35 minutes length
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Top 10s and lists
Forum Description: List all your favourites here
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84330
Printed Date: July 18 2025 at 10:54 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: 35 minutes length
Posted By: paganinio
Subject: 35 minutes length
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:08
==List of Classic Era Prog Albums That Are 35 Minutes in Length==
I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".
Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.
Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.
Now I'm confused. I really do remember a classic era prog album with the laughable length of 35 minutes. I just can't remember which one. Care to solve the puzzle for me?
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: The Truth
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:12
You actually check length of albums to grade them?

------------- http://blindpoetrecords.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Slaughternalia
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:15
I fink there are a bunch of GG albums that are short as balls
------------- I'm so mad that you enjoy a certain combination of noises that I don't
|
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
Longer than 45 minutes = filler
In non-electronic prog music at least.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
|
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:17
I don't listen for length (though when looking into a new band, I buy for length, if at all possible ). I care more about the quality of the music on the album than the quantity.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:21
LOL, you're corrupted by the post-modern age.
Any album that exceedes the 50 minutes length is just crap, solid fact, you can check wikipedia.
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:23
paganinio wrote:
I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".
Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.
Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.
|
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:24
paganinio wrote:
I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".
Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.
|
Your post took less than 35 seconds to read. Therefore it is lame.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: paganinio
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:42
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70
minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They
enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.
-------------
|
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:45
paganinio wrote:
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70
minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They
enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.
|
...Likewise concerning 35 minute album. 
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
paganinio wrote:
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70
minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They
enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.
|
That's what...she said? 
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: SaltyJon
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:49
I enjoy plenty of very long albums. I don't require the length to enjoy an album, though.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Salty_Jon" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: colorofmoney91
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 21:51
stonebeard wrote:
Longer than 45 minutes = filler
In non-electronic prog music at least. |
------------- http://hanashukketsu.bandcamp.com" rel="nofollow - Hanashukketsu
|
Posted By: presdoug
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:22
In all types of music i love length, it is not essential, but i like it
|
Posted By: MoodyRush
Date Posted: January 18 2012 at 22:33
Per un Amico is under 35 minutes and every bit a masterpiece. Length doesn't matter as long as the quality of the music is. Quality>Quantity as they say.
------------- Follow me down to the valley below.
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul.
-Lazarus
|
Posted By: Canterzeuhl
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 00:45
Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it.
|
Posted By: 2dogs
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 01:26
Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem.
|
Posted By: Matti
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:06
2dogs wrote:
Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem. |
 I'm still alive! Lucky me.
|
Posted By: Harold-The-Barrel
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 03:38
Epignosis wrote:
paganinio wrote:
I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".
Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.
|
Your post took less than 35 seconds to read. Therefore it is lame.
|
X 2
------------- You must be joking.....Take a running jump......
|
Posted By: JS19
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 04:57
paganinio wrote:
You people are just jealous cos you don't find enjoyment in the new 70
minutes+ masterpieces that came out in the last ten years. I do. They
enrich my life in a way you'll never get to experience.
|
WHO'S THAT UNDER THE BRIDGE??
Oh and can't you just listen to two 35min albums in a row? If you print of an album cover and glue it onto the top of the second album you can make it look like you're listening to the same album. True story.
I now can't listen to Marillion - Misplaced Childhood without it being followed immediately by The Dillinger Escape Plan - Option Paralysis. They are both half of the same album don't you know?
Canterzeuhl wrote:
Length means nothing if you don't know how to use it. |
-------------
|
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:17
paganinio wrote:
==List of Classic Era Prog Albums That Are 35 Minutes in Length==
I was laughing when listening to Moving Pictures, thinking "lame album, only 35 minutes long".
Then I realized it was 5 minutes longer than that. Not much longer but enough to remove the "lame" tag for me.
Then I remembered it was actually 2112 that was 35 minutes long. But then I checked, it was actually close to 39 minutes.
Now I'm confused. I really do remember a classic era prog album with the laughable length of 35 minutes. I just can't remember which one. Care to solve the puzzle for me?
|
What a load of sh*t. You really think an album is lame due to the fact it's less than 50 minutes or how ever the f**k you grade them? That's really stupid.
------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:39
I think Greenslade albums are short. Check out Time and Tide, I think it is about 30 mins...I thinki I remember a letter of compalint about it in the press.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:43
I usually find myself disappointed at short albums. I sorted by size and scanned the titles around that length and it's not always the case.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:50
Put it this way, I never say, and don't think I ever have said "this album is too short."
------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 06:57
irrelevant wrote:
Put it this way, I never say, and don't think I ever have said "this album is too short."
|
I think I may have done. You wait a year or more for an album and 30 minutes is a bit cheap. i would probably have said the album was a bit short rather bthan too short.
Although Van halen albums usede to around the 30 minmark and never complaIne so,,,,
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:02
It's easier to make a long album short than a short album long. Snip snip.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:20
MoodyRush wrote:
Per un Amico is under 35 minutes and every bit a masterpiece. Length doesn't matter as long as the quality of the music is. Quality>Quantity as they say. |
THIS!
-------------
|
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 07:24
I am going to sort my albums in order of running time - OK first cab off the rank is Transatlantic's "More Never Is Enough" which clocks in at a whopping 190 minutes. Of brilliant prog!
-------------
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 10:30
Of corny w**k, more like
Worst case scenario, if an album is "too short" I listen to it twice
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 10:33
^ It isn't as much w**k as Magma tho....
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:00
ture, but if you have to masturbate all over a drum kit may as well be the best at it
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:18
Triceratopsoil wrote:
ture, but if you have to masturbate all over a drum kit may as well be the best at it
|
But Vander isn't the best at anything.
Sorry I don't want to do this. Unlike you I don't want to put any band down by sl*g.ing the members. You win. I just can't get into your type of trolling.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 11:45
Truth be told one of the characteristics that got me into the prog was the song and album lengths. I mean 10 min. songs are just cool, however many can suffer from filler.
|
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: January 19 2012 at 12:05
2dogs wrote:
Nico's "The Marble Index" was kept down to 30 minutes due to a concern that listeners might kill themselves. Nowadays it comes as an expanded 2 CD set with alternate versions and extra songs. At least someone is taking action against the population problem. | \

My thought was, if someone can listen to it for 30 minutes and not kill themselves, couldn't they go another 5-10 minutes?
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
|
Posted By: 2dogs
Date Posted: January 20 2012 at 01:24
Slartibartfast wrote:
It's easier to make a long album short than a short album long. Snip snip.
|
"Neu! 2" where they ran out of money half way through and resorted to playing tracks at half speed, double speed, sticking fingers in tape machines etc.
|
|