on Roger Chapman's solo albums (notably HYENAS ONLY LAUGH FOR FUN).
Some folks like the earlier material because it was strange and sometimes weird, and it came off kinda drug crazy many times, but I find their last 3 albums much better all around (before they became STREETWALKERS), and for playing it on radio (Guy Guden pretty much tore up many of these albums, that's how much they were played!) around other pieces of music, these made for an excellent amount of material that could be heard time and again.
Personally, I liked some of their very explosive pieces, instead of the more recognized sounding stuff. Things like BUFFET TEA FOR TWO, TAKE YOUR PARTNERS, and the like stood out for their individuality, which might have had its inception from within the progressive ranks, however, I really think that these were all intentionally defined around making their rock music design stronger and more appealing than just a piece here and there and a solo right here, kind of thing ... it was not about the solo ... it was about illustrating Roger Chapman's voice, and all the way to Chappo's solos this was very well done.
To me, since there were no "solos" to speak off, in many ways that made it for more "progressive" than otherwise. Sometimes people name something "progressive" simply because someone extends the solo much more ... and his name is Howe, or __________ (whoever!). The earlier material was a bit on the stony and weird side, and fun to listen to ... so it can be considered "progressive", being in the early days of PF, later days of Beatles, and the psychedelia craze. Even though it is fun to listen to, it is not my favorite material by this band at all ... which for me has always been about the voice and the guitar explosions ... and Chappo was one of the best at it.
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: December 06 2018 at 08:26
^ I prefer the "druggy crazy stuff".
------------- This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: December 06 2018 at 08:33
Cosmiclawnmower wrote:
A perennial favourite lp from one of my all time favourite groups; and in my mind tops Family Entainment which followed.. It was 'Entertainment' along with ITCOTCK and some Procol Harum lps that Richard MacPhail brought to the Cottage where Genesis all lived together prior to recording Trespass..
One of the things that set Family a bit apart was the provincial background of the band, coming from the area around Leicester- the 'Scene' (using that phrase in its 60's meaning) was predominantly London based and very much middle class, Art School.. Family were (to use their phrase) a bunch of 'Scruffy Herberts' from the sticks.. before becoming Family (The Family) they were The Farinas and then the Roaring 60's.. much more hard R&B like the Pretty things and at one point they used to wear Italian mafia get ups! Roger Chapman's aggressive stage persona and the strange selection of instrumentation made audiences nervous and they had to work REALLY hard to get some of the limelight which came so easily to others. I think this provincial 'hunger' and work ethic to get noticed also applied to the Moody Blues..
Music in a dolls house benefited from Dave Mason's involvement in that (A) Traffic were a big deal (B) he helped and guided them through the production process (C) had access to Mellotrons and Sitars and probably most importantly(D) he had access to the best weed.. The only downside to Mason's involvement is the song he 'contributed' 'Never like this' which is the weakest on the lp and much like what he was writing for Traffic at the time. Of course they had the 2 best engineers of the era looking after things in the forms of Eddie Kramer and George Chkiantz..
Its a period piece; there is no other lp quite like it.. is it prog etc etc? who cares. Was it influential? yes definitely but subtly though they were always a bit too eccentric and rough around the edges for the mainstream to accept. John Peel really rated Family right from the start and (unlike some bands) stayed with them right through their career.. He appreciated that rough edge as sign of genuine passion and creativity.
My final comment is that the 1967 first single 'Scene through the eye of a lens' which didn't make it on to the original lp is just fantastic, one of the most telling debuts from any band.
Super bio Mr. Mowerman!
------------- This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Posted By: The.Crimson.King
Date Posted: December 06 2018 at 12:18
I've had this album for a couple years and have given many listens. I like it, but it's never risen to the level of other late 60's psych/protoprog I love like the 1st Floyd album, Nazz Nazz, Procol's debut, S&Garfunkel's Bookends, Zappa's Absolutely Free, Giles Giles & Fripp, etc. In a lot of ways, it reminds me of the Small Faces "Ogden's Nut Gone Flake" without the silly voices and narration.
OTOH, the Streetwalkers 1976 song, "Decadence Code" is my fave Roger Chapman song ever. Here's a bizarre fact, I was just looking the album "Red Card" up on wiki and the drummer was Nicko McBrain...soon to find world stardom as Iron Maiden's drummer
------------- https://wytchcrypt.wixsite.com/mutiny-in-jonestown" rel="nofollow - Mutiny in Jonestown : Progressive Rock Since 1987