Pink Floyd - jumping the shark?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1563
Printed Date: May 19 2025 at 05:44 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Pink Floyd - jumping the shark?
Posted By: Easy Livin
Subject: Pink Floyd - jumping the shark?
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 15:47
The last of the "Shark" polls from me for the time being, and possibly the one that will unearth the most differences of opinion.
So when did Pink Floyd "jump the shark"? As ever, plenty of comments on why you’ve voted the way you did please! (If you’re not sure what "jumping the shark is", see previous threads on the same topic.)
My own vote has gone to "They’ve never jumped the shark". This is a retrospective view, as I would probably have gone for -When they released "The wall"- had they not subsequently come up with "The Division bell", which I find to be one of their best.
I know there’s more chance of Scotland winning the World Cup, but I am still optimistic that there is one more great Pink Floyd album yet to come.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Bryan
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 16:06
The Floyd never jumped the shark. They were about to after The Wall, but then they rebounded with the fantastic Division Bell.
|
Posted By: Rain
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 17:12
NEVER, now matter how lost it looks, theres always something new, something strange something thats worth saving the album for.
For example, i Would says, Guilmours Floyd, but there's learning to fly, sorrow, Coming back to life, high hopes, what do you want from me? and so and so, thats worth saving both albums. About A new album, I truly consider the option of a new show, of even (let's put our hands together and pray to our lord) a bands reunion, for Syd Barrets death, I know it would suck, but poor madcap has been sick for a long time, and anything leading to a floyd re-union, can't be that bad
------------- And the meek shall inheret the earth - Niel Peart
|
Posted By: Fitzcarraldo
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 18:14
Well, I'm on record in my Archives review of this album as saying that *for me* it was all downhill after DSOTM. I'm in a minority (of one, probably) but they just never sounded as good again to me. Sure I can listen to the later stuff, but it just does not have the magic that DSOTM and some of the earlier stuff had. Sorry guys, just my own view.
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 18:43
I never particularly liked DSOTM but I've always liked The Wall.I recently bought Animals and I like that a lot as well.I also like Meddle.So that basically leaves me confused I suppose
|
Posted By: The Prognaut
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 20:05
They never knew of jumping no shark at all!!!!!!! 
------------- break the circle
reset my head
wake the sleepwalker
and i'll wake the dead
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 20:22
I agree with Land... they never jumped the shark!!!
Well maybe when Roger put Pink Floyd's name on The Final Cut... but that was just a small moment out of an otherwise flawless career.... I will go on record as saying I just love AMLOR... even the controversial "Dogs of War". Actually I love that song even more on DSOT... but I still love both of the Post-Waters albums. Actually The Division Bell is my third favorite PF album after Animals and DSOTM...
Now if we could just convince Dave that he needs to do another one... that would be excellent!! I just love his guitar on Alan Parson's new cd.... it still wails like no other...
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 20:29
I said after Roger left. While the Wall and Final Cut seemed more like Roger Water solo's(retrospectively of course) they are both still solid Albums.
A Momentary Lapse of Reason was fairly mediocre and lacked the darkness and excellent lyrics that normally accompanied Pink Floyd Albums from 73' and on. Roger Waters defined it best when he labeled the album as a decent forgery....I Agree(100%)
The Division Bell is a better effort no doubt but there has always been one thing that drove me crazy about that album. David Gilmour's singing has for some reason been reduced to speaking through the lyrics rather than singing them. Perhaps old age hasn't been kind to the mans vocal chords.
It has always bugged me a great deal that Echoes(the compilation) had 5 songs from those 2 albums. I could have forgiven 1 from each but I see 5 as a David Gilmour ego driven stroke fest. There was definately better material to choose from.
Still with all that said Pink Floyd never truly sold out like Genesis, Yes and perhaps even ELP. For that i will always hold a great deal of respect for them
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 21:35
In this case I go with the majoprity of the members who have voted here i believe PF never jumped the shark.
Of course there are great and other not so good or even bad albums (Especially when Roger left), but the sound of Floyd was always present in their music. Surely they changed, but they never sold ot as many other prog' bands did in some moment of their careers.
Even their worst album has a couple of great tracks.
Iván
|
Posted By: Cesar Inca
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 22:45
I voted on 'The Final Cut' moment, but it was only momentary. The band sold itself out into the intellectually rich but musically poor musical world of Roger Waters. It was time Waters left, and so he did... and then Gillmour was able to do some great stuff under the PF moniker. Sure, he was the last guy to join the band, but from day one his guitar playing and occasiona lwriting allowed PF shine in full splendour in the 70s.
Why 'The Final Cut'? Because it was the not so inventive continuation to 'The Wall', making itself a mere 'Wall' self-parody. Pity, since there are some good songs in there.
Regards.
|
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: September 06 2004 at 23:47
I see Pink Floyd as four bands (really?) separated by crucial personnel and stylistic differences:
The original Barrett Floyd, a whimsical psychedelic band with incredibly unique acid pop songs, very much a part of the times...but one of the best of its era. I guess hardcore Syd fans would say that Gilmour ruined the band, but the truth is that Syd ruined himself and the band incredibly managed to do a phoenix turn.
The Democratic Floyd (probably a misnomer, but the best I could come up with), an experimental, almost avant-garde band but with deep ties to the blues and pastoral acoustic Englishness. A band truly expanding its horizons, and the horizons of anyone who listened. The most obvious choices to represent the period are Meddle and Ummagumma, but the More OST is possibly an even more pure representation.
The Thoughtful Floyd (or the Waters Floyd, although his domination was less complete at first), a more introspective and chillingly critical band with increasing radio potential despite no punches being pulled...the initial warm eeriness of DSOTM develops into a more hard-hitting but isolated stance, with the songwriting skills finally rivalling their debut album after a decade of more sound-based exploration. I don't care for the Wall or the Final Cut, personally, but that may just be the contempt bred of familiarity.
The Friendly Floyd (or the Gilmour Floyd, or even the Pop Floyd), a less confrontational but increasingly accessible group of mellow middle-aged professionals who know how to compose and perform like few others; they managed to regain the warmth and atmosphere that dwindled a bit after DSOTM even if the actual songs were less essential. Like the Rolling Stones, they can still put on a great show and even release a song or two that stands up to their formidable early discography. My least favorite of the four (although I prefer Division Bell to either the Wall or Final Cut) but I'd still stop well short of dismissing them.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 04:30
richardh wrote:
I never particularly liked DSOTM but I've always liked The Wall.I recently bought Animals and I like that a lot as well.I also like Meddle.So that basically leaves me confused I suppose  |
I agree about DSOTM. I think there was some good ideas on that album, but perhaps they hadn't matured as enough as conceptual songwriters to really pull it off. It seemed to me that they were trying to make a 'wierd' album.
I much prefer 'Meddle' 'WYWH' 'Animals' and 'The Wall'
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: Dragon Phoenix
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 04:54
For me WYWH was their top, but I see "jumping the shark" as deliberately changing their sound to sell more records. That's what Genesis did after Duke, but I don't think PF ever did it.
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 08:15
I dont think they ever did either. They could never really be accused of selling out. They made their name on a very unique sound & style, which I dont think changed that much after Meddle.
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 12:50
Ah they were rubbish after Waters left.
I can't stand his solo stuff and think he's a miserable, bitter, thoroughly unpleasant indiviodual but Floyd were pretty crap without Roger.
Where's the tension, the angst, the push and pull between magalomaniac miserabilist Water and curmudgeonly axe hero Gilmour. That's the dynamic that made such sweet music from Meddle to The Wall.
Okay, The Final Cut was pushing it a little (it's singularly the most depressing record I've ever heard) but even it has gems like most of the first side and the title track.
Afterwards what was left. Dave Gilmour hooking up with Dream Academy frontman and protege Nick Laid Clowes to write some hopeless words, a drummer who couldn't play anymore and a keyboard player more fragile than a roomful of china. Momentary Lapse is bland and vacuous, Division Bell even more so...
David Gilmour is probably my favourite guitar player on the planet but he's always been a songwriter of very intermittent quality. His solo albums are wishy washy affairs and his guardianship of Floyd has been characterised by the same mediocrity.
I'm no Waters apologist (Radio KAOS makes Division Bell look like Sgt Pepper's) but neither Floyd nor Waters were ever any good without each other.
And David seems to finally have realised it by putting Floyd out to pasture and setting himself up as an ageing gunslinger for hire. Good man.
They should all have called it a day after The Final Cut.
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 12:58
I agree with our Irish friend, same thing with :
Fish-Marillion
Gabriel-Genesis
Neal Morse-Spock´s Beard
Some people just can´t be replaced 
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:12
Velvetclown wrote:
I agree with our Irish friend, same thing with :
Fish-Marillion
Gabriel-Genesis
Neal Morse-Spock´s Beard
Some people just can´t be replaced 
|
Wow I find myself agreeing with the Clover Clad fiend on this one!!
-------------
|
Posted By: Cesar Inca
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:19
I disagree: AMLOR and TDB are way better than TFC... while not being masterpieces, indeed. But generally speaking, tracks such as 'On the Turning Away', 'Terminal Frost', 'Dogs of War', the two instrumentals of TDB, 'High Hopes', and TDB's track 3 (I forgot the title, the one with prominent acoustic guitar and that eerie carnival-like interlude) are good enough to give artistic dignity to those albums, and make them better tha TFC. At least, IMHO...
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:20
I so disagree... The thought that they might of quit after Roger left and we wouldn't have gotten TDB... thats just too sad to contemplate.
Those that say the lyrics to AMLOR or TDB don't measure up to earlier PF works in just looking for grim. There is nothing wrong with the words on the last 2 PF albums. AMLOR had "On the Turning Away"... I don't care who wrote it... the words are very emotional, poignant and beautiful. Sorrow is some of David's finest work... guitar and lyrics.. Atleast when I listen to AMLOR and TDB.. I can hear FLoyd... unlike The Final Cut... where I can't hear them at all. And that guitar opening from "Coming Back to Life"... thats a sheer moment in ecstasy!
"No more turning away From the weak and the weary No more turning away From the coldness inside Just a world that we all must share It's not enough just to stand and stare Is it only a dream that there'll be No more turning away?"
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: arcer
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:20
Gabriel and Genesis - tough call. I still like some of the stuff on Trick and Wind and Wuthering and Duke's great. Even (and I know I'm gonna get shot for this) Abacab has it's moments (title track, Dodo) But you're right ... it's the same thing, Gabriel brought a tension, some slightly crazed vision that pushed the others to the edge of their abilities to fnd the soundtrack to accompany him. When Collins took over it was, as that famous expression goes, kinda like being savaged by a dead sheep. No drive, no internal turmoil, just a watered down version. Occasionally that distills into something potent but by and large its pretty insipid.
As for Marillion and Spock's Beard - can't comment don't know enough about either (once had script and fugazi but ditched them pretty quick) but I have signed up for current Marillion's free sampler out of curiosity...
And, finally..... clover clad?????
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:22
Oooops !!!!!!! Wrong thread.
Sorry just searching my body for some albums    
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:25
did you check in your pants? 
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 13:31
Yes, not a sausage  
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 15:04
I AM SHOCKED..I am surprised all you guys outside of the US know what Happy Days and jumping the shark mean!!!
Sometimes I forget most of you do not hail within the US
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 15:30
gdub411 wrote:
I AM SHOCKED..I am surprised all you guys outside of the US know what Happy Days and jumping the shark mean!!!
Sometimes I forget most of you do not hail within the US
|
It's amazing how much I've learnt since we got TV here last month! 
|
Posted By: Reed Lover
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 15:33
Yes and t'internet shortly after!
-------------
|
Posted By: threefates
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 18:12
I'm still amazed that they are actually other prog bands besides ELP, Pink Floyd & Yes... well, so I've heard here anyway...
------------- THIS IS ELP
|
Posted By: Fragile
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 20:13
I have never adhered to the great Pink Floyd thing I really like them I do, but they are just not up there with Yes and Genesis(Gabriel) of course and others of the time.My faves are Wish you were here and The Division Bell. What puzzled me most was their media acceptance almost everywhere where others were almost spat on, but jumping this bloody shark thing probably not.
|
Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: September 07 2004 at 20:31
Well I didn't mean to offend anyone I just didn't think a show like Happy Days(so-so at it's best) would merit attention from anyone outside of the US
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: September 08 2004 at 02:03
Well we are waiting for The Flower Kings and Pain Of Salvation to be Jumping The Herring some time soon over here Happy Daze are here again.
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: Carlos
Date Posted: September 08 2004 at 14:04
I have to admit that my interest to the band decreased when RW left...When I heard TFC, I felt something (not someone) was missing... It was the great teaming when the band played together, so for me TFC was not a really good album, just because of that...It's noticeable how the rest of the band tore apart each other, definetly that was not PF...However, Gilmour's era is not excellent , yet not the worst... You can hear great guitar works and progressive sound in those records...
Hence.. They never jump the shark
------------- Democracy=A form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people...
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: September 08 2004 at 14:11
gdub411 wrote:
Well I didn't mean to offend anyone I just didn't think a show like Happy Days(so-so at it's best) would merit attention from anyone outside of the US |
No offence taken G, just having a banter! 
|
Posted By: Rain
Date Posted: September 08 2004 at 17:22
Well, I can say, I can never heard of no happy days, or jumping the shark. But I sometimes catch beverly hills 90210 (90251, ejej, why?), does tht count????
No, now I think we all know what jumping the shark is because there was a previouse Jumping the shark thread were it explain the hole shark episode, PATETICO, BOLOOOOOO!
------------- And the meek shall inheret the earth - Niel Peart
|
Posted By: James Lee
Date Posted: September 09 2004 at 08:11
As long as you provincial foreigners got to see David Hasselhoff, we're well represented. Although I think he had more of a witty, metrosexual weltschmerz in Knight Rider- Baywatch was a little too self-indulgently artsy for me.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/sollipsist/?chartstyle=kaonashi">
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: September 09 2004 at 08:22
Yes a bit pretentious
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 06:51
What does jumping the shark mean?
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: PROGMAN
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 09:03
UM........Jumping the Shark??????????
------------- CYMRU AM BYTH
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 11:59
First off, Roger Waters is a spoiled little b*tch (and that's the short version) If he didn't want to be in Floyd anymore, by God, there would be no more Floyd at all!!! Secondly, I don't think Floyd ever jumped the shark because they knew to release stuff more sparsely as their career got older. They kind of starved their fans before they fed 'em to be sure that their records would do well. Smart marketing scheme, eh? All of their material is quality and they never put out a record that was crap IMO.
|
Posted By: salmacis
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 12:02
Even though 'Momentary Lapse Of Reason' is below par AOR material, in my opinion, it's not fair to say that they jumped the shark with that album- else you would be disgregarding 'The Division Bell' and the excellent 'Pulse' live set.
Therefore, I voted for 'never'.
|
Posted By: sigod
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 12:17
Jumping The Shark?....more like Hopping The Bush.
------------- I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 13:36
Snow Dog wrote:
What does jumping the shark mean? |
Will no one answer my question?
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 14:24
SD,
Here's a couple of threads which explain, read the first post in each.
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=270 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=270
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1185 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1185
And here's a poll re Yes on the same subject.
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1387 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1387
|
Posted By: Cluster One
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 14:55
PINK FLOYD never jumped the shark.
But didn't Led Zep have some fun with a shark and a groupie once?
------------- Marmalade...I like marmalade.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 15:02
Ok thanks Easy
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: valravennz
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 19:08
I dont think PF 'jumped the shark'. "The Final Cut" was an irritating blip in what until then had been some amazing pieces of work. IMO Roger Waters departure was inevitable - I mean, how much more depressed can one get and write music to compliment that mood??
The following albums after TFC were great with some very memorable standout tracks. I, like many others, am fond of "The Division Bell" and "A Momentary Lapse of Reason" . The PF sound has been consistant since David Gilmour joined and did not suffer in the absence of RW who, in my opinion, is highly overrated as the driving force behind PF.
-------------
"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp
|
Posted By: Hierophant
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 19:41
Easy Livin wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
I AM SHOCKED..I am surprised all you guys outside of the US know what Happy Days and jumping the shark mean!!!
Sometimes I forget most of you do not hail within the US
|
It's amazing how much I've learnt since we got TV here last month!  |
Im in the US and don't know what it means. Is that due to lack of sun?
|
Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: April 13 2005 at 22:01
Floyd has always released at least pretty good material, and for that, I believe they never jumped the shark. I love everything pre-The Wall, but when The Wall came around, I thought they were heading toward going downhill. I still liked The Wall though- but become concerned. I'll forgive them on The Final Cut because Waters decided to make a solo album under Pink Floyd.
|
Posted By: Olympus
Date Posted: August 24 2005 at 02:51
Pink Floyd never jumped the shark.
------------- "Let's get the hell away from this Eerie-ass piece of work so we can get on with the rest of our eerie-ass day"
|
Posted By: fender101
Date Posted: August 24 2005 at 04:54
Never. But between the three eras syd-rog-dave I could see some different opinions
|
|