Print Page | Close Window

35 minutes length

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Top 10s and lists
Forum Description: List all your favourites here
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84330
Printed Date: July 18 2025 at 10:54
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 35 minutes length
Posted By: paganinio
Subject: 35 minutes length
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:08
==List of Classic Era Prog Albums That Are 35 Minutes in Length==

I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.

Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.

Now I'm confused. I really do remember a classic era prog album with the laughable length of 35 minutes. I just can't remember which one. Care to solve the puzzle for me?




-------------



Replies:
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:12
You actually check length of albums to grade them?

Ermm


-------------
http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:15
I fink there are a bunch of GG albums that are short as balls

-------------
I'm so mad that you enjoy a certain combination of noises that I don't


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
Longer than 45 minutes = filler

In non-electronic prog music at least.


-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
I don't listen for length (though when looking into a new band, I buy for length, if at all possible Embarrassed).  I care more about the quality of the music on the album than the quantity. 

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:21
LOL, you're corrupted by the post-modern age.

Any album that exceedes the 50 minutes length is just crap, solid fact, you can check wikipedia. 


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:23
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:


I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.

Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.




Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:24
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:



I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.




Your post took less than 35 seconds to read.  Therefore it is lame.


-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: paganinio
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:42
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.

-------------


Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:45
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.

...Likewise concerning 35 minute album.Approve


Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.


That's what...she said?  Ermm



-------------
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays


Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
I enjoy plenty of very long albums.  I don't require the length to enjoy an album, though.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: colorofmoney91
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:51
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Longer than 45 minutes = filler

In non-electronic prog music at least.


-------------
http://hanashukketsu.bandcamp.com" rel="nofollow - Hanashukketsu


Posted By: presdoug
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:22
In all types of music i love length, it is not essential, but i like it


Posted By: MoodyRush
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:33
Per un Amico is under 35 minutes and every bit a masterpiece. Length doesn't matter as long as the quality of the music is. Quality>Quantity as they say.

-------------
Follow me down to the valley below.
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul.
-Lazarus


Posted By: Canterzeuhl
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 00:45
Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it.


Posted By: 2dogs
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 01:26
Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.


Posted By: Matti
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:06
Originally posted by 2dogs 2dogs wrote:

Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.
 
LOL I'm still alive! Lucky me.


Posted By: Harold-The-Barrel
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:38
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:



I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.




Your post took less than 35 seconds to read.  Therefore it is lame.
 
X 2


-------------
You must be joking.....Take a running jump......


Posted By: JS19
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 04:57
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70 minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.

WHO'S THAT UNDER THE BRIDGE??

Oh and can't you just listen to two 35min albums in a row? If you print of an album cover and glue it onto the top of the second album you can make it look like you're listening to the same album. True story.

I now can't listen to Marillion - Misplaced Childhood without it being followed immediately by The Dillinger Escape Plan - Option Paralysis. They are both half of the same album don't you know?

Originally posted by Canterzeuhl Canterzeuhl wrote:

Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it.

Big smile


-------------


Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:17
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

==List of Classic Era Prog Albums That Are 35 Minutes in Length==

I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".

Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.

Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.

Now I'm confused. I really do remember a classic era prog album with the laughable length of 35 minutes. I just can't remember which one. Care to solve the puzzle for me?



What a load of sh*t. You really think an album is lame due to the fact it's less than 50 minutes or how ever the f**k you grade them? That's really stupid.   


-------------
https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album!
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:39
I think Greenslade albums are short. Check out Time and Tide, I think it is about 30 mins...I thinki I remember a letter of compalint about it in the press.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:43
I usually find myself disappointed at short albums.  I sorted by size and scanned the titles around that length and it's not always the case.  

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:50
Put it this way, I never say, and don't think I ever have said "this album is too short."



-------------
https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album!
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:57
Originally posted by irrelevant irrelevant wrote:

Put it this way, I never say, and don't think I ever have said "this album is too short."


I think I may have done. You wait a year or more for an album and 30 minutes is a bit cheap. i would probably have said the album was a bit short rather bthan too short.

Although Van halen albums usede to around the 30 minmark and  never complaIne so,,,,


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:02
It's easier to make a long album short than a short album long.  Snip snip. Wink

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:20
Originally posted by MoodyRush MoodyRush wrote:

Per un Amico is under 35 minutes and every bit a masterpiece. Length doesn't matter as long as the quality of the music is. Quality>Quantity as they say.

THIS!


-------------


Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:24
I am going to sort my albums in order of running time - OK first cab off the rank is Transatlantic's "More Never Is Enough" which clocks in at a whopping 190 minutes. Of brilliant prog!

Transatlantic More Never Is Enough album cover


-------------


Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 10:30
Of corny w**k, more like

Worst case scenario, if an album is "too short" I listen to it twice


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 10:33
^ It isn't as much w**k as Magma tho....

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:00
ture, but if you have to masturbate all over a drum kit may as well be the best at it


Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:18
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

ture, but if you have to masturbate all over a drum kit may as well be the best at it

But Vander isn't the best at anything.

Sorry I don't want to do this. Unlike you I don't want to put any band down by sl*g.ing the members. You win. I just can't get into your type of trolling.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:45
Truth be told one of the characteristics that got me into the prog was the song and album lengths. I mean 10 min. songs are just cool, however many can suffer from filler. 


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 12:05
Originally posted by 2dogs 2dogs wrote:

Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.
\

LOL

My thought was, if someone can listen to it for 30 minutes and not kill themselves, couldn't they go another 5-10 minutes?





-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: 2dogs
Date Posted: January 20 2012 at 01:24
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

It's easier to make a long album short than a short album long.  Snip snip. Wink

"Neu! 2" where they ran out of money half way through and resorted to playing tracks at half speed, double speed, sticking fingers in tape machines etc.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk