Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How exactly is Deep Purple prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow exactly is Deep Purple prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 16:08
I've never had a problem accepting Deep Purple's career from about 1968-1971 or so as progressive; I very rarely use the 'band X is here so band Y should be' argument, but it really made no sense to me that acts like Warhorse (a DP spin off), Quatermass, Odin and of course Uriah Heep were here, when the first of their ilk, Deep Purple were not. I see their first 4 or so albums as genuine proto prog albums and 'Deep Purple In Rock' as a definite influence on the 'progressive hard rock' genre that the aforementioned bands owe a certain amount to. 'Fireball' also had progressive songs like 'Fools' and 'The Mule', and 'Machine Head' showed some prog sounding touches on songs like 'Highway Star', 'Lazy' and 'Pictures Of Home'. After that, I'd be admittedly hard pushed to find much, if any, prog output, but I think their earlier work makes them more than worthy to be included.
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 18:18
I love the use of this term "proto -prog."  So what happens if in the wake of all these prog metal bands there is a resurrection of Deep Purple, which their should be because all heavy metal bands are a foot note to DP.  They had it all and I don't think any of them had it all again.  So now Deep Purple is no longer proto-prog but the most significant prog band of the 1960s-70s.
Back to Top
Karn Evil 9 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: December 14 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 18:47

well after reading what you all had to say, I heard some very good points, and i think the one idea that i have, is that people may be to quick to put labels and titles on things.

Someone can call Deep Purple polka if they want to, but it doesnt mean it is. In the end it comes to to the simple fact that Deep Purple was and still is a great band (although not quite as good now as they were back in the day)

And as to all the posts about Rainbow, i feel they did more to progress music than Deep Purple did. Just listen to the version of Mistreated off of the album On Stage.

Watch out where the huskies go,dont you eat that yellow snow
Back to Top
Dr Know View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 532
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 19:37

Child in Time was a gigantic leap forward. Who was screaming in octaves at that time? Probably the greatest vocal performance of all time!! (Not to mention the guitar solo)

Rainbow had songs like Gates of Babylon, Temple of the king, Catch the Rainbow. I agree with you completely Karn Evil 9Clap

Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 19:53

Keep in mind that they are listed under proto-prog, which means that they are not exactly progressive by today's standards, but back then when there was no prog as such, they would have been considered more progressive than other blues/jazz rock bands and rock'n'roll. They did influence the formation of the genre, not being prog quite yet. If their discography ended with April, no one would have doubted their progressiveness. After In Rock the prog influence only remained in the keyboard work though.

They're a great band and IMO they deserve to be here

Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 21:00
There are times on here that I have to scratch this old cranium when I read things like this.Deep Purple were a heavy rock band;in fact, they were easily the best heavy rock band. Greater than Zeppelin and Sabbath.The progressive rock tag is plain silly.Uriah Heep who I loved dearly were slightly progressive but just because they do something with an orchestra doesn't make them prog.Just like a whole lot of other nonesense on here that gets touted as prog.Get Purple's new album ' Raptures in the Deep' it's a fine album.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 22:05
Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:

just because they do something with an orchestra doesn't make them prog.Just like a whole lot of other nonesense on here that gets touted as prog.


hmmm... make or may not make them prog... but probably why they are listed under proto-prog.  A section that could be seen for groups that while not generally considered prog... did influence what was to be considered prog rock. They are much like The Nice that were progressive before King Crimson kicked off the progressive rock era/movement, and groups were tagged as such.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Rising Force View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 09 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 439
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 22:06
Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:

The progressive rock tag is plain silly.Uriah Heep who I loved dearly were slightly progressive but just because they do something with an orchestra doesn't make them prog.Just like a whole lot of other nonesense on here that gets touted as prog


Agreed.
 
Back to Top
Gatot View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 28 2004
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 184
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 22:14

I agree, most of Deep Purple (April is an exception) are NON PROG or prog related whatsoever. That's why I never review any album of DP here at this site. But I love DP as well, only that they are not prog ...

Cheers,

Gatot

Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2006 at 23:15

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Fragile Fragile wrote:

just because they do something with an orchestra doesn't make them prog.Just like a whole lot of other nonesense on here that gets touted as prog.


hmmm... make or may not make them prog... but probably why they are listed under proto-prog.  A section that could be seen for groups that while not generally considered prog... did influence what was to be considered prog rock. They are much like The Nice that were progressive before King Crimson kicked off the progressive rock era/movement, and groups were tagged as such.

 

King Crimson was compared to the Beatles in their heyday; they were the Beatles with jazz.  The idea the King Crimson emerged on the scene and suddenly there was progressive rock is a misnomer.  It was years before these bands, Yes, Gensis, ELP were exclusively designated as progressive rock.

Progressive rock referred to a genre of intellectual rock that included The Byrds as well as Procol Harum and The Nice. By 1968, there was already a culture of '50s r-n-r nostalgia brewing in America that was reacting against the "intellectualization" of music. I just found this out. This goes against everything I've concluded in my studies of 1970s music.  The Punk aethetic was already in the air by 1968 and it may have reacted to the progressive elements, i.e intellectualization of music.  At least some writers of the time saw it that way.

Deep Purple was doing all those things with jazz saxophone and the orchestra but soon realized that if they used these elements they would be compared to the masters in the genre.  They stuck with what they did best. ELP should have figured this out.

 

My flippant point is that a lot of what people consider prog these days is metal.  The Mars Volta references Mahavishnu Orchestra who were influenced by Deep Purple.  Dream Theater cites Uriah heep as an influence who were also influenced by Deep Purple. So when all is said and done, they may become more influential they we realize now on future prog. 

Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 00:02
Originally posted by ken4musiq ken4musiq wrote:

 By 1968, there was already a culture of '50s r-n-r nostalgia brewing in America that was reacting against the "intellectualization" of music. I just found this out. This goes against everything I've concluded in my studies of 1970s music.  The Punk aethetic was already in the air by 1968 and it may have reacted to the progressive elements, i.e intellectualization of music.  At least some writers of the time saw it that way.



they weren't by chance referring to groups like Blue Cheer and the MC 5 were they hahahah.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
BiGi View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 01 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 02:53
Originally posted by Baza Baza wrote:

I agree. However, I think that the most famous hard rock group is Led Zeppelin.

That could easily be true.
However, IMHO Led Zeppelin were too much "straightforward", when compared to Deep Purple.
They surely did have interesting creative moments (Stairway to Heaven, Kashmir, Achille's Last Stand, Baby I'm Gonna Leave You, No Quarter, Immigrant Song, Celebration Day or Out on the Tiles...quite proggy numbers in my humble opinion!), and they sure did provide energetic performances...but I prefer Deep Purple...I find more variety in their efforts.
A flower?

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 03:01

"In Rock" is practically a pure Prog Rock album, but with a strong leaning towards the rock - I'm mystified that some people don't hear it.

It's certainly more Prog than anything Uriah Heep ever did (as a single example), and Uriah Heep are considered Prog, while Purple are Proto-Prog or Prog-related or something.

The concerto is absolutely outrageous - and also Prog, not just because it has an orchestra, but because of the way it's used.

I don't think that "Book..." is particularly proggy, but from 1970-1975 prog elements consistently appeared on their albums.

So they're at least Prog related - more so than ELO (as another single example).

Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 03:26
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

"In Rock" is practically a pure Prog Rock album, but with a strong leaning towards the rock - I'm mystified that some people don't hear it.

It's certainly more Prog than anything Uriah Heep ever did (as a single example), and Uriah Heep are considered Prog, while Purple are Proto-Prog or Prog-related or something.

The concerto is absolutely outrageous - and also Prog, not just because it has an orchestra, but because of the way it's used.

I don't think that "Book..." is particularly proggy, but from 1970-1975 prog elements consistently appeared on their albums.

So they're at least Prog related - more so than ELO (as another single example).

 

I listened to Dream Theater's Metroplis today, which I have in my collection but rarely listen to. The young people love and call it the best prog album.  It was number twelve at one point on the site list. I was listening for the Deep Purple influence and can say that not only is it there, it is one of the chief influences of the sound. Like Deep Purple, they come back to their R and B roots no matter where the music starts out or where it goes. If other people have heard this album, I would like to get their feedback. You seem to be in a proper position to render a verdict having a good knowledge of the more prog oriented DP.

Back to Top
ANDREW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 07:22

Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

Has Jon Lord's solo work been added to PA? I'd be much happier to see that here than DP, so seeing as we've got one the other must surely follow?

Jon Lord's "Gemini Suite" from 1971 is a good prog album.

Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 07:46
Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Should I teach "Prog Appreciation" there?


"Prog Appreciation"! What a course that would be! "Right chaps. Today we're going to look at noodling." *titters*





Today's assignments:

Noodling Versus Shredding - Discuss (please give examples, all workings to be shown)

"What About Those Mellotrons, Eh?" - 2000 word essay required.

Time allowed: duration of "Tales From Topographic Oceans" in its entirety, (or until you fall asleep/lose the will to live/float away with the album's sublime magnificence/bore remainder of class to death with lyrical analysis/all of the above)

Dividers may be used (but not on each other) - Rideout, you're in charge....

Edited by Jim Garten

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 08:12
Originally posted by Gatot Gatot wrote:

I agree, most of Deep Purple (April is an exception) are NON PROG or prog related whatsoever. That's why I never review any album of DP here at this site. But I love DP as well, only that they are not prog ...

Cheers,

Gatot

Don't forget that most of Genesis is not Prog either - only 30% of their albums are prog.

"Genesis to Revelations" is not Prog, and everything after "Duke" is not Prog.

That leaves 10 years out of 37 in which they produced prog rock - which is actually less than 30%...

So only review DP's proggy efforts

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21022
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 08:42
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

"In Rock" is practically a pure Prog Rock album, but with a strong leaning towards the rock - I'm mystified that some people don't hear it.

Agreed. Machine Head also has some pretty proggy moments. Burn contains a freaky synth experimentation and very innovative arrangements as well.

Back to Top
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 10:05
May I enter "The Book of Talisyn" as evidence of their prog-ness?  I venture to say that it was their progressive roots that had more influence on the embryonic progrock movement than their later efforts in hard rock had on speedmetal of the 70s and 80s.
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2006 at 11:34
Why is it that "good = prog" and "prog=good"? Why if bands are any good do we feel we have to be labelled "progessive"? Hence the constant argument about Led Zeppellin (no they are not prog!!)

If a Martian beamed down to earth to explore the wonders of progressive music, and looked on this site, here are a selection of artist/es listed on PA that he/she/it might find:

Deep Purple
ELO
Supertramp
Queen
Kate Bush

..and so having selected a few songs by these artists at random our Martian buddy might be listening to:

ELO - Mr Blue Sky;
Supertramp - Bloody Well Right;
Deep Purple - Smoke on the Water;

...etc........


So our cosmic chum might return home with some fine music ringing in his ears, but I put it to you all, absolutely none the bloody wiser about what progressive music is!!

He'd have had more clue if he was to pick up the following albums:

Miles Davis - Bitches Brew
Jan Hammer - The First Seven Days
Flaming Lips - Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots

....none of which are listed on PA but each of which has clear prog traits!!! Aargh!!!Help!!!




Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.