![]() |
If we ignore the technical brilliance? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678> |
Author | |
Visitor13 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 02 2005 Location: Poland Status: Offline Points: 4702 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't know what is left if we ignore the technical brilliance (whatever that is).
|
|
![]() |
|
Peter ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not sure I understand the question. I like lots of prog bands -- period. I like the music & lyrics. I don't sit there thinking of "time signatures," or how "technical," or supposedly "drug-related" it all is. (So I guess I already ignore those things.)
I like lots of music besides, & most of it is not "prog" & not complicated. I really like music. I'm listening to The Police right now. Earlier, it was John Hiatt, & before that Genesis' Wind and Wuthering.
For the record, I can't immediately think of any of my prog collection that has overtly "drug-related" (or drug advocating) lyrics. There were lots of drugs around in the late 60s - early 70s in rock music (& jazz -- even country) in general. (There still are.) The drugs didn't often show up in the lyrics, though -- unless (as was most often the case, in my experience) they were referred to in a negative, cautionary manner (see Steppenwolf's "The Pusher," Neil Young's "The Needle and the Damage Done" and Lynyrd Skynyrd's "That Smell," for example).
|
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|
![]() |
|
heyitsthatguy ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 17 2006 Location: Washington Hgts Status: Offline Points: 10094 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I like Dream Theater, and not for their technical brilliance either (which they on occasion overdose on)
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Forum Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[Prog] -- [technicality] = [Pink Floyd]
Don't forget progressive electronic. |
|
![]() |
|
Nightfly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 01 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3659 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree that much of PT's music is not that complicated in terms of structure but what Gavin Harrison fits into that with his drumming is far from simple. That guy has so many great fills up his sleeve.
Of course Prog doesn't have to be complicated to be good but it helps if a musician has the chops to go wherever he needs to. My imediate thought when I first heard Marillions first album, Script...... when it was released was that this band want to be Genesis but they'll never be as good because they can't play as well as Genesis. So maybe if you want to imitate somebody you'd better be as good as or a better player than them or develop your own style which Marillion went on to do.
|
|
![]() |
|
Fight Club ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: May 21 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 572 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would complete reverse those bands, and then I might agree with you...
DT definately does do that sometimes though, but not NEARLY as much as people say.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Philéas ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
100 % agreed. |
|
![]() |
|
infandous ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 23 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmm, yeah, hard to think of many prog songs with drug themes...........
And the other stuff is essential to prog if you ask me. But not necessary for good or even great music. But for me, compositional complexity (not necessarily the same thing as instrumental dexterity) is what defines prog as a genre. You can't have prog without it. Again though, this is not a requirement for good or great music and many prog bands incorporate simpler music into their albums (and even sections of longer pieces). But I think without it, you don't have prog (I am one of those heretics that doesn't consider PTree to be a prog band.........but they are a great band nonetheless). I don't know though, I get confused myself about what I consider prog, let alone what other people think ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ProgRobUK ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() Joined: February 12 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 76 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess I partially agree with you, Acolyte. My view is that prog is characterised by the quality, complexity and variety of the composition using rock elements but not being restricted to the classic verse, chorus, verse, chorus, etc of traditional rock. The sort of person who writes like this is probably also likely to have good technical musicianship skills and may well choose to write some tracks using odd time signatures. However, I don't see these as necessary elements I see them as a consequence of the type of music and the type of person who writes it.
An example. I was listening today to Pink Floyd's Division Bell and was struck by how much the album was dominated by Dave Gilmour's guitar, but without the trickery. I think that PF is the archetypal band demonstrating this and it is no surprise that they have been mentioned by several other people.
As for the drugs... they are not necessary at all for good prog.
Cheers,
Rob
|
|
![]() |
|
The Acolyte ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: January 15 2007 Location: Colombia Status: Offline Points: 85 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm really not interested in being rude nor close-minded, but to me the things you've listed aren't nonsense at all, in fact, they are some of the esence of prog. I'd prefer to say that some albums are more PROG (strictly talking in terms of elements) than others.
![]() |
|
"…but would I leave you in this moment of your trial?"
|
|
![]() |
|
Flucktrot ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 01 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 164 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good call!
And in similar fashion, Focus (especially Hamburger)
|
|
Thank you, God of Rock, for this chance to kick ass
|
|
![]() |
|
Anaon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 01 2005 Location: Kobaïa Status: Offline Points: 849 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jethro Tull is brillant in this way I think. It's not too technical (even if it must be really really hard to play their music!!), so making complex music sounding simple is just brillant!
|
|
![]() |
|
glass house ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 16 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 4986 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Technical brilliance - not if the emphasis is on it.
Different time signatures - sure why not, not really necessary though. So I'm thinking of Heavy Horses by JT. And afcourse they are all very good musicians. But they don't overdo it. Just some good compositions by excellent artists.
|
|
![]() |
|
Anaon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 01 2005 Location: Kobaïa Status: Offline Points: 849 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't find that VDGG is simple
![]() About "technical", I think really about playing skills. That's what I mean, for me prog is about complex composition (in different ways). Probably another endless debate ;) |
|
![]() |
|
coleio ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 272 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well it isn't prog if there isn't some sort of complex element to the playing or composition or recording.
I can't think of any real simple prog except for post-rock and perhaps a few odd other bands. And since when were VdGG simple ![]() |
|
Eat heartily at breakfast, for tonight, we dine in Hell!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Anaon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 01 2005 Location: Kobaïa Status: Offline Points: 849 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't know, I'm juste asking, for me it's clear that it's not a question of technical skills but I'm curious to know what people think about it here ;) |
|
![]() |
|
laplace ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: October 06 2005 Location: popupControl(); Status: Offline Points: 7606 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
someone mentioned VdGG but I always thought Banton was a stellar organist and Hammill's voice is a great example of control. Their music might not be full of mega-progressive flourishes and sh*tty moog patches but there's a solidly masterful reason for that - they're good musicians WITH taste =P
Edited by laplace - September 05 2007 at 08:25 |
|
![]() |
|
Shakespeare ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: July 18 2006 Status: Offline Points: 7744 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
why should it?^
|
|
![]() |
|
Anaon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 01 2005 Location: Kobaïa Status: Offline Points: 849 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So, it seems that music doesn't have to be technical to be prog for you here?
|
|
![]() |
|
JayDee ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: September 07 2005 Location: Elysian Fields Status: Offline Points: 10063 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's why I love both bands.
![]() I'm a sucker for technical brilliance.
And by the way, Dream Theater does actually produce good music, different with VdGG. ![]() Edited by Majestic_Mayhem - September 05 2007 at 05:56 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |