Time to rate Dark Side of the Moon
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Top 10s and lists
Forum Description: List all your favourites here
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=68543
Printed Date: August 18 2025 at 11:38 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Time to rate Dark Side of the Moon
Posted By: paganinio
Subject: Time to rate Dark Side of the Moon
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:10
Rate every track, the cover art, the female vocals, and then the album (out of five). The album rating is not necessarily an average of the track ratings. Also tell us: how dark do you think this album is (out of five)?
my answer: Speak to Me, Breathe   On the Run  Time    The Great Gig in the Sky   Money Us and Them    Any Colour You Like   Brain Damage    Eclipse  
cover art  female vocals    album    level of darkness  
so why's this in the Top 10 and Lists forum? because it's a list of ratings!
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:13
my answer: Speak to Me, Breathe      On the Run  Time     The Great Gig in the Sky     Money    Us and Them    Any Colour You Like     Brain Damage    Eclipse    
cover art      female vocals    album      level of darkness 
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:21
You don't like Breathe Paganinio? Weirdo
|
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:30
Everything is pefect on that album, don't even question it, perfect 
------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:32
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:36
^ How come, they were pre-1989 
|
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:51
My Answer: Speak to Me ** Breathe **** On the Run ** Time **** The Great Gig in the Sky ***** Money ***** Us and Them ***** Any Colour You Like **** Brain Damage ***** Eclipse **** Cover Art ***** Female Vocals **** Album **** Darkness Level (?) **
-------------
|
Posted By: Progist
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:58
Five stars for all except 'level of darkness', as I don't know what it mean; but probably 5 anyway
-------------
|
Posted By: yasko
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 11:59
speak to me * Breathe **** On the run ***** Time **** great gig in the sky ***** Money * Us and them ***** Any colour you like ***** Brain damage ***** Eclipse ***** Cover art ***** Female vocals *** Album ***** Darkness level no = Philosophical level = *****
|
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 12:01
Speak to Me **
Breathe ***
On the Run **
Time ****
The Great Gig in the Sky ****
Money ***
Us and Them ****
Any Colour You Like ***
Brain Damage ****
Eclipse ****
Cover Art *****
Female Vocals ****
Album ****
Darkness level ****
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 12:05
Speak to Me, Breathe      On the Run      Time     The Great Gig   Money    Us and Them      Any Colour You Like      Brain Damage      Eclipse     
cover art      female vocals  
album      level of darkness  
|
Posted By: DisgruntledPorcupine
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 12:49
Posted By: A B Negative
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 13:39
Speak to Me, Breathe      On the Run     Time     The Great Gig in the Sky Money    Us and Them     Any Colour You Like     Brain Damage     Eclipse    
cover art     female vocals  album      level of darkness   
------------- "The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 13:46
Or you can read my review of the album.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 13:56
Epignosis wrote:
Or you can read my review of the album.
|
Just have, and agree with every single word of your thoughts Robert. This album is a phenomenon and crucial to the history of this great genre. The lyrics and Waters thoughts are timeless, and I guarantee this will still be listened to in 200 years time.
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: kole
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 14:11
Speak to Me *** Breathe **** On the Run **
Time ***** The Great Gig in the Sky *****
Money **** Us and Them *****
Any Colour You Like ****
Brain Damage **** Eclipse ***** Cover Art *****
Female Vocals ****
Album ***** Darkness level ****
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 15:38
Speak to Me, Breathe (3,not a bad start)
On the Run (2, dull and dated) Time (5, my favourite Floyd track)
The Great Gig in the Sky (4, unique!) Money ( 3, never really liked this but still very recognisable and different) Us and Them (4 ,great track) Any Colour You Like (3 ,okay nice synth work) Brain Damage ( 3, beginning to lose interest at this point) Eclipse (2 , good its finished!)
cover art (3 , does nothing for me but is very original and helped sell zillions) female vocals (5 , one of the best features of this album) album (3 , much prefer the next 3 albums) level of darkness (1 , laughable to call this 'dark')
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 15:42
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me
|
Waters didn't sing on DSotM.
|
Posted By: idiotPrayer
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 16:15
Speak to Me, Breathe     On the Run     Time     The Great Gig in the Sky    Money    Us and Them   Any Colour You Like    Brain Damage     Eclipse    
cover art      female vocals    album      level of darkness  ish, occasionally more/less
|
Posted By: Ronnie Pilgrim
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 16:36
I agree with those who think that "The Great Gig in the Sky" and "Us and Them" are no less than 5 star affairs. They also demonstrate the creative contributions of Rick Wright, in case there were any doubts. OP - shame on you for missing the mark on those two tracks! 
I don't understand how anyone can rate "Eclipse" more than one star, either. Poor musical composition, worse lyrics, and the only positive thing about it is that it makes that droll song before it seem better by contrast.
|
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 16:55
Posted By: DisgruntledPorcupine
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 17:52
JLocke wrote:
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me  |
Waters didn't sing on DSotM.
|
He did, but only on Brain Damage and Eclipse.
|
Posted By: DisgruntledPorcupine
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 17:55
Ronnie Pilgrim wrote:
I agree with those who think that "The Great Gig in the Sky" and "Us and Them" are no less than 5 star affairs. They also demonstrate the creative contributions of Rick Wright, in case there were any doubts. OP - shame on you for missing the mark on those two tracks!
I don't understand how anyone can rate "Eclipse" more than one star, either. Poor musical composition, worse lyrics, and the only positive thing about it is that it makes that droll song before it seem better by contrast. |
I agree with the Us And Them statement.
However, The Great Gig In The Sky is awful. Just screaming over a piano, nothing else.
And Eclipse works just amazing as an album closer. As a single track, it's nothing much. But as a closer, it's breathtaking.
And Brain Damage is a fun little song I think.
|
Posted By: UndercoverBoy
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 18:12
Speak to Me/Breathe: 4 Stars
On the Run: 4 Stars
Time: 5 Stars
The Great Gig in the Sky: 5 Stars
Money: 4 Stars
Us and Them: 4 Stars
Any Colour You Like: 4 Stars
Brain Damage: 4 Stars
Eclipse: 3 Stars
Cover Art: 4 Stars
Femal Vocals: 3 Stars (2 if it weren't for "Gig")
Overall Album: 4 Stars
Darkness Level: 2 Stars (there is much creepier stuff out there.)
|
Posted By: Ronnie Pilgrim
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 19:26
DT-PT wrote:
However, The Great Gig In The Sky is awful. Just screaming over a piano, nothing else.
|
Well, this is just incorrect and not a matter of opinion.
DT-PT wrote:
And Eclipse works just amazing as an album closer. As a single track, it's nothing much. But as a closer, it's breathtaking.
|
My opinion will remain the same. The lyrics are about as imaginative as "Every Breath You Take" by The Police. And, coincidentally, "Eclipse" does not take my breath away, in case The Police are watching me. 
DT-PT wrote:
And Brain Damage is a fun little song I think. |
Yeah, so never mind the "screaming" if you find the song "fun." To me, it is lyrically droll and musically uninteresting. Edgar Allen Poe writes with creative genious about insanity. Roger Waters writes at a tenth grade level on the subject.
|
Posted By: TheClosing
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 19:33
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me
| Waters >>> Zappa
Truth.
|
Posted By: Ronnie Pilgrim
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 20:27
TheClosing wrote:
|
Zappa had a brain fart. Waters smelled it and wrote The Wall.
Opinion.
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 20:27
Pardon me. Waters doesn't sing in the lead on DSotM.
|
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 20:59
Posted By: TheClosing
Date Posted: June 21 2010 at 23:26
Ronnie Pilgrim wrote:
Zappa had a brain fart. Waters smelled it and wrote The Wall.
Opinion. |
The Grand Wazoo tripped on a shoe, and suddenly caught amnesia. A child at heart Zappa did fart, and thought to himself eureka!
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 00:50
I used to hate Great Gig In The Sky until I saw it performed live by The Australian Pink Floyd.There is nothing else like it in prog.
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 03:27
The Album Is Dark 5 out of 5
my overall ratings minus the female vocal rating because thats unrateable 5/5
Overall shibumi
100 out of 100
never really understood this album trackwise, like it sounds (the order) different every time
The most beautiful prog album ever imo 
more tea anyone
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 03:39
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me  | now Walter you Know you be digging this album. and Whiney roger Waters? you are so correct hated it
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: progman2010
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 04:08
Posted By: Ronnie Pilgrim
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 06:56
TheClosing wrote:
The Grand Wazoo tripped on a shoe, and suddenly caught amnesia. A child at heart Zappa did fart, and thought to himself eureka!
|
|
Posted By: Hawkwise
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 07:32
Seems bit weird to me to try separate the tracks as i see the whole thing as one complete Masterpiece !!!.
-------------
|
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 11:03
Posted By: Klogg
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 14:57
I'm the only one that thinks that DSotM is boring?
|
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 15:00
No, you're not.
WalterDigsTunes wrote:
Anything with whiny roger waters and his do-nothing crew gets a low rating from me
|
-------------
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: June 22 2010 at 15:17
The Group Pink Floyd is weird. Rogers is a crybaby. They all probably argue like crazy. Gilmores a recluse.
Tick toc drives me crazy
though I'd someth...nevermind
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: esky
Date Posted: June 23 2010 at 14:05
Posted By: yanch
Date Posted: June 24 2010 at 06:50
Speak to Me/Breathe: *** On the Run: *** Time: ***** The Great Gig in the Sky: *** Money: *** Us and Them: ***** Any Colour You Like: *** Brain Damage: **** Eclipse: *** Cover Art: **** Femal Vocals: *** Overall Album: *** Darkness Level: **
Have never been a big fan of this album. Us and Them is IMHO the best song on the album. It did raise the bar and change how albums were produced, which was a huge impact on the recording industry, but musically I never thought this a particularly interesting Floyd album. What it did do for Pink Floyd, was make them more accessible to a wider audience. Musically it is not there greatest work.
|
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: June 24 2010 at 07:09
Speak to Me/Breathe: **
On the Run: **
Time: *****
The Great Gig in the Sky: ***
Money: **
Us and Them: *****
Any Colour You Like: ***
Brain Damage: *****
Eclipse: *****
Cover Art: *
Female Vocals: ***
Overall Album: ***
Darkness Level: *
Last two tracks are easily the best for me.
-------------
|
Posted By: Xanthous
Date Posted: June 28 2010 at 21:14
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 20:24
Hmmm ... well, I can now cross this fellow off my list of people to trust when it comes to recommending good music.
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 20:32
I can't quite understand how anyone can rate anything on this album (or Wish You Were Here) as anything less than perfection. Every track is without equal. For that matter Pink Floyd is without equal.
I have to wonder if those who think to rate "On The Run" or "Eclipse" or any of these tracks as sub par, are the sort of people who think a movie is boring unless it has a car chase and a karate scene in it.
|
Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 20:52
Perfect album. No need for a breakdown... It should be taken as a whole, really.
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 20:54
Perfect?.................No
But it's so transcendental for the evolution of Progressive Rock, that I can't rate it with less than 5 stars.
There's Prog before DSOTM and after DSOTM.
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 21:13
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Perfect?.................No
|
Explain this.
Come on Ivan, I know you're better than just saying "it's not perfect". I gave you fuel so let's start a f**king fire!! 
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 23:07
Not need for fire it's simple for me.
According to my taste, even when DSOTM has superb moments like Claire Torry's solo, Money is simply not in the level, and makes the difference between a perfect album and an extremely good one..
But if you ask 1,000 persons which Prog Rock album you are familiar with, probably 1,000 will say Dark Side of the Moon before any other one, and this deserves a lot of recognition.
Love the female chorus and find the art cobver very imaginative.
Iván
BTW: I never give individual ratings to songs and obtain an average, will have to live with this, specially being almost a conceptual album.
-------------
|
Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 23:17
but wouldn't you consider it "progressive" that a band like Floyd would come off of albums like "clouds" and "Meddle" to create a hit single out of Money?
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 23:28
King By-Tor wrote:
but wouldn't you consider it "progressive" that a band like Floyd would come off of albums like "clouds" and "Meddle" to create a hit single out of Money? |
I don't know if Money if Progressive or not, I simply believe sounds out of place in the context of DSOTM.
Iván
EDIT: Being Progressive or not, has no relation with being perfect or not.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: July 03 2010 at 23:59
perfection all held within the ear of the listener
.
Money has become a bit like Stairway To heaven grossly overplayed. That shouldn't affect an opinion on the album as a whole though either so go figure.
------------- <font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:02
I don't consider Dark Side of the Moon a prog album at all. It's pretty much all pop songs.
And yet, I consider it a masterpiece of prog.
So there.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:03
Epignosis wrote:
I don't consider Dark Side of the Moon a prog album at all. It's pretty much all pop songs.
And yet, I consider it a masterpiece of prog.
So there.
|
Great gig in the sky - pop?
Speak to me - pop?
On the run- pop?
Any color you like - pop?
------------- <font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:11
Chris S wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I don't consider Dark Side of the Moon a prog album at all. It's pretty much all pop songs.
And yet, I consider it a masterpiece of prog.
So there.
|
Great gig in the sky - pop?
Speak to me - pop?
On the run- pop?
Any color you like - pop?
|
"Speak to Me" is not a song. "On the Run" is not a song. "Any Colour You Like" is not a song.
However..."Breathe," "Time," "Money," "Us and Them," and "Brain Damage" are pop songs. That's over half the album.
Still one of my favorite Floyd albums.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:13
I must have been crunching lettuce instead of listening to songs all these years then
------------- <font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:20
Chris S wrote:
I must have been crunching lettuce instead of listening to songs all these years then |
A song is something that has lyrics- you "sing" a "song."
Definition of a song: a short musical composition with words.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:20
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:25
That is just plain pedantic
------------- <font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:28
Chris S wrote:
That is just plain pedantic |
I always try to refer to instrumentals as pieces, if I don't want to be specific I just refer to it as a track, that seems all encompassing enough for me.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 00:30
Chris S wrote:
That is just plain pedantic |
No...just true. It's a pitfall of the English language. If you call something a "song," there should be lyrics. Otherwise, it's a "piece," "instrumental." or "tune," but not a "song."
That's what the word means, plain and simple.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 01:01
Epignosis wrote:
Chris S wrote:
That is just plain pedantic |
No...just true. It's a pitfall of the English language. If you call something a "song," there should be lyrics. Otherwise, it's a "piece," "instrumental." or "tune," but not a "song."
That's what the word means, plain and simple.
|
Damn straight, Robert. Tell 'em!!!
I'm in a pissy mood tonight, so watching anybody get corrected tickles me pink at the moment.
|
Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 01:11
So am I but I'll leave my oxford dictionary on my son's shelf. Not important but to call DSOTM a collection a great pop songs would leave my friends reeling in laughter......Like.....did we really do that?   + ( That one's for richard )
------------- <font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 01:14
By the way, John Martyn is fantastic. (I'm referring to your avatar, Chris. Not trying to change the subject)
|
Posted By: ergaster
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 08:59
stegokitty wrote:
I can't quite understand how anyone can rate anything on this album (or Wish You Were Here) as anything less than perfection.Every track is without equal. For that matter Pink Floyd is without equal.
I have to wonder if those who think to rate "On The Run" or "Eclipse" or any of these tracks as sub par, are the sort of people who think a movie is boring unless it has a car chase and a karate scene in it. |
Okay, I'll bite.
Wish You Were Here--perfection.
DSotM--meh.
Reasons? Emotional resonance. The former does it for me, first note to last. It is an Entire Experience.
I
never disliked Dark Side, but it never got higher than "pretty good,
excellent production, real serious musical competence, some real fine
moments, but overall .... kinda sterile."
So....Meh.
|
Posted By: jplanet
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 10:48
5 huge stars across the board. It's Dark Side of the F**n Moon, for crying out loud. I could listen to it every day and never tire of it - I only skip a few minutes of Any Colour You Like, not because it's filler, but because I'm always too excited to wait to experience the finale...
------------- https://www.facebook.com/ShadowCircus/" rel="nofollow - ..::welcome to the shadow circus::..
|
Posted By: TGM: Orb
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 10:50
Epignosis wrote:
Chris S wrote:
That is just plain pedantic |
No...just true. It's a pitfall of the English language. If you call something a "song," there should be lyrics. Otherwise, it's a "piece," "instrumental." or "tune," but not a "song."
That's what the word means, plain and simple.
|
If there are vocals (i.e. singing?) with no lyrics per se, what do you call that?
|
Posted By: jplanet
Date Posted: July 04 2010 at 10:57
TGM: Orb wrote:
If there are vocals (i.e. singing?) with no lyrics per se, what do you call that?
|
According to Wikipedia's definition of "instrumental":
Some recordings which include brief examples of the human voice are
typically considered instrumentals. Examples include singles with the
following:
- Short verbal interjections (as in " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tequila_%28song%29 - Tequila " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_%28song%29 - Topsy " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wipe_Out_%28song%29 - Wipe Out " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustle_%28song%29 - The Hustle ")
- Repetitive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonsense - nonsense words (e.g., "la la..." (as in " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcutta_%28song%29 - Calcutta ") or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woo_Hoo - Woo Hoo ");
- A short spoken passage (e.g., "To Live Is to Die" by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallica - Metallica );
- Wordless vocal effects, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_%28music%29 - drones (e.g., " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockit - Rockit ");
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocal_percussion - Vocal percussion , such as beatbox B-sides on rap
singles;
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yodeling - Yodeling
(e.g., " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hocus_Pocus_%28song%29 - Hocus Pocus ");
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistling - Whistling
(e.g., " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Was_Kaiser_Bills_Batman - I Was Kaiser Bill's Batman " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonel_Bogey_March - Colonel Bogey March ").
A few songs categorized as instrumentals may even include actual
vocals, if they appear only as a short part of an extended piece (e.g., " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unchained_Melody - Unchained Melody " (Les Baxter) or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TSOP_%28The_Sound_of_Philadelphia%29 - TSOP (The Sound of
Philadelphia) " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pick_Up_The_Pieces - Pick Up The Pieces " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly,_Robin,_Fly - Fly, Robin, Fly " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_It_Any_Way_You_Wanna - Do It Any Way You Wanna " or " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonna_Fly_Now - Gonna
Fly Now " ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Conti - Bill Conti )). Falling just outside that
definition is " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_From_Shaft - Theme From Shaft " by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Hayes - Isaac
Hayes .
------------- https://www.facebook.com/ShadowCircus/" rel="nofollow - ..::welcome to the shadow circus::..
|
Posted By: ten years after
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 05:10
Money is a very good track which would have fitted very nicely on Wish You Were Here. IMO it interrupts the musical concept that otherwise works so beautifully on DSOTM.
|
Posted By: ten years after
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 05:22
Regarding Money on Wish You Were Here I've often thought that the following track listing would work well:
Crazy Diamond (23 minutes)
Money (6.15)
Wish You were Here (5.15)
Have a Cigar (5.15)
Welcome to the Machine (7.15)
DSOTM would be better without Money, WYWH would be better with it.
|
Posted By: DisgruntledPorcupine
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 10:00
^^
Interesting. But I think the title track and Welcome to the Machine should be switched. 
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 10:46
King By-Tor wrote:
Perfect album. No need for a breakdown... It should be taken as a whole, really.
|
Exactly!
It's not an album that's permitted to be played in shuffle mode (neither Wish You Were Here, nor The Wall, for that matter).
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 10:53
[/QUOTE]
"Speak to Me" is not a song. "On the Run" is not a song. "Any Colour You Like" is not a song.
However..."Breathe," "Time," "Money," "Us and Them," and "Brain Damage" are pop songs. That's over half the album.
Still one of my favorite Floyd albums. [/QUOTE]
So if a song, or track, or tune, or piece has a catchy tune, that automatically discredits it as "progressive", and automatically classifies it as "pop"? I suppose that means "Eine Madchen oder Wiebchen" (sp?) by Mozart isn't really "classical"? Couldn't it be that much of what is described as progressive isn't really progressive but regressive, as quite a bit of it has unmemorable tunes and wimpy sounding leading vocalists?
So I wonder then if "Thick As a Brick" is no longer progressive, since it's a rather catchy tune.
|
Posted By: DisgruntledPorcupine
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 11:13
Epignosis wrote:
"Speak to Me" is not a song. "On the Run" is not a song. "Any Colour You Like" is not a song.
However..."Breathe," "Time," "Money," "Us and Them," and "Brain Damage" are pop songs. That's over half the album.
Still one of my favorite Floyd albums.
|
Songs or not, they are still part of the album just as much as the rest, so you can't just ignore them. Thats like saying you should completely disregard instrumentals while looking at an album. And I disagree with Us And Them being pop. 
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 11:18
stegokitty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
"Speak to Me" is not a song. "On the Run" is not a song. "Any Colour You Like" is not a song.
However..."Breathe," "Time," "Money," "Us and Them," and "Brain Damage" are pop songs. That's over half the album.
Still one of my favorite Floyd albums.
|
So if a song, or track, or tune, or piece has a catchy tune, that automatically discredits it as "progressive", and automatically classifies it as "pop"? I suppose that means "Eine Madchen oder Wiebchen" (sp?) by Mozart isn't really "classical"? Couldn't it be that much of what is described as progressive isn't really progressive but regressive, as quite a bit of it has unmemorable tunes and wimpy sounding leading vocalists?
So I wonder then if "Thick As a Brick" is no longer progressive, since it's a rather catchy tune. |
That isn't what Pop means at all. It has nothing to do with catchiness. They are pop because they exhibit a pop structure, which is to say, "verse, chorus, verse, chorus, perhaps a bridge, chorus" or something quite similar. Most of the songs on Dark Side of the Moon are thus Pop songs.
Pop and progressive are not polar opposites either. That's why we have progressive pop (usually found in Crossover).
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 11:22
Posted By: UndercoverBoy
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 11:47
Yeah, "Us and Them" is one of the most simplistic Prog songs ever. I don't get why people are getting so upset over calling it a pop song. Its structure is actually simpler than most pop songs; it doesn't even have a bridge (ditto for "The Court of the Crimson King.")
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 12:33
[/QUOTE]
That isn't what Pop means at all. It has nothing to do with catchiness. They are pop because they exhibit a pop structure, which is to say, "verse, chorus, verse, chorus, perhaps a bridge, chorus" or something quite similar. Most of the songs on Dark Side of the Moon are thus Pop songs.
Pop and progressive are not polar opposites either. That's why we have progressive pop (usually found in Crossover). [/QUOTE]
By that standard the Hymn "How Great Thou Art" would be a pop song. I submit, reality submits that it is not a pop song. And again, this would make "Thick As a Brick" a pop song, and virtually everything by Gentle Giant (my pastor's favourite PR band), and just about every song even made, even including the majority report of King Crimson songs (although they made a "pop" song on their "The Power to Believe" CD, "Happy with What You Have to Be Happy With", where they basically poke fun at all of the cookie cutter hard pop songs on the radio waves (of the Nickleback, Hinder garbage ilk).
But anyway, it'd be nice for you to produce some proof that the rule is, that if a song has verse, chorus, verse, chorus, plus whatever variation, that that ipso facto makes it a "pop" song. A "pop" song in my understanding is called thus because it's popular. And sometimes the public has it right (as per The Beatles) and sometimes they have it wrong (as per boy bands like NKOTB). Sometimes a song/tune/track/piece is just good and everyone recognizes the fact, no matter the structure. No?
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 12:47
Nothing by Pink Floyd can be considered a "pop" song, even "Another Brick In The Wall" because of it's anti-establishment stance can be considered pop, IMO
However, San Tropez ( not sure I have the title correct) could of been a pop hit, because of it's easy sound, not structure. Easy sound pretty much dictates whats "pop"
Regarding "Us and Them". Easy sound, but much too dark and dim. Not "pop"
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 12:51
stegokitty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
That isn't what Pop means at all. It has nothing to do with catchiness. They are pop because they exhibit a pop structure, which is to say, "verse, chorus, verse, chorus, perhaps a bridge, chorus" or something quite similar. Most of the songs on Dark Side of the Moon are thus Pop songs.
Pop and progressive are not polar opposites either. That's why we have progressive pop (usually found in Crossover).
|
By that standard the Hymn "How Great Thou Art" would be a pop song. I submit, reality submits that it is not a pop song. And again, this would make "Thick As a Brick" a pop song, and virtually everything by Gentle Giant (my pastor's favourite PR band), and just about every song even made, even including the majority report of King Crimson songs (although they made a "pop" song on their "The Power to Believe" CD, "Happy with What You Have to Be Happy With", where they basically poke fun at all of the cookie cutter hard pop songs on the radio waves (of the Nickleback, Hinder garbage ilk).
But anyway, it'd be nice for you to produce some proof that the rule is, that if a song has verse, chorus, verse, chorus, plus whatever variation, that that ipso facto makes it a "pop" song. A "pop" song in my understanding is called thus because it's popular.
|
Yes, "How
Great Thou Art" could be called a pop song due to its structure.
How in the world is "Thick as a Brick" a pop song? Virtually everything by Gentle Giant? 
And no, pop in this context is not about being popular per se (except to say that the pop structure is the most popular one and therefore has the widest appeal). If I ask some unknown singer what kind of music he makes and performs, and he says, "I write pop music," then we know he's not meaning popular music (because he isn't popular yet)...yet I still know what he means. How could that be?
Even Genesis understood the basic nature of the pop song...they named an album after it. 
http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/ - http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/
stegokitty wrote:
And sometimes the
public has it right (as per The Beatles) and sometimes they have it
wrong (as per boy bands like NKOTB). Sometimes a song/tune/track/piece
is just good and everyone recognizes the fact, no matter the structure.
No?
|
If a work of music is good, it is an opinion, not a fact.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 14:30
Epignosis wrote:
Yes, "How
Great Thou Art" could be called a pop song due to its structure.
How in the world is "Thick as a Brick" a pop song? Virtually everything by Gentle Giant? 
And no, pop in this context is not about being popular per se (except to say that the pop structure is the most popular one and therefore has the widest appeal). If I ask some unknown singer what kind of music he makes and performs, and he says, "I write pop music," then we know he's not meaning popular music (because he isn't popular yet)...yet I still know what he means. How could that be?
|
To answer the first part, does it not possess verses, refrain, chorus, etc? How is this really any different than a pop song?
To answer the second part, because you and the "popsongwriter" are abusing the English language. Sort of like when people use the word "can" as in "Can I use the bathroom?" The moniker "pop music" refers to it's popularity. Whatever consequential meanings have developed around it are exactly that.
Epignosis wrote:
Even Genesis understood the basic nature of the pop song...they named an album after it. 
http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/ - http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/
|
stegokitty wrote:
And sometimes the
public has it right (as per The Beatles) and sometimes they have it
wrong (as per boy bands like NKOTB). Sometimes a song/tune/track/piece
is just good and everyone recognizes the fact, no matter the structure.
No?
|
Epignosis wrote:
If a work of music is good, it is an opinion, not a fact.
|
Relativistic nonsense. Beethoven's 9th is good, whether anyone living recognizes it or not. Though a man and a cow look at the same sunset, the cow doesn't see it for it's beauty, though it is, objectively, beautiful. And that's a fact.
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 14:31
Epignosis wrote:
Even Genesis understood the basic nature of the pop song...they named an album after it. 
http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/ - http://cnx.org/content/m10842/latest/
|
BTW -- good article. Thanks.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 14:56
stegokitty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Yes, "How
Great Thou Art" could be called a pop song due to its structure.
How in the
world is "Thick as a Brick" a pop song? Virtually everything by Gentle
Giant? 
And no, pop in this
context is not about being popular per se (except to say that the
pop structure is the most popular one and therefore has the
widest appeal). If I ask some unknown singer what kind of music he
makes and performs, and he says, "I write pop music," then we know he's
not meaning popular music (because he isn't popular yet)...yet I
still know what he means. How could that be?
|
To answer the first
part, does it not possess verses, refrain, chorus, etc? How is this
really any different than a pop song?
To answer the
second part, because you and the "popsongwriter" are abusing the English
language. Sort of like when people use the word "can" as in "Can I use
the bathroom?" The moniker "pop music" refers to it's popularity.
Whatever consequential meanings have developed around it are exactly
that. |
"Thick as a Brick"
contains far more than verses, refrains, and choruses. It deviates and
has multiple complex sections, including instrumental passages. It is
not a pop song.
Who's abusing the English language? The word "pop" when it comes to
music refers to that style which would be popular (having the most
appeal). The structure that is the most popular is
verse-chorus-verse-chorus, etc. So this would include most country
music, by the way.
If it makes any difference to you, I have degree in English, and taught
the subject for two years, so I'll be glad to inform you that our
language is what it is because of hundreds of "consequential meanings"
gained and lost over time.
stegokitty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
stegokitty wrote:
And sometimes the
public has it right (as per The Beatles) and sometimes they have it
wrong (as per boy bands like NKOTB). Sometimes a song/tune/track/piece
is just good and everyone recognizes the fact, no matter the structure.
No?
|
If a work of
music is good, it is an opinion, not a fact.
|
Relativistic nonsense. Beethoven's 9th is
good, whether anyone living recognizes it or not. Though a man
and a cow look at the same sunset, the cow doesn't see it for it's
beauty, though it is, objectively, beautiful. And that's a fact. | Then please prove to
me that Beethoven's 9th is good. And don't say it's good because a lot
of people listen to it, like it, or anything of that nature. I want
objective proof.
And just how do you know what a cow sees?------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:08
this is going to be good
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:21
halabalushindigus wrote:
this is going to be good |
I could make you some POPcorn if you like. 
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:24
Epignosis wrote:
halabalushindigus wrote:
this is going to be good |
I could make you some POPcorn if you like. 
|
I've got Cheetos though. 
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:29
Epignosis wrote:
halabalushindigus wrote:
this is going to be good |
I could make you some POPcorn if you like. 
| i have no doubt that you can, Rob, really...now back to what a cow actually sees..
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:34
and Matt, if my avatar meets your avatar on the street..let's just say I like cheetos a whooole lot
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: halabalushindigus
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:51
lets take the song Money actually fits in the "pop" realm, lots of fm play..but nowadays theyv'e censored out the word spelled s-h-eye-t so how does that feel to have a "pop" song now all censored and sh*t thats bs FLOYDnever was and never will be included in any pop genre
-------------
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 15:54
If Dark Side isn't pop (I'm not saying whether it is or isn't, IDK), it is at least more radio friendly than their previous albums.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 16:12
At this point in our program I'd like to remind everyone that I rated the damn album a five.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 16:14
Epignosis wrote:
At this point in our program I'd like to remind everyone that I rated the damn album a five.
|
Your review is excellent, I'm sure I've said that before. And I agreed with it IIRC, it's been a while. 
Reread it, I absolutely agree.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 18:09
I'm going to need some Money up front.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: CinemaZebra
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 19:59
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 21:01
Epignosis wrote:
"Thick as a Brick"
contains far more than verses, refrains, and choruses. It deviates and
has multiple complex sections, including instrumental passages. It is
not a pop song.
Who's abusing the English language? The word "pop" when it comes to
music refers to that style which would be popular (having the most
appeal). The structure that is the most popular is
verse-chorus-verse-chorus, etc. So this would include most country
music, by the way.
If it makes any difference to you, I have degree in English, and taught
the subject for two years, so I'll be glad to inform you that our
language is what it is because of hundreds of "consequential meanings"
gained and lost over time.
|
I can only think of one deviation in TAAB -- and that might simply count as a bridge in a sense.
I thought you just said previously that the word "pop" has nothing to do with whether it's a popular song but of the styling of it, that is, whether it's a simple tune or not. While simple tunes are typically the popular ones, it is the word POPULAR from which "pop" derives.
And, no, it makes no difference to me what your degrees are or what you've taught. Especially in today's public school system there are many people who are ill-fitted to the task. I'm not suggesting that you are in that dreadful category. In fact I believe you probably did a good job of it, simply based on the way you respond. You're intelligent. However, as I said, knowing about the degree and teaching isn't impressive.
And yes, I'm aware of how the English language has evolved from a (mostly) Germanic dialect, with many additions and modifications. At the same time, as per my illustration, while the word "can" is substituted for "may", and while it might be understood contextually, it can cause serious problems in important areas of interpretation, since "can" has to do with ability, and "may" has to do with permission. But that's not the word in question - - the word is "pop", which means popular.
Epignosis wrote:
Then please prove to
me that Beethoven's 9th is good. And don't say it's good because a lot
of people listen to it, like it, or anything of that nature. I want
objective proof.
And just how do you know what a cow sees?
|
Firstly, if you need objective PROOF that Beethoven's 9th is objectively good, then there's a serious disconnect with your mind and reality. Think of it this way -- if suddenly there was a virus that attacked nearly everyone on the planet, causing them to become blithering idiots, and only three people remained who could still read, and whose minds were not affected, when they read Chaucer, or Emerson, or Poe, or Shakespeare they'd be reading great literature, whether the rest of the world knew it or not. It would take years for new people to be born and educated for them to appreciate the aforementioned, but nothing in the literature has changed. It IS good literature, and it takes an enabled mind to appreciate it. And all of the idiots in the world, no matter how much they protest are wrong if they say otherwise.
I don't know what a cow sees, but I know it doesn't appreciate in the same way that a human being does. And let's not continue down this silly road.
|
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: July 05 2010 at 21:14
stegokitty wrote:
I don't know what a cow sees, but I know it doesn't appreciate in the same way that a human being does. And let's not continue down this silly road. |
You've not been on PA long enough then. 
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: July 06 2010 at 09:31
stegokitty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
"Thick as a Brick"
contains far more than verses, refrains, and choruses. It deviates and
has multiple complex sections, including instrumental passages. It is
not a pop song.
Who's abusing the English language? The word "pop" when it comes to
music refers to that style which would be popular (having the most
appeal). The structure that is the most popular is
verse-chorus-verse-chorus, etc. So this would include most country
music, by the way.
If it makes any difference to you, I have degree in English, and taught
the subject for two years, so I'll be glad to inform you that our
language is what it is because of hundreds of "consequential meanings"
gained and lost over time.
|
I can only think of one deviation in TAAB -- and that might simply count as a bridge in a sense.
I thought you just said previously that the word "pop" has nothing to do with whether it's a popular song but of the styling of it, that is, whether it's a simple tune or not. While simple tunes are typically the popular ones, it is the word POPULAR from which "pop" derives.
And, no, it makes no difference to me what your degrees are or what you've taught. Especially in today's public school system there are many people who are ill-fitted to the task. I'm not suggesting that you are in that dreadful category. In fact I believe you probably did a good job of it, simply based on the way you respond. You're intelligent. However, as I said, knowing about the degree and teaching isn't impressive.
And yes, I'm aware of how the English language has evolved from a (mostly) Germanic dialect, with many additions and modifications. At the same time, as per my illustration, while the word "can" is substituted for "may", and while it might be understood contextually, it can cause serious problems in important areas of interpretation, since "can" has to do with ability, and "may" has to do with permission. But that's not the word in question - - the word is "pop", which means popular.
Epignosis wrote:
Then please prove to
me that Beethoven's 9th is good. And don't say it's good because a lot
of people listen to it, like it, or anything of that nature. I want
objective proof.
And just how do you know what a cow sees?
|
Firstly, if you need objective PROOF that Beethoven's 9th is objectively good, then there's a serious disconnect with your mind and reality. Think of it this way -- if suddenly there was a virus that attacked nearly everyone on the planet, causing them to become blithering idiots, and only three people remained who could still read, and whose minds were not affected, when they read Chaucer, or Emerson, or Poe, or Shakespeare they'd be reading great literature, whether the rest of the world knew it or not. It would take years for new people to be born and educated for them to appreciate the aforementioned, but nothing in the literature has changed. It IS good literature, and it takes an enabled mind to appreciate it. And all of the idiots in the world, no matter how much they protest are wrong if they say otherwise.
I don't know what a cow sees, but I know it doesn't appreciate in the same way that a human being does. And let's not continue down this silly road. |
I never said pop didn't come from popular. I said it doesn't mean popular per se. Otherwise all pop songs would be popular, and that's not the case.
And yes, I want objective proof, because you are making an objective assertion. I don't really like Beethoven's Ninth. I don't like The Beatles. I don't like Chaucer. And I don't like Emerson. I mean that.
stegokitty wrote:
And all of the idiots in the world, no matter how much they protest are
wrong if they say otherwise.
|
You can't be wrong about good music. The suggestion that you can is infantile at best, and elitist at worst.
Opinions are like asses. Everybody's got one, and some of them stink.
But every once in a while, you find someone who likes the smell of sh*t.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: stegokitty
Date Posted: July 06 2010 at 12:27
[/QUOTE]
Firstly, if you need objective PROOF that Beethoven's 9th is objectively good, then there's a serious disconnect with your mind and reality. Think of it this way -- if suddenly there was a virus that attacked nearly everyone on the planet, causing them to become blithering idiots, and only three people remained who could still read, and whose minds were not affected, when they read Chaucer, or Emerson, or Poe, or Shakespeare they'd be reading great literature, whether the rest of the world knew it or not. It would take years for new people to be born and educated for them to appreciate the aforementioned, but nothing in the literature has changed. It IS good literature, and it takes an enabled mind to appreciate it. And all of the idiots in the world, no matter how much they protest are wrong if they say otherwise.
I don't know what a cow sees, but I know it doesn't appreciate in the same way that a human being does.
And let's not continue down this silly road.
epignosis wrote:
I never said pop didn't come from popular. I said it doesn't mean popular per se. Otherwise all pop songs would be popular, and that's not the case.
And yes, I want objective proof, because you are making an objective assertion. I don't really like Beethoven's Ninth. I don't like The Beatles. I don't like Chaucer. And I don't like Emerson. I mean that.
|
NGAAAAHHH! Run for the hills! That imaginary disease is REAL!
|
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: July 06 2010 at 12:47
In the world of Pink Floyd.......DSOTM is a progressive album. If you watch any of the PF documentaries, there is one in cycle on BIO TV right now......They all talk about how the album transformed their sound as they really delved into noises, electronic, synths and such. I think we all agree it was a dramatic influence on their next albums as well as on other artists.
Its hard for me to call a song like Money "pop". Because it was never played on "pop radio" or Top20 radio.....Sure it was a huge FM rock radio hit and still is and always will be. Just because its on the radio does not mean its "pop".
Anyhow it is now a classic album in the general genre of Rock...and always will be. It is a progressive album to me because of how PF recorded it and what it did to their sound and thinking going forward.
It will be played by FM rock stations forever............It will be discussed by progressive music followers forever.
Its a 5  album.
-------------
|
|