Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Illegal Downloading
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIllegal Downloading

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Poll Question: Would you consider it acceptable if ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
7 [26.92%]
4 [15.38%]
1 [3.85%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [7.69%]
2 [7.69%]
2 [7.69%]
0 [0.00%]
6 [23.08%]
2 [7.69%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2007 at 05:58
Originally posted by Glueman Glueman wrote:

Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

Glueman:  can honestly say that if I hadn't been so fortunate, job wise, that I still would not have done it - purely on moral grounds. This is very naive. Let's say you didn't live in UK, but in some of the poorer eastern european countries instead. You write that you know you've been lucky. Well,  you (and I) are lucky with what countries we're born into, as well. Morals are easier when you can afford it. You're judging everyone less fortunate than you, and calling them bloody thiefs.
There is NO excuse to download on the basis that the album is out of print. You can absolutely guarantee that at some time in the future it will be. It may take some years but there will be a release. If the album is out of print, and and say 50 to 1000 copies exist (its like this with 1000's of gems), I think its just fantastic if some blogger puts out a vinylrip. This is the first step towards a possible re-release.  If you bought an overprized  rarity like that second hand, the artist wouldn't benefit from the sale anyway. But I'm defenatly not interested in discussing this here. Everything is all black or white for too many of  you.



Easy Livin': It is theft in the same way as walking into a record shop and stealing a CD you think is overpriced is theft. Stealing a physical object for sale, is obviously different.


Oh how very understanding you are! A thief is a thief is a thief. Circumstances do NOT or will NEVER excuse a crime. That's like saying it's ok to steal because you were born in a slum in a third world country. Well it's NOT. And besides we are talking about what is essentially a luxury. No-one needs to buy music - if you cannot afford it, like all other things, you can do without until such time as you are able to.

And it is just the same stealing online as it is physically puloining something.
 
And you might as well lose that logo about home taping - you are a hypocrite.
 


Nice. Like I said, everything's all black or white for some of you, no shades of grey. That makes disscussion impossible. Buying music is a luxury alright, and you deserve it because you've been lucky!?  
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2007 at 06:00

^ Rocktopus    Thumbs%20Up

Back to Top
eugene View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 2703
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2007 at 06:00
Originally posted by laplace laplace wrote:

option #6. teh innanet is the world's greatest promotional tool
 
I agree
carefulwiththataxe
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24392
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2007 at 06:11
Originally posted by Glueman Glueman wrote:

Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

Glueman:  can honestly say that if I hadn't been so fortunate, job wise, that I still would not have done it - purely on moral grounds. This is very naive. Let's say you didn't live in UK, but in some of the poorer eastern european countries instead. You write that you know you've been lucky. Well,  you (and I) are lucky with what countries we're born into, as well. Morals are easier when you can afford it. You're judging everyone less fortunate than you, and calling them bloody thiefs.
There is NO excuse to download on the basis that the album is out of print. You can absolutely guarantee that at some time in the future it will be. It may take some years but there will be a release. If the album is out of print, and and say 50 to 1000 copies exist (its like this with 1000's of gems), I think its just fantastic if some blogger puts out a vinylrip. This is the first step towards a possible re-release.  If you bought an overprized  rarity like that second hand, the artist wouldn't benefit from the sale anyway. But I'm defenatly not interested in discussing this here. Everything is all black or white for too many of  you.



Easy Livin': It is theft in the same way as walking into a record shop and stealing a CD you think is overpriced is theft. Stealing a physical object for sale, is obviously different.


Oh how very understanding you are! A thief is a thief is a thief. Circumstances do NOT or will NEVER excuse a crime. That's like saying it's ok to steal because you were born in a slum in a third world country. Well it's NOT. And besides we are talking about what is essentially a luxury. No-one needs to buy music - it's not a life or death need, like food, if you cannot afford it, like all other things, you should do without until such time as you are able to.

And stealing online it is just the same as physically puloining something. You do not take ownership until money has been exchanged.
 
And you might as well lose that logo about home taping - you are a hypocrite. It's not home taping that harms music and musicians - it's illegal downloading.
 


I'm afraid this thread is going to turn ugly very soon, as I can see words such "thief" and "hypocrite" bandied about a bit too easily. I can understand the reasons of both parties, but there is no excuse for exchanging hard words such as those. Therefore, I think the best idea is to close the thread at least for the time being.


Edited by Ghost Rider - February 13 2007 at 06:12
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.