Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Unnecessary: Last 9min of KC's Moonchild
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUnnecessary: Last 9min of KC's Moonchild

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Masque View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 01 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 03:29
Yes I think the last 9 minutes of Moon Child is how the Tool thing come about , people saying Tool is the new modern Crimson n crap like that , when I listen to the end bit from Moon Child I can see where they get it from Wink
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 04:04
Lastdodobird - you can add my nick to the 'Moonchild rules' brigade. How can you learn to appreciate it? What are you doing wrong? You're simply listening to something that isn't there. Listen to that section, and not to your expectations towards it, and you'll be rewarded. 
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 04:07
Yes, Moonchild is a must have!
Back to Top
prog4evr View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 22 2005
Location: Wuhan, China
Status: Offline
Points: 1455
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 06:14
Originally posted by lastdodobird lastdodobird wrote:

  ...all but around 9 to 10 minutes of it. That 9 or so minutes is the tail-end (that one huge tailend. hehe.) of track #4 - "Moonchild"...
It's like weak and uninspired jam caught on tape... For me, just random bits that doesn't add up to very much.
 
Couldn't agree more.  Seems like Walter (Wendy?) Carlos was inspired (cursed?) by the same "jam bug" when he did a similar moog jam cacophony on the Clockwork Orange soundtrack.  At least KC's weak jam lasted only 9 minutes; Carlos' lasts for the whole side A of the vinyl imprint of that album...
Back to Top
lastdodobird View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: May 12 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 11:45
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Lastdodobird - you can add my nick to the 'Moonchild rules' brigade. How can you learn to appreciate it? What are you doing wrong? You're simply listening to something that isn't there. Listen to that section, and not to your expectations towards it, and you'll be rewarded. 

Hehe. I've been there and done that actually... I still don't appreciate it, though I think I can understand where the pro-Moonchild people are coming from. Wink

I still maintain that it could've been better if it were a lot shorter though.

...a scar on the face of the crimson king. Tongue
Back to Top
lastdodobird View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: May 12 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 11:45
Originally posted by prog4evr prog4evr wrote:

Originally posted by lastdodobird lastdodobird wrote:

  ...all but around 9 to 10 minutes of it. That 9 or so minutes is the tail-end (that one huge tailend. hehe.) of track #4 - "Moonchild"...
It's like weak and uninspired jam caught on tape... For me, just random bits that doesn't add up to very much.
 
Couldn't agree more.  Seems like Walter (Wendy?) Carlos was inspired (cursed?) by the same "jam bug" when he did a similar moog jam cacophony on the Clockwork Orange soundtrack.  At least KC's weak jam lasted only 9 minutes; Carlos' lasts for the whole side A of the vinyl imprint of that album...

Hmmm... I better get me a hold of that Clockwork Orange soundtrack... just to hear it. Hehe. Is the soundtrack prog rock?
Back to Top
_sam_ View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 14:15
I love the first five minutes, but I'd have at least cut the jam part down to about 3 minutes or something. At some points it's even kind of funny...

Edited by _sam_ - May 23 2006 at 14:16
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 14:31
While we're at it...
 
Unneccessary: 50 minutes of each The Flower Kings disc. Wink
 
Uh oh, time to hide away. Confused
 
 -- Ivan


Edited by ivansfr0st - May 23 2006 at 14:33
sig
Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 15:01
Originally posted by chamberry chamberry wrote:

That part of the song HAD to be in the album. It's a part of the whole concept behind In the court of the crimson king and the first 4 albums of them.

It's all in the head of the genious Peter Sinfield.

And I don't find it bad at all.
...What concept? It's filler. Maybe you can come up with a really great explanation, but to me it has always sounded like they recorded the rest of the album and said "Oh crap! Our album is only 30 minutes long and we need some more music. I know; let's IMPROVISE!" I don't mind improvisations, but the song has to actually go somewhere.
 
I don't like Moonchild, but then again I don't even like the album as a whole.
 
While we're on the subject, does anyone else think that the songs Red and LTIA pt. 2 are way too repetitive to be interesting? I get tired of Red within a couple minutes, and after several minutes of LTIA pt. 2 I want to shout at Fripp and Cross: "PLAY SOMETHING DIFFERENT ALREADY! YOU'VE PLAYED THOSE CHORDS 20 TIMES!'
 
Back to Top
crimson thing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 28 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 16:07

Ghandi 2 asked:

"While we're on the subject, does anyone else think that the songs Red and LTIA pt. 2 are way too repetitive to be interesting? I get tired of Red within a couple minutes, and after several minutes of LTIA pt. 2 I want to shout at Fripp and Cross: "PLAY SOMETHING DIFFERENT ALREADY! YOU'VE PLAYED THOSE CHORDS 20 TIMES!'"

 
As far as Red goes, I personally think it logically works its way through the chord changes & reaches a satisfying ....errmm...... climax. I've described it before as a kind of heavy metal take on bell-ringing.
Back to Top
clairvoyant View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 68
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 16:14
Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

 
Clap - I could not imagine the album without "Moonchild". It's trippy, spacey and quiet - a nice intelude between two "bombastic" tracks and it leads beautifully into ITCOTCK.


Are you calling I Talk to the Wind and Epitah bombastic?

Not at all...
Back to Top
moonlapse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 19:14
Originally posted by clairvoyant clairvoyant wrote:

Are you calling I Talk to the Wind and Epitah bombastic?

Not at all...


Wrong order...
Back to Top
Pneubauer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 16 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 256
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2006 at 19:53
Im not so sure about comparing Moonchild to The Waiting Room... because TWR actually builds up to something (something awesome)

I dont have a problem with Moonchild, its not even close to 'bad' but its definitely not fantastic. If they had cut down the instrumental noise noodling I would be much happier.

On Lark's Tongues part 1 when it starts with noise and builds up to something, thats cool, especially when its heavy like it is. But 9 minutes of straight noodlin? Well, although I wouldnt erase it from existence, I wouldnt turn the volume up really loud to 'rock out' either
Back to Top
lastdodobird View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: May 12 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2006 at 00:46
Originally posted by clairvoyant clairvoyant wrote:

Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

 
Clap - I could not imagine the album without "Moonchild". It's trippy, spacey and quiet - a nice intelude between two "bombastic" tracks and it leads beautifully into ITCOTCK.


Are you calling I Talk to the Wind and Epitah bombastic?

Not at all...


Epitaph and the title track Tongue


Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2006 at 01:41
    I have always thought that this is what keeps ITCOTCK from being the "end-all classic" that it's supposed to be. I have loved this album from the first time I heard it (and that was a long time ago). I even used to enjoy all of "Moonchild" (especially when under the influence of a certain leafy substance). As time wore on, I found myself skipping it. I can appreciate the experimental aspect, but it just doesn't pay off.
Back to Top
crimson thing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 28 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2006 at 14:29
I decided I'd better listen to it again - despite spouting off about Moonchild earlier, I confess it's a track I habitually skip......
 
So I listened to Epitaph, Moonchild & Court.
 
Sorry, but I still think Moonchild is a very weak piece. There were several different sorts of different on this album: the heavy metal of Schizoid; the all-enveloping sound of Epitaph, which still raises goose bumps for me (my personal Sign Of A Great Track - someone else here recently described the "2 by 4" feeling, which is perhaps a better description); the Moonchild improv; and Court's bombast. Some work; some don't - that's experimentation.
 
The two things that Moonchild reminded me of this time; bits of "Crystal Silence" on the RTF "Return to Forever" album; and bits of Fripps' guitar eructations seemed similar to some Joe Pass phrases on an album I lost years ago.
 
Thought I'd compare Moonchild with other Kc improv. So listened to "Starless & Bible Black" from the eponymous album. That's a decent enough jam, although not what I'd call great.
 
Then Fracture - different class! Starts off with 6.40 or so of a pretty good improv. I like the way the theme gets repeated on the more unusual instruments - Bruford on glockenspiel & xylophone or two such similar instruments (heck - how should I know what they are? It's a frequent occurrence for me that I can't identify the various instruments on a KC track, despite numerous listenings!), and Cross on Violin and/or mellotron. Then, a minute or so of teasing from guitar, bass & drums - odd snippets to show they're still alive. Then, WHOOMPH! at 7.40 the earth splits & the band from hell gets going! Amazing energy, on a theme already pummeled into one's brain. At 8.30 there's an audible "whoop!" from the band (Bruford ? I presume), so they're clearly enjoying themselves! You get only 3 minutes of the best (partial) improv until the end, but it's almost enough by itself to justify the price of the album. These last 3 minutes play like a race between the four instruments - guitar, bass, drums & violin - with the last one to finish afraid of being labelled a cissy.... (the discussion elsewhere about Bruford's best drumming with Yes is pretty academic once you've heard Fracture.......)
 
I still don't reckon SaBB is their best album, but Fracture is unbelievable....
 
 
 
PS Can anyone explain why after the sublimity of the track "Starless" from Red, which includes the lyrical phrase "Starless and Bible Black" (pace Dylan Thomas's Under Milkwood ) , Fripp had to complicate the issue by recording a track called "Starless and Bible Black", (which as far as I can tell has no musical connection with the first one, and no Dylan Thomas lyrics) on an album called "Starless and Bible Black" - another of his jokes, or what ?
Back to Top
YYZed View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 282
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2006 at 19:16
Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Only 21 century on ITCOCK is a masterpiece. The rest is boring. I prefer Larks tonguesin aspic, Red, and Islands to ITCOCK


I feel the same way much of the time, but have started to appreciate the slower, mellower parts of the album...
Back to Top
Paul K. View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2006
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 197
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2006 at 12:26
Agreed with the previous posters - I'd cut it off to at least 4 minutes. Really, this jam seems to go nowhere. Don't get me wrong, I like KC's imprvoisations, but the only one issue I have about them - most of the time it's pointless noodling, which goes nowhere. I appreciate the very idea of gradually constructing music, so to speak revealing the whole scheme during jams, and they're able to do this, but fail to direct it to somewhere. They achieve balance quite rarely and Moonchild is not an example of it.

P.S: and please don't compare 'Moonchild' to 'The Waiting Room', which at least never boring and interesting to listen.
Weasels ripped my flesh
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24439
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2006 at 14:23
I would be lying if I said that the noodling on "Moonchild" was my favourite part of KC's output - but I really don't mind it, and I even find it as a charm all of its own. However, I agree that the jam probably goes on a bit too long. I find it better than "Providence", though, which is sometimes really harsh on the ears. Anyway, neither track manages to mar the magnificent album of which it is part.
Back to Top
crimson thing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 28 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2006 at 18:18
Having pushed myself to take in Moonchild anew, and some of the improvs from SaBB (4 posts North of here), I figured I'd better complete the hattrick with a proper going over of Providence, which I've sl*gged off a couple of times recently, but haven't really soaked up for a while.
 
I have to say first off that Providence has been (very slowly) growng on me for some time. Not so's I'd give it 10/10, but edging upwards from 2/10 towards the 4 or 5 mark. (In the same way, each time I listen to the Red album, I more & more realise how good are the two tracks which I'd always thought of as filler; Fallen Angel & (especially good) One More Red Nightmare; and how powerful & irreplaceable to the album's sound is Wetton's bass.) Plus, it's only recently that I've had a decent CD player through which to listen to the more subtle bits of these improvs.
 
However, I this evening it dawned on me that the two real problems with Providence are, 1) it's not long enough (pace Moonchild, which most people reckon is too long); and 2) the guitar bits.
 
I've always been frustrated with Providence; it's 8 minutes or so long, and its only in the last minute or two that it gets going, with a bassline that reminds me of a hangover I once had after a bottle of cinzano (no mixers) between two (don't laugh - that was the seventies. It was compulsory. Just be grateful you didn't have to do that.) If it had carried on to be a 15 minute song, I'm sure it could have been a contender. As it is, there's only a short gap between it waking up, and shooting off. It's the premature ejaculator of the KC prog canon, with a bit of foreplay to cover its blushes.
 
I also think it would work much better as a threesome - drums, bass, & Cross on violin (& mellotron if necessary). Sacrilege as it may be to say so, this is one track where I think Fripp's guitar detracts rather than enhances. On Trio, a track from the previous album, Bruford got a compositional credit for "admirable restraint" (a typical Fripp funny, only comprehensible if you know the track). I suspect "physical restraints" might have been necessary here, but might have helped in the creation of a very bassy 15 minute cult classic.
 
PS Can I repeat my request for more info on the confusion of Starless's (see above) ?
Evil Smile Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.