Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
kerosineboy
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 08 2008
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 9
|
Topic: Old Albums, re-done? Posted: September 09 2008 at 22:25 |
Im with WalterDigsTunes on this one. Much of todays productions are overblown and too lush. There may be a few exeptions where it would work but on the whole I think it would take something away from the original music. It does raise the issue though of using production techniques to complement the feel of the music. A great examle is Gentle Giant's In a Glasshouse album which has a dry and flat sound that perfectly matches the content of the songs and allows the natural sounds of the instruments to shine through. If this were re recorded with plush production techniques it just wouldnt be the prog classic that it undoubtedly is. On the other hand the Carptree album Man Made Machine has a very strong modern production that suits the music on the album perfectly.
|
The answer is never where the question is
|
 |
Carbon
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 30 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: September 07 2008 at 04:08 |
My opinion is there is nothing bad into re-mixing and re-mastering albums (not re-recording). When you have an ear to the Genesis remastered or the re-edition of A Night At The Opera, you wish they could do that to all the old stuff don't you?
|
 |
Kix
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 01 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 28
|
Posted: September 06 2008 at 20:35 |
_popupControl();
I've wondered for a while now if that Dark Side album they released a couple yrs ago really sounds any different, i haven't heard it yet, maybe I'll pick it up someday.
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: September 06 2008 at 04:32 |
This thread reminds me of a similar phenomenon: Making sequels to concept albums that were released ages ago. Dream Theater sorta did this with Metropolis Part 2, Queensrÿche had their Operation Mindcrime Part 2 which IIRC got really, really mixed reviews and Hawkwind's next album is going to be In Search of Space: The Return. (the original ISoS was supposed to have a unifying theme of "humans through the eyes of aliens")
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |
Avantgardehead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
|
Posted: September 05 2008 at 15:14 |
I really like the old production on the classic prog albums and think it would be sacrilege if they were re-done and modernized.
|
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
|
 |
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: September 05 2008 at 14:57 |
That sounds like something the Joker would want to do.
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 05 2008 at 06:26 |
...with a spray-can
|
What?
|
 |
M. B. Zapelini
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 21 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 773
|
Posted: September 05 2008 at 06:21 |
My opinion is: you shouldn't mess with something that is already perfect. Most of the times, rerecording an album sounds to me as something like repainting Sistin Chapel...
|
"He's a man of the past and one of the present"
PETER HAMMILL
|
 |
Fleetway
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: July 17 2008 at 20:56 |
I would like to be able to say "Yes id love to hear my fav songs done in the modern day". However experiece tells me that it shall end in horrible results.
Take for example the song Lady Fantasy by Camel. Its one of those songs every band has, that they play on each live show they do.
However it seems that the newer the recording of that song is, the worse it sounds. And the original is a real classic.
There are a few exceptions but they are VERY few.
|
 |
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: July 10 2008 at 17:31 |
MisterProg2112 wrote:
If old albums were recorded with today's technology it would be terrible. Of course they aren't as good quality, but that makes them sound unique and great.
Does anyone else notice how some great bands from the 60s and 70s release modern albums today, and they aren't half as good as the old ones?
Case and point. |
Forgive me if I'm not picking up on sarcasm, but that has nothing to do with technology. That has to do with them not being able to develop good songs. Maybe they're also trying to work with new technology an they don't really know how to do so, but it isn't the technology's fault.
Also, I don't think the technology always kills the soul of music. True artists don't let that happen. I could name so many modern artists that have used the technology to add atmospheres and what not that couldn't possibly have been created decades ago that help make the album even more absorbing. I don't think that "perfection" in the recording makes it sound less human, and I don't think that mistakes in peformance automatically ruin the record either. But albums are documents of a band's written work and should sound exactly how the band wants it to sound. Every note should be satisfactory to the musicians involved. And the satisfaction includes emotional touch. My band has redone good takes because they lacked the proper feel.
I don't think 70's records should be re-recorded with today's tecnology, but I would have loved to hear what they would have sounded like had the band's had the technology at the time of recording.
|
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph

|
 |
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: July 07 2008 at 14:57 |
For example the remasterig version of the Who Live at Leeds was even superior of the old one and adding more tracks was just fantastic.
|
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 03 2008 at 13:17 |
^ if you want to know what can be done today, by modern bands, using modern studios and 'ancient' instruments, check out the Collossus Projects by the The Finnish Progressive Music Association. If they can do that with new music, then there is no reason why it cannot be done when re-recording older albums.
|
What?
|
 |
grahawk
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 28 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Posted: July 03 2008 at 13:08 |
Just because your re-recording an album doesn't mean you can't use old instruments such as a Mellotron or Moog synth just as the guitarist may well be using a classic 60's guitar.
And I don't think it's reasonable to say "cheese Electrics sound keyboards of today". It's not as if keyboard players are using Casio home keyboards. And there's still new Moogs and Dave Smith synths as well as many decent virtual analogs by the likes of Access as well as decent synths like the Oasys. And you can now buy a new Mellotron.
|
 |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: July 03 2008 at 05:18 |
But what about the production techniques used by Steven Wilson in his Porcupine Tree recordings?
They're up to latest technological standard and still as warm and personal as I could wish for. Using his knowledge (which by all acounts seem to be quite unique) I'd like to hear some re-recordings in his hands. I'm sure he could pull it off.
As for a post above concerning Zappas remastering using new drum and bass recordings: According to an interview I read quite a while back, he was upset about this as well, but apparently the masters were in such a bad state that he didn't have a choice.
Edited by npjnpj - July 03 2008 at 05:19
|
 |
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: July 02 2008 at 23:33 |
Prospero wrote:
Do what you want, but don't touch the ZAPPA MASTER TAPES!
|
I think FZ already did that, not always in a good way.
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: July 02 2008 at 20:55 |
I would have to say in general it's a bad idea, but I make the exception for Tubular Bells. Nicely re-done and certainly worth re-doing.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
Prospero
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 06 2008
Location: Quebec
Status: Offline
Points: 91
|
Posted: July 02 2008 at 13:59 |
Do what you want, but don't touch the ZAPPA MASTER TAPES!
BTW, have you listened to Hackett's Genesis Files? The production is awful IMO, it makes it all so lame and normal.
Edited by Prospero - July 02 2008 at 14:01
|
 |
friso
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 24 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: July 01 2008 at 15:59 |
Recording the classic would be the worst thing to do. I myself like the '70 progsound far better than the 2000 and after progsound. It has lost all creation of a space where a band plays. Bad mixes, ugly amplification. It doesn't sound very warm to me. BTW the vocals are recorded most sh*tty of all these days.
You would defenitly ruin a lot of good music. Besides... you can hear the 'sound of the time' in those records, so you can hear the progression much better. Going from 'Foxtrot' to 'A trick of the Tail' is an amazing journey! Evolution!
|
 |
bazza1963
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 04 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3
|
Posted: July 01 2008 at 10:50 |
One album I wouldn't touch with new technology is "in the court of the crimson king". The old analogue recordings have a warmth that would be difficult to recapture. Especially in the case of the mellotron.
Infact, come to think of it, I can't think of many albums I would want to mess with!
BL
|
www.dynamitevision.com
|
 |
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: June 30 2008 at 19:32 |
Dean wrote:
Never said all artists and mixing engineers do this - just pointing out that the temptation is there  . And with Pro-Tools (or the like) it is blisteringly fast and simple to do in competent hands - I've seen an engineer (in a small independent studio) replace a fluffed kick-drum triplet with a good one from the previous bar in seconds, without even consulting the artist, and far quicker than re-recording the whole drum track. The speed, ease and fluidity with which he did it made me appreciate it wasn't the first time he had done it either. When questioned over it his reply was ::shrug:: 'time is money' - needless to say the drummer re-recorded the track again without the edit.
I agree with you on Muse and TMV - handled sensibly the digital studio produces excellent results. |
Well taking a bit of a previous kick part is easy to do. I meant reorganizing an entire 52 bar solo was a pain in the ass. Copying/pasting a previous part is simple. Another common trick that is used is using sampled kick/snare/tom/etc parts mixed in with whatever drum part is already recorded. (Brendan O'Brien and some other producers put out a set of these drum samples). This technique is pretty common on not so good drummers because engineers are able to beef up the drum sound (as the original recorded part is weak). Of course you also have to use a program that matches the sample to the rhythm of the original recording, but its pretty easy. The drummer usually has no clue that its been done either. Its not like they played bad, just didn't really play well enough to get a good sound out of the drums. And indeed, in many studios "time is money" and engineers do not want to be bothered with tons of retakes and especially do not want to be bothered with people that shouldn't be in the studio in the first place, even if they are helping to pay the bills.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.