Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Live together or marry first?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLive together or marry first?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Poll Question: Cohabitation, shacking, whatever the term, do you approve?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [50.00%]
10 [19.23%]
16 [30.77%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
spookytooth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 06 2008
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Status: Offline
Points: 438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 08:05
Personally, I think marriage is rather silly. However, I do understand why people marry. Still, I think it's fine if a couple lives together before they marry. I really see nothing wrong with it.

Would you like some Bailey's?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:58
There must something in the water in Ireland, though, and I can't figure out what it is LOL
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:41
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 


I think that marriage is encouraged this way exactly because it's traditionally considered a fundamental step towards raising a family; I don't think there are states encouraging marriage just for itself.

I agree that this kind of discrimination probably relies on the older perception that marriage is the way to raise a family and people who don't marry are probably not interested in family life, which is not true anymore. The way France addapted to the new times was to "legalize" non-marriage; you can register a concubinaje and you get the same legal status to that of a marriage (including the benefits). It is only a half-measure, but it does work well; it, combined with the benefits offered for having children, makes France have the second highest birth rate in the EU (why does Germany have the lowest birth rate in the EU? Shocked)
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:41
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^^ nah, tax the breaders, don't reward them Evil Smile


Clap



Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:40
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ Well, in countries which are suffering from overpopulation that might be the solution.

@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 
Demographically each country has an overpopulation "problem" in some social stratas and an underpopulation "problem" in others - I think that is the natural order of things and not something that should be subject to tax benefits. Rewarding breading, or punishing those that exercises (birth) control, doesn't solve the problem or create it. 
What?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:26
^ Well, in countries which are suffering from overpopulation that might be the solution.

@harmonium.ro: Yes, but married couples get tax benefits on top of the benefits for the children. IMO it would be better to abolish the tax benefits for married couples and instead focus on the raising children part - preferably also including some form of training courses for parenting which the parents have to participate in in order to receive the benefits. 
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:26
Originally posted by mystic fred mystic fred wrote:

Living together before being married is like opening all your Christmas presents in November....Ouch
 
 
.


Clap

Marriage first.  No surprise from me.

But I believe in divorce even less than I do cohabitation before marriage.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:22
^^ nah, tax the breaders, don't reward them Evil Smile
What?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 07:03
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Personally I think that people should get tax benefits for raising children - not for living together, marriage or not.


But they are, in most countries that I know. Isn't this happening in Germany too?


Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 06:58
They should definitely live together first ... and if they don't marry, that's fine with me, too. Personally I think that people should get tax benefits for raising children - not for living together, marriage or not.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 05:56
Commitment and Compromise - the paper work is irrelevant.
 
I would be two-faced and hypocritical if I objected to my 19yo daughter shacking-up with her boyfriend - what my personal feelings are towards it could be a different matter but that would also be true if they were getting married. My daughter is 20 and is moving in with her bf - I'm actually rather pleased for them.
What?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 05:44
JJ is full of wisdom as always

Voted 1st
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 03:26
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I dont think marriage should be scrapped, again whatever works for ya, but I don't see it as a sacred thing.
I do think its a good, and would be nice.

But if I ended up just living with someone without marriage, whatevs

Pretty much exactly what I think.


Way I see it. I would love it if I could spend the rest of my life with some I love.
Whether its made "official" with marriage or we just live together, doesn't mean much to me.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 03:21
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

I dont think marriage should be scrapped, again whatever works for ya, but I don't see it as a sacred thing.
I do think its a good, and would be nice.

But if I ended up just living with someone without marriage, whatevs

Pretty much exactly what I think.
Back to Top
Any Colour You Like View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12294
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 03:17
Marriage is archaic.
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24022
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 03:15
I vote for the second option. It's what I practised myself and I have never regretted it.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 03:05
I dont think marriage should be scrapped, again whatever works for ya, but I don't see it as a sacred thing.
I do think its a good, and would be nice.

But if I ended up just living with someone without marriage, whatevs
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67382
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 02:58
It depends on how easy it'll be to get a divorce, I guess. Voted for the third option.
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 02:31
Gender roles were very clearly defined for most of human history. Our roles in life have become so complex in comparison it is fairly irresponsible to not at least have some trial time playing house to evaluate domestic compatibility. Many fail to understand the difference between interdependency and codependency.  A successful relationship requires interdependency, which is impossible without an understanding of which partner will take on the various roles in the household. Something as simple as hating to take out the garbage can send the relationship into a tailspin. For the love of god, don't get married until you know that at least one of you is willing to take out the garbage.   
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2010 at 01:47
Living together before being married is like opening all your Christmas presents in November....Ouch
 
 
.
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.119 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.