Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Can Pop be Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCan Pop be Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 10:53
Originally posted by Fusionman Fusionman wrote:

Your phrasing is wrong. Pop is a description of a genre, not a genre its self.
 
Not sure Fusionman:
 
Quote
pop music
     n : music of general appeal to teenagers; a bland watered-down
         version of rock'n'roll with more rhythm and harmony and
         an emphasis on romantic love [syn: pop]
http://dict.die.net/pop%20music/
 

Characteristics as a Sub-Genre

 

Pop "is designed to appeal to everyone" and "doesn't come from any

particular place or mark off any particular taste."

 

In musical terms, it is essentially "conservative" in that it attempts to resonate

with a large segment of its target demographic rather than pushing artistic

boundaries.

 

It is "provided from on high (by record companies, radio programmers and

concert promoters) rather than being made from below..."

(Frith 2001, p.95-96).

 

But over time, pop has gone from "popular in general" to "a genre" consisting

of unchallenging, catchy songs, usually lasting between three and four minutes.

 

A pop song can take its sound from many different genres, but current pop

songs usually consist of sounds from hip hop, dance and soft rock or ballads.

 
 
 

Music Accessible To the Widest Audience

Since the mid-1950's pop music has usually been identified as the music and the musical styles that are accessible to the widest audience. This means the music that sells the most copies, draws the largest concert audiences, and is played most often on the radio. After Bill Haley's "Rock Around the Clock" hit #1 on music charts in 1955 the most popular music became the records influenced by rock 'n roll instead of the songs and light standards that had dominated TV's Your Hit Parade weekly countdown show. Since 1955 the music that appeals to the widest audience, or pop music, has been dominated by sounds that are still rooted in basic elements of rock 'n roll.

 
Well, it sounds as a musicall genre to me.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Fusionman View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: July 27 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 86
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 08:18
Your phrasing is wrong. Pop is a description of a genre, not a genre its self.

Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 07:13
Pop can definitely be Prog, just as Rock can be Prog. There are plenty of Pop bands around today whose music show a lot of Prog influence, Mew and Muse are two good examples, and there are many more. Be open-minded people!
Back to Top
Gaston View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 03:23
no such thing as prog, it's just a silly name we give to a broad spectrum of music we'd like to think of as our own. To be truly prog you must have end point, like start as point A and progess knowingly to point B. If not you're just experimental. Bleh. Experimental.

lol, y'all know i'm joking, you can classify a range of music into prog and damned right we do. you know, i'm involved in making a masterpiece prog album right now, you know how many times i post here a year? i don't care if anyone even reads this post let alone listens to our music. i'm doing this for you, not for us.

as soon as you understand that, you'll understand why there is no prog.

don't worry about my music either, we'll all be a part of it soon enough. i want everyone to enjoy us, not nit pick us. we do what we want in other words. long live, er... prog. lol


Gaston


It's the same guy. Great minds think alike.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 03:22
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

 
 
Again if we are talking what was "pop" when prog was popular (the ever popular AOR tag) then people are wrong when they call something like that pop today.  No one ever address this.  If you think it through is AOR really pop anymore?  What does it benefit a band to sound like that today?  This is the label I hear put on Spock's Beard, Kansas, The Flower Kings etc.  I actually don't get it.
If Neal Morse wrote only AOR music and secular lyrics do you think he is really going to get "popular"? 
 
 
 
I get your point Garion but for me POP involves much more than popular.
 
Pop is mainly
  1. Verse - Chorus - verse structure
  2. Easy listening.
  3. Not challenging
  4. Essentially commercial
  5. Repetitive and non important lyrics. 

Just the opposite of what Prog means. Dark Side of the Moon was popular, but it was a challenging and deep album.

Even the most challenging mainstream artists or bands are usually catalogued as "ALTERNATIVE"
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 03:12
[QUOTE=Ivan_Melgar_M]The reality is that a band can play Prog, POP or borderline music.
 
BUT:
 
1.- If a Prog song becomes POP, it ceases to be Prog and becomes Pop.
2.- If a Pop song becomes Prog, it ceases to be Pop and becomes Prog.
3.- If a song is in the limit it's Prog related or borderline but no way a song can be POP and Prog at the same time.
 
Iván
 
 
 
QUOTE]
 
 
Again if we are talking what was "pop" when prog was popular (the ever popular AOR tag) then people are wrong when they call something like that pop today.  No one ever address this.  If you think it through is AOR really pop anymore?  What does it benefit a band to sound like that today?  This is the label I hear put on Spock's Beard, Kansas, The Flower Kings etc.  I actually don't get it.
If Neal Morse wrote only AOR music and secular lyrics do you think he is really going to get "popular"? 
 
 


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20627
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 02:55
Originally posted by lucas lucas wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Listen to A.C.T.

They are "prog-pop" if you ask me.
 
Nice call, here !
 
ACT are one of my favourite current prog bands. On stage they are very good. And they are a successful blend of ABBA, Dream Theater, Saga and Queen.
 
One name comes to my mind when it comes to pop-prog : Kevin GILBERT, cf his early career with  'NRG' and his solo albums. He defined himself 'the shaming of the true' as pop-prog album.
 
Most of the art-rock bands could be regarded as prog-pop :
Supertramp
Roxy Music
10 CC
Manfred Mann's earthband
Kate Bush
 
 
 
 


I always thought of Shaming of the True as "Art Pop".Smile
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 02:30
The reality is that a band can play Prog, POP or borderline music.
 
BUT:
 
1.- If a Prog song becomes POP, it ceases to be Prog and becomes Pop.
2.- If a Pop song becomes Prog, it ceases to be Pop and becomes Prog.
3.- If a song is in the limit it's Prog related or borderline but no way a song can be POP and Prog at the same time.
 
Iván
 
 
 
            
Back to Top
NecroManiac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 20:58
Listen to Doves. Yes, "pop" can be prog. (I hate the term "Dream Pop", it's prog goddamn' it!"

What's yer faovrite album? =^_^=
Back to Top
Harkmark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 29 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 538
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 18:46
pop cannot be prog, prog can be pop...
Back to Top
lucas View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 18:39
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Listen to A.C.T.

They are "prog-pop" if you ask me.
 
Nice call, here !
 
ACT are one of my favourite current prog bands. On stage they are very good. And they are a successful blend of ABBA, Dream Theater, Saga and Queen.
 
One name comes to my mind when it comes to pop-prog : Kevin GILBERT, cf his early career with  'NRG' and his solo albums. He defined himself 'the shaming of the true' as pop-prog album.
 
Most of the art-rock bands could be regarded as prog-pop :
Supertramp
Roxy Music
10 CC
Manfred Mann's earthband
Kate Bush
 
 
 
 
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
Back to Top
Rosescar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 15:24
Originally posted by billbuckner billbuckner wrote:

I'm surprised that Supertramp haven't been brought up here.

I was thinking the same thing, though some albums/songs aren't that proggy. The most popular songs usually are verse-chorus-verse-flute solo-chorus =(
My music!

"THE AUDIENCE WERE generally drugged. (In Holland, always)." - Robert Fripp
Back to Top
billbuckner View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 14:54
I'm surprised that Supertramp haven't been brought up here.
Back to Top
coffeeintheface View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 397
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 14:49
Originally posted by philhepple philhepple wrote:

Originally posted by Rosescar Rosescar wrote:

As far as I'm aware, King Crimson was "pop" in 1969 because they were massively popular. Actually, most of prog was pop back then.

PLEASE do not make asinine comments about something that you are CLUELESS about!
 
Is there ANY need to cut someone down like this? He has a very strong point.
OBQM: www.soundcloud.com/onebigquestionmark (solo project)
nQuixote: www.soundcloud.com/n-quixote (ambient + various musical ideas)
Back to Top
coffeeintheface View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 397
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 14:48
Originally posted by philippe philippe wrote:

pop cannot be prog and rock is hardly prog
 
you lose
OBQM: www.soundcloud.com/onebigquestionmark (solo project)
nQuixote: www.soundcloud.com/n-quixote (ambient + various musical ideas)
Back to Top
Benjamin_Breeg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 05 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 229
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 14:04
I think so. Some bands like Radiohead, Muse and A.C.T. can do progressive music with a pop approach or pop music with progressive approach 
Back to Top
Inferno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 30 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 13:53
Prog was pop in the 70's


Progressive band were pop music. They were what mainstream people listened too. Maybe not the too obscur group that everyones seems to point out, but prog was pop.


Today it's mainly Emo (whatever that means...pop-punk and Melodic Hardcore is the good term to say what people calls EMo today since nobody knows what Moss Icon and Rites of spring are...and they were what Emo is...in 1994!) R&B and the Industry (people like Paris Hilton doing some sh*tty album)

That's the pop of today, with a couple of exception of Rock, of Alternative and even a little bit of metal.


There was pop in Prog and still. The Harmonic structure of today's prog (And I'm not mentionning all those experimental, psychedalic and Jazz fusion band) are still mainly pop.

Like I said, Prog is ambitious pop with a tad of this and that.
Back to Top
Soupykan View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 13:48

Dark Side of the Moon is arguably the most popular album of all time. Just because today's pop music is for the most part not remotely proggish, does not mean that prog music cannot be pop.

She ruled the toads of the short forest
And every Newt in Idaho....
Back to Top
Rosescar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 13:39
Originally posted by philhepple philhepple wrote:

Originally posted by Rosescar Rosescar wrote:

As far as I'm aware, King Crimson was "pop" in 1969 because they were massively popular. Actually, most of prog was pop back then.

PLEASE do not make asinine comments about something that you are CLUELESS about!
Yes, I am completely clueless. Thank god I got the bloody facts from Epitaph Volume 1 & 2 's liner notes.
My music!

"THE AUDIENCE WERE generally drugged. (In Holland, always)." - Robert Fripp
Back to Top
philhepple View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: January 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 49
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 11:51
Originally posted by Rosescar Rosescar wrote:

As far as I'm aware, King Crimson was "pop" in 1969 because they were massively popular. Actually, most of prog was pop back then.

PLEASE do not make asinine comments about something that you are CLUELESS about!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.