Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Roger Waters Wacked
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRoger Waters Wacked

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 18:06
Originally posted by Deadwing Deadwing wrote:

I'm more of a Wright fan, so for me anything from Meddle to Animals + Division Bells are 10/10 for me. Also, I've a soft spot for The Endless River, even though it's not as good as their golden albums. LOL

As for Roger, I think his political views are crazy, especially when he supports Maduro on Venezuela. Still, I don't think he should have access to the PF accounts because he's simply not in the band anymore.



Moslty my favourite eras too, though there's a good bit of Wright on their earlier albums. However, as far as the Endless River goes, just do a collection of the best from The Division Bell and The Endless River, and it gives you a good idea of how a more traditional Floyd sounding album would have come out in 94... and as much as I love The Division Bell, this combination would have made it even better. Version for such a union of albums would be: Things left unsaid / It's what we do / Ebb and Flow, Marooned, A great day for freedom. Take it back, Sum / Skins, Coming back to life. Keep Talking, Night light / Allons Y-1 / Autumn 68 / Allons Y-2, Talkin Hawkin. Poles apart, Calling / Eyes to Pearls / Surfacing, High Hopes.
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 17:57
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Too many floyd fanboys getting their knickers in a twist...floyd are in my second division, they are never going to threaten Genesis, Yes, ELP, Focus, IQ, Flowerkings, Spocks Beard, Glasshammer...ad nauseum...


Yessssss, I agree that all of those band are a bit nauseating compared to Floyd's 70's brilliance.TongueLOL

Floyd was the most brilliant and progressive band, becayse they questionned and redefined themselves with every new album. I mean not one of their albums sounds like another, and after one second, you know immediately on which album you are on, even with the patchy OBC. Floyd was about ideas, rather than technique or virtuosity. Clap
I mean which other 70's or post 70's band can claim that they totally reinvented themselves from one album to the next?

Floyd was progressive because they progressed with each new album, not like many who simply wallowed endlessly in the little niche they'd created for themselves, until forced to exit the niche because it had become stale.




And yet, you can easily know you are listening to Pink Floyd.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19710
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 07:19
Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

bet you hate Dream Theater...😁


My hate would be too much honour for DTStern Smile... They just Sleepy me to death


... on top of being the second most ridicule "prog" band after ELP.Evil Smile
Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 03:57
Mr Trane. Floyd was always overrated, especially by their fanboys. Your post confirms that. Aye. All those bands I mentioned are utter sh*te when compared to the brilliance of tbe floyd...of course they are....too much emphasis on all that virtuosity and aimless noodling....bet you hate Dream Theater...😁

Edited by M27Barney - May 25 2020 at 03:58
Back to Top
Deadwing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 03:35
I'm more of a Wright fan, so for me anything from Meddle to Animals + Division Bells are 10/10 for me. Also, I've a soft spot for The Endless River, even though it's not as good as their golden albums. LOL

As for Roger, I think his political views are crazy, especially when he supports Maduro on Venezuela. Still, I don't think he should have access to the PF accounts because he's simply not in the band anymore.

Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 01:47
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Tom Ozric Tom Ozric wrote:


.....and your post shows you had a fai bit of alcomohol today 😂


have you read yourself?? TongueEvil SmileLOL
[DIV

Yeah, I know, a dozen edits and I still make no sense
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19710
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 01:44
Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Too many floyd fanboys getting their knickers in a twist...floyd are in my second division, they are never going to threaten Genesis, Yes, ELP, Focus, IQ, Flowerkings, Spocks Beard, Glasshammer...ad nauseum...


Yessssss, I agree that all of those band are a bit nauseating compared to Floyd's 70's brilliance.TongueLOL

Floyd was the most brilliant and progressive band, becayse they questionned and redefined themselves with every new album. I mean not one of their albums sounds like another, and after one second, you know immediately on which album you are on, even with the patchy OBC. Floyd was about ideas, rather than technique or virtuosity. Clap
I mean which other 70's or post 70's band can claim that they totally reinvented themselves from one album to the next?

Floyd was progressive because they progressed with each new album, not like many who simply wallowed endlessly in the little niche they'd created for themselves, until forced to exit the niche because it had become stale.


Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2020 at 00:47
Too many floyd fanboys getting their knickers in a twist...floyd are in my second division, they are never going to threaten Genesis, Yes, ELP, Focus, IQ, Flowerkings, Spocks Beard, Glasshammer...ad nauseum...
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2020 at 19:18
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Frenetic Zetetic Frenetic Zetetic wrote:

Originally posted by iluvmarillion iluvmarillion wrote:

Really don't like this revisionism going on with Roger Waters regarding who wrote what on Comfortably Numb. It's entirely between Roger Waters and Dave Gilmour and has nothing to do with Pink Floyd fans like myself who don't want to know. His feud has nothing to do with us.

I'm with you 100%.

However...
 
<span style="line-height: 1.4;">Expecting PF fans to be rational, when they can circle jerk over drama instead, is a recipe for disaster.</span>


idk, there are two categories of PF fans, or maybe three.  One is the DB apologists and I am not in that category.  Two is the St Waters fan club who think his demands are somehow justified after everything he did to alienate the rest of the band.  Third is the ones who do think of the Waters years as the best phase of the band but don't like how he treated them, Mason and Wright in particular.  I belong to the third category and I think a few of us have been posting in this thread too. 


I guess I would be in the third one too, only clarifying a few things. The Waters years are the best, but particularly the ones from Meddle to Animals, and not because I think it was Waters doing, but because it was a collective effort, and they all contributed to the music. Dark Side of the Moon is perhaps the album with the most contributions from Wright. However, I do consider Waters did do some of the great songs from the era, like Welcome to the Machine and Sheep. Of course his contributions seem to be magnified because he wrote the lyrics to all songs at that time, so even if he hardly contributed to the music, he still gets writing credits, and so he has credits on just about every song. And also, even if this is my favourite period, I still think they did wonderful stuff at other times, and I would rank both the earlier era, as well as the Gilmour era, over just about any other band out there.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17538
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2020 at 09:26
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:


But Roger should really refrain from tweeting around the day after a solid night out (or in - in this case). Clearly, the man's puffed face shows that he ingested a fair bit of alcohol the day before.

Squirrels keep food stored in their cheeks till they bury it for a future snack date.....Roger must be doing the same with his alcomohol, allowing him to savor the moment and extend the effects a tad bit longer...Smile
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19710
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2020 at 02:37
Originally posted by Tom Ozric Tom Ozric wrote:


.....and your post shows you had a fai bit of alcomohol today 😂


have you read yourself?? TongueEvil SmileLOL



Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by DarksideofCollages DarksideofCollages wrote:

Anything Related to Floyd he is entitled to. 
sure...up to 1987 after that he is not Pink Floyd.


After 87, it's not fit to be Pink Floyd anyways. Tongue Fairly unworthy of the name.

Edited by Sean Trane - May 24 2020 at 02:37
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2020 at 02:35
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

^^^
I'd say that Roger is missing one category of Floyd fans: the Syd Barrett absolutistsLOL





Guess it's been so long since I've met them on here that I left them out. LOL


Come on:

Roger That
Roger "Syd" Barrett
Roger Waters LOL

Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

His interviews are always thoughtful and introspective, and he seems like a decent, caring guy who lets his music do the talking for him.


Yeah, nobody is disputing that - well not much anyways: I don't know which artiste doesn't do that kind of basic PR stuff. Same can be said for Roger : thoughtful and introspective, though he likes to explain a bit more his music.

It's just that when when this particular subject arises , they both contract anally and have a constipating diarrhea. LOL

===============

But Roger should really refrain from tweeting around the day after a solid night out (or in - in this case). Clearly, the man's puffed face shows that he ingested a fair bit of alcohol the day before.





.....and your post shows you had a fai bit of alcomohol today 😂

Edited by Tom Ozric - May 24 2020 at 02:35
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19710
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2020 at 02:10
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

^^^
I'd say that Roger is missing one category of Floyd fans: the Syd Barrett absolutistsLOL



Guess it's been so long since I've met them on here that I left them out. LOL


Come on:

Roger That
Roger "Syd" Barrett
Roger Waters LOL

Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

His interviews are always thoughtful and introspective, and he seems like a decent, caring guy who lets his music do the talking for him.


Yeah, nobody is disputing that - well not much anyways: I don't know which artiste doesn't do that kind of basic PR stuff. Same can be said for Roger : thoughtful and introspective, though he likes to explain a bit more his music.

It's just that when when this particular subject arises , they both contract anally and have a constipating diarrhea. LOL

===============

But Roger should really refrain from tweeting around the day after a solid night out (or in - in this case). Clearly, the man's puffed face shows that he ingested a fair bit of alcohol the day before.






Edited by Sean Trane - May 24 2020 at 02:33
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 22:35
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

He continues to neglect telling his fans that not only did he leave PF but he also sued them, he is playing on the fact that the band has attracted millions of people born in the 80s/90s that like their music. 
And again, he inserts his political BS feelings......


Yup, easy to confuse the narrative now that it's been years since it all happened. Mind, as a guy born in the mid 80s, I am well aware of the kerfuffle that broke out after TFC. But at the time I was getting into PF, we still used to read wiki or fansites to find out the facts as opposed to watching videos so it was maybe harder to fool us.  He's got a better shot now at manipulating people into thinking he's the one wronged by the other three/two.
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15916
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 21:16
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

^He got 3.9 million for one black Strat.
The one he used on Live at Pompeii ??

Edited by Tom Ozric - May 23 2020 at 21:17
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 10165
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 17:46
^He got 3.9 million for one black Strat.
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 12788
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 13:10
Gilmour just recently auctioned off 126 guitars (including the ones he toured with and those that were used for all the famous Floyd studio albums), and donated the resulting $21 million to charity. His interviews are always thoughtful and introspective, and he seems like a decent, caring guy who lets his music do the talking for him.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17538
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 10:36
Another case in point.....not sure what he is "announcing", he must have forgot 10 seconds into his video LOL. I guess he is announcing the band should be called Spinal Tap.
If I have the year right, the only content Pink Floyd should allow on their website by Waters is Pros/Cons of Hitch Hiking. 
He continues to neglect telling his fans that not only did he leave PF but he also sued them, he is playing on the fact that the band has attracted millions of people born in the 80s/90s that like their music. 
And again, he inserts his political BS feelings......

I'm currently watching the Gilmour Live in Pompeii documentary and you can see how very happy Gilmour is with his family, something that must irk at Waters that he does not apparently have, IDK? 
I'm starting to feel sorry for Roger Waters acting like "a right Mammory gland" LOL.

Back to Top
judahbenkenobi View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 09 2017
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 10:17
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

^ That's fair comment albeit tenuously ironic from someone with Judah in their forum name Wink

LOL Don't blame me! My real name IS Judah-Ben. Blame goes to my dad. I guess he just loves Ben-Hur a bit too much. He was 19 years old when that movie came out!
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13356
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2020 at 09:48
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:


idk, there are two categories of PF fans, or maybe three.  One is the DB apologists and I am not in that category.  Two is the St Waters fan club who think his demands are somehow justified after everything he did to alienate the rest of the band.  Third is the ones who do think of the Waters years as the best phase of the band but don't like how he treated them, Mason and Wright in particular.  I belong to the third category and I think a few of us have been posting in this thread too. 

What about those who love listening to great PF music and even discussing it, but are happy to leave their personal issues alone including all discussions of the kind what bit of the music belongs to whom as a person, who has more merit in their greatness and who contributed more to their downfall... Their music has made my life richer for 40+ years, their feuds don't mean anything to me.

Hurray to you if you can but if Waters very PUBLICLY injects himself into this topic and in fact resurrects it, I won't blame either category of fans for commenting on it.  And their feud doesn't HAVE to mean anything to me or anybody else to have a view on it. It has not diminished my respect for his work in any way but I am not going to be indifferent about what he did to the band either.
Agree.....I can spin early PF and have no reservations about Mr Waters behavior, I appreciate the music as a whole not in pcs. I feel I separate the dooshness of Waters being a dooshbag when listening to his talent in the group.

Absolutely right. It is perfectly possible to love the great music he created, and still accept that he acts like a right Mammory gland still times. 
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.