The Rush remasters |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||||
Enchant X
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 31 2014 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 868 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May 23 2020 at 06:55 |
|||
|
||||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Online Points: 16851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Great!!
|
||||
Enchant X
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 31 2014 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 868 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Edited by Enchant X - May 15 2020 at 18:36 |
||||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Online Points: 16851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Are you a fan of Triumph? Santers?
|
||||
noni
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 03 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1092 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Does Geddy's voice change on the remasters. .......Not a fan of Rush because of Geddy.
|
||||
geekfreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 21 2013 Location: Musical Garden Status: Offline Points: 9872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
well that`s a No from me
|
||||
Friedrich Nietzsche: "Without music, life would be a mistake."
Music Is Live Two people are better off than one, for they can help each other succeed. Keep Calm And Listen To The Music… < |
||||
Gentle and Giant
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 24 2019 Location: Blackpool Status: Offline Points: 4281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Over the years, reading about the different versions, the consensus is that the '97 Remasters are not as good as the originals and the Sector boxsets are better still. I haven't got any of the 97 ones, only original vinyl and the x3 Sector Boxsets, which sound very good indeed.
|
||||
Oh, for the wings of any bird, other than a battery hen
|
||||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Online Points: 16851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I believe the OP is referring to the standard remasters, not the deluxe anniversary editions that add live recordings.
|
||||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Maybe mine is a different version then. On the back it just says "original album" and I can't see anywhere it says it's remastered.
|
||||
JediJoker7169
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 05 2009 Location: West Coast, NA Status: Offline Points: 195 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
It is, and it does say. All the recent anniversary releases use the 2015 remasters by Sean Magee, which are fantastic. As far as Rush digital releases go, these are probably the best these albums have ever sounded and will ever sound. Some may prefer "original" CD releases, but even those folks would be the first to admit that Sean's work is without fault. |
||||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I've got the FTK 40th anniversary edition. As Richard says, worth having for the live stuff recorded at Hammersmith Odeon the night after I went, the downside is the awful version of Xanadu by Dream Theater. And actually, it doesn't say that the original album is remastered.
Edited by chopper - May 13 2020 at 07:33 |
||||
Manuel
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 09 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13179 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
not much of a difference, really.
|
||||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 27729 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Yeah the reissues are no great improvement soundwise although I like the bonus material that comes with some of them especially the live stuff when they toured England in the late seventies. Worth having for that.
|
||||
verslibre
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Online Points: 16851 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Option #2.
|
||||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I only bought these albums once.
|
||||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
||||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17817 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|||
I can't chose since this is about the CD versions and in general those 90's "Remastered" are not very good, as most of those 90s CD are.
The Reissue/Remastered releases of the past couple years (ones on LP) are fantastic! They are remastered by Sean Magee at Abbey Road Studios, pressed by QRP and Sean cut them as DMM, pressed on 200g LPs. DMM is Direct Metal Mastering onto a copper plate, so it eliminates one of the steps in making an LP....I have all of them 'cept Test For Echo. For example Moving Pictures the holy grail is the original that is mastered by Robert Ludwig at Masterdisk, both sides. The 2015 version is as good if not better in some cases, the RL version can be a bit more beefy in the lows.....but for a VG++ condition original press you'll pay $75-$100. Some are on par IMO, like AFTK my original is mastered at JAMF and is a tough one to beat, but the new one is also fantastic....For the most part all of the reissues by Sean Magee have been praised as excellent issues.
|
||||
|
||||
TCat
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 07 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 11612 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
This is all good to know. I recently sold my Rush vinyls (out of necessity unfortunately), but am now able to start getting them all back as I find them. The only remaster I have got so far is "Presto", which is the first time I've owned it on vinyl, and it definitely sounds better than the older CD version. I did manage to keep the original "Rush Archives" on vinyl (which most know are their first 3 albums in one package), but I will probably end up with all of the vinyls again eventually, and if there really isn't that much difference, if I find a used one in excellent shape, I won't hold out for the remaster.
|
||||
Jeffro
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 29 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 2162 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Considering that I bought the remasters back when they were released in the later 90s and then gave all my non remastered versions to my younger cousin, I don't really remember.
|
||||
We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.
My face IS a maserati |
||||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I didn't notice an awful lot of difference, same with the various Led Zep ones.
|
||||
DarkTower
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 22 2018 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 507 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Looks pretty much the same. It is like the new remasters from Led Zeppelin. I got all of them. The only difference is the extra CD.
|
||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |