![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Author | ||||
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
What?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
let prog reign ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 11 2010 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 256 |
![]() |
|||
Because this thread has caused so much arguing and fighting I've decided I will make poll on what you think. Is The wall progressive rock or not
|
||||
Once upon a time there was some writing on the wall we all ignored, until the time that there was war and feasts of famine at our door
|
||||
![]() |
||||
boo boo ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 28 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 905 |
![]() |
|||
Yeah, I agree with Dean for the most part, rock operas really need to be judged as a whole. Like previous Floyd albums, many of the songs do segue together as if they were a part of something bigger.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() |
||||
What?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
let prog reign ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 11 2010 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 256 |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
Once upon a time there was some writing on the wall we all ignored, until the time that there was war and feasts of famine at our door
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
|||
Interesting post Dean, you put a lot of thought into that.
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() |
|||
Floyd were always leaders of the movement, not driven by it, so by the time they had recorded Dark Side of the Moon they had already covered most of the ground that we consider to be Prog Rock, from its Psychedelic beginnings, through the avant garde, space rock, symphonic/baroque rock, prog folk, electronic prog, heavy prog, jazzy prog and pop prog and were moving into Art Rock with albums as an art form rather than just a random collection of nice tunes or a contrived assortment of themed tracks held together by an external concept. That last point is an important one, concept albums and Rock Opera, (or Rock Musicals as they should more accurately be called), didn't tell the whole story within the music, they required some-other means to convey the back story - an external narrative to unlock the meaning and to relate the concept - if someone needs to explain the concept then it doesn't really work as a concept. The Wall is one of the few concept albums that does not need CliffNotes to aid the listener in understanding the message or the idea being expressed - it's contained there in full within the lyrics. Of course Floyd were not the first or the only band to do this, The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway doesn't need the narrative on the album sleeve, but it has it never-the-less, then that was Gabriel's method, on stage he would use short surreal stories to prelude each song (mainly to fill-in time while Rutherford, Hackett and Banks tuned and re-tuned between each song) so the narrative on the album sleeve is an extension of this. Waters didn't use such contrivances, his stage "presence" could not support that (the whole idea of Floyd was a band that hid behind "spectacle" on stage and that is reflected in the concept of the wall and the surrogate band), apart from a few iconic moments like Waters hitting the flaming gong or Gilmour's back-lit solo during Comfortably Numb, they did not engage in the stage theatrics; that happened around them and in front of them, or perhaps in spite of them - another point emphasised in the production of The Wall as an album; in the construction of the Wall itself on stage; and in Parker's cinematic version where Floyd do not appear at all, each are just another brick in the wall in the same way that Cousin Kevin, Uncle Ernie and the Gypsy are just bricks in the wall for Tommy.
Of course the whole of that last paragraph just concerns the story as portrayed by the lyric, so begs the question "can lyric be progressive?" - something that I feel is not exactly overlooked in Prog, but at least sidelined to secondary importance, an idea not helped by some of the more toe-curling lyrics that Prog is destined to throw up from time to time. My answer to this is "yes, of course" - Hammill is the past-master of the Progressive lyric and has few equals, Bowie for all his adoption of trends in music and pseudo-intellectual tangents is Progressive lyricist who can form seemingly simple songs from esoteric and erudite concepts and ideas that could at times leave Sinfield's oh so clever lyrics wallowing in a land of make believe. Anderson (Jon) is oft derided for his incomprehensible and baffling lyrics, but that in essence is what Prog is musically so those same ideas given voice should be accepted as being on par with the music - music and lyric being equal components of the whole, of equal weight and equal relevance. These lyricist show that the gulf between Prog lyric to Pop/Rock lyric is as wide as the gulf between Prog music and Pop/Rock music, something that we recognise in the definitions of Progressive Rock in the PA Guide to Prog Rock and something to be considered before nay-saying some of the additions to the archive.
Dark Side of the Moon was Waters first successful foray into this realm of progressive lyricism, and one of the few Floyd albums where the balance between Progressive Music and Progressive Lyric achieved equilibrium, (I could add that this numbers as one of the few Prog albums ever to achieve this). Wish You Were Here and Animals tips the balance back towards the music and the lyric, while important to Waters maybe, is less important to the listener. However, on The Wall and The Final Cut we see the emphasis shift away from the music, so the lyric (and Waters' influence) is more important than the music that carries it. Here the music is composed to fit within the time constrains imposed by the lyrics, without that restraint and the withholding of musical excess and extended soloing, the album's length would increase with furthering the concept one iota - and to that end a double album is long enough, a triple or quadruple album would become an endurance. That is not to say that the music is unimportant, or not progressive in itself - instrumental versions of those albums, should such a thing exist, would still be progressive - musically both albums are not a million miles away from Atom Heart Mother in the way themes and motifs replicate and repeat through each track and in the overall tone and feel of the music - the fact that we can recognise the similarities between these albums is more than just the observation that they were composed by the same person or played by the same musicians (substituting Kamen & Ezrin for Geesin & Smith where appropriate).
As Bob said early on in this thread, we need to regard The Wall as a whole and not as a compendium of individual songs, and with that we need to take into account the lyric content as vital component of the whole when assessing it as a work of Progressive Rock; that the elevation to the "high art" that some appear to hold Prog Rock requires that acceptance of lyric as narrative prose taken as something "higher" than melodic rhyming couplets to sing along to in the shower or woo a prospective mate on dancefloor. Edited by Dean - February 06 2011 at 08:12 |
||||
What?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
boo boo ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 28 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 905 |
![]() |
|||
Yeah, I don't think a band has to be progressive to be prog, and even if I don't find a band progressive I don't consider that a bad thing, if they have a sound they are good at, nothing wrong with sticking to it.
But yeah, there are many progressive musicians from many genres that are not prog rock.
There are electronica artists who can be considered progressive (Aphex Twin), hip hop artists who can be considered progressive (Madlib), even punk artists can be progressive, in fact that's essentially what post punk was, progressive punk.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 30716 |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Rockjf1 ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: December 29 2010 Location: 2 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
![]() |
|||
Of course it's progresive maybe not songs alone but the whole concept with emotional lyrics gives this album a very progressive side so yes it's prog
|
||||
![]() |
||||
iluvmarillion ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 09 2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3247 |
![]() |
|||
Agree. When I listen to Arena, IQ and Pendragon I feel I'm listening to very dated music. Doesn't mean it's not Prog rock. When I listen to David Bowie I feel I'm listening to an artist always ahead of the game, experimenting with new music forms and willing to collaborate with other artists to achieve his ends. I think more of David Bowie as a progressive Pop artist and influencer of Prog rock artists such as Marillion. Coming back to the original question I still don't see why an album such as Animals is more progressive than The Wall, apart from the obvious that Animals has longer songs!
|
||||
![]() |
||||
The Neck Romancer ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 01 2010 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 10189 |
![]() |
|||
The OP cares, that's why he made this thread.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13437 |
![]() |
|||
That they put a lot of thought and work into it is neither here nor there.
Someone put forth the proposition that DSotM was more "progressive" than The Wall, and additionally stated The Wall was "not very progressive." I have yet to see valid clarification of such statements. To be honest, I believe such statements to be subjective in the extreme and not very factual.
|
||||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||||
![]() |
||||
boo boo ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 28 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 905 |
![]() |
|||
Just because The Wall isn't the first concept album doesn't mean it's not progressive, it's stupid to say all newer concept albums can't be progressive since there are many different kinds of themes they can explore.
The Wall may not be the first concept album to feature the kind of themes it did (alienation, bitterness, fascism) but it was the first to execute them as well as it did.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Progmind ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 29 2010 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 3458 |
![]() |
|||
I really dont care if "The wall" its progressive or not
I really enjoy this album and contains very good songs |
||||
![]() |
||||
rogerthat ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
![]() |
|||
It's art rock. I prefer to lump art rock with prog rock because the distinction between the two gets really blurred often. DSOTM is more progressive than prog, if that makes sense, but in 1979, rock concept album was not the most progressive idea around (although yet to be flogged to death), so The Wall is neither. I'd call Meddle both prog and progressive.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 30716 |
![]() |
|||
The Wall feels to me more like a progressive rock album than DSOTM.More expressive and takes you on more of a journey.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
|||
Why is IQ not "Progressive Rock"? And why do you put them alongside Toto? Two bands so unlike.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
irrelevant ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 07 2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 13382 |
![]() |
|||
That's right.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
boo boo ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 28 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 905 |
![]() |
|||
Yeah I'm sure when somebody here says "this is not progressive" they really just mean "it's not prog", if that's what they mean then that's what they should say.
Because the next time I see somebody with a Kamelot avatar saying Brian Eno isn't progressive I WILL try to ruin that person's life.
![]() I know I'm really nitpicking over a simple thing, but it really does bug me. I don't think the tern"progressive rock" has been shortened to "prog rock" over time just out of sheer convenience. Because as the genre has evolved it's been made VERY clear that prog doesn't strictly mean progressive anymore.
It did at first, when the term was first being used for bands that actually were progressive, but then people started using the term for bands like IQ and Toto and so shortening it to prog became a neccesity because calling those bands progessive would (and should) result in you being completely laughed at outside of the prog community. Edited by boo boo - February 05 2011 at 06:34 |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |